Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
POR lead NOP lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
NOP 2P — 3P —
POR 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 176 attempts

NOP NOP Shot-making Δ

Murphy III 7/17 -2.5
Bey Hard 6/14 +1.2
Fears Hard 7/10 +7.0
Queen 4/10 -2.8
Murray 4/10 -3.1
Jones Hard 3/9 -1.1
Williamson Open 4/7 -0.6
Missi Open 3/6 -1.1
Peavy Open 0/1 -1.4

POR POR Shot-making Δ

Holiday Hard 10/22 +4.4
Avdija 7/20 -5.8
Camara Hard 8/15 +5.7
Henderson 6/12 +1.3
Thybulle Hard 4/9 +1.3
Williams III Open 3/5 -0.4
Clingan 2/4 -0.4
Cissoko 1/3 -1.6
Murray 1/2 -0.5
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
NOP
POR
38/84 Field Goals 42/92
45.2% Field Goal % 45.7%
9/23 3-Pointers 20/51
39.1% 3-Point % 39.2%
21/26 Free Throws 14/18
80.8% Free Throw % 77.8%
55.5% True Shooting % 59.0%
52 Total Rebounds 54
12 Offensive 14
32 Defensive 31
25 Assists 27
1.32 Assist/TO Ratio 1.69
19 Turnovers 13
9 Steals 11
5 Blocks 7
21 Fouls 17
48 Points in Paint 40
19 Fast Break Pts 17
15 Points off TOs 24
8 Second Chance Pts 25
39 Bench Points 24
10 Largest Lead 12
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Toumani Camara
23 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 39.4 MIN
+24.05
2
Jeremiah Fears
21 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 26.0 MIN
+18.91
3
Jrue Holiday
27 PTS · 5 REB · 9 AST · 37.4 MIN
+17.37
4
Deni Avdija
26 PTS · 8 REB · 7 AST · 37.2 MIN
+15.87
5
Matisse Thybulle
13 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 30.9 MIN
+14.96
6
Robert Williams III
6 PTS · 9 REB · 1 AST · 23.1 MIN
+13.44
7
Trey Murphy III
19 PTS · 8 REB · 2 AST · 36.4 MIN
+12.96
8
Scoot Henderson
14 PTS · 1 REB · 3 AST · 20.5 MIN
+12.68
9
Saddiq Bey
15 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 34.7 MIN
+10.59
10
Derik Queen
12 PTS · 6 REB · 7 AST · 27.7 MIN
+10.12
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:20 J. Holiday STEAL (1 STL) 106–118
Q4 0:20 J. Fears bad pass TURNOVER (2 TO) 106–118
Q4 0:22 POR shot clock Team TURNOVER 106–118
Q4 0:44 D. Avdija REBOUND (Off:1 Def:7) 106–118
Q4 0:46 MISS Z. Williamson driving Layup 106–118
Q4 0:55 D. Avdija Free Throw 2 of 2 (26 PTS) 106–118
Q4 0:55 D. Avdija Free Throw 1 of 2 (25 PTS) 106–117
Q4 0:55 H. Jones personal FOUL (3 PF) (Avdija 2 FT) 106–116
Q4 1:09 H. Jones Free Throw 2 of 2 (9 PTS) 106–116
Q4 1:09 TEAM offensive REBOUND 105–116
Q4 1:09 MISS H. Jones Free Throw 1 of 2 105–116
Q4 1:09 D. Avdija personal FOUL (4 PF) (Jones 2 FT) 105–116
Q4 1:21 J. Holiday 25' 3PT step back (27 PTS) 105–116
Q4 1:40 J. Holiday REBOUND (Off:0 Def:5) 105–113
Q4 1:43 MISS H. Jones 23' pullup Shot 105–113

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Toumani Camara 39.4m
23
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+19.5

Delivered an absolute masterclass in two-way impact, fueled by monumental hustle metrics and elite perimeter shot-making. Completely broke the game open during a crucial stretch by burying momentum-shifting triples and suffocating ball-handlers at the point of attack.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 6/12 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.5%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg +24.1
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.4m
Scoring +17.7
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +6.2
Hustle +3.1
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jrue Holiday 37.4m
27
pts
5
reb
9
ast
Impact
+11.0

Heavy shot volume and missed attempts inside the arc slightly offset a blistering perimeter shooting display. A pattern of inefficiency on two-point looks kept his overall impact hovering just below neutral, despite orchestrating the offense and providing sturdy perimeter defense.

Shooting
FG 10/22 (45.5%)
3PT 7/15 (46.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.4%
USG% 27.7%
Net Rtg +15.4
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.4m
Scoring +18.0
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +8.2
Hustle +1.5
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Deni Avdija 37.2m
26
pts
8
reb
7
ast
Impact
+12.6

A massive volume of missed shots and forced attempts at the rim actively sabotaged his overall efficiency. A recurring pattern of empty offensive possessions and forced drives dragged him into the red, completely overshadowing his strong defensive instincts.

Shooting
FG 7/20 (35.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 10/13 (76.9%)
Advanced
TS% 50.5%
USG% 29.9%
Net Rtg +9.7
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.2m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +3.6
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +6.3
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 3
S Donovan Clingan 22.2m
4
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.1

Anchored the paint with imposing size, deterring drives and altering shots to generate a solid defensive rating. A pattern of fundamentally sound rebounding and sheer physical presence kept his net impact in the green despite minimal offensive involvement.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg +4.4
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Scoring +2.4
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +11.4
Defense -5.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 24
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 45.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Scoot Henderson 20.5m
14
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.1

Controlled the tempo effectively during his shifts, using quick bursts of acceleration to collapse the defense. A stretch of smart shot selection and decisive rim attacks yielded a steady, positive offensive footprint.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -31.1
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.5m
Scoring +9.7
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.4
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
13
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.7

Wreaked his usual havoc in the passing lanes, generating key deflections that fueled transition opportunities. A pattern of timely perimeter conversions perfectly complemented his disruptive off-ball defense to secure a positive overall rating.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.8%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg +27.8
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.9m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +6.3
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
6
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.3

Dominated the interior with explosive vertical spacing and elite rim protection. A dominant stretch of cleaning up the glass and erasing defensive mistakes at the basket drove a highly efficient and impactful shift.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 8.9%
Net Rtg +21.5
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +10.5
Defense -0.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
Kris Murray 20.1m
3
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.1

Extreme offensive passivity severely limited his overall value, as he routinely passed up open looks. A pattern of failing to threaten the defense on the other end resulted in a noticeable negative swing, even though his defensive rotations were crisp.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +7.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 2
2
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-14.6

Struggled to find the rhythm of the game during a brief stint, forcing a couple of contested looks that stalled offensive flow. A pattern of erratic decision-making with the ball ultimately dragged his score down despite decent defensive effort.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -44.0
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.3m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
NOP New Orleans Pelicans
S Trey Murphy III 36.4m
19
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.9

Perimeter inefficiency heavily weighed down his overall value, as a barrage of missed triples stunted scoring runs. While his defensive rotations provided a solid boost, the sheer volume of empty outside possessions established a negative pattern that kept his net rating submerged.

Shooting
FG 7/17 (41.2%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.6%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg -18.9
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.4m
Scoring +11.9
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +2.4
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 47.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Saddiq Bey 34.7m
15
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+7.6

Clunky shot selection from the perimeter and missed opportunities inside the arc dragged his overall impact into the red. A pattern of stalling offensive momentum with forced contested looks proved too costly to overcome, despite generating positive hustle metrics.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.4%
USG% 19.8%
Net Rtg -31.0
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.7m
Scoring +8.3
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +5.7
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Zion Williamson 29.4m
15
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.2

A stark lack of offensive aggression severely limited his typical rim-pressure impact. Passing up driving lanes and failing to physically dominate his matchups in the paint created a pattern of passivity that left his overall footprint surprisingly negative.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 0/0
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 71.3%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -13.6
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.4m
Scoring +12.2
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.7
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Dejounte Murray 28.0m
9
pts
8
reb
5
ast
Impact
-8.1

Struggled to orchestrate the offense effectively, with clunky shot creation and offensive stagnation driving his negative score. A pattern of poor offensive rhythm and forced isolation plays completely negated his elite defensive metrics and disruptive perimeter coverage.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.1%
USG% 23.4%
Net Rtg -41.4
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.0m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +4.3
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -12.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
S Herbert Jones 25.9m
9
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-14.6

Impact cratered largely due to uncharacteristic defensive struggles and poor shot selection that derailed half-court possessions. Failing to provide his usual perimeter lockdown presence against quicker guards allowed opponents to capitalize while he forced contested looks on the other end.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.5%
USG% 22.6%
Net Rtg -16.4
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +2.2
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
Derik Queen 27.7m
12
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
-2.8

Playmaking from the post and relentless activity on the glass defined a highly productive shift. Generated massive defensive and hustle value by repeatedly blowing up pick-and-roll actions in the paint and keeping critical possessions alive.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 20.6%
Net Rtg +3.4
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.7m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +2.8
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 3
21
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+10.7

Pushed the pace relentlessly, turning defensive stops into high-value transition opportunities. A stretch of decisive perimeter shooting and aggressive point-of-attack defense created a commanding positive swing whenever he was on the floor.

Shooting
FG 7/10 (70.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 86.1%
USG% 21.5%
Net Rtg +23.1
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.0m
Scoring +18.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +3.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 47.1%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 2
Yves Missi 19.7m
6
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.1

Thrived as an interior anchor, utilizing high-energy rim runs and disciplined verticality to fortify the defense. A dominant stretch of altering shots at the rim and finishing through contact generated a highly positive two-way footprint in limited minutes.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg -5.1
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.7m
Scoring +3.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +8.9
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Micah Peavy 12.2m
0
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-9.3

A completely invisible offensive shift resulted in a negative net rating. Floated through possessions without generating any meaningful rim pressure, establishing a pattern of passivity that failed to assert any defensive disruption during his brief rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 3.1%
Net Rtg +49.3
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.2m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense +1.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0