2025-26 Season

DUOP REATH

Portland Trail Blazers | Center | 6-9

2025-26 Season

DUOP REATH

Portland Trail Blazers | Center | 6-9 | Yr 2

2.9 PPG

1.2 RPG

0.3 APG

8.1 MPG

-0.2 Impact

Reath produces at an average rate for a 8-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN

Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average

-0.2

Scoring +1.8

Points 2.9 PPG × +1.00 = +2.9

Missed 2PT 0.3/g × -0.78 = -0.2

Missed 3PT 1.0/g × -0.87 = -0.9

Missed FT 0.0/g × -1.00 = -0.0

Creation +0.5

Assists 0.3/g × +0.50 = +0.1

Off. Rebounds 0.3/g × +1.26 = +0.4

Turnovers -0.4

Turnovers 0.2/g × -1.95 = -0.4

Defense -0.9

Steals 0.2/g × +2.30 = +0.5

Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2

Def. Rebounds 0.9/g × +0.30 = +0.3

Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9

Hustle & Effort +0.8

Contested Shots 2.5/g × +0.20 = +0.5

Deflections 0.2/g × +0.65 = +0.1

Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1

Screen Assists 0.4/g × +0.30 = +0.1

Raw Impact +1.8

Baseline (game-average expected) −2.0

Net Impact

-0.2

9th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

TEAM COMPARISON

Impact

#11

Offense

#15

Hustle

#12

Defense

of 17 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)

Donovan Clingan +8.3 Robert Williams III +5.8 Matisse Thybulle +2.2 Duop Reath +0.8 Deni Avdija +0.5 Shaedon Sharpe -0.1 Jrue Holiday -0.3 Toumani Camara -0.4 Jerami Grant -2.2 Scoot Henderson -2.2 Hansen Yang -2.4 Vít Krejčí -2.8 Rayan Rupert -2.9 Blake Wesley -2.9 Kris Murray -3.0 Sidy Cissoko -3.5 Caleb Love -4.1

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 14th

4.5 PPG

Efficiency 64th

61.4% TS

Playmaking 7th

0.5 APG

Rebounding 2th

1.8 RPG

Rim Protection 38th

0.17/min

Hustle 38th

0.11/min

Shot Creation 50th

0% pullup

TO Discipline 96th

0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Duop Reath’s first twenty games were defined by the wildly erratic, feast-or-famine reality of being a one-dimensional floor-spacing big. When his outside shot falls, he completely warps opposing coverages. He did exactly that on 11/05 vs OKC, burying four threes for 12 points and generating a massive +5.0 impact score through lethal pick-and-pop execution. However, his lack of physical interior presence constantly threatens to erase his offensive value. Look at his 11/18 vs PHX appearance, where a catastrophic inability to secure the defensive glass resulted in a dismal -5.8 impact score despite logging 10 minutes. Strangely enough, he occasionally found ways to survive without hitting shots at all. On 11/30 vs OKC, Reath managed a +0.9 impact score despite putting up zero points, entirely because his solid defensive positioning kept the team afloat during a brief cameo. Ultimately, he remains a situational luxury who is highly effective when spacing the floor but too fragile on the boards to trust consistently.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Below-average consistency. Reath is negative impact in 56% of games, with scoring moving ~4 points game-to-game.

Streaky shooter — only cracks 45% from the field in 29% of games. Efficiency is all over the place night-to-night.

Average defender. Reath doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -0.0, second-half -0.4. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 48 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.