Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
POR lead SAS lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
SAS 2P — 3P —
POR 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 177 attempts

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Castle 10/18 +4.6
Fox Hard 7/16 0.0
Harper 9/12 +8.6
Vassell Hard 4/12 -1.1
Kornet Open 6/9 +2.0
Champagnie Hard 3/7 +1.8
Johnson 1/7 -4.6
Bryant Hard 1/5 -2.1
Barnes Hard 0/1 -1.1

POR POR Shot-making Δ

Holiday Hard 12/18 +10.3
Henderson Hard 8/18 +2.3
Avdija 3/15 -8.6
Grant 4/11 -3.2
Williams III Open 5/8 -0.2
Clingan 2/6 -1.5
Camara 1/6 -5.1
Sharpe 2/5 -1.3
Thybulle 0/2 -2.2
Krejčí Hard 0/1 -0.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
SAS
POR
41/87 Field Goals 37/90
47.1% Field Goal % 41.1%
16/33 3-Pointers 14/38
48.5% 3-Point % 36.8%
22/28 Free Throws 20/29
78.6% Free Throw % 69.0%
60.4% True Shooting % 52.5%
61 Total Rebounds 54
14 Offensive 16
36 Defensive 29
27 Assists 21
1.80 Assist/TO Ratio 1.91
13 Turnovers 10
6 Steals 7
8 Blocks 4
25 Fouls 24
42 Points in Paint 44
15 Fast Break Pts 19
17 Points off TOs 23
22 Second Chance Pts 12
35 Bench Points 30
15 Largest Lead 15
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jrue Holiday
29 PTS · 6 REB · 5 AST · 40.5 MIN
+32.46
2
Dylan Harper
27 PTS · 10 REB · 3 AST · 29.8 MIN
+29.2
3
Stephon Castle
33 PTS · 2 REB · 5 AST · 34.1 MIN
+21.74
4
Robert Williams III
11 PTS · 9 REB · 2 AST · 25.0 MIN
+16.49
5
Luke Kornet
14 PTS · 10 REB · 2 AST · 29.9 MIN
+15.57
6
Scoot Henderson
21 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 36.1 MIN
+9.21
7
Julian Champagnie
9 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 27.2 MIN
+7.58
8
Devin Vassell
11 PTS · 7 REB · 3 AST · 32.5 MIN
+7.28
9
Deni Avdija
19 PTS · 6 REB · 9 AST · 36.7 MIN
+7.19
10
Carter Bryant
3 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 22.6 MIN
+6.95
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:21 SAS shot clock Team TURNOVER 120–108
Q4 0:43 D. Harper REBOUND (Off:3 Def:7) 120–108
Q4 0:45 MISS V. Krejčí 26' 3PT 120–108
Q4 0:55 Yang REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 120–108
Q4 0:59 MISS D. Fox Free Throw 2 of 2 120–108
Q4 0:59 TEAM offensive REBOUND 120–108
Q4 0:59 MISS D. Fox Free Throw 1 of 2 120–108
Q4 0:59 J. Holiday personal FOUL (4 PF) (Fox 2 FT) 120–108
Q4 1:10 S. Henderson 27' 3PT (21 PTS) (J. Holiday 5 AST) 120–108
Q4 1:17 D. Fox 9' driving floating Jump Shot (18 PTS) (D. Vassell 3 AST) 120–105
Q4 1:37 J. Grant driving DUNK (13 PTS) (J. Holiday 4 AST) 118–105
Q4 1:41 S. Castle Free Throw 2 of 2 (33 PTS) 118–103
Q4 1:41 S. Castle Free Throw 1 of 2 (32 PTS) 117–103
Q4 1:41 S. Henderson shooting personal FOUL (4 PF) (Castle 2 FT) 116–103
Q4 1:42 S. Castle STEAL (1 STL) 116–103

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Jrue Holiday 40.5m
29
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+30.3

Holiday put on an absolute two-way clinic, torching the nets for 29 points on 12-of-18 shooting to command a massive +25.9 Offense credit. He was just as disruptive off the ball, racking up 4 steals (avg 0.9) and 3 deflections to fuel a +9.8 Defense credit, even as opponents found some success shooting over him.

Shooting
FG 12/18 (66.7%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.6%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.5m
Scoring +24.2
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +8.4
Hustle +7.6
Defense +4.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 58.8%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 2
S Deni Avdija 36.7m
19
pts
6
reb
9
ast
Impact
+6.4

Avdija's playmaking and ability to draw fouls salvaged a rough shooting performance, as he bricked his way to a 3-of-15 mark from the floor. He leaned heavily on his facilitating (9 assists) and a parade to the charity stripe (12-of-16 FT) to grind out a +11.2 Offense credit despite the lack of touch.

Shooting
FG 3/15 (20.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 12/16 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.1%
USG% 27.0%
Net Rtg -17.8
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.7m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +5.2
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +7.6
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Scoot Henderson 36.1m
21
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.6

Henderson embraced a score-first mentality, knocking down 5-of-10 from beyond the arc to drive his +9.8 Offense credit while his playmaking took a back seat (just 1 assist). He also brought active hands to the defensive end, generating 4 deflections and holding his matchups to 42% shooting to earn a +1.5 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 8/18 (44.4%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 22.5%
Net Rtg +11.7
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.1m
Scoring +13.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Toumani Camara 33.5m
2
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-18.4

An ice-cold perimeter stroke completely derailed Camara's offensive impact, as he missed all four of his three-point attempts en route to a -5.4 Offense credit. He tried to compensate with high-motor activity, logging 8 contests and 2 deflections to generate a +6.2 Hustle credit, but his scoring void was too steep to overcome.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 9.5%
Net Rtg -13.6
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Scoring -2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Donovan Clingan 20.0m
7
pts
11
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.4

Clingan anchored the interior with imposing physicality, gobbling up 11 rebounds and racking up 5 screen assists to grease the offensive wheels for a +8.9 Offense credit. His rim deterrence was equally vital, as he contested 7 shots and suffocated his defensive matchups to a dismal 3-of-11 (27%) shooting mark for a +4.4 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.1%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +4.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.0m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +10.1
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+6.7

Williams III was a highly disruptive force in the paint, pairing efficient interior finishing (5-of-8 FG) with a +13.3 Offense credit. His rim protection was elite, as he swatted 2 shots and held opponents to 7-of-18 shooting (39%) when he was the primary defender to secure a +5.7 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.9%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg -24.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.0m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +11.4
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 38.9%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
Jerami Grant 22.6m
13
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.2

Grant supplied a modest scoring punch with 13 points, generating a +9.2 Offense credit, but his inability to contribute elsewhere left his overall imprint lacking. He failed to record a single assist, steal, or block, and his defensive resistance was soft, allowing matchups to shoot 60% against him.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.8%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg -38.8
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Scoring +7.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.6
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.4

Sharpe was largely a passenger during his 13 minutes of action, managing just 4 points on five shot attempts. While his +3.1 Offense credit suggests he didn't actively hurt the team, his lack of aggression kept him from making a meaningful dent in the game.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -19.8
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.8m
Scoring +0.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.2

Thybulle barely saw the floor in a brief six-minute stint, failing to convert a field goal on two attempts. He managed to chip in a block and hit two free throws, but his limited run prevented him from establishing his usual defensive rhythm, netting a modest +1.2 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +24.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.4m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.9

Murray logged less than two minutes of garbage time, failing to record a single box-score statistic. He was a complete non-factor in this contest, registering a flat +0.0 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -66.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.8

Yang grabbed a single rebound during his 59 seconds on the floor. His appearance was strictly limited to the final moments of the game, yielding a modest +0.3 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.0m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Cissoko logged just under a minute of garbage time. He did not register any statistics during his brief stint, serving merely as an end-of-bench placeholder.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.0m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Wesley saw less than a minute of action in this matchup. He recorded no stats during his brief appearance, leaving no tangible imprint on the game.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.0m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.8

Krejčí made only a fleeting 59-second cameo at the end of the game. He had no opportunity to impact the outcome, missing his lone three-point attempt and posting a -0.9 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.0m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
SAS San Antonio Spurs
S De'Aaron Fox 36.5m
18
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
-2.3

Fox's playmaking and scoring volume yielded a solid +8.7 Offense credit, but his perimeter jumper remained icy (1-of-6 from deep). More concerning was his point-of-attack resistance, as opponents torched him for 10-of-14 shooting (71%) when he was the primary defender, resulting in a -0.3 Defense score.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.5%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg +14.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.5m
Scoring +10.6
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense -4.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Stephon Castle 34.1m
33
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+17.5

Castle erupted as a primary scoring engine, pouring in 33 points on hyper-efficient shooting (10-of-18 FG, 10-of-11 FT) to drive a massive +23.2 Offense credit. While his aggressive downhill attacks fueled the offense, his decision-making occasionally wavered, resulting in four turnovers (avg 3.5).

Shooting
FG 10/18 (55.6%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 10/11 (90.9%)
Advanced
TS% 72.2%
USG% 32.9%
Net Rtg -9.2
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.1m
Scoring +27.3
Creation +4.1
Shot Making +5.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Devin Vassell 32.5m
11
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.9

Vassell's defensive activity anchored his performance, generating a +7.3 Defense credit while adding a pair of steals (avg 1.1). His offensive output was muted by inefficient two-point shooting (4-of-12 overall), though he still managed to stretch the floor by hitting 3-of-7 from deep.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.2%
USG% 17.3%
Net Rtg +7.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.5m
Scoring +4.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +7.9
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Luke Kornet 29.9m
14
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+6.2

Kornet dominated the interior on both ends, pairing a highly efficient 14-point scoring night (6-of-9 FG) with a massive +17.3 Offense credit. He was equally imposing around the rim defensively, logging 12 contests and holding opponents to 9-of-21 shooting when guarded to secure a +4.9 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.9%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg +2.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +10.8
Defense -5.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
9
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.3

Champagnie made his mark on the defensive end, stifling his primary assignments to a mere 5-of-14 (36%) shooting for a +4.4 Defense credit. He complemented this perimeter containment with efficient spot-up shooting, knocking down half of his four three-point attempts to buoy his +4.8 Offense score.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.5%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg +12.3
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +6.1
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +1.8
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Dylan Harper 29.8m
27
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+30.2

Harper delivered a masterclass in offensive efficiency, torching the nets for 27 points on 9-of-12 shooting to generate a staggering +28.5 Offense credit. He paired this blistering shot-making (4-of-5 from deep) with excellent positional rebounding, pulling down 10 boards (avg 3.8) to complete a dominant two-way showing.

Shooting
FG 9/12 (75.0%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 92.2%
USG% 21.9%
Net Rtg +41.7
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +24.4
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +10.8
Defense +2.0
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
3
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-5.2

Bryant's value stemmed entirely from his connective passing and rim protection rather than his scoring, as evidenced by his 4 assists and 3 blocks (avg 0.7). Though he struggled to find the bottom of the net (1-of-5 FG), his defensive activity and 6 contests earned him a sturdy +4.1 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 9.3%
Net Rtg +40.9
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Scoring -0.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +7.6
Defense -2.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
5
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.3

A brutal shooting night (1-of-7 FG) completely neutralized Johnson's scoring punch, resulting in a flat -0.1 Offense credit. Despite the offensive deep freeze, he remained highly engaged on the other end, contesting 8 shots and suffocating his matchups (opponents shot 2-of-9) to salvage value with a +5.6 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 31.7%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg +9.5
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +3.4
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.9

Barnes was a complete non-factor during his brief six-minute cameo, failing to record a single point, rebound, or assist. His inability to leave any tangible imprint on the game resulted in a flat -0.3 Offense credit and a quick hook from the rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.3%
Net Rtg -24.2
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.4m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0