GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Jrue Holiday 40.5m
29
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+30.3

Holiday put on an absolute two-way clinic, torching the nets for 29 points on 12-of-18 shooting to command a massive +25.9 Offense credit. He was just as disruptive off the ball, racking up 4 steals (avg 0.9) and 3 deflections to fuel a +9.8 Defense credit, even as opponents found some success shooting over him.

Shooting
FG 12/18 (66.7%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.6%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.5m
Scoring +24.2
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +8.4
Hustle +7.6
Defense +4.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 58.8%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 2
S Deni Avdija 36.7m
19
pts
6
reb
9
ast
Impact
+7.3

Avdija's playmaking and ability to draw fouls salvaged a rough shooting performance, as he bricked his way to a 3-of-15 mark from the floor. He leaned heavily on his facilitating (9 assists) and a parade to the charity stripe (12-of-16 FT) to grind out a +11.2 Offense credit despite the lack of touch.

Shooting
FG 3/15 (20.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 12/16 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.1%
USG% 27.0%
Net Rtg -17.8
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.7m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +5.2
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +7.6
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Scoot Henderson 36.1m
21
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.6

Henderson embraced a score-first mentality, knocking down 5-of-10 from beyond the arc to drive his +9.8 Offense credit while his playmaking took a back seat (just 1 assist). He also brought active hands to the defensive end, generating 4 deflections and holding his matchups to 42% shooting to earn a +1.5 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 8/18 (44.4%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 22.5%
Net Rtg +11.7
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.1m
Scoring +13.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Toumani Camara 33.5m
2
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-18.5

An ice-cold perimeter stroke completely derailed Camara's offensive impact, as he missed all four of his three-point attempts en route to a -5.4 Offense credit. He tried to compensate with high-motor activity, logging 8 contests and 2 deflections to generate a +6.2 Hustle credit, but his scoring void was too steep to overcome.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 9.5%
Net Rtg -13.6
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Scoring -2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Donovan Clingan 20.0m
7
pts
11
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.5

Clingan anchored the interior with imposing physicality, gobbling up 11 rebounds and racking up 5 screen assists to grease the offensive wheels for a +8.9 Offense credit. His rim deterrence was equally vital, as he contested 7 shots and suffocated his defensive matchups to a dismal 3-of-11 (27%) shooting mark for a +4.4 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.1%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +4.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.0m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +10.1
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.4

Williams III was a highly disruptive force in the paint, pairing efficient interior finishing (5-of-8 FG) with a +13.3 Offense credit. His rim protection was elite, as he swatted 2 shots and held opponents to 7-of-18 shooting (39%) when he was the primary defender to secure a +5.7 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.9%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg -24.2
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.0m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +11.4
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 38.9%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
Jerami Grant 22.6m
13
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.2

Grant supplied a modest scoring punch with 13 points, generating a +9.2 Offense credit, but his inability to contribute elsewhere left his overall imprint lacking. He failed to record a single assist, steal, or block, and his defensive resistance was soft, allowing matchups to shoot 60% against him.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.8%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg -38.8
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Scoring +7.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.6
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.4

Sharpe was largely a passenger during his 13 minutes of action, managing just 4 points on five shot attempts. While his +3.1 Offense credit suggests he didn't actively hurt the team, his lack of aggression kept him from making a meaningful dent in the game.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -19.8
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.8m
Scoring +0.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.2

Thybulle barely saw the floor in a brief six-minute stint, failing to convert a field goal on two attempts. He managed to chip in a block and hit two free throws, but his limited run prevented him from establishing his usual defensive rhythm, netting a modest +1.2 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 34.7%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +24.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.4m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.9

Murray logged less than two minutes of garbage time, failing to record a single box-score statistic. He was a complete non-factor in this contest, registering a flat +0.0 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -66.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.8

Yang grabbed a single rebound during his 59 seconds on the floor. His appearance was strictly limited to the final moments of the game, yielding a modest +0.3 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.0m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Wesley saw less than a minute of action in this matchup. He recorded no stats during his brief appearance, leaving no tangible imprint on the game.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.0m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Cissoko logged just under a minute of garbage time. He did not register any statistics during his brief stint, serving merely as an end-of-bench placeholder.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.0m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.1

Krejčí made only a fleeting 59-second cameo at the end of the game. He had no opportunity to impact the outcome, missing his lone three-point attempt and posting a -0.9 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.0m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
SAS San Antonio Spurs
S De'Aaron Fox 36.5m
18
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
-0.8

Fox's playmaking and scoring volume yielded a solid +8.7 Offense credit, but his perimeter jumper remained icy (1-of-6 from deep). More concerning was his point-of-attack resistance, as opponents torched him for 10-of-14 shooting (71%) when he was the primary defender, resulting in a -0.3 Defense score.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.5%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg +14.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.5m
Scoring +10.6
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense -4.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Stephon Castle 34.1m
33
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+18.4

Castle erupted as a primary scoring engine, pouring in 33 points on hyper-efficient shooting (10-of-18 FG, 10-of-11 FT) to drive a massive +23.2 Offense credit. While his aggressive downhill attacks fueled the offense, his decision-making occasionally wavered, resulting in four turnovers (avg 3.5).

Shooting
FG 10/18 (55.6%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 10/11 (90.9%)
Advanced
TS% 72.2%
USG% 32.9%
Net Rtg -9.2
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.1m
Scoring +27.3
Creation +4.1
Shot Making +5.9
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Devin Vassell 32.5m
11
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.8

Vassell's defensive activity anchored his performance, generating a +7.3 Defense credit while adding a pair of steals (avg 1.1). His offensive output was muted by inefficient two-point shooting (4-of-12 overall), though he still managed to stretch the floor by hitting 3-of-7 from deep.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.2%
USG% 17.3%
Net Rtg +7.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.5m
Scoring +4.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +7.9
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Luke Kornet 29.9m
14
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.4

Kornet dominated the interior on both ends, pairing a highly efficient 14-point scoring night (6-of-9 FG) with a massive +17.3 Offense credit. He was equally imposing around the rim defensively, logging 12 contests and holding opponents to 9-of-21 shooting when guarded to secure a +4.9 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.9%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg +2.8
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +10.8
Defense -5.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
9
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.2

Champagnie made his mark on the defensive end, stifling his primary assignments to a mere 5-of-14 (36%) shooting for a +4.4 Defense credit. He complemented this perimeter containment with efficient spot-up shooting, knocking down half of his four three-point attempts to buoy his +4.8 Offense score.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.5%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg +12.3
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +6.1
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +1.8
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Dylan Harper 29.8m
27
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+30.2

Harper delivered a masterclass in offensive efficiency, torching the nets for 27 points on 9-of-12 shooting to generate a staggering +28.5 Offense credit. He paired this blistering shot-making (4-of-5 from deep) with excellent positional rebounding, pulling down 10 boards (avg 3.8) to complete a dominant two-way showing.

Shooting
FG 9/12 (75.0%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 92.2%
USG% 21.9%
Net Rtg +41.7
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +24.4
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +10.8
Defense +2.0
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
3
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.8

Bryant's value stemmed entirely from his connective passing and rim protection rather than his scoring, as evidenced by his 4 assists and 3 blocks (avg 0.7). Though he struggled to find the bottom of the net (1-of-5 FG), his defensive activity and 6 contests earned him a sturdy +4.1 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 9.3%
Net Rtg +40.9
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Scoring -0.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +7.6
Defense -2.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
5
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.0

A brutal shooting night (1-of-7 FG) completely neutralized Johnson's scoring punch, resulting in a flat -0.1 Offense credit. Despite the offensive deep freeze, he remained highly engaged on the other end, contesting 8 shots and suffocating his matchups (opponents shot 2-of-9) to salvage value with a +5.6 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 31.7%
USG% 18.5%
Net Rtg +9.5
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Scoring +0.8
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +3.4
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.9

Barnes was a complete non-factor during his brief six-minute cameo, failing to record a single point, rebound, or assist. His inability to leave any tangible imprint on the game resulted in a flat -0.3 Offense credit and a quick hook from the rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.3%
Net Rtg -24.2
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.4m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0