HOU

2025-26 Season

STEVEN ADAMS

Houston Rockets | Center | 6-11
Steven Adams
6.0PPG
8.5RPG
1.5APG
23.0MPG
+2.6 Impact

Adams produces at an above average rate for a 23-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+2.6
Scoring +4.3
Points Scored 6.0 PPG = +6.0
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.5
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.8
Creation +0.6
Assists & Self-Creation 1.5 AST/g + self-creation = +0.6
Turnovers -2.6
Turnovers 1.1/g (live + dead blend) = -2.6
Defense +0.6
Steals 0.7/g = +1.6
Blocks 0.7/g = +0.6
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.6
Hustle & Effort +10.0
Rebounds 8.5 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +7.2
Contested Shots 5.4/g = +1.1
Deflections 0.9/g = +0.6
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 2.8/g = +0.8
Raw Impact +12.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.3
Net Impact
+2.6
57th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 27th
6.0 PPG
Efficiency 27th
56.2% TS
Playmaking 53th
1.5 APG
Rebounding 81th
8.5 RPG
Defense 51th
+6.5/g
Hustle 44th
+16.5/g
Creation 52th
+2.28/g
Shot Making 16th
+2.32/g
TO Discipline 59th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Steven Adams's early season was defined by a stark role change, transitioning from an overtaxed starter into an incredibly efficient enforcer off the bench. Before heading to the second unit, he bullied the paint on 10/24 vs DET, logging a massive +19.1 Impact score by grabbing 10 rebounds and hitting all four of his field goal attempts. The move to a reserve role immediately paid dividends. He dominated the interior on 10/29 vs TOR, generating a +14.9 Impact in just 20 minutes behind a highly efficient 12-point, 12-rebound double-double. Even when his individual scoring completely vanished, the veteran big man still controlled the glass to keep his overall value afloat. Look at his gritty performance on 11/15 vs POR. Despite managing only five points, he earned a +5.3 Impact simply by ripping down 11 rebounds and doing the exhausting dirty work inside. He might not be built for a heavy workload anymore, but his physical presence remains a massive luxury for the second unit.

Steven Adams spent this eleven-game stretch oscillating wildly between dominant interior enforcer and absolute offensive liability. The veteran big man frequently generated value entirely through brute-force rebounding, even when his scoring was nonexistent. During 12/20 vs DEN, Adams managed a +2.2 impact despite scoring a single point because he bullied his way to 12 crucial rebounds. Yet, his total lack of touch around the rim often sabotaged his own hustle. On 12/19 vs NOP, Adams hauled in 10 rebounds but still registered a dismal -7.2 impact because he bricked eight of his ten field goal attempts. Empty offensive shifts require elite rebounding. He learned that the hard way on 12/16 vs DEN, where a total failure to secure a single rebound in 16 minutes resulted in a disastrous -14.9 impact.

This eleven-game stretch was defined by Adams's fluctuating role as a spot-starter, where he delivered a masterclass in doing the dirty work without demanding the basketball. On 01/16 vs OKC, he posted a massive +11.6 impact score off the bench despite scoring just six points. That outsized value came entirely from his relentless presence on the glass, as he vacuumed up 11 rebounds and punished smaller defenders in the paint. He offered a similarly bruising performance on 01/08 vs POR, logging a +7.2 impact while adding four assists to his 11 boards. However, his value plummets when he cannot establish that physical dominance. During a brief 14-minute stint on 12/24 vs LAC, Adams managed just four rebounds and two points, resulting in a dismal -7.5 impact score. As long as he is setting bone-crushing screens and controlling the boards, his total lack of scoring remains entirely irrelevant.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Adams's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~3 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 62% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Adams consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: +4.3, second-half: +1.1. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 7 games. Longest cold streak: 2 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 37 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Clingan 66.8 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 8
J. Allen 49.6 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
N. Jokić 48.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Williams 46.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 8
O. Ighodaro 46.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
J. Valančiūnas 43.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
D. Queen 35.0 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
I. Hartenstein 33.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
J. Williams 33.0 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
Y. Missi 32.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Clingan 73.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 22.2%
PPP 0.24
PTS 18
J. Allen 54.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
N. Jokić 54.4 poss
FG% 47.1%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.39
PTS 21
M. Williams 51.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
O. Ighodaro 42.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 3
R. Williams III 32.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
D. Queen 32.1 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 11
J. Valančiūnas 31.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 8
Z. Williamson 30.2 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 11
I. Hartenstein 25.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

33
Games
6.0
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.5
APG
0.7
SPG
0.7
BPG
51.0
FG%
0.0
3P%
57.3
FT%
23.0
MPG

GAME LOG

33 games played