GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
30
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+29.0

An absolute masterclass in offensive efficiency drove an astronomical Box score (+30.1) and total impact (+29.0). Slicing through the defense at will, his near-perfect shot selection was paired with excellent defensive metrics (+8.7). He completely controlled the pace and outcome of the game, operating as an unstoppable force on both ends of the floor.

Shooting
FG 11/15 (73.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 83.0%
USG% 26.1%
Net Rtg +34.9
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Offense +30.1
Hustle +5.4
Defense +8.7
Raw total +44.2
Avg player in 28.6m -15.2
Impact +29.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 0
S Cason Wallace 26.5m
5
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.1

A sharp drop in offensive production and reluctance to shoot tanked his total impact (-6.1) despite positive underlying metrics. His poor perimeter efficiency limited the team's spacing, neutralizing the value of his solid hustle (+3.4) and defensive (+1.8) contributions. The lack of scoring gravity ultimately hurt the overall offensive flow during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 9.2%
Net Rtg +23.1
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Offense +2.7
Hustle +3.4
Defense +1.8
Raw total +7.9
Avg player in 26.5m -14.0
Impact -6.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jalen Williams 25.7m
13
pts
7
reb
7
ast
Impact
+8.0

Elite defensive metrics (+7.8) and high-level hustle (+6.3) drove a stellar overall impact (+8.0). Despite struggling from deep, his ability to score inside the arc and disrupt the opponent's offense fueled a strong Box score (+7.5). His two-way versatility was on full display, impacting winning through effort and execution rather than raw scoring volume.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.4%
USG% 24.2%
Net Rtg +21.0
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Offense +7.5
Hustle +6.3
Defense +7.8
Raw total +21.6
Avg player in 25.7m -13.6
Impact +8.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
S Luguentz Dort 24.8m
12
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.4

A heavy diet of three-pointers paid off, driving a strong Box score (+7.6) and breaking him out of a recent scoring slump. Combined with his trademark physical defense (+4.3) and relentless hustle (+4.6), his floor-spacing provided a solid positive impact (+3.4). He embraced his role as a 3-and-D enforcer perfectly, launching exclusively from beyond the arc.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg +20.4
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Offense +7.6
Hustle +4.5
Defense +4.3
Raw total +16.4
Avg player in 24.8m -13.0
Impact +3.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Chet Holmgren 24.7m
12
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+15.4

Generational defensive impact (+15.9) and off-the-charts hustle (+10.2) resulted in a massive total rating (+15.4). He completely locked down the paint, altering shots and dominating the glass, which far outweighed a modest offensive output. Operating as an absolute terror in drop coverage, his rim protection was the defining feature of the game.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.1%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg +53.0
+/- +29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Offense +2.4
Hustle +10.2
Defense +15.9
Raw total +28.5
Avg player in 24.7m -13.1
Impact +15.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 26.7%
STL 2
BLK 6
TO 4
17
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+12.8

Flawless shooting efficiency drove a massive Box score (+16.4) and stellar total impact (+12.8). Capitalizing on every single offensive touch, his perfect shot selection was paired with strong defensive value (+5.8). He operated as a highly effective weapon, maximizing his minutes through sheer offensive perfection.

Shooting
FG 4/4 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.0%
USG% 15.3%
Net Rtg +35.4
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Offense +16.4
Hustle +2.9
Defense +5.8
Raw total +25.1
Avg player in 23.2m -12.3
Impact +12.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
2
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.5

Snapping a streak of highly efficient games, a complete offensive disappearing act cratered his Box score (-5.2) and total impact (-8.5). Missing all of his attempts from the field completely negated excellent defensive metrics (+5.9) and solid hustle (+2.5). The stark contrast between his defensive value and offensive void defined his frustrating night.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 14.8%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg +39.2
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.0m
Offense -5.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense +5.9
Raw total +3.2
Avg player in 22.0m -11.7
Impact -8.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
12
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.4

A massive surge in scoring efficiency compared to recent outings drove a solid Box score (+4.7). Hitting a couple of threes stretched the floor effectively, complementing his surprisingly strong defensive metrics (+4.3). He capitalized perfectly on increased opportunity to deliver a positive overall impact, breaking out of a severe shooting slump.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.7%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +11.9
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.7m
Offense +4.7
Hustle +1.9
Defense +4.3
Raw total +10.9
Avg player in 19.7m -10.5
Impact +0.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
Isaiah Joe 19.4m
15
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.9

Elite perimeter spacing fueled a strong Box score (+11.4) and kept his total impact positive (+0.9). Launching exclusively from beyond the arc, his offensive gravity masked subpar defensive (-0.7) and hustle (+0.4) metrics. He functioned purely as a floor-stretching specialist, punishing the defense for any lapses in coverage.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 20.4%
Net Rtg +18.4
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.4m
Offense +11.4
Hustle +0.4
Defense -0.7
Raw total +11.1
Avg player in 19.4m -10.2
Impact +0.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.4

Continued struggles with shooting efficiency dragged his Box score (-1.6) and total impact (-2.4) into the red. Solid defensive metrics (+3.8) couldn't offset the damage done by missing multiple perimeter looks. His inability to provide any reliable offensive value severely limited his effectiveness during a short stint.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 25.5%
USG% 22.6%
Net Rtg +40.7
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.0m
Offense -1.6
Hustle +1.6
Defense +3.8
Raw total +3.8
Avg player in 12.0m -6.2
Impact -2.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.1

Strong defensive rotations (+2.8) kept his impact near neutral (-0.1) during a very brief stint. Limited offensive involvement resulted in a negligible Box score (+0.5), as he barely factored into the scoring equation. He provided his standard perimeter disruption but simply didn't play enough minutes to swing the game.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg +5.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.6m
Offense +0.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.8
Raw total +4.5
Avg player in 8.6m -4.6
Impact -0.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.2

A brief, empty shift resulted in negative metrics across the board, culminating in a -3.2 total impact. Missing his only attempts and failing to register defensively made him a complete non-factor. He couldn't replicate his recent efficiency, failing to make a mark during his limited garbage-time minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.9m
Offense -0.5
Hustle +0.2
Defense -0.3
Raw total -0.6
Avg player in 4.9m -2.6
Impact -3.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Toumani Camara 33.5m
6
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
-18.6

A severe offensive regression from his recent hot streak tanked his overall impact (-18.6). Inability to finish inside the arc dragged down his Box score, neutralizing the value of his typically strong hustle plays (+3.3). The stark drop-off in scoring efficiency completely derailed his overall effectiveness.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.1%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg -33.2
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Offense -5.5
Hustle +3.3
Defense +1.3
Raw total -0.9
Avg player in 33.5m -17.7
Impact -18.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 73.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
S Deni Avdija 31.9m
17
pts
7
reb
7
ast
Impact
-4.3

Elite defensive rotations and a relentless motor (+6.7 Hustle) were completely undone by poor shot selection. Clanking away on high volume dragged his Box score into the negative, pulling his total impact down to -4.3. The stark contrast between his defensive intensity and offensive inefficiency defined the outing.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 49.8%
USG% 28.9%
Net Rtg -31.9
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.9m
Offense -1.2
Hustle +6.7
Defense +7.2
Raw total +12.7
Avg player in 31.9m -17.0
Impact -4.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 7
S Shaedon Sharpe 28.4m
14
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.7

Brutal shooting efficiency cratered his overall impact (-5.7) despite excellent defensive metrics (+7.3). Forcing contested looks rather than letting the offense flow resulted in a negative Box score. While his athleticism translated to strong defensive stops, operating as an offensive black hole negated those gains.

Shooting
FG 5/17 (29.4%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 37.3%
USG% 29.3%
Net Rtg -32.2
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Offense -0.9
Hustle +3.0
Defense +7.3
Raw total +9.4
Avg player in 28.4m -15.1
Impact -5.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Sidy Cissoko 27.2m
19
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.9

A massive perimeter shooting explosion completely flipped his recent offensive slump, driving a stellar Box score (+12.9). Knocking down a barrage of triples stretched the floor in ways he rarely provides, anchoring a positive overall impact. The sudden offensive eruption masked a relatively quiet defensive night.

Shooting
FG 7/10 (70.0%)
3PT 5/7 (71.4%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 95.0%
USG% 17.8%
Net Rtg -37.8
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Offense +12.9
Hustle +2.1
Defense +1.3
Raw total +16.3
Avg player in 27.2m -14.4
Impact +1.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Donovan Clingan 17.4m
6
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.6

Rim protection and active rotations kept his defensive metrics (+2.5) firmly in the green during a brief stint. Stepping out to hit a rare perimeter shot buoyed his Box score, but limited overall volume prevented him from making a larger dent. Ultimately, a lack of paint dominance resulted in a slightly negative total impact (-0.6).

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg -68.8
+/- -29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Offense +4.0
Hustle +2.0
Defense +2.5
Raw total +8.5
Avg player in 17.4m -9.1
Impact -0.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 13
Opp FG% 68.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Caleb Love 30.1m
10
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.7

Taking on a significantly larger offensive workload only amplified his struggles with shot selection, tanking his total impact (-6.7). Strong defensive metrics (+6.8) and active hustle couldn't overcome the damage done by forcing low-quality perimeter looks. The increased volume ultimately hurt the team's offensive flow.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg -14.9
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.1m
Offense -0.6
Hustle +3.0
Defense +6.8
Raw total +9.2
Avg player in 30.1m -15.9
Impact -6.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
Kris Murray 25.8m
10
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.0

Highly efficient opportunistic scoring boosted his Box score (+8.2), capitalizing perfectly on limited touches. However, a complete lack of defensive resistance (-0.7) and minimal hustle (+0.2) dragged his total impact deep into the red (-6.0). He provided an offensive spark but gave it all back on the other end.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 85.0%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg -8.7
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.8m
Offense +8.2
Hustle +0.2
Defense -0.7
Raw total +7.7
Avg player in 25.8m -13.7
Impact -6.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
8
pts
8
reb
0
ast
Impact
+10.4

Flawless finishing around the rim drove a massive Box score (+13.4) and a stellar overall impact (+10.4). Continuing a streak of hyper-efficient interior play, he paired perfect shot selection with strong defensive anchoring (+4.6). He maximized every minute of his brief stint by dominating the paint on both ends.

Shooting
FG 4/4 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 9.3%
Net Rtg +14.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.2m
Offense +13.4
Hustle +1.1
Defense +4.6
Raw total +19.1
Avg player in 16.2m -8.7
Impact +10.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
Rayan Rupert 12.1m
2
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.6

Continuing a troubling trend of offensive inefficiency, his inability to find a rhythm dragged his total impact to -3.6. Clanking multiple looks negated his modest defensive (+1.2) and hustle (+1.9) contributions. The complete lack of scoring punch made him a liability during his brief rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -40.1
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.1m
Offense -0.2
Hustle +1.9
Defense +1.2
Raw total +2.9
Avg player in 12.1m -6.5
Impact -3.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Hansen Yang 10.8m
3
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.2

Solid defensive positioning (+2.9) kept his impact positive (+1.2) despite a noticeable dip in offensive efficiency. Hitting a perimeter shot salvaged a positive Box score (+2.1) on a night where his interior finishing abandoned him. He managed to provide value through effort and rotations rather than scoring.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -17.9
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.8m
Offense +2.1
Hustle +1.9
Defense +2.9
Raw total +6.9
Avg player in 10.8m -5.7
Impact +1.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Duop Reath 6.5m
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.0

A completely empty offensive shift tanked his Box score (-4.4) and overall impact (-4.0). Missing all of his attempts in a short stint completely negated a surprisingly solid defensive rating (+3.0). He failed to capitalize on his brief opportunity, acting as an offensive zero while on the floor.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg -24.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.5m
Offense -4.4
Hustle +0.8
Defense +3.0
Raw total -0.6
Avg player in 6.5m -3.4
Impact -4.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1