MEM

2025-26 Season

OLIVIER-MAXENCE PROSPER

Memphis Grizzlies | Forward | 6-7
Olivier-Maxence Prosper
9.7 PPG
3.5 RPG
1.0 APG
18.6 MPG
+1.6 Impact

Prosper produces at an above average rate for a 19-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.6
Scoring +6.8
Points 9.7 PPG × +1.00 = +9.7
Missed 2PT 1.3/g × -0.78 = -1.0
Missed 3PT 1.6/g × -0.87 = -1.4
Missed FT 0.5/g × -1.00 = -0.5
Creation +1.6
Assists 1.0/g × +0.50 = +0.5
Off. Rebounds 0.9/g × +1.26 = +1.1
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.9/g × -1.95 = -1.8
Defense +1.0
Steals 0.8/g × +2.30 = +1.8
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 2.7/g × +0.30 = +0.8
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.2
Contested Shots 3.9/g × +0.20 = +0.8
Deflections 1.1/g × +0.65 = +0.7
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 1.2/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.2
Net Impact
+1.6
71st pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 63th
11.1 PPG
Efficiency 97th
67.0% TS
Playmaking 28th
1.1 APG
Rebounding 48th
4.0 RPG
Rim Protection 66th
0.16/min
Hustle 48th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 49th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Prosper's first twenty games were defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between disruptive defensive shifts and stretches where mental lapses actively hurt his squad. On 11/02 vs TOR, he scored just 6 points but generated a stellar +4.9 impact score by blowing up multiple dribble hand-offs on the perimeter. Conversely, his focus entirely vanished on 12/22 vs OKC. Despite shooting an efficient 3-for-5 from the floor, missed rotations and glaring defensive lapses dragged him down to a brutal -7.5 impact mark. He finally put all the pieces together when thrust into the starting lineup on 01/25 vs DEN. Pouring in 19 points on just nine shots, Prosper paired elite shot selection with suffocating defense to post a massive +7.5 impact score. When engaged, he looks like a legitimate weapon.

Olivier-Maxence Prosper spent this twenty-game stretch riding a chaotic pendulum between ruthless two-way efficiency and baffling mental lapses. When he fully committed to his defensive assignments and decisive cuts, he was an absolute wrecking ball on the floor. During the 02/27 vs DAL matchup, he paired 16 points with 10 rebounds to generate a massive +16.4 impact, driven entirely by his suffocating defensive presence against the opposing wings. Even when his shot volume dropped to just 9 points on 02/21 vs MIA, he still managed a +6.6 impact by maximizing his playmaking and defensive utility to elevate the starting unit. Yet, his value cratered the moment he lost focus. Despite an efficient 15 points on 03/09 vs BKN, careless ball security and live-ball turnovers tanked his impact to a dismal -7.4. Ultimately, he dictates his own worth through hustle and discipline rather than raw scoring totals.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Prosper's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 67% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Prosper consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -0.3, second-half: +3.4. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Hot right now — 5 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 5 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 58 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Clingan 53.9 poss
FG% 38.9%
3P% 54.5%
PPP 0.45
PTS 24
D. Gafford 44.8 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.22
PTS 10
R. Gobert 42.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 9
M. Raynaud 36.8 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
L. Garza 31.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 8
N. Jokić 28.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
J. Randle 24.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Duren 24.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.45
PTS 11
R. Williams III 23.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Huff 22.4 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 9

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Clingan 66.8 poss
FG% 68.8%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 25
D. Gafford 57.4 poss
FG% 88.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 16
N. Jokić 47.4 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 16
R. Gobert 38.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
M. Raynaud 36.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
J. Randle 34.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 14
N. Reid 31.5 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
L. Garza 30.9 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 11
Z. Williamson 30.8 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 12
J. Duren 27.1 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.52
PTS 14

SEASON STATS

51
Games
9.7
PPG
3.5
RPG
1.0
APG
0.8
SPG
0.3
BPG
54.0
FG%
39.9
3P%
76.4
FT%
18.6
MPG

GAME LOG

51 games played