Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
NYK lead POR lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
POR 2P — 3P —
NYK 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 180 attempts

POR POR Shot-making Δ

Sharpe 10/16 +5.4
Love Hard 5/15 -3.3
Avdija 4/14 -8.0
Grant Hard 4/9 +0.4
Holiday Hard 2/7 -1.8
Clingan 3/6 +0.1
Cissoko Open 5/5 +5.6
Camara Hard 0/4 -4.4
Rupert 0/3 -3.3
Williams III Open 2/2 +1.2

NYK NYK Shot-making Δ

Brunson Hard 8/20 +0.1
Hart 9/17 +0.3
Anunoby 10/16 +5.3
Towns Open 5/12 -3.8
Bridges 3/10 -3.9
Diawara Hard 4/8 +1.6
Kolek Hard 5/7 +5.7
Shamet Hard 1/6 -3.7
Jones Hard 1/1 +1.9
Robinson Open 1/1 +0.6
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
POR
NYK
35/81 Field Goals 48/99
43.2% Field Goal % 48.5%
13/43 3-Pointers 19/45
30.2% 3-Point % 42.2%
14/19 Free Throws 12/14
73.7% Free Throw % 85.7%
54.3% True Shooting % 60.4%
47 Total Rebounds 58
8 Offensive 16
29 Defensive 36
23 Assists 29
1.15 Assist/TO Ratio 2.07
20 Turnovers 13
5 Steals 9
5 Blocks 3
13 Fouls 21
42 Points in Paint 50
13 Fast Break Pts 15
13 Points off TOs 16
9 Second Chance Pts 17
48 Bench Points 33
0 Largest Lead 33
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Karl-Anthony Towns
14 PTS · 20 REB · 3 AST · 29.5 MIN
+20.77
2
Jalen Brunson
26 PTS · 1 REB · 3 AST · 34.1 MIN
+19.66
3
Sidy Cissoko
15 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 26.8 MIN
+18.26
4
Josh Hart
20 PTS · 6 REB · 5 AST · 29.8 MIN
+17.29
5
Shaedon Sharpe
26 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 27.8 MIN
+17.04
6
OG Anunoby
24 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 30.8 MIN
+16.0
7
Robert Williams III
4 PTS · 11 REB · 3 AST · 20.3 MIN
+14.23
8
Tyler Kolek
13 PTS · 2 REB · 4 AST · 17.8 MIN
+11.5
9
Mikal Bridges
10 PTS · 2 REB · 5 AST · 32.6 MIN
+10.88
10
Caleb Love
12 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 27.2 MIN
+8.99
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:06 NYK shot clock Team TURNOVER 97–127
Q4 0:29 A. Hukporti REBOUND (Off:1 Def:1) 97–127
Q4 0:32 MISS C. Love 3PT 97–127
Q4 0:34 TEAM offensive REBOUND 97–127
Q4 0:36 MISS C. Love 3PT 97–127
Q4 0:48 M. Diawara 14' step back Jump Shot (10 PTS) 97–127
Q4 1:06 C. Love running Layup (12 PTS) 97–125
Q4 1:11 C. Love STEAL (2 STL) 95–125
Q4 1:11 T. Kolek bad pass TURNOVER (2 TO) 95–125
Q4 1:20 M. Diawara REBOUND (Off:0 Def:3) 95–125
Q4 1:22 MISS C. Love 26' pullup 3PT 95–125
Q4 1:34 A. Hukporti offensive foul TURNOVER (1 TO) 95–125
Q4 1:34 A. Hukporti offensive FOUL (2 PF) 95–125
Q4 1:34 A. Hukporti REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 95–125
Q4 1:36 MISS M. Diawara 25' 3PT 95–125

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

NYK New York Knicks
S Jalen Brunson 34.1m
26
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+18.8

Incredible hustle metrics (+8.8) and high-volume three-point shooting fueled a dominant overall performance. Despite missing a large chunk of his jumpers, his aggressive creation and defensive engagement (+6.8) dictated the tempo of the game.

Shooting
FG 8/20 (40.0%)
3PT 5/12 (41.7%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.6%
USG% 27.1%
Net Rtg +28.3
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.1m
Scoring +16.4
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +6.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Mikal Bridges 32.6m
10
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
+4.3

Phenomenal hustle (+7.2) and sticky perimeter defense salvaged a rough shooting night. Even when his jumper wasn't falling, his constant off-ball movement and disruption of passing lanes kept him in the green.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.2%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg +38.6
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.6m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +0.6
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S OG Anunoby 30.8m
24
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
+15.1

Searing perimeter shooting and lockdown wing defense (+5.7) created a massive two-way swing. Capitalizing on open catch-and-shoot opportunities allowed him to significantly outpace his recent scoring averages.

Shooting
FG 10/16 (62.5%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg +50.4
+/- +34
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.8m
Scoring +18.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +5.7
Hustle +4.7
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Josh Hart 29.8m
20
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+13.9

Relentless transition pushes and excellent defensive positioning drove a highly positive net rating. Thriving on chaotic plays, he generated high-value looks inside the arc to punish retreating defenders.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.9%
USG% 26.3%
Net Rtg +10.9
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +13.9
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +3.7
Defense +2.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
14
pts
20
reb
3
ast
Impact
+25.8

Absolute dominance on the glass and elite interior deterrence (+9.4 defense) completely overshadowed a dip in his usual scoring efficiency. Vacuuming up every available miss to deny second-chance opportunities secured a massive positive impact.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.9%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +23.4
+/- +17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.5m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +22.5
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.3

Poor shot selection from the perimeter severely hampered his offensive value. While he offered mild resistance on defense, clanking the majority of his looks prevented him from being a positive rotational piece.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg +25.6
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.7m
Scoring -1.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Tyler Kolek 17.8m
13
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+2.3

A massive surge in shooting efficiency from the perimeter sparked a highly productive bench stint. Capitalizing on defensive breakdowns to drill open threes vastly exceeded his typical offensive output.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 92.9%
USG% 19.6%
Net Rtg +17.3
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.8m
Scoring +11.5
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
10
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.5

Confident stroke mechanics allowed him to double his usual scoring output, yet he still finished in the red. Hidden defensive lapses and a lack of secondary playmaking likely dragged down his net score despite the solid shooting splits.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg +68.8
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.6

Taking a massive step back in offensive involvement, he attempted just a single shot after a stretch of highly efficient scoring. He still managed to break even by securing the defensive glass and avoiding mistakes.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 4.8%
Net Rtg +0.8
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.1m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +7.0
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.7

Making the most of his garbage-time minutes, he immediately knocked down a perimeter look. This provided a quick, mistake-free spark at the end of the rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.1m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.6

Playing a negligible role during his brief time on the court, he converted his only look at the rim. Slight defensive miscommunications kept his overall rating just below neutral.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.1m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +2.5
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.1

Completely disappearing offensively, he failed to attempt a single shot after being a reliable scorer recently. A lack of rim protection (-0.5 defense) further contributed to his negative footprint in limited action.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.1m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Deni Avdija 28.4m
11
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.9

A brutal shooting slump cratered his overall impact despite solid defensive metrics (+5.3). Clanking a high volume of perimeter looks and falling drastically short of his recent scoring tear completely neutralized the value he brought on the other end of the floor.

Shooting
FG 4/14 (28.6%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 35.9%
USG% 29.2%
Net Rtg -38.1
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +1.5
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Shaedon Sharpe 27.8m
26
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+13.0

Elite shot-making efficiency drove a massive +14.6 box score impact. Hunting good looks from beyond the arc and converting at a high clip allowed him to serve as the primary offensive engine for his squad.

Shooting
FG 10/16 (62.5%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.2%
USG% 30.3%
Net Rtg -14.8
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Scoring +20.2
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Toumani Camara 26.4m
0
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-15.8

Completely vanished from the offense, failing to score a single basket after being a reliable weapon in his previous five outings. His inability to pressure the rim dragged down his overall rating to a team-worst -15.8 despite decent hustle numbers.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg -36.4
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.4m
Scoring -3.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jrue Holiday 21.9m
5
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
-13.1

An uncharacteristically passive offensive night derailed his overall effectiveness. Struggling to generate his usual scoring gravity resulted in empty possessions that overshadowed his standard perimeter defensive contributions.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 21.2%
Net Rtg -34.0
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +1.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Donovan Clingan 21.6m
7
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.2

Anchoring the paint effectively (+3.8 defensive impact) allowed him to provide steady, perfectly neutral minutes. He didn't force the issue offensively, taking high-percentage looks to maintain balance while serving as a reliable rotational big.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 18.0%
Net Rtg -59.1
+/- -26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.6m
Scoring +4.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +7.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 47.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
Caleb Love 27.2m
12
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.0

Heavy perimeter volume yielded diminishing returns, as a barrage of missed three-pointers tanked his offensive efficiency. Surprisingly strong defensive metrics (+5.5) were the only thing keeping his overall impact from completely bottoming out during the erratic shooting display.

Shooting
FG 5/15 (33.3%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.0%
USG% 26.2%
Net Rtg -19.6
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +0.9
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Sidy Cissoko 26.8m
15
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+10.3

Delivering an absolute masterclass in two-way efficiency, he paired a flawless shooting night with off-the-charts hustle metrics (+7.3). This explosive breakout performance completely caught the defense off guard and heavily tilted the floor.

Shooting
FG 5/5 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 110.9%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -25.1
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Scoring +14.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense +1.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 85.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
Jerami Grant 22.0m
15
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.0

A significant drop in scoring volume from his recent hot streak limited his overall influence on the game. While his shot selection was reasonable, the lack of aggressive rim pressure resulted in a negative net rating.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 31.4%
Net Rtg -35.4
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.0m
Scoring +10.7
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
4
pts
11
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.8

Dominating the glass and controlling the interior generated a stellar +6.9 defensive impact. His flawless efficiency around the rim continued a strong trend of mistake-free finishing, maximizing his value in limited minutes.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 4.2%
Net Rtg -2.8
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.3m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +11.1
Defense +0.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.8

Empty offensive possessions plagued his brief stint on the floor. The lack of secondary stats or defensive resistance compounded the damage of his missed perimeter looks.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -76.9
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.3m
Scoring -2.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.6

Failing to attempt a shot or grab a board rendered him a complete non-factor in his limited run. His inability to replicate his recent rotational scoring left him with a slightly negative footprint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -11.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.1m
Scoring +0.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +1.1
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -1.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.2

Deep reserve minutes passed without tilting the scales in either direction. He stayed out of the way offensively and avoided costly defensive rotations during garbage time.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -11.1
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.1m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0