GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Toumani Camara 33.5m
15
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.4

High-level finishing (+3.8 shot-making) and active rebounding (+5.1 hustle) formed the foundation of his positive impact during this stretch. While he completely ignored his teammates (+0.0 creation) and struggled to contain his assignment (-1.9 defense), a pattern of flawless ball security (+0.0 turnovers) ensured his scoring efficiency translated directly to the bottom line.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 53.6%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg +3.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +5.1
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Deni Avdija 33.1m
25
pts
6
reb
10
ast
Impact
+10.2

A blistering perimeter display fueled a massive +6.9 shot-making bonus, allowing him to rack up significant scoring value (+16.7) against his primary matchups. However, his aggressive playmaking came with severe hidden costs, as a pattern of reckless passes (-5.9 turnover penalty) and defensive lapses (-1.6) prevented this from being a truly elite performance.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 27.4%
Net Rtg +17.6
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +16.7
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +6.9
Hustle +1.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jrue Holiday 32.5m
23
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
+9.4

A staggering -9.5 turnover penalty nearly sabotaged an otherwise brilliant offensive display, highlighting a pattern of highly destructive live-ball giveaways. He salvaged his overall impact through elite shot-making (+5.2) and surprisingly robust rebounding (+8.9 hustle), proving that his scoring gravity was strong enough to overcome his reckless decision-making.

Shooting
FG 8/18 (44.4%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 55.7%
USG% 29.8%
Net Rtg +13.2
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.5m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +8.9
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Scoot Henderson 27.1m
15
pts
2
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.6

Flashes of brilliant shot-making (+3.6) and solid scoring volume (+10.3) were heavily diluted by a pattern of erratic ball control. The steep -5.9 turnover cost highlights a chaotic offensive rhythm during his stretch on the floor, though his slight positive contributions on defense (+1.3) kept him marginally in the green.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.3%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg +14.8
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring +10.3
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Donovan Clingan 23.8m
13
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.9

Absolute dominance on the glass (+10.8 hustle) anchored his value, providing a massive physical advantage in the paint against opposing bigs. That interior force was necessary to offset a catastrophic defensive showing (-5.8), where a pattern of surrendering easy looks and committing costly fouls severely damaged his overall impact.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 65.0%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg +20.3
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.8m
Scoring +9.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +10.8
Defense -5.8
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Kris Murray 30.2m
9
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+12.2

Smothering point-of-attack defense (+6.8) was the driving force behind this highly impactful outing, completely neutralizing his primary matchups. He paired that elite defensive disruption with a pattern of zero turnovers and solid activity on the boards (+4.1 hustle), executing a flawless two-way role-player performance.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 92.2%
USG% 6.6%
Net Rtg +41.4
+/- +27
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.2m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +4.1
Defense +6.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+9.7

A monstrous +11.7 hustle rating defined this performance, as he completely controlled the glass and generated a pattern of vital extra possessions. Combined with flawless ball security (+0.0 turnovers) and solid rim protection (+2.1 defense), he functioned as a perfect low-usage, high-leverage interior anchor during his minutes.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg +12.7
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.5m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +11.7
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 22
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 40.9%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
9
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.4

Strong defensive instincts (+2.9) and decent peripheral activity couldn't overcome the damage caused by a pattern of live-ball mistakes (-2.4 turnovers). His offensive rhythm was disjointed throughout his stretch on the floor, as modest scoring and shot-making bonuses were quickly erased by his inability to protect the basketball.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 36.5%
USG% 31.0%
Net Rtg +13.5
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.0m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.8

Uncharacteristic defensive struggles (-1.6) completely undermined his brief stretch on the floor, as he failed to generate his usual disruptive event rate. Despite a minor bump from hitting difficult looks (+1.3 shot-making), a pattern of zero playmaking (+0.0 creation) and minimal hustle stats left him as a noticeable negative.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg +5.9
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.1m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.9

A complete lack of tangible production across the board resulted in a steep negative impact during his brief stretch on the court. Without any creation, hustle, or defensive value to fall back on, a pattern of empty offensive possessions failed to justify his presence in the rotation.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.9m
Scoring +0.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.9

Offering virtually nothing outside of a marginal +0.3 hustle bump, his time on the floor was defined by a pattern of statistical barrenness. This severe negative score reflects a brief stretch where he was entirely disconnected from the flow of the game, failing to register any meaningful offensive or defensive actions.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.6m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.5

A completely empty statistical profile, save for a slight defensive penalty (-0.3), resulted in a disastrous impact rating during his short stretch on the floor. He was a total non-factor against his matchups, establishing a pattern of failing to generate a single positive metric in any category.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.6m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.5

Failing to produce a single positive stat, his brief appearance was defined by a pattern of total invisibility on both ends. The minor defensive lapse (-0.3) was the only measurable event of a stretch that actively dragged down the team's overall performance.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.6m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Caleb Love 1.6m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.9

Missing his only look (-0.7 scoring) without contributing anything else across the box score led to a deeply negative impact during his brief stretch. He operated as an offensive black hole, establishing a pattern of providing zero peripheral value to offset the missed shot.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.6m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.0

A single missed shot (-0.8 scoring penalty) was the entirety of his statistical footprint during this short stretch of action. Without any hustle, creation, or defensive metrics to balance the ledger, his brief cameo established a pattern of pure negative value for the lineup.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -133.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.6m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
SAC Sacramento Kings
S Nique Clifford 38.8m
24
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
+12.7

Elite shot creation and finishing (+4.8 shot-making) allowed him to generate massive scoring value (+21.8), repeatedly breaking down the defense to find high-quality looks. However, a brutal stretch of giveaways (-8.2 turnover penalty) severely capped his ceiling, indicating a pattern of aggressive offensive initiation that ran a bit too hot.

Shooting
FG 10/13 (76.9%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.3%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg -13.7
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.8m
Scoring +21.8
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +2.1
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Maxime Raynaud 37.4m
21
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+16.9

An unstoppable scoring barrage (+19.0) anchored this outing, fueled by a pattern of excellent shot-making (+3.9) that consistently punished defensive rotations. Despite bleeding value through careless live-ball turnovers (-7.1), his activity on the boards (+6.6 hustle) and solid defensive disruptions (+3.4) ensured his overall impact remained overwhelmingly positive.

Shooting
FG 7/10 (70.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 89.3%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg -10.1
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.4m
Scoring +19.0
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +6.6
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 26
FGM Against 14
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 3
27
pts
11
reb
4
ast
Impact
+21.6

A dominant interior presence drove this elite performance, highlighted by a massive +13.0 hustle rating that points to a relentless pattern of work on the offensive glass. He compounded that physical edge with superb finishing efficiency (+4.0 shot-making), allowing his high-volume scoring output (+16.4) to completely overshadow a handful of costly turnovers.

Shooting
FG 10/21 (47.6%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 7/11 (63.6%)
Advanced
TS% 52.2%
USG% 34.1%
Net Rtg -1.4
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.0m
Scoring +16.4
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +13.0
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Devin Carter 34.4m
8
pts
6
reb
8
ast
Impact
+1.0

With his scoring efficiency faltering (-2.0), he managed to salvage a positive impact through sheer grit and a pattern of defensive tenacity (+4.9 defense). His relentless activity on the glass (+7.6 hustle) and ability to set up teammates (+2.8 creation) proved that he can positively influence winning even during a rough shooting stretch.

Shooting
FG 3/14 (21.4%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/5 (40.0%)
Advanced
TS% 24.7%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg -14.3
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.4m
Scoring -2.0
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +7.6
Defense +4.9
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Daeqwon Plowden 22.2m
8
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-12.1

Severe ball-security issues completely derailed his offensive contributions, as a catastrophic -7.1 turnover penalty erased any value gained from his positive scoring metrics. While he managed to convert his limited looks at an above-average clip (+1.2 shot-making), a pattern of sloppy decision-making and defensive lapses (-2.7) rendered him a massive net negative.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.3%
USG% 17.3%
Net Rtg -19.5
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.7
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 3
9
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.9

Solid point-of-attack defense (+2.9) and decent shot-making (+2.0) kept him competitive, but his inability to protect the basketball ultimately pushed him into the red. The -3.1 turnover penalty highlighted a pattern of loose handles and poor reads that undermined an otherwise steady two-way effort.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.7%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg -14.8
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.8m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.1

A lack of defensive resistance (-1.4) and minimal peripheral contributions ultimately dragged down a moderately efficient shooting night. Although he provided a slight boost with a pattern of hitting difficult perimeter looks (+2.0 shot-making), his inability to generate offense for others (+0.2 creation) left him as a one-dimensional liability.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.5%
USG% 9.2%
Net Rtg +1.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
8
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.5

Relentless effort on the glass (+10.2 hustle) was the sole reason he managed to stay in the green, providing a crucial pattern of second-chance opportunities. That physical interior work barely offset a sloppy offensive showing, where poor ball control (-3.1 turnovers) and defensive missteps (-0.9) nearly negated his value.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg -24.7
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +10.2
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1