GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Toumani Camara 37.2m
16
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+2.7

Off-the-charts hustle metrics and relentless offensive rebounding defined this highly efficient two-way showing. He capitalized on every backdoor cut and loose ball, turning garbage plays into high-value possessions.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.0%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg -11.5
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.2m
Offense +11.1
Hustle +13.6
Defense +0.2
Raw total +24.9
Avg player in 37.2m -22.2
Impact +2.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Deni Avdija 36.9m
26
pts
10
reb
9
ast
Impact
+4.7

Tremendous connective passing and aggressive rebounding salvaged a highly inefficient shooting performance. He consistently forced the issue on drives, and while his finishing suffered, the resulting defensive collapses created wide-open looks for his teammates.

Shooting
FG 5/17 (29.4%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 15/16 (93.8%)
Advanced
TS% 54.1%
USG% 28.0%
Net Rtg +5.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.9m
Offense +17.7
Hustle +2.6
Defense +6.4
Raw total +26.7
Avg player in 36.9m -22.0
Impact +4.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 3
S Jrue Holiday 34.9m
22
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.4

Blistering perimeter marksmanship and solid hustle numbers were surprisingly negated by untimely live-ball turnovers. A late-game stretch of sloppy ball-handling allowed the opposition to generate easy transition points, erasing his offensive contributions.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 6/10 (60.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.2%
USG% 23.6%
Net Rtg -9.1
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.9m
Offense +9.6
Hustle +6.7
Defense +4.2
Raw total +20.5
Avg player in 34.9m -20.9
Impact -0.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Donovan Clingan 25.1m
7
pts
8
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.2

Elite drop-coverage positioning deterred multiple drives, but his inability to finish through contact on the other end proved costly. Fumbling interior entry passes and missing easy put-backs ultimately dragged his net impact into the red.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -0.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.1m
Offense +3.7
Hustle +2.0
Defense +7.0
Raw total +12.7
Avg player in 25.1m -14.9
Impact -2.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 1
S Shaedon Sharpe 22.6m
18
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+11.1

Stifling perimeter defense and active passing-lane disruption were the true engines behind his massive positive impact. Even with streaky isolation shooting, his ability to turn defensive stops into immediate transition opportunities completely swung the game's momentum.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.7%
USG% 30.6%
Net Rtg -5.4
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.6m
Offense +10.3
Hustle +3.1
Defense +11.2
Raw total +24.6
Avg player in 22.6m -13.5
Impact +11.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
Jerami Grant 33.8m
20
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
-2.2

Stagnant isolation sets and a tendency to hold the ball late in the shot clock bogged down the offensive flow. While he accumulated counting stats, his poor shot selection against set defenses yielded a negative overall impact.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.1%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg +13.2
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.8m
Offense +14.2
Hustle +2.4
Defense +1.3
Raw total +17.9
Avg player in 33.8m -20.1
Impact -2.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Duop Reath 20.2m
12
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.2

Lethal pick-and-pop execution completely warped the opposing frontcourt defense. By burying nearly every perimeter look he took, he single-handedly stretched the floor and generated a highly efficient positive impact.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 120.0%
USG% 9.8%
Net Rtg +46.7
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.2m
Offense +12.7
Hustle +1.2
Defense +3.3
Raw total +17.2
Avg player in 20.2m -12.0
Impact +5.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Kris Murray 17.5m
0
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.3

A complete lack of offensive aggression and blown defensive rotations resulted in a catastrophic net rating. He was repeatedly targeted in pick-and-roll switches, bleeding points while offering absolutely zero spacing value on the other end.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.5%
Net Rtg +4.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.5m
Offense -2.4
Hustle +2.0
Defense -0.6
Raw total -1.0
Avg player in 17.5m -10.3
Impact -11.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 22.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.2

Wandered through his limited minutes without making any tangible imprint on the game. Passive offensive positioning and a few blown weak-side rotations quickly earned him a spot back on the bench.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.0%
Net Rtg +28.4
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.9m
Offense +0.4
Hustle 0.0
Defense -0.9
Raw total -0.5
Avg player in 7.9m -4.7
Impact -5.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.9

Forced up ill-advised interior looks during a highly abbreviated rotation stint. His inability to quickly acclimate to the game's pace resulted in empty offensive trips before being subbed out.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -83.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.8m
Offense -1.7
Hustle +0.4
Defense +1.6
Raw total +0.3
Avg player in 3.8m -2.2
Impact -1.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
35
pts
9
reb
4
ast
Impact
+7.9

Relentless rim pressure and foul-drawing masked a highly inefficient night finishing inside the arc. His sheer scoring gravity bent the opposing defense entirely, generating a strong positive impact despite an uncharacteristically poor conversion rate on contested mid-range pull-ups.

Shooting
FG 10/26 (38.5%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 12/13 (92.3%)
Advanced
TS% 55.2%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg -1.4
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Offense +26.3
Hustle +3.6
Defense +0.4
Raw total +30.3
Avg player in 37.5m -22.4
Impact +7.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Cason Wallace 36.2m
5
pts
8
reb
5
ast
Impact
-0.5

Elite hustle metrics and point-of-attack defense kept his floor relatively stable, but extreme offensive passivity dragged his overall impact into the negative. He repeatedly deferred on open looks he typically takes, stalling the team's half-court rhythm.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg +6.0
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.2m
Offense +5.5
Hustle +9.1
Defense +6.4
Raw total +21.0
Avg player in 36.2m -21.5
Impact -0.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 21.4%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Ajay Mitchell 31.5m
21
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.1

Despite a significant surge in scoring volume, his overall net rating slipped into the red due to defensive bleed. Opposing guards consistently targeted him in isolation, neutralizing the value of his highly efficient offensive execution.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.6%
USG% 24.4%
Net Rtg -7.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.5m
Offense +9.5
Hustle +4.0
Defense +3.2
Raw total +16.7
Avg player in 31.5m -18.8
Impact -2.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 14.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
10
pts
11
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.0

Paint intimidation and disciplined rim protection served as the foundation for his positive overall rating. Though his offensive usage was minimal, his ability to consistently wall off driving lanes without fouling stabilized the interior defense.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 80.6%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg -2.5
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.2m
Offense +8.4
Hustle +5.3
Defense +7.9
Raw total +21.6
Avg player in 31.2m -18.6
Impact +3.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
S Aaron Wiggins 27.4m
27
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+16.8

An absolute flamethrower from the perimeter, his pristine shot selection and quick trigger fueled a massive positive impact. Continuing a blistering efficiency streak, he exploited defensive rotations perfectly to punish late closeouts.

Shooting
FG 10/19 (52.6%)
3PT 7/10 (70.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 71.1%
USG% 27.9%
Net Rtg +22.0
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Offense +20.7
Hustle +5.8
Defense +6.7
Raw total +33.2
Avg player in 27.4m -16.4
Impact +16.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
Isaiah Joe 25.7m
14
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.9

Forcing contested looks early in the shot clock actively hurt the team's offensive rhythm. Even with active hands generating deflections on the perimeter, his poor shot selection from deep ultimately dragged his net score into the negative.

Shooting
FG 4/12 (33.3%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.9%
USG% 23.2%
Net Rtg +6.9
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.7m
Offense +3.5
Hustle +6.2
Defense +2.7
Raw total +12.4
Avg player in 25.7m -15.3
Impact -2.9
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
3
pts
9
reb
4
ast
Impact
-0.1

Commendable positional defense and charge-drawing mitigated the damage from a frigid shooting night. Settling for heavily contested above-the-break jumpers torpedoed his offensive value, leaving him with a perfectly neutral net impact.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 30.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -19.3
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Offense +2.8
Hustle +2.6
Defense +6.8
Raw total +12.2
Avg player in 20.9m -12.3
Impact -0.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 23.1%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
4
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.2

A sharp regression in offensive assertiveness and bricked perimeter looks severely capped his effectiveness. While his length provided solid weak-side rim deterrence, the inability to capitalize on offensive mismatches kept his overall impact slightly negative.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 29.1%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +6.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.9m
Offense +2.9
Hustle +2.6
Defense +5.1
Raw total +10.6
Avg player in 19.9m -11.8
Impact -1.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.8

A disastrously brief stint was defined by rushed offensive execution and blown layups. Failing to convert on point-blank rim runs completely cratered his impact score during his limited rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg -64.7
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.2m
Offense -3.2
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.1
Raw total -1.9
Avg player in 8.2m -4.9
Impact -6.8
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.9

Barely saw the floor during a brief garbage-time cameo. His minimal court time offered zero opportunity to generate any meaningful statistical or rotational impact.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -75.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.5m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense 0.0
Raw total 0.0
Avg player in 1.5m -0.9
Impact -0.9
How is this calculated?
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0