2025-26 Season
VÍT KREJČÍ
2025-26 Season
VÍT KREJČÍ
Krejčí produces at an below average rate for a 22-minute workload.
About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works
TEAM COMPARISON
of 17 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Vít Krejčí’s opening stretch of the season was defined by wildly volatile, boom-or-bust perimeter shooting that swung games entirely on its own. When his jumper was falling, he looked untouchable. He erupted for 28 points on an absurd 8-for-10 from deep on 11/10 vs LAC, driving a massive +12.7 impact score through elite shot selection and near-perfect execution. But when the well ran dry, his value plummeted just as violently. During a rare start on 11/18 vs DET, his perimeter bricklaying actively killed offensive possessions, resulting in a disastrous -15.4 impact score despite chipping in 9 points. He did occasionally find ways to survive his cold spells, managing a +0.4 impact score on 11/30 vs PHI despite scoring just 5 points. In that contest, his strong perimeter defense managed to completely offset a dreadful 1-for-5 shooting night. Ultimately, Krejčí operates as a high-variance weapon whose heavy reliance on the three-point line makes him a thrilling but deeply unreliable rotational piece.
Vít Krejčí’s midseason stretch was defined by a jarring identity crisis, morphing from a lethal bench sniper into an offensive liability the moment he entered the starting lineup. Operating as a reserve on 12/23 vs CHI, he punished the opposition with decisive reads and spot-up shooting, racking up 19 points and a stellar +8.5 impact score. Yet, scoring volume did not always translate to winning basketball. During a promotion to the starting unit on 12/29 vs OKC, he dropped 18 points but posted a -3.0 impact score because defensive lapses during crucial stretches bled away all his offensive value. The bottom completely fell out shortly after on 01/09 vs DEN. Throwing up brick after brick from the perimeter, he went 0-for-8 from the field to finish with zero points and a disastrous -10.5 impact rating. When Krejčí sticks to quick reads and corner spacing against second units, he is a highly effective glue guy, but asking him to shoulder heavier starting minutes exposes a fragile overall game.
Wild inconsistency and a maddening inability to sync his offensive execution with his defensive effort defined this volatile stretch for Vít Krejčí. He could occasionally salvage a brutal shooting night through sheer grit, like during 02/03 vs PHX. Despite scoring just 5 points on a woeful 2/7 from the field, he generated a +5.8 impact score by leaning heavily into his off-ball defensive responsibilities. Yet, the inverse was also painfully true. During 03/01 vs ATL, he dropped 14 points on a near-perfect 4/5 shooting clip, but his impact plummeted to a catastrophic -10.2. Hidden turnover costs and lazy transition defensive lapses completely erased his scoring efficiency that night. The slump reached its nadir during 03/08 vs IND, where a disastrous 1/8 display from beyond the arc short-circuited the half-court spacing and tanked his impact to -10.4. When he hits spot-up looks and rotates on time, he looks like a playable bench wing, but these twenty games revealed a player severely lacking reliability.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Inconsistent. Krejčí has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~6 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 48% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Krejčí locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.
In a rough stretch — 8 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 8 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY
Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
64 games played