Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
MIA lead POR lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
POR 2P — 3P —
MIA 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 205 attempts

POR POR Shot-making Δ

Avdija 12/21 +2.2
Sharpe 9/19 -1.6
Holiday 6/19 -5.2
Camara Hard 5/17 -5.1
Clingan Open 6/9 +1.7
Grant 5/9 +0.5
Murray Open 3/8 -3.9
Cissoko Open 1/4 -3.0
Reath Hard 2/3 +2.8

MIA MIA Shot-making Δ

Jović 10/16 +5.2
Powell 7/16 -2.9
Jaquez Jr. Open 6/15 -6.5
Wiggins 5/14 -3.6
Larsson 7/10 +3.5
Ware Open 4/8 -1.6
Mitchell 4/7 +1.3
Smith 4/6 +1.5
Fontecchio Hard 2/4 +1.8
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
POR
MIA
49/109 Field Goals 49/96
45.0% Field Goal % 51.0%
14/51 3-Pointers 10/35
27.5% 3-Point % 28.6%
19/23 Free Throws 28/36
82.6% Free Throw % 77.8%
55.0% True Shooting % 60.8%
63 Total Rebounds 57
22 Offensive 12
35 Defensive 35
29 Assists 37
1.45 Assist/TO Ratio 2.47
20 Turnovers 14
8 Steals 17
4 Blocks 5
32 Fouls 23
68 Points in Paint 74
26 Fast Break Pts 26
25 Points off TOs 32
25 Second Chance Pts 14
33 Bench Points 63
12 Largest Lead 12
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Deni Avdija
33 PTS · 11 REB · 8 AST · 36.5 MIN
+23.97
2
Dru Smith
13 PTS · 5 REB · 6 AST · 22.3 MIN
+23.93
3
Nikola Jović
29 PTS · 9 REB · 6 AST · 31.4 MIN
+21.54
4
Donovan Clingan
13 PTS · 7 REB · 0 AST · 20.9 MIN
+20.79
5
Davion Mitchell
11 PTS · 2 REB · 8 AST · 25.8 MIN
+19.71
6
Jrue Holiday
18 PTS · 9 REB · 13 AST · 34.9 MIN
+19.37
7
Norman Powell
22 PTS · 2 REB · 3 AST · 30.1 MIN
+16.83
8
Jaime Jaquez Jr.
14 PTS · 12 REB · 7 AST · 29.1 MIN
+12.46
9
Kel'el Ware
9 PTS · 12 REB · 1 AST · 22.9 MIN
+12.2
10
Pelle Larsson
16 PTS · 1 REB · 5 AST · 27.4 MIN
+12.07
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 T. Camara putback Layup (13 PTS) 131–136
Q4 0:00 T. Camara REBOUND (Off:2 Def:5) 129–136
Q4 0:02 MISS D. Avdija 26' 3PT 129–136
Q4 0:04 TEAM offensive REBOUND 129–136
Q4 0:07 MISS D. Avdija 26' pullup 3PT 129–136
Q4 0:15 N. Jović Free Throw 2 of 2 (29 PTS) 129–136
Q4 0:15 N. Jović Free Throw 1 of 2 (28 PTS) 129–135
Q4 0:15 J. Holiday personal FOUL (3 PF) (Jović 2 FT) 129–134
Q4 0:16 D. Avdija driving finger roll Layup (33 PTS) (J. Holiday 13 AST) 129–134
Q4 0:21 D. Mitchell Free Throw 2 of 2 (11 PTS) 127–134
Q4 0:21 D. Mitchell Free Throw 1 of 2 (10 PTS) 127–133
Q4 0:21 S. Sharpe personal FOUL (3 PF) (Mitchell 2 FT) 127–132
Q4 0:25 N. Powell REBOUND (Off:0 Def:2) 127–132
Q4 0:29 MISS J. Holiday 26' 3PT 127–132
Q4 0:44 D. Clingan REBOUND (Off:5 Def:2) 127–132

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MIA Miami Heat
S Andrew Wiggins 33.1m
15
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.6

Settled for heavily contested midrange fadeaways that bailed out the defense and disrupted offensive flow. While he provided solid on-ball resistance on the other end, his clunky shot profile and forced isolations ultimately dragged the lineup down.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.6%
USG% 18.7%
Net Rtg -9.1
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +7.1
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 31.2%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 1
S Norman Powell 30.1m
22
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+7.9

Provided essential rim pressure by attacking closeouts with relentless aggression, generating crucial free throw trips. The underlying value of those drives was partially masked by a cold streak from the perimeter, but his downhill mentality kept the offense afloat.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 56.4%
USG% 24.4%
Net Rtg +15.1
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.1m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Pelle Larsson 27.4m
16
pts
1
reb
5
ast
Impact
-0.1

Capitalized on defensive breakdowns by aggressively cutting baseline for high-percentage finishes. His pristine shot selection maximized his offensive touches, though a couple of late-clock defensive lapses prevented his rating from soaring higher.

Shooting
FG 7/10 (70.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.6%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg -15.2
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Scoring +13.7
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Davion Mitchell 25.8m
11
pts
2
reb
8
ast
Impact
+3.3

Completely derailed the opposing offensive scheme with suffocating ball pressure that blew up multiple handoff actions. His decisive playmaking in the halfcourt capitalized on the chaos he created defensively, resulting in a highly impactful two-way performance.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.8%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg +8.5
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.8m
Scoring +8.6
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +5.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 5
BLK 0
TO 1
S Kel'el Ware 22.9m
9
pts
12
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.9

Anchored the interior with disciplined drop coverage that routinely forced opposing guards into difficult floaters. He secured the defensive glass with authority, ensuring that successful stops translated directly into clean transition runouts.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 48.3%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg +5.8
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.9m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +15.2
Defense +3.8
Turnovers -6.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 2
29
pts
9
reb
6
ast
Impact
+11.6

Exploited mismatches in the post and stretched the floor with supreme confidence, serving as the primary offensive engine. His timely weakside blocks showcased a growing defensive awareness that perfectly complemented his diverse scoring arsenal.

Shooting
FG 10/16 (62.5%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 6/8 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.3%
USG% 30.5%
Net Rtg +25.5
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.4m
Scoring +23.3
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +5.9
Hustle +9.5
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -14.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 38.9%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 6
14
pts
12
reb
7
ast
Impact
+1.1

Bogged down the offense by repeatedly driving into crowded paint areas, leading to blocked shots and live-ball turnovers. Despite putting together a rugged defensive shift, his tunnel vision on the block severely limited the unit's overall efficiency.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 21.5%
Net Rtg +9.6
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Scoring +6.7
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +3.6
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 52.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Dru Smith 22.3m
13
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+15.1

Operated with surgical precision as a secondary creator, consistently finding the roll man while avoiding risky passes. His phenomenal screen navigation on defense completely neutralized the opponent's primary pick-and-roll attack, driving a massive positive swing.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 75.2%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +4.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.3m
Scoring +11.1
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense +9.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.2

Punctured the zone defense with timely spot-up shooting from the perimeter, but gave the production right back on the other end. Opposing wings relentlessly targeted his slow lateral slides, turning him into an isolation target that outweighed his floor spacing.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.8%
USG% 8.7%
Net Rtg -15.0
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.8m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +1.3
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Toumani Camara 39.2m
13
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.3

Bricklaying from the perimeter absolutely cratered his overall value despite tremendous effort on the margins. He generated extra possessions through relentless offensive rebounding, but those gains were instantly negated by a steady stream of clanked above-the-break threes.

Shooting
FG 5/17 (29.4%)
3PT 3/13 (23.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 38.2%
USG% 17.7%
Net Rtg -14.2
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.2m
Scoring +3.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +7.0
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 47.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Deni Avdija 36.5m
33
pts
11
reb
8
ast
Impact
+17.3

Relentless downhill pressure yielded a massive scoring surge that carried the offensive unit. His ability to collapse the defense created high-value looks, though a handful of forced passes into the paint kept his overall impact from reaching elite territory.

Shooting
FG 12/21 (57.1%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 68.5%
USG% 24.8%
Net Rtg +26.1
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.5m
Scoring +25.9
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +6.6
Hustle +6.2
Defense -3.2
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Jrue Holiday 34.9m
18
pts
9
reb
13
ast
Impact
+14.1

Elite point-of-attack defense and brilliant table-setting salvaged a night where his jumper simply refused to fall. He dictated the tempo perfectly in the pick-and-roll, offsetting his icy shooting splits by consistently spoon-feeding cutters and locking down the opposing primary creator.

Shooting
FG 6/19 (31.6%)
3PT 3/10 (30.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.4%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -8.4
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.9m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +5.0
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +10.5
Defense +7.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 22
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 3
S Shaedon Sharpe 28.2m
21
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.6

Poor shot selection from beyond the arc heavily taxed the offense and dragged his net rating into the red. While his explosive transition finishing provided a baseline of value, settling for contested pull-up jumpers early in the shot clock stalled out halfcourt momentum.

Shooting
FG 9/19 (47.4%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 51.7%
USG% 31.0%
Net Rtg +25.5
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +13.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +9.5
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -14.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 6
S Donovan Clingan 20.9m
13
pts
7
reb
0
ast
Impact
+13.0

Dominated the interior with vertical spacing and elite rim deterrence that completely altered the opponent's shot profile. His massive defensive footprint snuffed out multiple driving lanes, while efficient finishing on rolls to the basket anchored a highly productive stint.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 72.2%
USG% 15.3%
Net Rtg +12.2
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +7.9
Defense +3.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 0
Jerami Grant 22.1m
18
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.4

A lack of off-ball engagement and poor weakside rotations allowed opponents to exploit his defensive matchups. Even though he scored efficiently in isolation sets, his inability to secure contested rebounds or generate deflections resulted in a net negative floor presence.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 71.9%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg -33.1
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.1m
Scoring +14.5
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +3.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
Kris Murray 21.7m
6
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.9

Struggled to find a rhythm within the flow of the offense, frequently stalling ball movement with hesitant decision-making. Defensive miscommunications on perimeter switches further compounded his struggles, allowing open driving lanes that bled points.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg -36.3
+/- -23
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.7m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +3.8
Defense -4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Sidy Cissoko 17.3m
3
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-15.1

Overzealous closeouts and undisciplined fouling negated the energy he brought in transition. He forced the issue on out-of-control drives, squandering possessions that the secondary unit desperately needed to convert.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 33.8%
USG% 8.5%
Net Rtg +2.1
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.3m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Duop Reath 11.6m
6
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.4

Stretched the floor effectively as a trail big, knocking down pick-and-pop looks to punish drop coverage. However, his inability to anchor the defensive glass against physical matchups allowed costly second-chance opportunities that slightly outweighed his shooting contributions.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 11.8%
Net Rtg -63.8
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.6m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.4

Provided a brief but effective defensive spark by blowing up consecutive pick-and-roll actions. His sheer presence in the paint deterred rim attempts during his short stint, though a lack of offensive involvement kept his overall influence muted.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +23.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.5m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0