LAC

2025-26 Season

BROOK LOPEZ

LA Clippers | Center | 7-1
Brook Lopez
8.2 PPG
3.4 RPG
1.3 APG
21.5 MPG
+0.6 Impact

Lopez produces at an average rate for a 22-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.6
Scoring +4.5
Points 8.2 PPG × +1.00 = +8.2
Missed 2PT 1.4/g × -0.78 = -1.1
Missed 3PT 2.7/g × -0.87 = -2.4
Missed FT 0.2/g × -1.00 = -0.2
Creation +1.8
Assists 1.3/g × +0.50 = +0.7
Off. Rebounds 0.9/g × +1.26 = +1.1
Turnovers -1.6
Turnovers 0.8/g × -1.95 = -1.6
Defense +1.4
Steals 0.6/g × +2.30 = +1.4
Blocks 1.2/g × +0.90 = +1.1
Def. Rebounds 2.6/g × +0.30 = +0.8
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.3
Contested Shots 8.0/g × +0.20 = +1.6
Deflections 1.7/g × +0.65 = +1.1
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 1.5/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.8
Net Impact
+0.6
17th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 42th
8.2 PPG
Efficiency 9th
50.1% TS
Playmaking 42th
1.3 APG
Rebounding 10th
3.4 RPG
Rim Protection 69th
0.21/min
Hustle 82th
0.14/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 89th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Brook Lopez’s transition to a full-time bench role to open the 2025-26 campaign was defined by a harsh reality: his aging legs simply cannot survive modern NBA space. Even when his jumper found the net, his defensive limitations bled away value. During 11/12 vs DEN, he tallied 10 points but posted a dismal -5.6 impact score because his lack of perimeter mobility left the defense completely exposed. He could still anchor a unit when kept strictly near the basket. On 10/26 vs POR, Lopez scored just 5 points but generated a robust +4.3 impact by utilizing elite drop-coverage positioning to entirely wall off the paint. Unfortunately, those vintage rim-protection shifts were rare compared to nights where poor shot selection actively harmed the offense. Look no further than his brutal -6.8 impact mark on 10/28 vs GSW, a game where he forced heavily contested pick-and-pop threes that clanked iron and ignited opponent fast breaks. Operating strictly as a backup, the veteran big man is finding that occasional floor-spacing can no longer mask his glaring immobility.

A jarring demotion to the second unit and wildly erratic perimeter shooting defined Brook Lopez's midseason stretch. He initially looked like an offensive juggernaut on 12/26 vs POR, draining nine threes to drive a massive +16.9 impact score. That magic vanished quickly. Just a week later on 01/01 vs UTA, he stubbornly bricked 11 deep attempts, torpedoing his offensive value and dragging his impact down to a disastrous -7.2. Relegated to the bench shortly after, his overall utility became entirely dependent on paint deterrence rather than scoring. Take his outing on 01/19 vs WAS as the perfect example. Despite scoring a meager six points and missing all five of his three-pointers, he generated a stellar +8.9 impact because his elite rim protection completely erased his frigid shooting. When his drop coverage is locked in, Lopez remains a defensive necessity, but his frequent offensive disappearing acts make him a tough player to trust.

Matchup-dependent extremes defined Brook Lopez's mid-season stretch, swinging wildly between impenetrable defensive anchor and slow-footed perimeter liability. When opponents challenged him at the summit, he punished them. He erupted for 26 points and a massive +16.5 impact on 03/06 vs SAS, completely altering driving angles with elite rim protection while dominating the paint. Even when his shot fell, hidden costs occasionally dragged down his overall effectiveness. On 02/02 vs PHI, he scored an above-average 13 points but still suffered a -1.3 impact because his abysmal rebounding from the center position surrendered crucial extra possessions. Yet, his sheer size often salvaged his nightly value when his offense vanished entirely. Look at 03/16 vs SAS, where Lopez managed a positive +0.2 impact despite a meager 3 points and 1 rebound. He generated that non-scoring value strictly through disciplined rim deterrence, walling off the basket to offset his own offensive invisibility.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Lopez's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 44% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Lopez consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -0.7, second-half: +1.9. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Gobert 103.1 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 44.4%
PPP 0.16
PTS 16
D. Clingan 61.3 poss
FG% 35.0%
3P% 26.7%
PPP 0.36
PTS 22
A. Sengun 55.9 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
M. Raynaud 55.5 poss
FG% 38.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 15
J. Huff 53.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.45
PTS 24
N. Richards 50.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
M. Bagley III 47.5 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
N. Jokić 42.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
S. Bey 40.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
J. Duren 38.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Gobert 120.5 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 12
A. Sengun 81.4 poss
FG% 52.2%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 29
M. Raynaud 77.4 poss
FG% 91.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 23
D. Clingan 71.0 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 9
N. Richards 63.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.21
PTS 13
J. Sims 53.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
L. Kornet 51.8 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 10
J. Huff 50.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.31
PTS 16
V. Wembanyama 50.8 poss
FG% 27.3%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.16
PTS 8
N. Jokić 50.0 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.54
PTS 27

SEASON STATS

70
Games
8.2
PPG
3.4
RPG
1.3
APG
0.6
SPG
1.2
BPG
42.3
FG%
35.4
3P%
77.3
FT%
21.5
MPG

GAME LOG

70 games played