Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
SAS lead POR lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
POR 2P — 3P —
SAS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 181 attempts

POR POR Shot-making Δ

Avdija Open 13/21 +2.4
Henderson 7/20 -6.6
Holiday 6/17 -4.7
Camara 7/12 +4.5
Clingan 4/7 +3.0
Thybulle 0/5 -5.6
Wesley Open 1/4 -2.8
Williams III Open 2/3 -0.2
Murray 1/2 -0.5
Cissoko 1/2 -0.5

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Fox 10/20 -0.1
Johnson Open 8/15 -1.6
Harper 6/14 -1.9
Vassell Hard 5/13 -0.7
Bryant 6/9 +6.9
Kornet Open 5/6 +2.1
Champagnie 1/6 -5.0
Barnes Hard 2/4 +0.3
McLaughlin Hard 0/1 -0.8
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
POR
SAS
42/93 Field Goals 43/88
45.2% Field Goal % 48.9%
12/37 3-Pointers 11/29
32.4% 3-Point % 37.9%
5/10 Free Throws 15/19
50.0% Free Throw % 78.9%
51.8% True Shooting % 58.1%
53 Total Rebounds 53
11 Offensive 11
32 Defensive 34
26 Assists 28
1.62 Assist/TO Ratio 1.65
16 Turnovers 15
9 Steals 13
5 Blocks 6
15 Fouls 14
58 Points in Paint 54
20 Fast Break Pts 22
19 Points off TOs 26
9 Second Chance Pts 8
10 Bench Points 48
6 Largest Lead 17
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Toumani Camara
18 PTS · 4 REB · 6 AST · 40.0 MIN
+21.28
2
Keldon Johnson
20 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 28.9 MIN
+20.85
3
Donovan Clingan
11 PTS · 11 REB · 5 AST · 28.3 MIN
+20.66
4
Luke Kornet
10 PTS · 5 REB · 6 AST · 26.0 MIN
+20.18
5
Carter Bryant
17 PTS · 5 REB · 4 AST · 24.7 MIN
+19.05
6
De'Aaron Fox
25 PTS · 5 REB · 7 AST · 34.5 MIN
+18.7
7
Scoot Henderson
20 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 38.0 MIN
+16.02
8
Deni Avdija
29 PTS · 6 REB · 6 AST · 37.5 MIN
+13.33
9
Devin Vassell
14 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 31.0 MIN
+10.33
10
Dylan Harper
13 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 32.6 MIN
+9.47
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:06 SAS shot clock Team TURNOVER 101–112
Q4 0:30 L. Kornet REBOUND (Off:1 Def:4) 101–112
Q4 0:32 MISS J. Holiday 25' step back 3PT 101–112
Q4 0:38 D. Fox cutting finger roll Layup (25 PTS) (L. Kornet 6 AST) 101–112
Q4 0:41 J. Holiday 10' pullup Jump Shot (13 PTS) 101–110
Q4 0:55 K. Johnson 8' turnaround Hook (20 PTS) 99–110
Q4 1:16 D. Fox STEAL (3 STL) 99–108
Q4 1:16 J. Holiday lost ball TURNOVER (3 TO) 99–108
Q4 1:24 TEAM offensive REBOUND 99–108
Q4 1:24 MISS S. Henderson driving finger roll Layup 99–108
Q4 1:36 SAS shot clock Team TURNOVER 99–108
Q4 1:36 D. Harper REBOUND (Off:2 Def:4) 99–108
Q4 1:39 MISS D. Fox 15' pullup Shot 99–108
Q4 2:01 D. Avdija running Layup (29 PTS) 99–108
Q4 2:07 J. Holiday REBOUND (Off:2 Def:8) 97–108

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Why this game is worth arguing about

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
S De'Aaron Fox 34.5m
25
pts
5
reb
7
ast
Impact
+15.8

Slicing through the primary line of defense at will, he consistently collapsed the opposing shell to create high-value looks. His aggressive point-of-attack pressure (+6.9 defense) perfectly complemented an offensive masterclass that broke a recent scoring slump.

Shooting
FG 10/20 (50.0%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 58.6%
USG% 30.9%
Net Rtg -5.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.5m
Scoring +17.2
Creation +3.8
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +3.4
Defense +5.0
Turnovers -9.5
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 4
S Dylan Harper 32.6m
13
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+2.8

Forcing tough, contested looks in the paint broke his recent streak of hyper-efficient finishing. Despite bringing exceptional energy and lateral quickness on defense (+6.8), those empty offensive possessions ultimately tipped his net score into the negative.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 46.4%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg +7.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.6m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +4.7
Defense +5.4
Turnovers -8.9
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 4
S Devin Vassell 31.0m
14
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.5

Clanking five attempts from deep stunted the offensive rhythm and offset his otherwise stellar defensive rotations. While his active hands generated solid hustle metrics (+3.5), the inefficient shot profile kept him just below the break-even line.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 48.9%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg +1.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.0m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +2.4
Defense +4.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.1

Total offensive paralysis defined this outing, as he bricked open looks and stalled half-court sets. The massive gap between his box score and total impact (-10.4) points to back-breaking live-ball mistakes that fed directly into opponent scoring runs.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 16.7%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg +8.3
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Scoring -2.0
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 0
S Luke Kornet 26.0m
10
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+12.0

Flawless execution in the pick-and-roll allowed him to feast on easy interior looks. He compounded this offensive efficiency with superb drop-coverage positioning (+7.0 defense), forcing guards into contested mid-range floaters all night.

Shooting
FG 5/6 (83.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg +7.5
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.0m
Scoring +9.3
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +5.4
Defense +5.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
20
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+18.2

Abandoning the three-point line to bully his way to the rim yielded fantastic results. Relentless downhill drives punished smaller defenders, while his physical presence on the glass anchored a robust +9.9 overall impact.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.1%
USG% 25.3%
Net Rtg +19.2
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.9m
Scoring +14.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +9.2
Defense +3.7
Turnovers -3.5
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
9
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.0

Passive positioning and an unwillingness to let it fly from deep allowed his defender to freely roam and double-team others. This lack of offensive gravity, combined with sluggish transition recoveries, resulted in a punishing -7.3 net rating.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 67.8%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +20.6
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -8.5
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
17
pts
5
reb
4
ast
Impact
+10.3

Catching absolute fire from beyond the arc completely shattered his recent shooting slump and stretched the defense to its breaking point. This elite floor-spacing gravity opened up driving lanes for everyone else, driving a massive +12.9 impact score.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 5/6 (83.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 94.4%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg +7.1
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Scoring +14.6
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +5.4
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.1

Operating strictly as a connective passer, he kept the ball moving but offered zero scoring threat to keep the defense honest. A few mistimed defensive rotations slightly outweighed his hustle, leaving him just below neutral.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.2%
USG% 10.5%
Net Rtg +52.9
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.6m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Toumani Camara 40.0m
18
pts
4
reb
6
ast
Impact
+13.8

Elite perimeter defense and a constant motor (+3.8 hustle) anchored a highly productive two-way performance. He consistently disrupted passing lanes to generate stops, while cashing in on spot-up opportunities from deep to stretch the floor efficiently.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg +9.9
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.0m
Scoring +14.2
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +3.1
Defense +5.7
Turnovers -4.7
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
S Scoot Henderson 38.0m
20
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+11.0

Errant shot selection at the rim and a heavy volume of missed jumpers nearly derailed his night. However, relentless ball pressure and excellent screen navigation on the other end (+9.1 defensive impact) managed to keep his head just above water.

Shooting
FG 7/20 (35.0%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 46.0%
USG% 24.5%
Net Rtg -10.1
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.0m
Scoring +9.1
Creation +2.3
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +7.6
Turnovers -2.4
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
S Deni Avdija 37.5m
29
pts
6
reb
6
ast
Impact
+10.0

Despite a high-volume scoring night fueled by aggressive drives, his overall impact sank into the red (-2.4) due to hidden defensive costs. Poor rotational awareness allowed opponents to capitalize on the weak side, completely erasing the value of his offensive output.

Shooting
FG 13/21 (61.9%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.7%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +9.0
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Scoring +22.2
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +7.6
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -14.2
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 6
S Jrue Holiday 31.5m
13
pts
10
reb
6
ast
Impact
+2.0

Forced perimeter shots and a brutal 1-for-7 night from beyond the arc cratered his offensive efficiency. The resulting long rebounds fueled opponent transition pushes, dragging his overall impact down to a dismal -9.4 despite standard point-of-attack defensive effort.

Shooting
FG 6/17 (35.3%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 38.2%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -13.2
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.5m
Scoring +5.1
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +12.7
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -7.8
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Donovan Clingan 28.3m
11
pts
11
reb
5
ast
Impact
+18.3

Stepping out to knock down three triples completely warped the opposing frontcourt's defensive shell. His massive +10.4 impact was further cemented by dominant rim protection and active rebounding that choked off second-chance opportunities.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 78.6%
USG% 10.8%
Net Rtg -5.1
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.3m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +14.0
Defense +0.7
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.2

Offensive zeroing out completely sabotaged his elite defensive disruption. Opponents simply ignored him on the perimeter, packing the paint and turning his empty possessions into a crippling -9.5 overall deficit.

Shooting
FG 0/5 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg -33.5
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.1m
Scoring -4.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +4.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.0

Operating strictly as a vertical spacer and drop-coverage anchor, he provided exactly what was required in his limited stint. Solid rim deterrence (+2.2 defense) and mistake-free finishing kept his impact marginally positive.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.5%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -37.9
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.8m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +8.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -4.7
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Kris Murray 12.4m
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.0

Failing to establish any physical presence during his rotation, he was frequently targeted on switches. This defensive bleeding (-1.5) combined with complete offensive passivity resulted in a steep negative impact during his brief time on the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 6.1%
Net Rtg -34.9
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.4m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.5

Blown coverages on the perimeter quickly eroded any value from his short stint. Getting caught out of position defensively (-1.5) allowed easy penetration, dragging his net score into the red.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -34.5
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.9m
Scoring +1.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.2

Rushing his offensive reads led to three quick misses that killed momentum. The resulting empty trips and poor transition balance turned a brief cameo into a notable negative.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 50.0%
Net Rtg +22.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.3m
Scoring -0.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Caleb Love 2.2m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.9

A purely cardio stint where he failed to register a single meaningful offensive action. His inability to impact the flow of the game during garbage time resulted in a sluggish -2.4 rating.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -66.7
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1