Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
DEN lead POR lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
POR 2P — 3P —
DEN 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 190 attempts

POR POR Shot-making Δ

Holiday Hard 7/19 +0.4
Camara Hard 10/16 +11.0
Avdija 6/15 -3.8
Henderson Hard 6/14 +1.8
Clingan 6/13 -1.1
Thybulle Hard 5/7 +6.5
Williams III Open 2/4 -0.8
Cissoko Hard 0/1 -1.1

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Jokić 15/31 -3.4
Murray 7/15 +1.4
Gordon 8/14 +4.0
Johnson 6/9 +3.4
Valančiūnas 6/7 +5.8
Braun 4/7 +0.2
Hardaway Jr. Hard 1/7 -4.1
Brown 1/6 -4.1
Strawther Hard 4/5 +4.2
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
POR
DEN
42/89 Field Goals 52/101
47.2% Field Goal % 51.5%
25/52 3-Pointers 12/38
48.1% 3-Point % 31.6%
23/28 Free Throws 21/24
82.1% Free Throw % 87.5%
65.1% True Shooting % 61.4%
50 Total Rebounds 55
11 Offensive 17
28 Defensive 28
29 Assists 37
1.61 Assist/TO Ratio 3.08
15 Turnovers 12
8 Steals 10
5 Blocks 5
24 Fouls 26
32 Points in Paint 66
18 Fast Break Pts 13
16 Points off TOs 20
15 Second Chance Pts 30
21 Bench Points 34
18 Largest Lead 7
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Nikola Jokić
35 PTS · 14 REB · 13 AST · 43.2 MIN
+39.64
2
Toumani Camara
30 PTS · 5 REB · 0 AST · 34.9 MIN
+23.16
3
Aaron Gordon
23 PTS · 9 REB · 5 AST · 31.1 MIN
+22.47
4
Donovan Clingan
18 PTS · 12 REB · 0 AST · 30.0 MIN
+20.48
5
Matisse Thybulle
14 PTS · 1 REB · 3 AST · 33.2 MIN
+15.95
6
Deni Avdija
26 PTS · 4 REB · 7 AST · 39.5 MIN
+15.34
7
Jrue Holiday
19 PTS · 6 REB · 11 AST · 38.9 MIN
+14.76
8
Jonas Valančiūnas
14 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 9.8 MIN
+14.7
9
Christian Braun
8 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 39.9 MIN
+14.04
10
Jamal Murray
20 PTS · 1 REB · 7 AST · 38.3 MIN
+14.02
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q5 0:09 N. Jokić REBOUND (Off:7 Def:7) 132–137
Q5 0:12 MISS S. Henderson 27' running pullup 3PT 132–137
Q5 0:17 S. Henderson REBOUND (Off:1 Def:2) 132–137
Q5 0:18 MISS J. Murray driving Layup 132–137
Q5 0:37 D. Avdija running Layup (26 PTS) 132–137
Q5 0:41 R. Williams III REBOUND (Off:2 Def:4) 130–137
Q5 0:43 MISS C. Braun 3PT 130–137
Q5 1:02 N. Jokić REBOUND (Off:7 Def:6) 130–137
Q5 1:04 MISS J. Holiday driving Layup 130–137
Q5 1:26 N. Jokić driving Layup (35 PTS) (J. Murray 7 AST) 130–137
Q5 1:51 D. Avdija driving reverse Layup (24 PTS) 130–135
Q5 2:01 J. Murray driving DUNK (20 PTS) (N. Jokić 13 AST) 128–135
Q5 2:24 M. Thybulle bad pass out-of-bounds TURNOVER (5 TO) 128–133
Q5 2:38 J. Murray Free Throw 2 of 2 (18 PTS) 128–133
Q5 2:38 J. Murray Free Throw 1 of 2 (17 PTS) 128–132

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DEN Denver Nuggets
S Nikola Jokić 43.2m
35
pts
14
reb
13
ast
Impact
+37.0

Total schematic dominance from the high post completely broke the opponent's defensive shell and yielded a monstrous net rating. Exceptional positioning and quick hands in the passing lanes fueled an unexpectedly dominant defensive performance. He systematically dismantled the opposing frontcourt through sheer processing speed and spatial awareness.

Shooting
FG 15/31 (48.4%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.4%
USG% 38.2%
Net Rtg +5.7
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.2m
Scoring +23.5
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +7.1
Hustle +17.8
Defense +9.7
Turnovers -14.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 5
BLK 2
TO 6
S Christian Braun 39.9m
8
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.5

Elite point-of-attack harassment and relentless screen navigation were heavily offset by a complete lack of perimeter gravity. Refusing to take open catch-and-shoot looks allowed his defender to aggressively pack the paint. His defensive tenacity couldn't fully compensate for the offensive spacing issues he created.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 7.2%
Net Rtg +11.0
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.9m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +5.7
Defense +5.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jamal Murray 38.3m
20
pts
1
reb
7
ast
Impact
+7.0

Relentless off-ball movement and aggressive loose-ball recoveries kept his overall impact in the green despite a dip in scoring volume. Navigating heavy trapping schemes with poise prevented live-ball turnovers and maintained offensive rhythm. His willingness to do the dirty work compensated for an uneven shooting night.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.3%
USG% 18.9%
Net Rtg +11.3
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.3m
Scoring +14.1
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.1
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
S Cameron Johnson 36.7m
17
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
+2.0

Giving up straight-line drives on the perimeter torpedoed his overall value despite a highly efficient shooting night. Slow lateral slides allowed opposing wings to collapse the defense and generate high-value looks. His offensive precision simply couldn't outpace the defensive bleed.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.9%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg +35.2
+/- +25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.7m
Scoring +14.0
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +5.7
Defense -2.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Aaron Gordon 31.1m
23
pts
9
reb
5
ast
Impact
+15.1

Bullying smaller defenders in the dunker spot established a physical tone that drove a strong positive rating. Punishing sagging coverage by confidently stepping into perimeter jumpers forced the defense into impossible rotational binds. His sheer athletic force dictated the terms of engagement in the half-court.

Shooting
FG 8/14 (57.1%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.0%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg +4.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.1m
Scoring +17.7
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +5.6
Hustle +7.5
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Bruce Brown 24.2m
6
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-14.6

Struggling to finish through contact at the rim resulted in empty possessions and a steep negative rating. A lack of burst off the dribble allowed primary defenders to easily stay in front and contest his floaters. Unable to generate his usual chaotic energy, his minutes were largely a net negative.

Shooting
FG 1/6 (16.7%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.7%
USG% 17.5%
Net Rtg -3.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.2m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +5.4
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 46.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-16.9

Forcing heavily contested jumpers early in the shot clock completely short-circuited the second unit's offensive flow. Clanking wide-open looks allowed the opposition to leak out and generate easy transition points. This prolonged shooting slump severely damaged the team's momentum during his shifts.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 21.4%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -42.0
+/- -24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring -1.9
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
11
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.2

Decisive attacking against closeouts provided a crucial offensive spark and drove a solid positive rating. Moving intelligently without the ball allowed him to find soft spots in the zone for high-percentage finishes. His crisp execution maximized his limited rotational minutes.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 93.5%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg -10.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.7m
Scoring +10.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
14
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.2

Absolute bullying in the deep post overwhelmed the backup frontcourt and spiked his per-minute impact. Sealing his man early in the shot clock generated guaranteed buckets and forced immediate defensive adjustments. He maximized a short stint by playing with sheer physical dominance.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 88.8%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +9.4
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.8m
Scoring +12.7
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
POR Portland Trail Blazers
S Deni Avdija 39.5m
26
pts
4
reb
7
ast
Impact
+2.0

Inefficient perimeter shooting dragged his overall impact into the red despite a high offensive usage rate. Clanking the vast majority of his attempts from beyond the arc stalled out half-court possessions and generated long rebounds for the opposition. His active defensive rotations partially salvaged his overall rating.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 13/14 (92.9%)
Advanced
TS% 61.4%
USG% 28.3%
Net Rtg -17.3
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.5m
Scoring +18.9
Creation +3.1
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 4
S Jrue Holiday 38.9m
19
pts
6
reb
11
ast
Impact
+2.4

Forcing contested looks inside the arc severely suppressed his net impact. While his perimeter spacing was valuable, empty trips on drives allowed the opposing transition game to flourish. He struggled to generate clean separation against primary defenders, leading to a volume-heavy but inefficient outing.

Shooting
FG 7/19 (36.8%)
3PT 5/12 (41.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 21.1%
Net Rtg -1.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.9m
Scoring +10.7
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +1.8
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Scoot Henderson 35.7m
18
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+4.8

Questionable decision-making in traffic negated a solid shooting night from the perimeter. Getting bogged down in drop coverage led to stalled possessions and empty offensive trips. His inability to consistently break down the first line of defense kept his overall impact firmly in the negative.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.5%
USG% 20.5%
Net Rtg -19.8
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.7m
Scoring +12.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +2.8
Defense +1.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Toumani Camara 34.9m
30
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+22.6

Blistering perimeter execution completely warped the opponent's defensive scheme and drove a massive positive rating. Catching fire from the corners forced aggressive closeouts, opening up the floor for the entire unit. A slight dip in defensive containment was easily overshadowed by his lethal spot-up gravity.

Shooting
FG 10/16 (62.5%)
3PT 8/13 (61.5%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 88.9%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg +2.8
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.9m
Scoring +25.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +8.7
Hustle +6.3
Defense -0.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Donovan Clingan 30.0m
18
pts
12
reb
0
ast
Impact
+14.4

Elite rim protection and active interior contests anchored a highly positive defensive rating. Stepping out to connect on pick-and-pop actions stretched the opposing frontcourt out of their comfort zone. His sheer physical presence in the paint dictated the terms of engagement all night.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -8.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.0m
Scoring +11.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +12.3
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 26
FGM Against 16
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
14
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+1.6

Disruptive off-ball roaming and elite passing-lane anticipation fueled a massive defensive rating. Punishing defensive lapses with timely corner triples made him a devastating two-way presence. His ability to blow up dribble hand-offs completely derailed the opponent's primary offensive sets.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 4/6 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg +17.7
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.2m
Scoring +12.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense +10.8
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 5
BLK 1
TO 5
6
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-7.0

Failing to establish deep post position limited his utility as a vertical threat. Opposing bigs easily pushed him off his spots, neutralizing his typical offensive rebounding advantage. A lack of forceful rim deterrence on defense compounded a highly ineffective shift.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.0m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +7.6
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Kris Murray 21.8m
1
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-21.4

Complete offensive invisibility created a severe spacing handicap for the second unit. Refusing to look at the rim allowed his defender to freely roam and clog the driving lanes for primary creators. This extreme passivity, combined with late closeouts on the other end, resulted in a cratered net rating.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 5.7%
Net Rtg +8.0
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.8m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-16.3

A brief rotational cameo was marred by missed defensive assignments and a lack of offensive aggression. Floating on the perimeter without cutting with purpose allowed the defense to rest. He failed to generate any tangible momentum during his limited floor time.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 5.0%
Net Rtg -13.4
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.0m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0