GSW

2025-26 Season

DRAYMOND GREEN

Golden State Warriors | Forward | 6-6
Draymond Green
8.6 PPG
5.6 RPG
5.3 APG
27.5 MPG
-3.1 Impact

Green produces at an below average rate for a 28-minute workload. 2.7 turnovers per game cost 5.3 points of value nightly.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.1
Scoring +4.5
Points 8.6 PPG × +1.00 = +8.6
Missed 2PT 1.2/g × -0.78 = -0.9
Missed 3PT 3.2/g × -0.87 = -2.8
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +4.4
Assists 5.3/g × +0.50 = +2.6
Off. Rebounds 1.4/g × +1.26 = +1.8
Turnovers -5.3
Turnovers 2.7/g × -1.95 = -5.3
Defense +2.0
Steals 0.9/g × +2.30 = +2.1
Blocks 0.7/g × +0.90 = +0.6
Def. Rebounds 4.2/g × +0.30 = +1.2
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +4.6
Contested Shots 7.5/g × +0.20 = +1.5
Deflections 2.2/g × +0.65 = +1.4
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 2.6/g × +0.30 = +0.8
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.4
Raw Impact +10.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −13.3
Net Impact
-3.1
10th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 46th
8.6 PPG
Efficiency 31th
54.1% TS
Playmaking 95th
5.3 APG
Rebounding 75th
5.6 RPG
Rim Protection 65th
0.16/min
Hustle 88th
0.14/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 2th
0.10/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Draymond Green’s early season was defined by a severe offensive identity crisis that actively sabotaged his team on the floor. He swung wildly between paralyzing passivity and disastrous shot selection. During the 11/04 vs PHX matchup, his absolute refusal to look at the rim yielded a dismal -13.5 impact score, as his hesitation allowed defenders to play five-on-four and stall the offense entirely. Even when he occasionally found his scoring touch, hidden costs still ruined his value. He dropped 13 points on 12/02 vs OKC, but his impact plummeted to -9.2 because uncharacteristic defensive lapses completely erased his aggressive offensive output. He remained capable of flipping a game without filling the cup, generating a stellar +7.8 impact on 10/28 vs LAC with just 7 points by blowing up pick-and-rolls and masterfully directing the defensive scheme. Unfortunately, those vintage defensive masterclasses were rare bright spots in a brutal slump marred by crippling hesitation and careless turnovers.

A maddening offensive identity crisis defined this stretch, as erratic scoring gravity routinely sabotaged Green's elite defensive anchoring. Hesitation is a killer in the modern NBA. The absolute floor arrived on 01/28 vs UTA, where a scoreless night on 0/6 shooting allowed defenders to completely abandon him, resulting in a catastrophic -12.1 impact score. However, he occasionally salvaged his value without putting the ball in the basket. On 01/24 vs MIN, he scored just two points but still managed a +0.9 impact because his elite backline communication held the defense together. Yet, even when the scoring appeared robust, hidden costs frequently dragged his rating into the red. Despite tallying 15 points on 01/30 vs DET, uncharacteristic defensive lapses and late rotations completely undermined his aggressive shooting, leaving him with a frustrating -4.2 impact.

A baffling obsession with the three-point line and agonizing offensive passivity defined this brutal midseason stretch for Draymond Green. Opposing defenses aggressively dared him to shoot, leading to disastrous results like his 02/19 vs BOS appearance. He hoisted five empty triples on his way to a scoreless night, cratering his overall value to a -14.6 impact score. Even when his perimeter shots actually fell, hidden costs dragged down his effectiveness. During the 02/09 vs MEM matchup, Green poured in 14 points on sharp 4-of-6 shooting from deep, yet still posted a -5.6 impact score because his hot hand masked severe underlying issues with his offensive execution. He only managed to flip the script when he abandoned the erratic jumper and leaned entirely into his elite processing. On 03/27 vs WAS, Green scored a meager six points but generated a brilliant +9.6 impact score by bringing high-level playmaking and dishing out 10 assists to perfectly orchestrate the half-court offense.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Green has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~5 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 44% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Green consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 4 games. Longest cold streak: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 66 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

V. Wembanyama 116.4 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 22.2%
PPP 0.23
PTS 27
D. Clingan 76.4 poss
FG% 41.2%
3P% 27.3%
PPP 0.22
PTS 17
S. Barnes 54.8 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.24
PTS 13
J. Duren 54.1 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 9
N. Jokić 51.7 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 13
J. Williams 47.4 poss
FG% 70.0%
3P% 71.4%
PPP 0.4
PTS 19
M. Turner 47.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
A. Sengun 45.1 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 16
W. Carter Jr. 40.6 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
N. Queta 39.3 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

V. Wembanyama 133.9 poss
FG% 48.6%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.33
PTS 44
Z. Williamson 64.7 poss
FG% 42.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 19
D. Clingan 51.2 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 9
D. Ayton 48.7 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
K. Leonard 48.3 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 14
N. Jokić 47.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.27
PTS 13
A. Sengun 45.3 poss
FG% 46.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 15
S. Barnes 41.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
J. Duren 40.5 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.47
PTS 19
K. Durant 39.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8

SEASON STATS

63
Games
8.6
PPG
5.6
RPG
5.3
APG
0.9
SPG
0.7
BPG
41.6
FG%
32.8
3P%
68.8
FT%
27.5
MPG

GAME LOG

63 games played