NOP

2025-26 Season

DERIK QUEEN

New Orleans Pelicans | Center | 6-9
Derik Queen
11.7PPG
7.1RPG
3.7APG
25.0MPG
+0.9 Impact

Queen produces at an average rate for a 25-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.9
Scoring +9.7
Points Scored 11.7 PPG = +11.7
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -4.0
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.0
Creation +1.6
Assists & Self-Creation 3.7 AST/g + self-creation = +1.6
Turnovers -5.6
Turnovers 2.3/g (live + dead blend) = -5.6
Defense +0.3
Steals 1.0/g = +2.3
Blocks 0.9/g = +0.8
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.8
Hustle & Effort +6.0
Rebounds 7.1 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.6
Contested Shots 6.3/g = +1.3
Deflections 2.1/g = +1.4
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 1.4/g = +0.4
Raw Impact +12.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.1
Net Impact
+0.9
45th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 67th
11.7 PPG
Efficiency 12th
53.3% TS
Playmaking 92th
3.7 APG
Rebounding 64th
7.1 RPG
Defense 97th
+11.4/g
Hustle 95th
+27.0/g
Creation 97th
+5.57/g
Shot Making 53th
+5.18/g
TO Discipline 3th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Derik Queen's first 27 games were defined by a jarring mid-November promotion to the starting lineup, transforming him from a sporadic bench spark into a highly volatile offensive hub. When his shot selection was disciplined, he was absolutely lethal. He peaked on 11/20 vs DEN with a brilliant 30-point, 9-rebound barrage on 12-of-18 shooting that generated a massive +27.4 Impact score. Conversely, his high-usage role occasionally dragged the offense into the mud through forced shots and sloppy possessions. Look at his 11/09 vs SAS outing; despite logging 13 points and 8 assists, his woeful 5-for-14 shooting created a slew of empty possessions that tanked his Impact to -8.1. Yet Queen also found ways to tilt the floor without hunting his own shot. During an 11/05 vs CHA matchup, he attempted just seven field goals but racked up 8 rebounds and 7 assists, using smart ball movement and relentless hustle to drive a stellar +10.2 Impact score. He is clearly a dynamic playmaker, but until he trims the fat from his shot diet, his nightly value will remain a coin flip.

Derik Queen’s midseason stretch was defined by a maddening tug-of-war between brilliant connective playmaking and baffling stretches of empty minutes. When he actively crashed the glass and moved the ball, his value skyrocketed regardless of his own scoring totals. Just look at his performance on 01/07 vs LAL, where he scored a modest 10 points but generated a robust +8.0 Impact by dominating the boards with 13 rebounds and dishing out eight assists. Conversely, when he forced his own offense without anchoring the paint, his presence actively hurt the team. During the 01/04 vs MIA matchup, Queen tallied 13 points but bled value elsewhere, resulting in a brutal -10.2 Impact because his empty counting stats couldn't mask defensive lapses and a mediocre 5-for-11 shooting night. He finally put the entire puzzle together on 01/30 vs MEM. By blending hyper-efficient scoring with sharp passing, he racked up 22 points and seven assists on 8-of-12 shooting to earn a dominant +13.3 Impact. If Queen wants to be a reliable nightly anchor, he has to realize his true worth lies in doing the dirty work, not just hunting his own shot.

Derik Queen spent most of this stretch drifting aimlessly in a reserve role before a late-season return to the starting lineup unleashed an absolute monster. As a bench big, he often bled value by forcing the issue offensively. During the 03/29 vs HOU matchup, he managed 13 points, but his -2.7 Impact score exposed the hidden costs of erratic shot selection and sluggish transition defense. Yet, he occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without filling up the basket. In the 04/03 vs SAC game, Queen scored a modest 8 points but still posted a +7.3 Impact by setting bruising screens, fighting for loose balls, and altering shots at the rim. Everything changed when he reclaimed a starting job in April. He absolutely bullied the opposition on 04/12 vs MIN, erupting for 30 points and 22 rebounds to generate a massive +22.4 Impact through relentless offensive rebounding and sheer physical dominance in the paint.

A chaotic blend of brilliant high-post facilitation and maddening mental lapses defined Derik Queen's late-season transition from erratic reserve to spot starter. His true value often hid beneath the surface, perfectly illustrated during the Mar 21 vs CLE matchup. Despite scoring just 9 points, he generated a massive +10.3 impact score by operating as a flawless offensive hub and picking apart the zone with pinpoint interior passing. Conversely, raw box score production frequently masked severe underlying flaws. When he moved into the starting lineup on Apr 07 vs UTA, he stuffed the stat sheet with 17 points, 12 rebounds, and 7 assists. Yet, he dragged the unit down to a dismal -8.1 impact because a rash of illegal screens constantly sabotaged their momentum. He finally married heavy usage with winning basketball on Apr 10 vs BOS, pouring in 25 points and utilizing exceptional defensive positioning to drive a +9.6 impact score.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Queen's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 52% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Queen consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +1.8, second-half: -0.0. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Gobert 104.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 24
J. Landale 95.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 19
L. Kornet 73.5 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 30
N. Vučević 58.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
K. Ware 56.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 15
D. Ayton 56.0 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
J. Huff 54.9 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
M. Raynaud 54.6 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 8
D. Daniels 48.3 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
D. Gafford 46.2 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 12

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Gobert 99.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 23
L. Kornet 83.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 10
D. Ayton 75.3 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 29
K. Ware 57.9 poss
FG% 31.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
J. Landale 57.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 21
J. Jackson Jr. 53.0 poss
FG% 38.1%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.4
PTS 21
M. Raynaud 47.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
A. Davis 45.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.7
PTS 32
D. Gafford 45.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
A. Sengun 43.6 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 12

SEASON STATS

81
Games
11.7
PPG
7.1
RPG
3.7
APG
1.0
SPG
0.9
BPG
47.3
FG%
26.1
3P%
79.5
FT%
25.0
MPG

GAME LOG

81 games played