NOP

2025-26 Season

DERIK QUEEN

New Orleans Pelicans | Center | 6-9
Derik Queen
11.3 PPG
6.8 RPG
3.7 APG
24.5 MPG
+1.5 Impact

Queen produces at an above average rate for a 24-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.5
Scoring +6.8
Points 11.3 PPG × +1.00 = +11.3
Missed 2PT 3.9/g × -0.78 = -3.1
Missed 3PT 0.8/g × -0.87 = -0.7
Missed FT 0.7/g × -1.00 = -0.7
Creation +4.0
Assists 3.7/g × +0.50 = +1.9
Off. Rebounds 1.7/g × +1.26 = +2.1
Turnovers -4.5
Turnovers 2.3/g × -1.95 = -4.5
Defense +2.7
Steals 1.0/g × +2.30 = +2.3
Blocks 0.9/g × +0.90 = +0.8
Def. Rebounds 5.1/g × +0.30 = +1.5
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +3.9
Contested Shots 6.8/g × +0.20 = +1.4
Deflections 2.2/g × +0.65 = +1.4
Charges Drawn 0.1/g × +2.70 = +0.3
Loose Balls 0.4/g × +0.60 = +0.2
Screen Assists 1.5/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.2
Raw Impact +12.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.4
Net Impact
+1.5
29th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 64th
11.3 PPG
Efficiency 15th
53.3% TS
Playmaking 92th
3.7 APG
Rebounding 59th
6.8 RPG
Rim Protection 58th
0.20/min
Hustle 84th
0.14/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 4th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

A turbulent evolution from a blue-collar bench enforcer into an erratic offensive hub defined Derik Queen's opening twenty games. Early on, he thrived by doing the dirty work, a dynamic perfectly captured on 10/22 vs MEM. He scored a meager 3 points that night, yet still posted a +1.5 impact score because his gritty interior defense and relentless loose-ball pursuit salvaged his floor time. As his offensive usage increased, his desire to hunt his own shot occasionally hurt the team. During the 11/08 vs SAS contest, Queen tallied a solid 13 points but registered a dismal -4.1 impact. A high volume of forced interior looks and poor shot selection completely undercut his value in that matchup, serving as a hidden cost to his scoring bump. Fortunately, he eventually found his rhythm as a starter, erupting for 30 points on 11/19 vs DEN where his elite interior finishing and defensive anchoring drove a massive +19.0 impact score.

This twenty-game stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating wildly between historic offensive dominance and frustrating self-sabotage. Queen reached his absolute ceiling on 12/08 vs SAS, erupting for 33 points, 10 rebounds, and 10 assists to post a staggering +14.0 impact score. That massive leap in playmaking completely shattered his previous limits. Yet, he frequently undermined his own value, exactly like he did on 01/04 vs MIA. Despite putting up 13 points and finding a better offensive rhythm, he posted a brutal -9.4 impact score because hidden costs like poorly timed turnovers dragged down his overall effectiveness. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without scoring much at all, as seen on 01/07 vs ATL. He managed just 6 points in that contest, yet still recorded a +6.0 impact. Relentless hustle and elite interior defense drove that highly positive shift, making him a winning player even when his touch completely abandoned him.

A jarring demotion to the bench and wild swings in nightly effectiveness defined this turbulent stretch for Derik Queen. When his shot abandoned him, he occasionally found ways to salvage his minutes through sheer grit. On 01/27 vs OKC, a phenomenal defensive anchor performance generated a +6.3 impact despite him scoring just 9 points on inefficient interior looks. Conversely, his scoring totals often masked severe fundamental lapses. During the 02/11 vs MIA matchup, Queen managed 12 points but posted a dismal -6.8 impact because opposing bigs easily exploited his defensive porousness. Yet, just before losing his starting job in late February, he delivered an absolute masterclass on 02/20 vs MIL. He racked up 18 points and 9 rebounds, earning a massive +10.1 impact by combining superb rim-running with active hands in the passing lanes.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Queen's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 52% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Queen consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Hot right now — 4 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 5 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Gobert 104.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 24
J. Landale 95.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 19
L. Kornet 73.5 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 30
N. Vučević 58.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
K. Ware 56.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 15
D. Ayton 56.0 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
J. Huff 54.9 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
M. Raynaud 54.6 poss
FG% 36.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 8
D. Daniels 48.3 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
D. Gafford 46.2 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 12

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Gobert 99.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 23
L. Kornet 83.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 10
D. Ayton 75.3 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 29
K. Ware 57.9 poss
FG% 31.2%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
J. Landale 57.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 21
J. Jackson Jr. 53.0 poss
FG% 38.1%
3P% 28.6%
PPP 0.4
PTS 21
M. Raynaud 47.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 9
A. Davis 45.6 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.7
PTS 32
D. Gafford 45.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
A. Sengun 43.6 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 12

SEASON STATS

76
Games
11.3
PPG
6.8
RPG
3.7
APG
1.0
SPG
0.9
BPG
47.3
FG%
26.2
3P%
79.7
FT%
24.5
MPG

GAME LOG

76 games played