2025-26 Season

TONY BRADLEY

Indiana Pacers | Center-Forward | 6-10

2025-26 Season

TONY BRADLEY

Indiana Pacers | Center-Forward | 6-10 | Yr 7

4.1 PPG

2.9 RPG

0.5 APG

11.2 MPG

+0.5 Impact

Bradley produces at an average rate for a 11-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN

Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average

+0.5

Scoring +2.9

Points 4.1 PPG × +1.00 = +4.1

Missed 2PT 1.2/g × -0.78 = -0.9

Missed 3PT 0.0/g × -0.87 = -0.0

Missed FT 0.3/g × -1.00 = -0.3

Creation +1.1

Assists 0.5/g × +0.50 = +0.2

Off. Rebounds 0.7/g × +1.26 = +0.9

Turnovers -1.0

Turnovers 0.5/g × -1.95 = -1.0

Defense -0.5

Steals 0.2/g × +2.30 = +0.5

Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2

Def. Rebounds 2.2/g × +0.30 = +0.7

Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9

Hustle & Effort +1.4

Contested Shots 2.9/g × +0.20 = +0.6

Deflections 0.4/g × +0.65 = +0.3

Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1

Screen Assists 0.9/g × +0.30 = +0.3

Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1

Raw Impact +3.9

Baseline (game-average expected) −3.4

Net Impact

+0.5

17th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

TEAM COMPARISON

Impact

#12

Offense

#18

Hustle

#19

Defense

of 20 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)

Isaiah Jackson +4.3 Pascal Siakam +4.1 T.J. McConnell +3.8 Jay Huff +2.3 Micah Potter +2.3 Obi Toppin +1.1 Quenton Jackson +0.9 Tony Bradley +0.6 Garrison Mathews -0.7 Andrew Nembhard -2.1 Aaron Nesmith -2.2 Jeremiah Robinson-Earl -2.4 Taelon Peter -2.6 Johnny Furphy -2.9 Kobe Brown -3.1 Jarace Walker -3.4 Ben Sheppard -3.6 Bennedict Mathurin -3.7 Ethan Thompson -4.6 Kam Jones -5.7

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 16th

4.6 PPG

Efficiency 34th

57.0% TS

Playmaking 9th

0.6 APG

Rebounding 8th

3.3 RPG

Rim Protection 4th

0.10/min

Hustle 11th

0.09/min

Shot Creation 50th

0% pullup

TO Discipline 72th

0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Tony Bradley’s first twenty games were defined by a frustrating tug-of-war between bruising offensive efficiency and glaring defensive limitations. When deployed carefully off the bench, he occasionally bullied opposing frontcourts. Look directly at 10/26 vs MIN, where he poured in 12 points and 5 rebounds to generate a massive +9.5 impact score through elite shot selection and dominant positioning around the rim. He even found ways to anchor lineups without demanding the basketball. On 10/29 vs DAL, Bradley posted a stellar +6.6 impact alongside a modest 6 points because his bone-rattling screen-setting and aggressive rim-running warped the defense. Then the starting lineup called, and everything collapsed. Despite shooting an efficient 4-for-6 for 8 points on 11/11 vs UTA, he registered a -2.4 impact. Opponents ruthlessly targeted him in the pick-and-roll, exploiting his heavy-footed drop coverage to erase any value his interior finishing provided.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Steady role player. Bradley's impact doesn't swing much in absolute terms, and he's positive in 57% of games. You know what you're getting.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 70% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Average defender. Bradley doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact +0.4, second-half +0.5. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

Hot right now — 4 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 47 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.