ATL

2025-26 Season

TONY BRADLEY

Atlanta Hawks | Center-Forward | 6-10
Tony Bradley
3.9PPG
2.9RPG
0.6APG
11.2MPG
-4.5 Impact

Bradley produces at an below average rate for a 11-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-4.5
Scoring +3.7
Points Scored 3.9 PPG = +3.9
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -0.9
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.7
Creation +0.3
Assists & Self-Creation 0.6 AST/g + self-creation = +0.3
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.4/g (live + dead blend) = -1.2
Defense -0.9
Steals 0.2/g = +0.5
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.6
Hustle & Effort +2.9
Rebounds 2.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.9
Contested Shots 2.4/g = +0.5
Deflections 0.3/g = +0.2
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.8/g = +0.2
Raw Impact +4.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.3
Net Impact
-4.5
12th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 15th
4.4 PPG
Efficiency 46th
58.3% TS
Playmaking 9th
0.6 APG
Rebounding 7th
3.2 RPG
Defense 10th
+2.9/g
Hustle 12th
+10.5/g
Creation 6th
+1.10/g
Shot Making 19th
+2.54/g
TO Discipline 87th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Tony Bradley’s opening stretch of the 2025-26 campaign was defined by a jarring inconsistency, oscillating between highly efficient bench bursts and disastrous stints where he actively harmed his team's rotation. He looked like a legitimate rotation piece on 10/26 vs MIN, pouring in 12 points and 5 rebounds on near-perfect 6/7 shooting to generate a stellar +6.2 Impact score. His reliable interior finishing gave the second unit a massive offensive jolt. However, a brief promotion to the starting lineup quickly exposed his limitations as a full-time anchor. During a start on 11/12 vs UTA, Bradley scored an efficient 8 points but managed just a single rebound in 20 minutes, leading to a -3.6 Impact as his inability to secure the glass crippled the defense. The bottom completely fell out upon his return to the bench on 11/18 vs DET. He forced terrible shots to finish 1/6 from the floor, logging an abysmal -14.5 Impact as his offensive stagnation dragged the entire lineup down.

Deep bench irrelevance and a staggering inability to positively affect the game defined Tony Bradley's mid-season stretch. The nadir arrived on 11/25 vs DET. He logged zero points and just one rebound in six minutes, generating an abysmal -11.3 Impact score because he was completely invisible on both ends of the floor. Even when he managed to find the basket, like his six-point outing on 12/02 vs CLE, the underlying metrics remained grim. He posted a -6.4 Impact score in that contest because his scoring was entirely negated by porous defensive rotations and a glaring lack of rebounding. His longest run came on 12/04 vs DEN, yielding a stretch-high seven points and four rebounds in 14 minutes. Yet, his sluggish closeouts and inability to anchor the paint still dragged him down to a -1.6 Impact, highlighting exactly why his minutes remained so scarce.

Tony Bradley spent this mid-season stretch fighting a losing battle against his own limited offensive utility, mostly serving as a net-negative presence at the end of the bench. His severe limitations were glaring during an abysmal 04/06 vs NYK appearance. He managed zero points on two missed shots in just four minutes of action to post a staggering -13.7 Impact score. When a big man cannot convert easy looks or control the glass in brief spurts, he actively bleeds value for his team. He did manage one rare flash of brilliance on 01/18 vs DET, racking up 12 points on near-perfect 5-for-6 shooting. Because he actually finished his looks around the rim and even hit a three-pointer, his Impact score surged to a robust +5.5. Yet, when finally gifted a starting nod on 04/12 vs MIA, his inefficient 2-for-6 shooting and meager four points resulted in a -3.7 Impact, confirming he lacks the offensive punch necessary to anchor a modern rotation.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Bradley has posted negative impact in 84% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 64% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Bradley doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -4.3, second-half -4.7. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 22 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 47 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

N. Jokić 44.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
J. Nurkić 31.9 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 8
R. Gobert 30.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
A. Horford 29.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
J. Duren 28.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
J. Embiid 22.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 6
P. Reed 20.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 7
I. Stewart 18.8 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
N. Richards 17.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 6
J. Poeltl 16.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 5

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

N. Jokić 45.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 13
J. Nurkić 31.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
J. Duren 30.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 8
R. Gobert 30.3 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 7
A. Horford 26.1 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 3
P. Reed 23.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
J. Embiid 23.0 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 9
N. Richards 21.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Poeltl 18.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
W. Carter Jr. 15.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 1

SEASON STATS

44
Games
3.9
PPG
2.9
RPG
0.6
APG
0.2
SPG
0.2
BPG
55.4
FG%
60.0
3P%
73.5
FT%
11.2
MPG

GAME LOG

44 games played