DEN

2025-26 Season

CAMERON JOHNSON

Denver Nuggets | Forward | 6-8
Cameron Johnson
12.4PPG
3.8RPG
2.4APG
30.6MPG
+1.6 Impact

Johnson produces at an above average rate for a 31-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.6
Scoring +11.5
Points Scored 12.4 PPG = +12.4
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -3.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +2.8
Creation +1.0
Assists & Self-Creation 2.4 AST/g + self-creation = +1.0
Turnovers -2.1
Turnovers 0.9/g (live + dead blend) = -2.1
Defense -0.3
Steals 0.8/g = +1.8
Blocks 0.4/g = +0.4
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.5
Hustle & Effort +2.8
Rebounds 3.8 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +0.5
Contested Shots 3.3/g = +0.7
Deflections 1.5/g = +1.0
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.2
Loose Balls 0.4/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.6/g = +0.2
Raw Impact +12.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.3
Net Impact
+1.6
63th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 68th
12.4 PPG
Efficiency 73th
59.4% TS
Playmaking 73th
2.4 APG
Rebounding 42th
3.8 RPG
Defense 41th
+6.8/g
Hustle 32th
+10.2/g
Creation 49th
+2.37/g
Shot Making 70th
+7.25/g
TO Discipline 90th
0.03/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Cameron Johnson’s first 19 games were defined by a jarring identity crisis, morphing from a complete offensive liability early on into a lethal perimeter weapon by late November. His opening night on 10/23 vs GSW set a bleak tone, yielding an abysmal -14.2 impact score as he clanked five of his six three-point attempts and bled points on the other end. He looked entirely lost for weeks, repeatedly forcing contested looks while failing to generate any meaningful gravity. The fog finally lifted on 11/29 vs SAS, where Johnson erupted for 28 points on blistering 6-of-9 shooting from deep. That outburst earned a massive +20.0 impact score, driven entirely by elite shot-making and active hands that disrupted San Antonio's rhythm. Yet, his underlying metrics remain wildly volatile, as seen the very next night on 11/30 vs PHX. Despite a respectable 15 points and four assists, he posted a -1.1 impact score because hidden costs like poor closeouts and empty off-ball possessions quietly handicapped the team. He remains a dangerous but deeply unpredictable floor spacer.

Cameron Johnson’s midseason stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating violently between elite floor-spacing and complete offensive invisibility. Volume scoring rarely guaranteed positive results for the veteran wing. Take his 16-point outing on 12/06 vs ATL, which yielded a frustrating -1.3 Impact. Despite hitting four threes, empty possessions and a lack of secondary playmaking drained his overall value on the floor. On the flip side, he managed a massive +14.6 Impact on 02/20 vs POR while scoring just 15 points. That stellar rating stemmed from relentless hustle plays, sharp extra passes, and timely defensive rotations that kept the offense humming without him needing to dominate the ball. Unfortunately, the bottom completely fell out on 03/01 vs MIN. Missing all six of his field goal attempts to finish with zero points and a catastrophic -22.4 Impact, Johnson became an offensive black hole who actively harmed the team's rhythm.

Cameron Johnson settled into a rhythm as a lethal, high-efficiency floor spacer during this late-season run, though his overall influence fluctuated wildly depending on his engagement in the dirty work. On 03/22 vs POR, he roasted the defense for 19 points on a blistering 5-for-7 from deep. That brilliant shot selection and sharp defensive effort generated a massive +17.5 impact score. Yet, his passivity off the ball occasionally erased his scoring value entirely. Take his 03/25 vs DAL appearance, where he contributed an efficient 12 points on 5-for-8 shooting but still posted a -4.0 impact. That negative mark stemmed from hidden costs, namely grabbing just a single rebound and failing to disrupt the Mavericks' perimeter flow. When he actively crashed the glass and moved the ball, his true ceiling emerged. He put everything together on 04/01 vs UTA, posting 19 points, nine rebounds, and six assists to drive a commanding +17.0 impact.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Johnson's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 53% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Johnson locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -0.2, second-half: +3.4. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 49 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Smith Jr. 86.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 5
D. Avdija 54.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 15
D. DeRozan 53.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
J. Walker 50.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 4
R. Westbrook 40.5 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 9
Z. LaVine 40.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 14
K. Durant 38.5 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 7
J. Fears 38.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
C. Flagg 38.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4
N. Marshall 37.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 8

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Smith Jr. 109.7 poss
FG% 38.9%
3P% 55.6%
PPP 0.19
PTS 21
R. Westbrook 58.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.26
PTS 15
N. Marshall 55.1 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.13
PTS 7
A. Thompson 45.8 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 16
J. Walker 44.0 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 7
J. Kuminga 37.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
J. Champagnie 36.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
G. Jackson 33.7 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 13
T. Murphy III 33.6 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
W. Richard 33.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

60
Games
12.4
PPG
3.8
RPG
2.4
APG
0.8
SPG
0.4
BPG
48.2
FG%
41.6
3P%
82.2
FT%
30.6
MPG

GAME LOG

60 games played