Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
DEN lead MEM lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
MEM 2P — 3P —
DEN 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 172 attempts

MEM MEM Shot-making Δ

Jackson 6/12 +0.9
Jerome Hard 4/11 +1.0
Mashack 4/11 -3.6
Pippen Jr. Hard 3/10 -2.5
Wells 7/9 +5.8
Hendricks 4/8 +1.5
Caldwell-Pope Hard 2/8 -2.3
Spencer Hard 1/8 -5.0
Prosper 6/7 +5.8
Anderson 4/5 +2.9

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Murray Hard 7/18 -2.2
Jokić Open 8/17 -2.8
Strawther Hard 5/9 +2.2
Hardaway Jr. Hard 7/8 +10.4
Braun Open 6/8 +2.4
Johnson Hard 2/7 -2.1
Brown 4/6 +2.9
Valančiūnas 3/5 +0.7
Pickett Hard 1/3 +0.2
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MEM
DEN
42/91 Field Goals 43/81
46.2% Field Goal % 53.1%
15/39 3-Pointers 10/22
38.5% 3-Point % 45.5%
17/21 Free Throws 26/32
81.0% Free Throw % 81.2%
57.9% True Shooting % 64.2%
38 Total Rebounds 61
8 Offensive 9
21 Defensive 37
28 Assists 29
4.67 Assist/TO Ratio 1.93
6 Turnovers 14
12 Steals 2
5 Blocks 1
32 Fouls 19
50 Points in Paint 58
26 Fast Break Pts 10
22 Points off TOs 4
5 Second Chance Pts 20
42 Bench Points 43
4 Largest Lead 15
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
GG Jackson
21 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 28.2 MIN
+18.99
2
Tim Hardaway Jr.
21 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 27.8 MIN
+18.53
3
Ty Jerome
19 PTS · 1 REB · 7 AST · 21.0 MIN
+17.65
4
Jamal Murray
23 PTS · 6 REB · 7 AST · 33.1 MIN
+15.78
5
Olivier-Maxence Prosper
14 PTS · 5 REB · 0 AST · 23.0 MIN
+14.89
6
Jaylen Wells
17 PTS · 1 REB · 0 AST · 24.3 MIN
+13.54
7
Christian Braun
14 PTS · 7 REB · 6 AST · 39.1 MIN
+11.38
8
Nikola Jokić
26 PTS · 15 REB · 11 AST · 33.9 MIN
+10.71
9
Jahmai Mashack
9 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 21.8 MIN
+9.27
10
Julian Strawther
11 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 25.3 MIN
+8.94
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 TEAM offensive REBOUND 116–122
Q4 0:01 MISS G. Jackson tip Layup 116–122
Q4 0:02 G. Jackson REBOUND (Off:2 Def:3) 116–122
Q4 0:02 MISS S. Pippen Jr. 26' pullup 3PT 116–122
Q4 0:04 J. Murray Free Throw 2 of 2 (23 PTS) 116–122
Q4 0:04 J. Murray Free Throw 1 of 2 (22 PTS) 116–121
Q4 0:04 O. Prosper take personal FOUL (4 PF) (Murray 2 FT) 116–120
Q4 0:07 J. Murray REBOUND (Off:1 Def:5) 116–120
Q4 0:09 MISS L. Lovering Free Throw 2 of 2 116–120
Q4 0:09 L. Lovering Free Throw 1 of 2 (3 PTS) 116–120
Q4 0:09 N. Jokić take personal FOUL (2 PF) (Lovering 2 FT) 115–120
Q4 0:11 J. Murray Free Throw 2 of 2 (21 PTS) 115–120
Q4 0:11 J. Murray Free Throw 1 of 2 (20 PTS) 115–119
Q4 0:11 S. Pippen Jr. take personal FOUL (5 PF) (Murray 2 FT) 115–118
Q4 0:14 J. Murray REBOUND (Off:1 Def:4) 115–118

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DEN Denver Nuggets
S Christian Braun 39.1m
14
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
-1.4

Highly efficient finishing was undone by a failure to generate secondary defensive events or secure contested loose balls. Played heavy minutes but struggled to influence the game's momentum, allowing opponents to exploit his side of the floor in transition.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.8%
USG% 11.7%
Net Rtg +16.2
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.1m
Scoring +12.4
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.1
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 21.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Nikola Jokić 33.9m
26
pts
15
reb
11
ast
Impact
+13.3

Uncharacteristic turnovers and missed bunnies around the rim sapped the efficiency from an otherwise dominant statistical profile. Despite dictating the offensive geometry and offering solid rim protection (+3.6), the wasted possessions tilted his net impact slightly negative.

Shooting
FG 8/17 (47.1%)
3PT 0/0
FT 10/14 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 56.1%
USG% 37.2%
Net Rtg +12.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.9m
Scoring +18.0
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +15.2
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -21.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 9
S Jamal Murray 33.1m
23
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
+13.3

Poor shot selection and missed perimeter looks dragged down his scoring efficiency, but he compensated with relentless effort. A massive +5.7 hustle rating reflected his willingness to dive for loose balls and disrupt actions at the point of attack, keeping his overall impact highly positive.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.4%
USG% 29.3%
Net Rtg +1.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.1m
Scoring +15.7
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +5.7
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 55.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Cameron Johnson 28.8m
5
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.8

A drastic departure from his recent efficient scoring, as he struggled to find space against physical perimeter defense. The lack of offensive production left a gaping hole in the rotation, resulting in a team-worst -9.8 net impact.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 10.4%
Net Rtg -10.2
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense -2.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 83.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.4

Found his stroke after a brutal five-game slump, but defensive miscommunications and late rotations kept his overall impact in the red. While the scoring burst was a welcome sight, his inability to string together stops negated the offensive resurgence.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 16.1%
Net Rtg -18.0
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.3m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 83.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Bruce Brown 29.1m
10
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.2

Continued his streak of hyper-efficient situational scoring while wrecking havoc as a cutter. A phenomenal +4.8 hustle score highlighted his knack for backbreaking offensive rebounds and timely deflections that kept possessions alive.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 8.7%
Net Rtg +8.6
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.1m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
21
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+14.3

Caught fire from the perimeter to completely shatter his recent slump and stretch the opposing defense to its breaking point. The sheer gravity of his outside shooting created driving lanes for teammates, driving a massive +19.1 box impact.

Shooting
FG 7/8 (87.5%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 107.6%
USG% 14.9%
Net Rtg +22.8
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Scoring +19.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +5.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Bullied his way to high-percentage looks in the paint to maintain his recent streak of interior efficiency. Capitalized on drop coverage to punish smaller defenders, serving as a reliable release valve when the half-court offense bogged down.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.6%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.2m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +6.7
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.3

Provided steady point-of-attack defense (+2.3) during a brief stint on the floor. Managed the game well enough to avoid costly mistakes, though his limited offensive repertoire kept his overall impact neutral.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg +56.3
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.7m
Scoring +1.5
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
MEM Memphis Grizzlies
S GG Jackson 28.2m
21
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+11.7

Continued his recent surge with high-quality shot selection that maximized his offensive efficiency. His ability to consistently find gaps in the defense fueled a massive +17.2 box score impact, while active rotations on the other end solidified his two-way value.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 69.6%
USG% 23.5%
Net Rtg +7.2
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.2m
Scoring +15.6
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +3.4
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Jaylen Wells 24.3m
17
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+7.0

An aggressive offensive approach yielded a massive scoring spike that overwhelmed his defensive lapses. Capitalized on transition opportunities and loose balls to generate a +4.3 hustle score, proving to be a spark plug when the team needed an injection of pace.

Shooting
FG 7/9 (77.8%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 90.0%
USG% 17.3%
Net Rtg +14.9
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.3m
Scoring +15.6
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 64.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Jahmai Mashack 21.8m
9
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.5

Overcame a rough shooting night through relentless defensive pressure that drove a +5.1 defensive impact. His ability to disrupt passing lanes and generate hustle plays (+2.4) kept his overall value positive despite struggling to find a rhythm offensively.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.9%
USG% 22.0%
Net Rtg +9.9
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.8m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +3.8
Defense +3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
S Ty Jerome 21.0m
19
pts
1
reb
7
ast
Impact
+11.0

Compensated for a mediocre shooting night by relentlessly attacking the paint and drawing fouls to generate offense. His masterful orchestration of pick-and-roll coverages drove a stellar +15.9 box impact, allowing him to control the game's tempo despite missing several open looks.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 8/9 (88.9%)
Advanced
TS% 63.5%
USG% 36.6%
Net Rtg +11.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.0m
Scoring +13.3
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Kyle Anderson 18.5m
8
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.7

Broke out of a severe offensive slump by converting high-percentage looks around the basket. A tremendous +4.7 hustle rating highlighted his willingness to do the dirty work, completely flipping his recent trajectory to anchor the second unit.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg +12.5
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.5m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.7

Elite perimeter defense (+5.5) was completely overshadowed by an inability to convert open perimeter looks. Stalled the offense with clunky shot selection, leading to a negative overall impact despite his usual reliability in locking down his primary assignment.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 31.3%
USG% 13.1%
Net Rtg -16.5
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.2m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense +4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
14
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+10.3

Sustained his highly efficient finishing streak by punishing mismatches in the paint. His disciplined shot profile minimized empty possessions, allowing his offensive gravity to dictate the flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 12.7%
Net Rtg -35.3
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.0m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +5.4
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Cam Spencer 21.9m
2
pts
2
reb
9
ast
Impact
-8.4

Elite playmaking vision was entirely undermined by a disastrous shooting performance that allowed defenders to sag into the paint. The sheer volume of bricked jumpers negated a solid +3.3 defensive impact, as his inability to space the floor cratered his overall value.

Shooting
FG 1/8 (12.5%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 12.5%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -20.5
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring -2.6
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
10
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.7

Showed signs of life offensively compared to his recent slump, but defensive positioning errors and costly fouls dragged down his net impact. Failed to leverage his athleticism consistently, resulting in a performance that gave back too much on the margins.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg -11.9
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.9m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense -3.9
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
8
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-10.6

Errant decision-making and forced jumpers severely damaged his offensive rating. While he showed flashes of energy with a positive hustle score, the sheer volume of wasted possessions derailed any rhythm the second unit tried to establish.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 36.8%
USG% 27.1%
Net Rtg -23.8
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.7m
Scoring +2.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.0
Turnovers -6.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
3
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.1

Made his presence felt entirely through effort plays and rim deterrence during his limited minutes. A robust +3.5 hustle score reflected his commitment to setting hard screens and battling for positioning, keeping his impact marginally positive.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg -11.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.6m
Scoring +1.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +4.1
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1