SAC

2025-26 Season

ZACH LAVINE

Sacramento Kings | Guard | 6-5
Zach LaVine
19.2 PPG
2.8 RPG
2.3 APG
31.4 MPG
-2.1 Impact

LaVine produces at an below average rate for a 31-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-2.1
Scoring +12.7
Points 19.2 PPG × +1.00 = +19.2
Missed 2PT 3.3/g × -0.78 = -2.6
Missed 3PT 4.0/g × -0.87 = -3.5
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +2.0
Assists 2.3/g × +0.50 = +1.1
Off. Rebounds 0.7/g × +1.26 = +0.9
Turnovers -3.7
Turnovers 1.9/g × -1.95 = -3.7
Defense +0.6
Steals 0.7/g × +2.30 = +1.6
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 2.1/g × +0.30 = +0.6
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.8
Contested Shots 4.2/g × +0.20 = +0.8
Deflections 1.3/g × +0.65 = +0.8
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.2/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Raw Impact +13.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −15.5
Net Impact
-2.1
35th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 90th
19.2 PPG
Efficiency 84th
59.7% TS
Playmaking 41th
2.3 APG
Rebounding 48th
2.8 RPG
Rim Protection 16th
0.08/min
Hustle 4th
0.06/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 42th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Zach LaVine’s opening stretch of the 2025-26 campaign was defined by the maddening illusion of empty-calorie volume. He routinely filled the box score while actively hurting his team on the floor. On 10/26 vs LAL, LaVine poured in 32 points but still posted a -0.8 impact score because his isolation-heavy approach constantly stalled the offensive flow. He followed the exact same script on 11/28 vs UTA. A 34-point outburst masked a deeply flawed overall performance, ultimately yielding another negative net impact at -0.8. When the shots stopped falling entirely, his value completely cratered. Look no further than 11/26 vs PHX, where he managed just 13 points and generated a brutal -14.8 impact score by settling for deep, contested jumpers early in the shot clock. Instead of leveraging his elite athleticism to pressure the rim, the hidden costs of his erratic shot selection dragged down his team on a nightly basis.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. LaVine's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~9 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 64% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. LaVine consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -3.3, second-half: -0.9. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 39 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. McDaniels 70.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 14
J. Wells 67.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 80.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 22
C. Braun 55.1 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
M. Smart 53.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. DiVincenzo 47.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
C. Wallace 46.8 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.3
PTS 14
S. Mykhailiuk 41.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
A. Nembhard 40.9 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 10
A. Green 40.0 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 15
D. Booker 37.4 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.45
PTS 17

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. DiVincenzo 57.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.16
PTS 9
C. Braun 50.7 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 12
A. Edwards 49.3 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.47
PTS 23
M. Smart 43.0 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
A. Green 43.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.16
PTS 7
S. Mykhailiuk 42.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
C. Johnson 40.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 14
C. Coward 39.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
J. McDaniels 37.8 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
J. Wells 36.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

39
Games
19.2
PPG
2.8
RPG
2.3
APG
0.7
SPG
0.3
BPG
47.9
FG%
39.0
3P%
88.0
FT%
31.4
MPG

GAME LOG

39 games played