SAC

2025-26 Season

ZACH LAVINE

Sacramento Kings | Guard | 6-5
Zach LaVine
19.2PPG
2.8RPG
2.3APG
31.4MPG
+4.9 Impact

LaVine produces at an above average rate for a 31-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+4.9
Scoring +17.9
Points Scored 19.2 PPG = +19.2
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -5.5
Shot Making above expected FG% = +4.2
Creation +1.2
Assists & Self-Creation 2.3 AST/g + self-creation = +1.2
Turnovers -4.1
Turnovers 1.9/g (live + dead blend) = -4.1
Defense -0.3
Steals 0.7/g = +1.6
Blocks 0.3/g = +0.3
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.2
Hustle & Effort +1.1
Rebounds 2.8 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.7
Contested Shots 4.2/g = +0.8
Deflections 1.3/g = +0.8
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +15.8
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.9
Net Impact
+4.9
79th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 89th
19.2 PPG
Efficiency 88th
59.7% TS
Playmaking 42th
2.3 APG
Rebounding 48th
2.8 RPG
Defense 10th
+4.4/g
Hustle 8th
+4.1/g
Creation 78th
+3.85/g
Shot Making 90th
+9.85/g
TO Discipline 44th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Zach LaVine's early season was a jarring Jekyll-and-Hyde act, opening with a blistering scoring binge before violently collapsing into a passive, inefficient slump. He looked utterly unstoppable on 10/30 vs CHI, torching the net for 30 points on 12-for-19 shooting to generate a massive +24.1 Impact score through hyper-efficient shotmaking and relentless offensive aggression. However, the floor fell out from under him just days later on 11/04 vs DEN. Despite logging 37 minutes, he managed a meager 15 points on 4-for-11 shooting, earning a -10.4 Impact score because his stagnant perimeter play and poor shot selection crippled the offensive flow. The slump bottomed out entirely on 11/20 vs OKC. He sleepwalked to just 8 points while missing all four of his three-point attempts. His resulting -15.4 Impact score in that contest perfectly captured the hidden costs of his cold streaks; without his scoring punch, his lack of defensive resistance and playmaking actively dragged his team into the mud.

Wild, unpredictable volatility defined Zach LaVine's mid-season stretch, as he oscillated violently between brilliant shot-making and absolute offensive disappearance. When his jumper fell, he looked utterly unstoppable, peaking on 12/07 vs MIA with a spectacular 42-point eruption. He buried eight three-pointers in that contest, generating a massive +33.9 impact score by overwhelming Miami's perimeter defense with pure scoring gravity. Yet, that masterclass arrived just days after an abysmal outing on 12/04 vs HOU where he managed a meager two points in 19 minutes. He earned a brutal -10.8 impact mark against Houston because he offered zero playmaking or rebounding to offset his completely broken jumper. The coaching staff even briefly relegated him to the second unit on 01/05 vs MIL to stabilize his rhythm. The demotion worked beautifully, as he posted a +11.4 impact off the bench by taking smarter shots and distributing four assists rather than forcing heavily contested looks.

This midseason stretch for Zach LaVine was defined by maddening inconsistency and a sudden, brief demotion to the second unit. The frustration peaked on 01/29 vs PHI, where he was relegated to the bench and posted a -3.7 impact score because his 17 points required a dismal 16 field goal attempts. He offered virtually zero playmaking or rebounding during that slump, leaving his overall value entirely dependent on whether his jumper was falling. You could see this glaring limitation a few nights earlier on 01/24 vs CLE. He managed just 10 points while recording zero rebounds and zero assists, dragging his night to an ugly -5.0 impact. Yet, just when you write him off as a one-dimensional liability, he erupts. He took over on 02/01 vs WAS, pouring in 35 points and grabbing six rebounds to generate a massive +25.0 impact score. In that matchup, his sheer scoring volume and aggressive shot creation completely overwhelmed the opponent, reminding everyone why teams still tolerate his empty-calorie nights.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Volatile for his role. LaVine has noticeable ups and downs, with scoring moving ~9 points between games.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 64% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. LaVine doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 6 games. Longest cold streak: 2 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 39 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. McDaniels 70.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 14
J. Wells 67.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 80.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 22
C. Braun 55.1 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 6
M. Smart 53.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. DiVincenzo 47.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.11
PTS 5
C. Wallace 46.8 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.3
PTS 14
S. Mykhailiuk 41.9 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
A. Nembhard 40.9 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 10
A. Green 40.0 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 15
D. Booker 37.4 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.45
PTS 17

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. DiVincenzo 57.2 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.16
PTS 9
C. Braun 50.7 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 12
A. Edwards 49.3 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.47
PTS 23
M. Smart 43.0 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
A. Green 43.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.16
PTS 7
S. Mykhailiuk 42.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
C. Johnson 40.4 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.35
PTS 14
C. Coward 39.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
J. McDaniels 37.8 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
J. Wells 36.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

39
Games
19.2
PPG
2.8
RPG
2.3
APG
0.7
SPG
0.3
BPG
47.9
FG%
39.0
3P%
88.0
FT%
31.4
MPG

GAME LOG

39 games played