Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
LAL lead DEN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
DEN 2P — 3P —
LAL 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 188 attempts

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Jokić 10/19 +1.1
Gordon Hard 9/16 +6.6
Murray Hard 1/14 -10.1
Hardaway Jr. Hard 6/13 +2.8
Johnson Hard 6/13 +1.9
Braun Open 5/9 -0.7
Brown 4/6 +3.4
Jones 2/4 +0.5
Valančiūnas Open 1/1 +0.6

LAL LAL Shot-making Δ

Dončić Hard 10/26 -0.2
Reaves Hard 12/21 +6.7
Smart Hard 8/15 +5.7
James 7/13 +2.1
Hachimura Hard 3/6 +0.4
Ayton Open 4/6 +0.3
LaRavia 2/2 +2.0
Kennard Hard 1/2 +0.8
Hayes Open 1/2 -0.3
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DEN
LAL
44/95 Field Goals 48/93
46.3% Field Goal % 51.6%
19/49 3-Pointers 14/42
38.8% 3-Point % 33.3%
18/22 Free Throws 17/26
81.8% Free Throw % 65.4%
59.7% True Shooting % 60.8%
52 Total Rebounds 59
7 Offensive 7
34 Defensive 39
33 Assists 31
2.06 Assist/TO Ratio 1.82
15 Turnovers 16
13 Steals 10
5 Blocks 6
22 Fouls 20
44 Points in Paint 56
25 Fast Break Pts 15
17 Points off TOs 33
7 Second Chance Pts 13
39 Bench Points 18
8 Largest Lead 17
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Nikola Jokić
24 PTS · 16 REB · 14 AST · 43.0 MIN
+33.41
2
Marcus Smart
21 PTS · 3 REB · 2 AST · 35.3 MIN
+28.65
3
Austin Reaves
32 PTS · 7 REB · 6 AST · 45.5 MIN
+24.66
4
Aaron Gordon
27 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 34.8 MIN
+17.69
5
Tim Hardaway Jr.
20 PTS · 1 REB · 3 AST · 28.5 MIN
+17.67
6
Bruce Brown
12 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 19.7 MIN
+15.74
7
Luka Dončić
30 PTS · 11 REB · 13 AST · 43.0 MIN
+14.41
8
Cameron Johnson
18 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 43.0 MIN
+10.22
9
LeBron James
17 PTS · 6 REB · 5 AST · 40.2 MIN
+8.77
10
Christian Braun
12 PTS · 1 REB · 3 AST · 33.2 MIN
+8.58
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q5 0:00 TEAM offensive REBOUND 125–127
Q5 0:00 L. Dončić BLOCK (3 BLK) 125–127
Q5 0:00 MISS T. Hardaway Jr. 28' 3PT - blocked 125–127
Q5 0:00 L. Dončić 17' step back Jump Shot (30 PTS) 125–127
Q5 0:15 N. Jokić driving Layup (24 PTS) 125–125
Q5 0:23 TEAM offensive REBOUND 123–125
Q5 0:23 D. Ayton BLOCK (1 BLK) 123–125
Q5 0:23 MISS N. Jokić driving Hook - blocked 123–125
Q5 0:30 M. Smart 25' 3PT (21 PTS) (L. Dončić 13 AST) 123–125
Q5 0:47 A. Gordon 26' 3PT step back (27 PTS) 123–122
Q5 0:57 D. Ayton personal FOUL (3 PF) 120–122
Q5 1:12 D. Ayton Hook (9 PTS) (L. James 5 AST) 120–122
Q5 1:28 D. Ayton REBOUND (Off:4 Def:5) 120–120
Q5 1:28 MISS N. Jokić 11' pullup Shot 120–120
Q5 1:45 C. Braun REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 120–120

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

LAL Los Angeles Lakers
S Austin Reaves 45.5m
32
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+19.7

Carried the offensive load with a massive scoring spike fueled by aggressive, high-quality shot selection. His constant motion and hustle (+6.2) kept the defense scrambling, translating heavy minutes into a highly positive net result.

Shooting
FG 12/21 (57.1%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 67.7%
USG% 25.5%
Net Rtg +9.9
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 45.5m
Scoring +25.2
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +7.2
Hustle +6.0
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S Luka Dončić 43.0m
30
pts
11
reb
13
ast
Impact
+7.3

High-volume inefficiency from beyond the arc created empty possessions that slightly outweighed his elite playmaking. Even with strong defensive metrics (+9.1), the sheer number of missed perimeter looks dragged his massive workload into the red.

Shooting
FG 10/26 (38.5%)
3PT 4/14 (28.6%)
FT 6/9 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 50.1%
USG% 34.3%
Net Rtg -1.8
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.0m
Scoring +17.6
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +7.2
Hustle +3.3
Defense +2.0
Turnovers -14.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 23
FGM Against 12
Opp FG% 52.2%
STL 1
BLK 3
TO 6
S LeBron James 40.2m
17
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
-2.4

Despite solid defensive metrics (+5.7) and efficient shot selection, hidden costs like live-ball turnovers or poor transition recovery cratered his overall rating (-8.7). The steady baseline production masked underlying structural breakdowns during his heavy minutes.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 59.4%
USG% 19.8%
Net Rtg +8.4
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.2m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +1.8
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 5
S Marcus Smart 35.3m
21
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+20.6

Completely dictated the terms of engagement with elite point-of-attack defense (+12.8) and relentless hustle (+7.2). A massive, unexpected perimeter scoring surge amplified his disruptive energy, resulting in a game-high +18.9 net impact.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 5/12 (41.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 17.9%
Net Rtg +21.6
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.3m
Scoring +15.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +2.8
Defense +9.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 5
BLK 1
TO 0
S Deandre Ayton 27.1m
9
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.3

Maintained his highly efficient interior finishing but lacked the necessary volume to impose his will on the paint. A slight dip in defensive anchoring allowed opponents to exploit the middle, dragging his overall impact slightly into the negative.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/4 (25.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.0%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg +7.4
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring +6.1
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +9.5
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
6
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.4

A lack of defensive resistance (+0.3) and minimal hustle plays severely limited his effectiveness on the wing. While his interior looks were efficient, his inability to stretch the floor or disrupt opponents drove a steep -7.6 overall rating.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 9.5%
Net Rtg -18.6
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Scoring +3.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +2.2
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jaxson Hayes 20.8m
5
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.0

Saw his usual offensive involvement plummet, taking away the vertical spacing he typically provides. Without that rim pressure, his moderate defensive contributions weren't enough to keep his net impact above water.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 66.5%
USG% 8.5%
Net Rtg +0.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.8m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Luke Kennard 16.0m
3
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.0

Faded into the background offensively, attempting too few shots to provide his usual spacing value. The passive approach combined with negligible defensive impact to produce a negative stint off the bench.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 5.1%
Net Rtg -26.5
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.0m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 27.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Jake LaRavia 11.7m
4
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.9

Made the most of a brief rotation spot by taking only high-percentage looks. Provided just enough connective tissue on both ends to scrape out a marginally positive impact score.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 8.0%
Net Rtg +17.8
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.7m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DEN Denver Nuggets
S Cameron Johnson 43.0m
18
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+1.0

Despite solid hustle metrics (+5.4) and capable floor spacing, his overall impact slipped into the negative (-2.8) due to hidden costs like defensive rotations or live-ball turnovers. The perimeter volume was there, but he struggled to translate those heavy minutes into a net-positive team advantage.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.8%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg +10.3
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.0m
Scoring +12.4
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Nikola Jokić 43.0m
24
pts
16
reb
14
ast
Impact
+33.5

Dominated the game's flow through sheer defensive positioning (+16.1) and elite offensive orchestration. His ability to control the glass and generate high-value looks for teammates resulted in a staggering +16.7 net impact that dictated the entire matchup.

Shooting
FG 10/19 (52.6%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.4%
USG% 22.3%
Net Rtg +2.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.0m
Scoring +17.5
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +16.4
Defense +9.2
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 31.6%
STL 5
BLK 1
TO 4
S Jamal Murray 36.0m
5
pts
6
reb
6
ast
Impact
-9.0

A catastrophic shooting slump completely tanked his value, resulting in a brutal -19.8 net rating. The massive drop-off from his usual elite scoring production created empty possessions that his moderate defensive effort couldn't begin to offset.

Shooting
FG 1/14 (7.1%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 16.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -16.8
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.0m
Scoring -4.8
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +7.6
Defense +0.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 83.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
S Aaron Gordon 34.8m
27
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+14.7

An unexpected perimeter explosion fueled a massive offensive surge, doubling his usual scoring output to anchor the frontcourt. His defensive versatility (+5.6) paired perfectly with this aggressive shot-making to drive a highly positive overall impact.

Shooting
FG 9/16 (56.2%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 4/7 (57.1%)
Advanced
TS% 70.8%
USG% 26.8%
Net Rtg -7.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +20.0
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +6.7
Hustle +6.3
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 3
S Christian Braun 33.2m
12
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.5

Efficient finishing around the rim couldn't salvage a negative overall rating (-4.0) driven by off-ball lapses. He provided decent energy on the margins, but likely gave back value through poor spacing or defensive breakdowns in transition.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.7%
USG% 14.5%
Net Rtg -6.9
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.2m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
20
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+10.2

Capitalized on a hot perimeter streak to nearly double his typical scoring average and stretch the opposing defense. This aggressive shot selection paid off, combining with surprisingly stout defensive metrics to yield a strong positive impact.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.8%
USG% 22.9%
Net Rtg -0.5
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.6m
Scoring +14.6
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.4

Flashed some opportunistic scoring above his usual baseline, but struggled to hold up on the defensive end (+0.2). The lack of resistance on the perimeter ultimately dragged his overall net impact into the red.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 7.4%
Net Rtg +2.7
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.4m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Bruce Brown 19.7m
12
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+5.1

Continued a highly efficient offensive streak by punishing defensive rotations with timely cuts. His stout point-of-attack defense (+5.7) maximized his limited minutes, driving a stellar +7.4 overall rating.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.2%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg -4.8
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.7m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-16.4

Barely saw the floor in a highly limited stint that prevented him from establishing any interior rhythm. The abbreviated run resulted in a negative impact score, reflecting an inability to influence the game's physical tone.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 42.9%
Net Rtg -126.7
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.2m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2