Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
MIN lead DEN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click a shooter to isolate their shots on the court
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 176 attempts

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Murray 10/25 -5.4
Jokić 8/22 -6.9
Gordon Hard 4/11 -2.4
Hardaway Jr. 3/10 -5.8
Brown 3/7 -1.6
Johnson 3/6 +0.3
Braun 2/4 +0.6
Jones Hard 0/2 -2.2

MIN MIN Shot-making Δ

Dosunmu 13/17 +12.9
Randle 6/16 -5.1
Reid 7/13 -0.5
McDaniels 4/11 -3.2
Hyland 3/9 -3.5
Edwards Hard 1/8 -4.9
Gobert Open 2/8 -6.9
Conley Hard 2/4 +1.2
Shannon Jr. Hard 1/1 +1.9
Anderson Hard 0/1 -0.8
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DEN
MIN
33/87 Field Goals 39/89
37.9% Field Goal % 43.8%
6/28 3-Pointers 9/25
21.4% 3-Point % 36.0%
24/28 Free Throws 25/26
85.7% Free Throw % 96.2%
48.3% True Shooting % 55.8%
51 Total Rebounds 60
12 Offensive 16
26 Defensive 34
21 Assists 22
2.10 Assist/TO Ratio 1.83
10 Turnovers 12
7 Steals 6
7 Blocks 5
22 Fouls 22
42 Points in Paint 54
15 Fast Break Pts 8
16 Points off TOs 15
12 Second Chance Pts 11
16 Bench Points 76
7 Largest Lead 16
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Ayo Dosunmu
43 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 42.0 MIN
+39.44
2
Nikola Jokić
24 PTS · 15 REB · 9 AST · 40.6 MIN
+24.32
3
Jamal Murray
30 PTS · 5 REB · 5 AST · 42.0 MIN
+17.59
4
Naz Reid
17 PTS · 9 REB · 2 AST · 27.8 MIN
+16.33
5
Rudy Gobert
4 PTS · 15 REB · 2 AST · 35.6 MIN
+10.53
6
Bones Hyland
8 PTS · 1 REB · 7 AST · 19.6 MIN
+8.2
7
Tim Hardaway Jr.
10 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 27.7 MIN
+8.2
8
Jaden McDaniels
12 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 33.0 MIN
+7.43
9
Mike Conley
5 PTS · 1 REB · 4 AST · 20.5 MIN
+5.29
10
Christian Braun
8 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 33.7 MIN
+4.48
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 TEAM offensive REBOUND 96–112
Q4 0:01 DEN Heave 96–112
Q4 0:01 Ejection J. Randle 96–112
Q4 0:01 Ejection N. Jokić 96–112
Q4 0:01 J. Randle double technical FOUL (1 Tech) 96–112
Q4 0:01 N. Jokić double technical FOUL (1 Tech) 96–112
Q4 0:02 J. McDaniels Layup (12 PTS) (M. Conley 4 AST) 96–112
Q4 0:08 M. Conley REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 96–110
Q4 0:10 MISS J. Murray 26' step back 3PT 96–110
Q4 0:17 A. Dosunmu Free Throw 2 of 2 (43 PTS) 96–110
Q4 0:17 A. Dosunmu Free Throw 1 of 2 (42 PTS) 96–109
Q4 0:17 S. Jones take personal FOUL (3 PF) (Dosunmu 2 FT) 96–108
Q4 0:27 N. Jokić Free Throw 2 of 2 (24 PTS) 96–108
Q4 0:27 N. Jokić Free Throw 1 of 2 (23 PTS) 95–108
Q4 0:27 R. Gobert personal FOUL (2 PF) (Jokić 2 FT) 94–108

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Rudy Gobert 35.6m
4
pts
15
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.1

Gobert was an absolute terror on the interior, contesting a massive 13 shots and racking up 4 deflections to drive a +7.9 defensive credit. His offensive touch was nonexistent (4 points on 2-of-8 shooting), but he generated a +5.2 hustle credit through 7 screen assists and relentless glass-cleaning (15 rebounds). He embraced his role as a defensive anchor, forcing opponents to shoot just 42 percent on a staggering 26 attempts against him.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 25.0%
USG% 11.6%
Net Rtg +6.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.6m
Scoring -1.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +18.1
Defense +4.8
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 26
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 42.3%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 2
S Jaden McDaniels 33.0m
12
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.9

McDaniels leveraged his length to suffocate opponents on the perimeter, holding his matchups to a dismal 6-of-16 shooting mark. While his jumper remained erratic (4-of-11 from the field), he salvaged a +10.0 offensive credit by attacking the glass for 8 rebounds (well above his 4.4 average) and hitting all four of his free throws. His 7 shot contests provided steady resistance, even if his overall defensive credit dipped slightly below zero.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +24.3
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.0m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +10.2
Defense -3.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Julius Randle 32.1m
15
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.1

Randle's offensive flow was derailed by inefficient volume (6-of-16 shooting) and 4 turnovers, dragging his offensive credit down to a meager +3.0. He compensated by locking in defensively, smothering his primary matchups to a 38 percent shooting clip and contesting 6 shots. His 9 rebounds (above his 6.2 average) helped secure possessions, even as his playmaking and scoring faltered.

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.2%
USG% 30.1%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.1m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +7.5
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 38.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
S Anthony Edwards 17.6m
5
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.0

Edwards endured a brutal offensive outing, managing just 5 points on 1-of-8 shooting to post a negative offensive credit (-0.2). He failed to record a single assist, completely stalling out as a creator during his 17 minutes of action. His only silver lining came on defense, where he quietly held his matchups to 1-of-3 shooting.

Shooting
FG 1/8 (12.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 28.2%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -9.1
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.6m
Scoring -0.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.8

DiVincenzo barely broke a sweat, logging just over a minute of action before exiting. He managed to record a single assist and one shot contest, resulting in negligible component credits across the board.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +166.7
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.3m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Ayo Dosunmu 42.0m
43
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+40.3

Dosunmu delivered an absolute offensive masterclass, erupting for 43 points on a flawless 5-of-5 from deep and 12-of-12 from the line to generate a staggering +43.6 offensive credit. He paired this nuclear scoring efficiency with relentless two-way energy, logging 10 shot contests and 2 loose-ball recoveries for a +4.5 hustle credit. His defensive execution was equally brilliant, suffocating his matchups to a 33 percent shooting clip on 15 attempts.

Shooting
FG 13/17 (76.5%)
3PT 5/5 (100.0%)
FT 12/12 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 96.5%
USG% 22.9%
Net Rtg +13.3
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.0m
Scoring +40.2
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +9.0
Hustle +5.1
Defense -3.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Naz Reid 27.8m
17
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
+9.6

Reid provided a massive offensive spark off the bench, pouring in 17 points on efficient 7-of-13 shooting to drive a +13.3 offensive credit. He dominated the glass with 9 rebounds (well above his 6.0 average) and added a +3.9 defensive credit by holding opponents to 3-of-7 shooting. His aggressive interior play more than made up for a cold 1-of-5 night from beyond the arc.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.2%
USG% 21.9%
Net Rtg +21.7
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Scoring +12.5
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +9.5
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
Mike Conley 20.5m
5
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-6.8

Conley operated as a low-usage game manager, posting a modest +3.4 offensive credit by handing out 4 assists and hitting half of his four shots. He flashed quick hands defensively with 2 steals and 2 deflections, fueling a +2.2 defensive credit. However, his on-ball resistance was lacking, as opponents shot a comfortable 57 percent against him.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 9.6%
Net Rtg +21.8
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.5m
Scoring +3.7
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Bones Hyland 19.6m
8
pts
1
reb
7
ast
Impact
-2.0

Hyland's perimeter jumper completely abandoned him (0-of-5 from deep), but he salvaged a +6.8 offensive credit by pivoting into a pure distribution role with 7 assists. He was surprisingly disruptive on the other end, logging 3 deflections and clamping his matchups to 2-of-7 shooting. His +2.5 defensive credit highlights a rare two-way effort on a night where his scoring touch was absent.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.5%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +23.1
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.7

Shannon made the most of his limited seven minutes, drilling his only three-point attempt to secure a +3.0 offensive credit. He offered virtually nothing else across the box score, finishing without a rebound or assist. His defensive impact was negligible, registering a single shot contest before heading back to the bench.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 150.0%
USG% 6.7%
Net Rtg +44.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.2m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.6

Anderson was effectively a ghost during his brief three-minute stint, failing to record a single point, rebound, or assist. His lone field goal attempt missed, resulting in a slightly negative offensive credit (-0.8) in a purely ceremonial appearance.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg +92.9
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.3m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DEN Denver Nuggets
S Jamal Murray 42.0m
30
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+11.7

Murray shouldered a massive scoring burden, pouring in 30 points to generate a stellar +19.6 offensive credit despite needing 25 shots to get there. His flawless 7-of-7 trip to the foul line salvaged his overall efficiency on a night where his playmaking took a slight backseat (5 assists vs 7.1 average). Defensively, he held his own, limiting opponents to 5-of-11 shooting as the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 10/25 (40.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 53.4%
USG% 31.3%
Net Rtg -16.7
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.0m
Scoring +18.2
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +5.9
Hustle +4.4
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Nikola Jokić 40.6m
24
pts
15
reb
9
ast
Impact
+23.8

Jokić dominated the game's flow despite an uncharacteristically poor 8-of-22 shooting night, driving a massive +19.0 offensive credit through elite playmaking (9 assists) and foul-drawing (8-of-8 FTs). His defensive engagement was superb, generating 5 deflections and 3 steals (above his 1.3 average) to fuel a +9.2 defensive credit. He anchored the glass with 15 rebounds and stifled opponents to 43 percent shooting as the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 8/22 (36.4%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.0%
USG% 30.3%
Net Rtg -17.8
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.6m
Scoring +14.0
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +19.1
Defense +5.1
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 23
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 43.5%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 4
S Christian Braun 33.7m
8
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.9

Braun's low-usage offensive night (8 points on just four attempts) kept his offensive credit at a modest +3.8. He made his mark through sheer activity, racking up 4 deflections and 3 screen assists to drive a solid +3.6 hustle credit. However, his on-ball defense faltered, as matchups shot a blistering 55 percent when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 9.9%
Net Rtg -17.2
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.7m
Scoring +5.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +1.5
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Cameron Johnson 26.6m
9
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.6

Johnson struggled to find his typical scoring volume, managing just 9 points on six shot attempts as his recent perimeter slump continued. His +3.8 offensive credit reflects efficient conversion when he did shoot (3-of-6), but his lack of aggression limited his overall footprint. Defensively, he offered little resistance, allowing his matchups to shoot 50 percent when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg -26.2
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.6m
Scoring +5.9
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +2.5
Defense +2.0
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Aaron Gordon 23.2m
9
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.1

Gordon's offensive utility cratered due to a frigid 1-of-5 showing from beyond the arc, continuing a troubling recent perimeter slump. While his 7 contests provided some interior resistance, his defensive credit (+0.6) remained muted as opponents converted 8-of-17 shots against him. He failed to register a single assist or secure his usual rebounding volume, rendering him largely ineffective.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.9%
USG% 22.9%
Net Rtg -15.6
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring +3.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 47.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
10
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.8

A brutal 0-of-6 showing from beyond the arc defined Hardaway's offensive struggles, though he salvaged a +7.6 offensive credit by attacking the rim and hitting 4-of-5 free throws. He surprisingly made his biggest impact on the other end, holding his matchups to a stifling 36 percent shooting clip. His 5 rebounds (above his 2.9 average) added a rare layer of utility to an otherwise cold shooting night.

Shooting
FG 3/10 (30.0%)
3PT 0/6 (0.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.0%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.7m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +4.4
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.2

Jones was a complete non-factor offensively, failing to score while attempting just two shots in 25 minutes. However, his defensive footprint was undeniable, as he logged 3 deflections, 2 blocks, and held opponents to a suffocating 2-of-8 shooting mark to drive a +4.2 defensive credit. His +3.0 hustle credit reflects a player who found ways to contribute without ever looking at the rim.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 3.3%
Net Rtg -21.8
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.4m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +5.1
Defense +2.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
Bruce Brown 20.7m
6
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.2

Brown's offensive impact was muted by a passive 6-point outing, yielding a quiet +4.0 offensive credit. He was highly effective in isolation defense, clamping his matchups to a 29 percent shooting clip (2-of-7). Despite the strong individual coverage, his overall defensive credit (-1.0) suffered due to a lack of rebounding and weak-side rim protection.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 13.2%
Net Rtg -35.0
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.7m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.0

Holmes logged just a single second of garbage-time action, failing to record any box score statistics. His zeroed-out component credits reflect a purely ceremonial appearance.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.0

Pickett stepped on the floor for a single second of game time, leaving no statistical footprint. He generated zero impact across all component categories during his fleeting cameo.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0