Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
DEN lead MIN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click a shooter to isolate their shots on the court
MIN 2P — 3P —
DEN 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 164 attempts

MIN MIN Shot-making Δ

Randle 8/15 +2.2
Dosunmu 7/14 +2.8
Reid Hard 5/11 +1.2
McDaniels 5/11 -1.0
Shannon Jr. Hard 6/10 +3.9
Hyland Hard 5/9 +4.3
Conley 2/4 +0.3
Anderson 2/4 -0.3
Gobert Open 1/2 -0.6
Clark Open 0/1 -1.4

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Murray 9/23 -2.1
Jokić 9/15 +3.1
Johnson 8/13 +4.2
Jones 7/9 +6.9
Brown 3/7 -2.3
Hardaway Jr. 3/5 +1.4
Braun Open 3/5 +0.6
Valančiūnas 4/4 +3.7
Jones Open 1/2 -0.2
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MIN
DEN
41/81 Field Goals 47/83
50.6% Field Goal % 56.6%
12/28 3-Pointers 11/29
42.9% 3-Point % 37.9%
19/23 Free Throws 20/25
82.6% Free Throw % 80.0%
62.0% True Shooting % 66.5%
48 Total Rebounds 38
9 Offensive 5
29 Defensive 24
26 Assists 35
1.04 Assist/TO Ratio 2.19
25 Turnovers 16
6 Steals 16
2 Blocks 6
27 Fouls 29
50 Points in Paint 62
13 Fast Break Pts 23
21 Points off TOs 35
19 Second Chance Pts 12
48 Bench Points 27
3 Largest Lead 27
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Nikola Jokić
27 PTS · 12 REB · 16 AST · 37.5 MIN
+24.58
2
Cameron Johnson
18 PTS · 6 REB · 5 AST · 35.7 MIN
+24.06
3
Spencer Jones
20 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 36.9 MIN
+23.64
4
Jamal Murray
24 PTS · 4 REB · 7 AST · 38.9 MIN
+18.44
5
Julius Randle
27 PTS · 9 REB · 6 AST · 32.1 MIN
+16.72
6
Ayo Dosunmu
18 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 38.1 MIN
+12.35
7
Christian Braun
9 PTS · 2 REB · 3 AST · 30.9 MIN
+11.39
8
Terrence Shannon Jr.
15 PTS · 1 REB · 0 AST · 13.9 MIN
+9.28
9
Bones Hyland
15 PTS · 1 REB · 1 AST · 23.2 MIN
+8.97
10
Rudy Gobert
3 PTS · 7 REB · 2 AST · 29.3 MIN
+7.43
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:11 N. Jokić REBOUND (Off:0 Def:12) 113–125
Q4 0:14 MISS T. Shannon Jr. running finger roll Layup 113–125
Q4 0:20 J. Beringer STEAL (1 STL) 113–125
Q4 0:20 N. Jokić lost ball TURNOVER (3 TO) 113–125
Q4 0:44 T. Shannon Jr. 17' step back Jump Shot (15 PTS) 113–125
Q4 0:54 N. Jokić 8' floating Jump Shot (27 PTS) (C. Johnson 5 AST) 111–125
Q4 1:15 C. Braun STEAL (3 STL) 111–123
Q4 1:15 J. Beringer lost ball TURNOVER (1 TO) 111–123
Q4 1:31 T. Shannon Jr. REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 111–123
Q4 1:34 MISS C. Johnson 27' 3PT 111–123
Q4 1:45 J. Beringer Free Throw 2 of 2 (2 PTS) 111–123
Q4 1:45 J. Beringer Free Throw 1 of 2 (1 PTS) 110–123
Q4 1:45 N. Jokić shooting personal FOUL (4 PF) (Beringer 2 FT) 109–123
Q4 1:53 C. Johnson driving DUNK (18 PTS) (N. Jokić 16 AST) 109–123
Q4 2:04 T. Shannon Jr. Free Throw 1 of 1 (13 PTS) 109–121

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DEN Denver Nuggets
S Jamal Murray 38.9m
24
pts
4
reb
7
ast
Impact
+15.1

Despite struggling with his shooting efficiency (9-of-23 from the floor), his relentless defensive activity salvaged his night. He generated a massive +9.2 Defense credit by swiping 4 steals (well above his 0.5 average) and racking up 4 deflections.

Shooting
FG 9/23 (39.1%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.5%
USG% 31.5%
Net Rtg +10.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.9m
Scoring +14.8
Creation +3.0
Shot Making +4.9
Hustle +4.1
Defense +7.6
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 47.4%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 4
S Nikola Jokić 37.5m
27
pts
12
reb
16
ast
Impact
+11.8

Complete offensive orchestration was on full display as he racked up 16 assists and 27 points, driving a monstrous +25.9 Offense credit. He also anchored the defense effectively (+6.4 Defense credit), holding opponents to 4-of-9 shooting while swatting two shots.

Shooting
FG 9/15 (60.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.6%
USG% 25.3%
Net Rtg +22.2
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Scoring +21.7
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +3.6
Defense -2.4
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 3
S Spencer Jones 36.9m
20
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+17.7

An absolute offensive eruption defined his night, as he torched the nets for 20 points (shattering his 4.1 average) on 4-of-5 from deep to earn a +17.9 Offense credit. He matched that scoring with elite rim-protection and event creation, racking up 3 steals and 3 blocks to anchor a +7.5 Defense score.

Shooting
FG 7/9 (77.8%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 101.2%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +16.9
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.9m
Scoring +18.2
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +0.9
Defense +4.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 58.8%
STL 3
BLK 3
TO 1
S Cameron Johnson 35.7m
18
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
+20.2

A hyper-active two-way performance was highlighted by an incredible 7 deflections, driving massive Hustle (+8.4) and Defense (+8.3) credits. He paired this disruptive energy with an efficient 18-point offensive showing (+17.0 Offense credit) on 8-of-13 shooting.

Shooting
FG 8/13 (61.5%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 69.2%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg +31.2
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.7m
Scoring +14.0
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +4.7
Defense +6.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S Christian Braun 30.9m
9
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.3

While his scoring volume dipped below his season average, he made his mark as a disruptive defensive presence with 3 steals. This point-of-attack pressure limited his matchups to 2-of-5 shooting and fueled a solid +4.5 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 76.5%
USG% 9.9%
Net Rtg +28.9
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.9m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
Bruce Brown 20.4m
7
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.5

Careless decision-making plagued his offensive stint, as 3 turnovers dragged his Offense credit into the negative (-2.1). He redeemed himself on the other end, utilizing his physicality to hold opponents to a stifling 1-of-5 shooting mark.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg +2.5
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.4m
Scoring +3.4
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
Tyus Jones 13.7m
3
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.8

He managed the game quietly during his 13 minutes, dishing out 2 assists without committing a single turnover to earn a +2.7 Offense credit. Defensively, he struggled to contain his assignments, allowing them to shoot 60% from the floor.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 9.4%
Net Rtg -20.2
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.7m
Scoring +1.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.5

Operating purely as a spot-up threat, he delivered a tidy 8 points on 3-of-5 shooting to generate a +6.5 Offense credit. However, his complete lack of peripheral stats (zero rebounds or assists) limited his overall influence on the game.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.5%
USG% 17.2%
Net Rtg +1.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.6m
Scoring +6.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.9

Perfect execution around the basket (4-of-4 shooting) drove a solid +4.3 Offense credit in just 10 minutes of action. However, his impact was severely blunted by poor ball security (3 turnovers) and an unusually quiet night on the glass (2 rebounds).

Shooting
FG 4/4 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 92.2%
USG% 30.8%
Net Rtg -31.2
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.5m
Scoring +8.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +2.5
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -7.3
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-9.6

He was a complete ghost during his brief four minutes of action, failing to record a single point, rebound, or assist. His only noticeable involvement was allowing his lone defensive matchup to score, resulting in a -0.8 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -60.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.9m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Ayo Dosunmu 38.1m
18
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+5.8

Reliable perimeter shot-making (3-of-5 from deep) drove a highly effective offensive performance (+11.9 Offense credit). He paired that scoring punch with sturdy point-of-attack defense, holding his primary assignments to a frigid 4-of-11 from the floor.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.3%
USG% 17.0%
Net Rtg -20.7
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.1m
Scoring +13.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +2.8
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Julius Randle 32.1m
27
pts
9
reb
6
ast
Impact
+17.1

A dominant offensive showing (+18.8 Offense credit) was fueled by his aggressive downhill attacking, yielding 27 points on efficient 8-of-15 shooting and 11 free throw attempts. However, his defensive resistance was nearly non-existent, allowing his primary matchups to torch him for 7-of-9 shooting.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 9/11 (81.8%)
Advanced
TS% 68.0%
USG% 32.5%
Net Rtg -25.3
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.1m
Scoring +21.1
Creation +3.2
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +9.5
Defense +1.2
Turnovers -12.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 77.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
S Rudy Gobert 29.3m
3
pts
7
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.3

Despite a remarkably quiet scoring night (3 points on just two attempts), he still managed to dictate the game's physicality. High-end activity metrics like 5 deflections and 7 screen assists translated into strong Hustle (+4.7) and Defense (+6.7) credits.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 4.0%
Net Rtg -41.9
+/- -25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.3m
Scoring +2.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +6.0
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Jaden McDaniels 27.2m
13
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-9.7

Careless ball security undermined his offensive value, as he coughed up 4 turnovers (avg 1.6) while failing to connect from deep (0-of-3). His defensive impact (-0.4 Defense credit) was similarly muted, allowing opponents to shoot 50% when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.2%
USG% 25.8%
Net Rtg -47.7
+/- -25
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +7.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +2.8
Defense -3.2
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Mike Conley 16.9m
4
pts
1
reb
4
ast
Impact
-7.5

Operating in a limited 17-minute role, the veteran point guard played a controlled, low-usage game. He stifled his matchups defensively (opponents shot just 1-of-5) while managing the offense cleanly with 4 assists to a single turnover.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.8%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.9m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Naz Reid 24.1m
12
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.2

Solid work on the glass (8 rebounds) helped anchor his stint, but offensive friction limited his overall effectiveness. Three turnovers stunted his rhythm, resulting in a modest +3.2 Offense credit despite shooting a respectable 5-of-11 from the floor.

Shooting
FG 5/11 (45.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.5%
USG% 23.3%
Net Rtg +5.5
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.1m
Scoring +7.6
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +7.2
Defense -6.2
Turnovers -5.9
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
Bones Hyland 23.2m
15
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.1

His instant-offense reputation held true as he poured in 15 points on 5-of-9 shooting, translating to a +7.9 Offense credit. However, that scoring punch was offset by sloppy ball security (3 turnovers) and porous defense, allowing his matchups to convert 7-of-9 attempts.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 75.9%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg -5.8
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring +11.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +1.3
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 77.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
4
pts
3
reb
6
ast
Impact
-12.8

His connective passing was evident with 6 assists, but uncharacteristic sloppiness (4 turnovers compared to his 0.5 average) dragged his Offense credit down to -0.8. Furthermore, he offered zero resistance defensively, letting opponents shoot a perfect 4-of-4 when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 19.5%
Net Rtg +14.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.9m
Scoring +2.6
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 4
15
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.2

An explosive scoring burst defined his 14 minutes off the bench, generating 15 points on sharp 6-of-10 shooting. This hyper-efficient microwave production resulted in a stellar +9.9 Offense credit, completely overshadowing his lack of peripheral stats.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.8%
USG% 29.7%
Net Rtg -12.5
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.9m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Jaylen Clark 11.3m
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.3

He was a complete non-factor offensively, failing to score while attempting just a single shot in 11 minutes. However, his perimeter defense was absolute lockdown, blanking his matchups on 0-of-5 shooting to help salvage his stint.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 3.7%
Net Rtg +54.2
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.3m
Scoring -0.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.5

Making the most of his brief three-minute cameo, he generated a strong +2.9 Defense credit by completely shutting down his lone matchup. He didn't attempt a field goal but managed to get on the board with a pair of free throws.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.9m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Joe Ingles 2.9m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.5

His three minutes of garbage time were entirely empty across the box score. He failed to record a single counting stat and offered no resistance on the one shot he contested.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.9m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.9

Relegated to end-of-bench duty, he logged three scoreless minutes without attempting a shot. A single loose-ball recovery was his only tangible contribution to the hustle metrics.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +100.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.9m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0