Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
DEN lead MIN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click a shooter below to isolate their shots
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 176 attempts

MIN MIN Shot-making Δ

Edwards 10/25 -5.6
McDaniels 7/15 -2.8
Randle 7/14 -0.8
DiVincenzo Hard 6/9 +6.1
Reid 4/9 -0.6
Dosunmu 4/8 -0.3
Hyland Hard 4/5 +5.6
Gobert Open 1/4 -2.5
Anderson Hard 0/1 -0.9

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Murray Hard 11/25 +3.0
Jokić Hard 8/20 -2.8
Johnson 5/10 -1.0
Hardaway Jr. 4/9 +1.6
Braun Open 5/9 -0.5
Gordon 3/9 -2.7
Brown Hard 2/4 +2.0
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
MIN
DEN
43/90 Field Goals 38/86
47.8% Field Goal % 44.2%
14/34 3-Pointers 15/41
41.2% 3-Point % 36.6%
19/30 Free Throws 23/30
63.3% Free Throw % 76.7%
57.7% True Shooting % 57.5%
60 Total Rebounds 54
9 Offensive 5
40 Defensive 38
30 Assists 28
2.50 Assist/TO Ratio 3.11
12 Turnovers 9
6 Steals 5
2 Blocks 1
30 Fouls 24
52 Points in Paint 40
13 Fast Break Pts 21
12 Points off TOs 10
20 Second Chance Pts 3
33 Bench Points 23
8 Largest Lead 19
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jamal Murray
30 PTS · 7 REB · 7 AST · 42.7 MIN
+21.3
2
Anthony Edwards
30 PTS · 10 REB · 2 AST · 40.0 MIN
+19.18
3
Christian Braun
16 PTS · 3 REB · 5 AST · 35.4 MIN
+17.93
4
Julius Randle
24 PTS · 9 REB · 6 AST · 36.4 MIN
+17.08
5
Nikola Jokić
24 PTS · 15 REB · 8 AST · 40.3 MIN
+15.35
6
Donte DiVincenzo
16 PTS · 7 REB · 6 AST · 30.6 MIN
+12.63
7
Tim Hardaway Jr.
16 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 27.3 MIN
+10.99
8
Bones Hyland
13 PTS · 0 REB · 2 AST · 9.7 MIN
+10.48
9
Naz Reid
11 PTS · 9 REB · 1 AST · 27.0 MIN
+8.53
10
Cameron Johnson
13 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 28.1 MIN
+8.48
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:00 TEAM offensive REBOUND 119–114
Q4 0:00 DEN Heave 119–114
Q4 0:03 D. DiVincenzo running DUNK (16 PTS) (J. Randle 6 AST) 119–114
Q4 0:08 D. DiVincenzo REBOUND (Off:0 Def:7) 117–114
Q4 0:11 MISS J. Murray 20' pullup Shot 117–114
Q4 0:18 J. Randle Free Throw 2 of 2 (24 PTS) 117–114
Q4 0:18 J. Randle Free Throw 1 of 2 (23 PTS) 116–114
Q4 0:18 A. Gordon take personal FOUL (4 PF) (Randle 2 FT) 115–114
Q4 0:19 C. Braun Free Throw 2 of 2 (16 PTS) 115–114
Q4 0:19 TEAM offensive REBOUND 115–113
Q4 0:19 MISS C. Braun Free Throw 1 of 2 115–113
Q4 0:19 J. Randle shooting personal FOUL (4 PF) (Braun 2 FT) 115–113
Q4 0:30 A. Edwards traveling TURNOVER (2 TO) 115–113
Q4 0:49 N. Jokić driving DUNK (24 PTS) 115–113
Q4 1:05 D. DiVincenzo 27' 3PT (14 PTS) (A. Edwards 2 AST) 115–111

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DEN Denver Nuggets
S Jamal Murray 42.7m
30
pts
7
reb
7
ast
Impact
+19.2

Operating as an unapologetic, high-usage offensive engine, he torched the nets with 6 three-pointers to fuel a massive +18.2 offensive credit. While his 4 turnovers showed some erratic orchestration, his aggressive scoring volume and solid positional rebounding (7 boards) kept the defense constantly on its heels.

Shooting
FG 11/25 (44.0%)
3PT 6/14 (42.9%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.7m
Scoring +19.5
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +8.4
Hustle +6.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -9.5
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Nikola Jokić 40.3m
24
pts
15
reb
8
ast
Impact
+5.6

He dictated the geometry of the court with sheer rebounding volume (15 boards) and elite orchestration (8 assists), driving a +13.7 offensive credit. Though his perimeter jumper was unusually frigid (1-of-7 from deep), his ability to anchor the glass and protect the rim (+3.1 defensive credit) ensured his superstar influence remained intact.

Shooting
FG 8/20 (40.0%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.3m
Scoring +14.7
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +4.5
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -7.1
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Aaron Gordon 36.9m
8
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
-5.0

A passive offensive showing defined his night, as he managed just 8 points on 33% shooting to drag his offensive credit down to +4.5. While he provided solid connective tissue with 4 assists and zero turnovers, his inability to consistently pressure the rim left the frontcourt lacking its usual punch.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.9m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +2.1
Defense -2.5
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Christian Braun 35.4m
16
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+10.5

Brilliant two-way aggression defined his performance, pairing a highly efficient 16 points with flawless decision-making (5 assists, zero turnovers) for a +14.7 offensive credit. He was equally disruptive on the other end, utilizing active hands to swipe 2 steals and generate a robust +4.8 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 5/7 (71.4%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.4m
Scoring +11.4
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +0.9
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Cameron Johnson 28.1m
13
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-0.7

His perimeter stroke abandoned him (1-of-6 from deep), but he still managed to salvage a +10.1 offensive credit by attacking inside the arc and avoiding turnovers entirely. However, his lack of engagement on the glass (just 1 rebound) and a -1.1 defensive credit highlighted his struggles when the three-ball isn't falling.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring +9.1
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense -4.2
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
16
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+6.6

He delivered the quintessential microwave scoring experience, catching fire from beyond the arc (a perfect 3-of-3) to generate a +12.1 offensive credit. By drawing fouls and avoiding turnovers entirely, he maximized his value as an instant-offense weapon despite offering zero playmaking.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 3/3 (100.0%)
FT 5/8 (62.5%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.4m
Scoring +10.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +1.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Bruce Brown 16.5m
7
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.7

He provided a modest offensive spark by knocking down a pair of three-pointers, earning a +3.7 offensive credit in his 16 minutes of action. However, his usual defensive utility was missing (-1.4 defensive credit), and a lack of peripheral hustle stats prevented him from truly tilting the floor.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.5m
Scoring +4.9
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.8

Trapped in rotational purgatory, he logged 10 empty minutes characterized by total offensive invisibility and zero shot attempts. His inability to find any rhythm resulted in negative marks across the board, including a -1.9 offensive credit and a -1.6 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.0m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -3.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.3

Marooned at the end of the rotation, he struggled to find any rhythm during a microscopic three-minute stint. Failing to attempt a single shot, his presence was barely felt outside of grabbing two rebounds before returning to the bench, yielding a -1.2 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.9m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Anthony Edwards 40.0m
30
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+21.0

Sheer volume scoring and aggressive rebounding defined his two-way impact, driving a robust +15.9 offensive credit despite erratic perimeter efficiency (3-of-11 from deep). He supplemented his 30-point outburst with excellent rim protection for a guard, swatting 2 shots to help anchor a +5.3 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 10/25 (40.0%)
3PT 3/11 (27.3%)
FT 7/9 (77.8%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.0m
Scoring +17.5
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +5.9
Hustle +5.9
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -2.2
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 2
S Jaden McDaniels 37.5m
14
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-7.2

Defensive struggles heavily weighed down his overall profile, reflected in a -3.5 defensive credit and a complete lack of peripheral stats (zero steals or blocks). While he found some rhythm inside the arc (7-of-12 on twos), his 3 live-ball turnovers stunted the offensive flow and capped his offensive credit at +3.6.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Scoring +7.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +2.5
Defense -4.0
Turnovers -7.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Julius Randle 36.4m
24
pts
9
reb
6
ast
Impact
+10.1

A highly adaptable offensive hub performance defined his night, generating a massive +19.6 offensive credit. He punished the defense at all three levels (50% from the field, 8-of-10 from the line) while keeping his decision-making crisp, as evidenced by 6 assists against just a single turnover.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 8/10 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.4m
Scoring +17.9
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +2.7
Defense -5.0
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
16
pts
7
reb
6
ast
Impact
+4.9

Blistering perimeter shooting (4-of-7 from deep) and excellent connective playmaking fueled a highly efficient +10.9 offensive credit. He operated as a vital sparkplug rather than a chaotic variable, crashing the glass for 7 rebounds and dishing 6 assists to round out a stellar two-way showing that included a +2.1 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.6m
Scoring +12.7
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +2.1
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -5.4
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Rudy Gobert 27.6m
2
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.2

An uncharacteristically quiet night on the glass (7 rebounds, well below his 11.5 average) and a near-total offensive vanishing act (2 points on 1-of-4 shooting) severely limited his usual interior dominance. He still managed to provide some resistance with a +2.0 defensive credit and a pair of steals, but his lack of rim pressure (-1.5 offensive credit) left the frontcourt wanting.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Scoring -1.4
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +7.0
Defense +3.8
Turnovers -6.1
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
Naz Reid 27.0m
11
pts
9
reb
1
ast
Impact
+2.0

Operating as a reliable microwave presence, he avoided the erratic decision-making that sometimes plagues his game by committing zero turnovers. His clean offensive execution (+8.8 offensive credit) was bolstered by strong work on the boards, grabbing 9 rebounds to anchor the second unit's frontcourt.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Scoring +6.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +5.6
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Ayo Dosunmu 22.4m
9
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
-2.1

Though his scoring volume dipped well below his season average (9 points), he maintained his offensive value (+8.8 credit) through efficient shot selection (4-of-8 shooting) and crisp playmaking (5 assists). However, a lack of defensive disruption (-1.6 defensive credit) prevented him from fully tilting the floor in his minutes.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.4m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +4.1
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
13
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.1

He fully embraced his role as an electric microwave scorer, torching the nets for 13 points on a blistering 4-of-5 shooting in under 10 minutes of action. This hyper-efficient burst generated a +11.6 offensive credit, proving he can be an instant-offense weapon when his jumper is dialed in.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.8m
Scoring +12.2
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -3.1
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.8

A total offensive vanishing act (zero points on one attempt) relegated him to a purely connective and defensive role during his brief stint. He managed to salvage some value with a +1.9 defensive credit and a steal, but his passivity severely capped his overall influence (+0.2 offensive credit).

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.0

Father Time and a diminished bench role were evident as he failed to attempt a single shot or grab a rebound in his four minutes of action. While he managed to distribute 2 assists to scrape together a +1.0 offensive credit, his inability to pressure the defense rendered him largely invisible.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.0m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0