GAME ANALYSIS

GET THIS IN YOUR INBOX

Every breakdown for your team — free, the morning after the game.

Follow your team — free

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

GSW Golden State Warriors
21
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+16.7

Overcame a clunky shooting performance by relentlessly attacking passing lanes and disrupting the opponent's offensive flow (+7.1 defensive impact). His ability to generate extra possessions through sheer physicality kept his total impact firmly in the green (+6.1).

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 53.8%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +10.3
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +13.6
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +6.3
Defense +5.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
S Stephen Curry 37.0m
42
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
+37.1

Torched the nets with elite shot-making across all three levels, generating a monstrous +32.7 box impact. Beyond the scoring barrage, his active hands and disciplined closeouts yielded a phenomenal +10.2 defensive score, making this a complete two-way masterpiece.

Shooting
FG 14/25 (56.0%)
3PT 6/12 (50.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.6%
USG% 35.7%
Net Rtg +18.5
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.0m
Scoring +34.4
Creation +3.0
Shot Making +9.7
Hustle +1.8
Defense +7.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
14
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.0

Settled for poor angles and struggled to navigate screens, leading to a disappointing -10.4 total impact. His defensive rotations were consistently a half-step slow (+0.8), allowing easy driving lanes that erased his decent offensive efficiency.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg +7.6
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.2m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.9

Brought excellent energy with a +4.2 hustle score, diving for loose balls and extending possessions. Unfortunately, a string of forced shots and missed perimeter looks dragged his total impact into the negative (-7.4).

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.7%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg +0.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.4m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +2.8
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Draymond Green 34.3m
13
pts
8
reb
8
ast
Impact
-2.1

Anchored the frontcourt with high-IQ defensive reads (+5.1) and timely perimeter shooting. His ability to hit trailing threes punished drop coverages, while his vocal leadership and backline rotations stabilized the defensive unit.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.2%
USG% 13.7%
Net Rtg +18.4
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.3m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +2.4
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Al Horford 29.0m
13
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.5

Provided a masterclass in veteran spacing, punishing late rotations by drilling his perimeter looks. His pristine positioning on the backline (+6.0 defensive impact) deterred drives and anchored a highly effective defensive stretch.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 92.9%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg +3.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Scoring +11.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +1.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
Buddy Hield 22.9m
11
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.0

A frigid showing from beyond the arc completely neutralized his floor-spacing value, resulting in a -6.1 overall impact. The opponent successfully ran him off his spots, forcing him into contested looks that fueled transition opportunities the other way.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.3%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg -7.6
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.9m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Will Richard 16.7m
6
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.1

Maximized his role by flying around the court for a +4.2 hustle score, generating extra possessions through sheer effort. His timely corner shooting and disciplined closeouts (+3.1 defense) secured a positive +2.4 total impact in his reserve minutes.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg -11.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.7m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.5

Injected immediate energy off the bench, converting efficiently at the rim to drive a +4.5 total impact. His trademark point-of-attack pressure disrupted the opposing ball handlers and shifted the momentum during his short stint.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -18.5
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.5m
Scoring +4.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +7.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.5

Saw brief garbage-time action, offering minor rim deterrence (+0.9 defense) without factoring into the offensive game plan. His low usage kept his total impact near neutral.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -37.5
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.4m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +3.4
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DEN Denver Nuggets
S Nikola Jokić 40.8m
21
pts
13
reb
10
ast
Impact
+8.5

A brutal volume-shooting night from beyond the arc dragged his overall impact down to a near-neutral +0.4. He salvaged his value entirely through elite positional rebounding and active hands, posting a +7.5 defensive score to offset the slew of missed jumpers.

Shooting
FG 8/23 (34.8%)
3PT 2/13 (15.4%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.4%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg -10.7
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.8m
Scoring +9.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +5.8
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Jamal Murray 40.0m
25
pts
3
reb
10
ast
Impact
+17.1

Efficient mid-range creation and steady playmaking drove a solid +19.2 box impact. His surprisingly stout point-of-attack defense (+6.0) was the defining element of his night, helping to contain perimeter penetration and secure a positive overall rating.

Shooting
FG 11/20 (55.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.9%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg -17.7
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.0m
Scoring +19.6
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +5.7
Hustle +3.8
Defense +4.0
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 52.6%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Aaron Gordon 38.6m
50
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+45.2

An absolute masterclass in shot selection and execution, draining a historic volume of perimeter looks to generate a massive +44.2 box score impact. His unprecedented outside efficiency completely broke the opposing defensive scheme, forcing rotations that opened up the entire offense.

Shooting
FG 17/21 (81.0%)
3PT 10/11 (90.9%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 105.8%
USG% 29.1%
Net Rtg +0.2
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +47.3
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +12.4
Hustle +2.4
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Christian Braun 38.5m
6
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-13.2

Defensive lapses (-1.9) and a lack of offensive assertiveness resulted in a staggering -19.8 overall impact. His inability to stay in front of his primary matchup consistently compromised the team's defensive shell, negating a few decent hustle plays.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg -8.5
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.5m
Scoring +2.9
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +5.1
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 47.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Cameron Johnson 32.0m
5
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-14.2

Bricklaying from the perimeter severely capped his offensive value, leading to a disastrous -16.5 total impact. Despite showing some life on hustle plays, his inability to stretch the floor allowed defenders to sag off and clog the driving lanes.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 31.3%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg -26.2
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.0m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
10
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Found a rhythm on his perimeter looks but offered virtually zero resistance or secondary effort, reflected in a meager +0.4 hustle score. His one-dimensional approach meant that when he wasn't actively scoring, he was a slight negative (-2.4) on the floor.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg +13.7
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.8m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Bruce Brown 19.4m
4
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.1

Operated purely as a connective piece, taking very few shots but maintaining high efficiency. However, his low usage and passive offensive approach allowed the defense to ignore him, resulting in a slight negative overall impact (-2.1) despite decent hustle metrics.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg +19.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.4m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-17.6

Completely invisible on the offensive end with zero shot attempts, rendering his team effectively four-on-five in the halfcourt. This lack of gravity tanked his overall impact (-8.6), as minor defensive contributions couldn't make up for being an offensive non-factor.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.0m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
8
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.1

Capitalized on his size advantage inside, converting highly efficient looks around the rim to post a +4.2 total impact in limited action. His physical screening and interior finishing provided a reliable safety valve during a crucial second-unit stretch.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg +26.9
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.2m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.9

Logged brief minutes primarily as a defensive specialist, generating a +2.6 defensive score through active rotations. The lack of offensive involvement kept his overall impact slightly in the red (-1.6).

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg +52.6
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1