GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

GSW Golden State Warriors
21
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+16.7

Overcame a clunky shooting performance by relentlessly attacking passing lanes and disrupting the opponent's offensive flow (+7.1 defensive impact). His ability to generate extra possessions through sheer physicality kept his total impact firmly in the green (+6.1).

Shooting
FG 6/16 (37.5%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 53.8%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +10.3
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +13.6
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +6.3
Defense +5.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 0
S Stephen Curry 37.0m
42
pts
6
reb
7
ast
Impact
+37.1

Torched the nets with elite shot-making across all three levels, generating a monstrous +32.7 box impact. Beyond the scoring barrage, his active hands and disciplined closeouts yielded a phenomenal +10.2 defensive score, making this a complete two-way masterpiece.

Shooting
FG 14/25 (56.0%)
3PT 6/12 (50.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.6%
USG% 35.7%
Net Rtg +18.5
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.0m
Scoring +34.4
Creation +3.0
Shot Making +9.7
Hustle +1.8
Defense +7.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 2
14
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.0

Settled for poor angles and struggled to navigate screens, leading to a disappointing -10.4 total impact. His defensive rotations were consistently a half-step slow (+0.8), allowing easy driving lanes that erased his decent offensive efficiency.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg +7.6
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.2m
Scoring +9.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +2.5
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
11
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.9

Brought excellent energy with a +4.2 hustle score, diving for loose balls and extending possessions. Unfortunately, a string of forced shots and missed perimeter looks dragged his total impact into the negative (-7.4).

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.7%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg +0.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.4m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +2.8
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Draymond Green 34.3m
13
pts
8
reb
8
ast
Impact
-2.1

Anchored the frontcourt with high-IQ defensive reads (+5.1) and timely perimeter shooting. His ability to hit trailing threes punished drop coverages, while his vocal leadership and backline rotations stabilized the defensive unit.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 73.2%
USG% 13.7%
Net Rtg +18.4
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.3m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +2.4
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
Al Horford 29.0m
13
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-2.5

Provided a masterclass in veteran spacing, punishing late rotations by drilling his perimeter looks. His pristine positioning on the backline (+6.0 defensive impact) deterred drives and anchored a highly effective defensive stretch.

Shooting
FG 5/7 (71.4%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 92.9%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg +3.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Scoring +11.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +1.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
Buddy Hield 22.9m
11
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.0

A frigid showing from beyond the arc completely neutralized his floor-spacing value, resulting in a -6.1 overall impact. The opponent successfully ran him off his spots, forcing him into contested looks that fueled transition opportunities the other way.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.3%
USG% 24.6%
Net Rtg -7.6
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.9m
Scoring +4.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Will Richard 16.7m
6
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.1

Maximized his role by flying around the court for a +4.2 hustle score, generating extra possessions through sheer effort. His timely corner shooting and disciplined closeouts (+3.1 defense) secured a positive +2.4 total impact in his reserve minutes.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg -11.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.7m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +6.3
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.5

Injected immediate energy off the bench, converting efficiently at the rim to drive a +4.5 total impact. His trademark point-of-attack pressure disrupted the opposing ball handlers and shifted the momentum during his short stint.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -18.5
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.5m
Scoring +4.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +7.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.5

Saw brief garbage-time action, offering minor rim deterrence (+0.9 defense) without factoring into the offensive game plan. His low usage kept his total impact near neutral.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -37.5
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.4m
Scoring +4.8
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +3.4
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -2.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DEN Denver Nuggets
S Nikola Jokić 40.8m
21
pts
13
reb
10
ast
Impact
+8.6

A brutal volume-shooting night from beyond the arc dragged his overall impact down to a near-neutral +0.4. He salvaged his value entirely through elite positional rebounding and active hands, posting a +7.5 defensive score to offset the slew of missed jumpers.

Shooting
FG 8/23 (34.8%)
3PT 2/13 (15.4%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.4%
USG% 30.0%
Net Rtg -10.7
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.8m
Scoring +9.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +5.8
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Jamal Murray 40.0m
25
pts
3
reb
10
ast
Impact
+17.1

Efficient mid-range creation and steady playmaking drove a solid +19.2 box impact. His surprisingly stout point-of-attack defense (+6.0) was the defining element of his night, helping to contain perimeter penetration and secure a positive overall rating.

Shooting
FG 11/20 (55.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.9%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg -17.7
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.0m
Scoring +19.6
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +5.7
Hustle +3.8
Defense +4.0
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 52.6%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S Aaron Gordon 38.6m
50
pts
8
reb
2
ast
Impact
+45.2

An absolute masterclass in shot selection and execution, draining a historic volume of perimeter looks to generate a massive +44.2 box score impact. His unprecedented outside efficiency completely broke the opposing defensive scheme, forcing rotations that opened up the entire offense.

Shooting
FG 17/21 (81.0%)
3PT 10/11 (90.9%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 105.8%
USG% 29.1%
Net Rtg +0.2
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +47.3
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +12.4
Hustle +2.4
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Christian Braun 38.5m
6
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-13.2

Defensive lapses (-1.9) and a lack of offensive assertiveness resulted in a staggering -19.8 overall impact. His inability to stay in front of his primary matchup consistently compromised the team's defensive shell, negating a few decent hustle plays.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 10.7%
Net Rtg -8.5
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.5m
Scoring +2.9
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +5.1
Defense -3.7
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 47.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Cameron Johnson 32.0m
5
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-14.2

Bricklaying from the perimeter severely capped his offensive value, leading to a disastrous -16.5 total impact. Despite showing some life on hustle plays, his inability to stretch the floor allowed defenders to sag off and clog the driving lanes.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 31.3%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg -26.2
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.0m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
10
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.4

Found a rhythm on his perimeter looks but offered virtually zero resistance or secondary effort, reflected in a meager +0.4 hustle score. His one-dimensional approach meant that when he wasn't actively scoring, he was a slight negative (-2.4) on the floor.

Shooting
FG 4/8 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg +13.7
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.8m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Bruce Brown 19.4m
4
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-4.1

Operated purely as a connective piece, taking very few shots but maintaining high efficiency. However, his low usage and passive offensive approach allowed the defense to ignore him, resulting in a slight negative overall impact (-2.1) despite decent hustle metrics.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 66.7%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg +19.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.4m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +6.3
Defense -0.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-17.6

Completely invisible on the offensive end with zero shot attempts, rendering his team effectively four-on-five in the halfcourt. This lack of gravity tanked his overall impact (-8.6), as minor defensive contributions couldn't make up for being an offensive non-factor.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 8.6%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.0m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
8
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.1

Capitalized on his size advantage inside, converting highly efficient looks around the rim to post a +4.2 total impact in limited action. His physical screening and interior finishing provided a reliable safety valve during a crucial second-unit stretch.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg +26.9
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.2m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.9

Logged brief minutes primarily as a defensive specialist, generating a +2.6 defensive score through active rotations. The lack of offensive involvement kept his overall impact slightly in the red (-1.6).

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg +52.6
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1