DAL

2025-26 Season

COOPER FLAGG

Dallas Mavericks | Forward | 6-9
Cooper Flagg
21.0PPG
6.7RPG
4.5APG
33.5MPG
+12.7 Impact

Flagg produces at an elite rate for a 34-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+12.7
Scoring +18.3
Points Scored 21.0 PPG = +21.0
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -6.8
Shot Making above expected FG% = +4.1
Creation +1.9
Assists & Self-Creation 4.5 AST/g + self-creation = +1.9
Turnovers -5.2
Turnovers 2.3/g (live + dead blend) = -5.2
Defense +1.3
Steals 1.2/g = +2.8
Blocks 0.9/g = +0.8
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.3
Hustle & Effort +5.2
Rebounds 6.7 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.1
Contested Shots 6.5/g = +1.3
Deflections 2.0/g = +1.3
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.7/g = +0.4
Screen Assists 0.4/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +21.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −8.8
Net Impact
+12.7
92th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 93th
21.0 PPG
Efficiency 30th
53.6% TS
Playmaking 92th
4.5 APG
Rebounding 86th
6.7 RPG
Defense 77th
+9.5/g
Hustle 53th
+12.7/g
Creation 94th
+4.93/g
Shot Making 99th
+12.48/g
TO Discipline 17th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Cooper Flagg's opening stretch of the 2025-26 season was defined by a rapid evolution from a hesitant rookie into a relentless, two-way terror. He looked entirely overwhelmed early on, hitting rock bottom on 10/27 vs OKC with a brutal two-point, 1-for-9 shooting night that resulted in a -6.3 Impact score due to forced shots and offensive hesitation. But even when his jumper abandoned him, his elite motor kept him extremely valuable. Take his performance on 11/02 vs DET, where he clanked his way to an inefficient 16 points on 3-for-14 shooting but still managed a +10.0 Impact score simply by crashing the glass, generating extra possessions, and playing suffocating defense. The league was in trouble once his offense caught up. He finally put all the pieces together on 11/11 vs MIL, erupting for 26 points and nine rebounds on highly efficient 9-for-15 shooting. That masterpiece earned him a staggering +31.5 Impact score, driven by flawless shot selection and an absolute refusal to let opponents breathe in the half-court.

This midseason stretch defined Cooper Flagg as a volatile but terrifying two-way force. He could swing wildly between cold shooting slumps and absolute offensive domination. He reached a breathtaking apex on 01/29 vs CHA, erupting for 49 points on 20-for-29 shooting to generate a massive +47.8 Impact score. That elite mark stemmed from flawless shot selection and sheer volume, punishing Charlotte without forcing bad looks. However, his aggression sometimes crossed into reckless territory, leading to ugly outings like his 01/11 vs CHI performance. Poor shooting—hitting just 4 of 13 attempts—and a total lack of playmaking dragged his Impact down to -10.4 that night. Yet Flagg usually found ways to salvage rough offensive nights through sheer grit, perfectly illustrated on 01/04 vs HOU. Despite a miserable 3-for-12 shooting night that yielded just 10 points, relentless defensive effort and hustle on the glass allowed him to scrape out a +0.2 Impact.

This stretch of the season was defined by a spectacular offensive evolution, as Cooper Flagg transformed from an erratic volume shooter into a genuine superstar scorer. During the 03/06 vs BOS matchup, a brutal 7-for-23 shooting night yielded a dismal -7.7 Impact score, as forced jumpers and poor shot selection completely negated his eight rebounds. He adapted quickly, though. On 03/21 vs LAC, Flagg scored a modest 18 points on 16 shots but still posted a +12.1 Impact by grinding out 10 rebounds, dishing eight assists, and anchoring the floor with relentless defensive hustle. When his efficiency finally caught up to his ambition in April, the results were terrifying. He completely dismantled the defense on 04/03 vs ORL, dropping 51 points on a blistering 19-of-30 from the field. That masterpiece earned a staggering +57.5 Impact score because he paired pristine shot selection—including hitting 6-of-9 from deep—with constant off-ball hustle to break the game wide open.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Flagg posts positive impact in 89% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~10 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 57% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Flagg consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: +11.0, second-half: +14.4. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 33 games. Longest cold streak: 1 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 65 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

H. Jones 84.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 12
J. Harden 76.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 18
A. Thompson 70.0 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.07
PTS 5
T. Camara 69.6 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 15
S. Jones 63.4 poss
FG% 58.8%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.35
PTS 22
S. Castle 59.7 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 13
T. Murphy III 58.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 14
D. Vassell 58.0 poss
FG% 10.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 2
D. Daniels 54.0 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 10
M. Moody 53.6 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.26
PTS 14

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

H. Jones 97.2 poss
FG% 58.8%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.24
PTS 23
J. Smith Jr. 72.0 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 16
T. Camara 61.6 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
P. Watson 61.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
T. Eason 61.4 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.18
PTS 11
J. Collins 60.3 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 11
M. Moody 59.3 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 30.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 15
S. Jones 55.6 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
D. Vassell 53.9 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 11
D. Jones Jr. 47.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

70
Games
21.0
PPG
6.7
RPG
4.5
APG
1.2
SPG
0.9
BPG
46.8
FG%
29.5
3P%
82.7
FT%
33.5
MPG

GAME LOG

70 games played