Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
MIN lead DEN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
DEN 2P — 3P —
MIN 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 169 attempts

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Jokić 11/19 +3.2
Murray 4/17 -8.3
Johnson 8/15 +4.1
Hardaway Jr. 4/7 +2.1
Jones 3/4 +3.2
Jones Hard 2/4 +0.6
Braun Hard 1/4 -1.4
Valančiūnas 1/3 -0.8
Brown 0/2 -2.3

MIN MIN Shot-making Δ

McDaniels 13/25 +2.3
Shannon Jr. 9/20 -3.6
Randle 6/17 -3.2
Reid 7/13 +0.6
Conley Hard 3/7 +0.2
Gobert Open 4/6 -0.4
Clark Hard 1/3 -0.4
Hyland Hard 0/3 -3.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DEN
MIN
34/75 Field Goals 43/94
45.3% Field Goal % 45.7%
10/27 3-Pointers 7/29
37.0% 3-Point % 24.1%
20/25 Free Throws 17/24
80.0% Free Throw % 70.8%
57.0% True Shooting % 52.6%
46 Total Rebounds 58
6 Offensive 19
27 Defensive 31
24 Assists 26
1.85 Assist/TO Ratio 3.25
13 Turnovers 7
4 Steals 8
8 Blocks 3
26 Fouls 21
40 Points in Paint 64
7 Fast Break Pts 13
10 Points off TOs 16
4 Second Chance Pts 20
20 Bench Points 19
5 Largest Lead 12
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jaden McDaniels
32 PTS · 10 REB · 3 AST · 44.9 MIN
+32.18
2
Terrence Shannon Jr.
24 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 34.7 MIN
+22.16
3
Rudy Gobert
10 PTS · 13 REB · 8 AST · 41.8 MIN
+21.43
4
Nikola Jokić
28 PTS · 9 REB · 10 AST · 43.4 MIN
+18.38
5
Cameron Johnson
27 PTS · 8 REB · 3 AST · 39.2 MIN
+15.21
6
Tim Hardaway Jr.
13 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 21.0 MIN
+15.19
7
Naz Reid
15 PTS · 7 REB · 4 AST · 33.8 MIN
+11.08
8
Mike Conley
7 PTS · 6 REB · 3 AST · 26.5 MIN
+5.96
9
Jamal Murray
12 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 40.3 MIN
+5.79
10
Julius Randle
18 PTS · 4 REB · 5 AST · 37.5 MIN
+5.73
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:22 R. Gobert REBOUND (Off:7 Def:6) 98–110
Q4 0:24 MISS C. Johnson 26' 3PT 98–110
Q4 0:25 J. McDaniels Free Throw 2 of 2 (32 PTS) 98–110
Q4 0:25 J. McDaniels Free Throw 1 of 2 (31 PTS) 98–109
Q4 0:25 B. Brown take personal FOUL (3 PF) (McDaniels 2 FT) 98–108
Q4 0:43 TEAM defensive REBOUND 98–108
Q4 0:46 MISS N. Jokić 24' 3PT 98–108
Q4 0:55 R. Gobert Free Throw 2 of 2 (10 PTS) 98–108
Q4 0:55 R. Gobert Free Throw 1 of 2 (9 PTS) 98–107
Q4 0:55 N. Jokić personal FOUL (5 PF) (Gobert 2 FT) 98–106
Q4 0:56 R. Gobert REBOUND (Off:7 Def:5) 98–106
Q4 0:57 MISS J. Randle Free Throw 2 of 2 98–106
Q4 0:57 J. Randle Free Throw 1 of 2 (18 PTS) 98–106
Q4 0:57 S. Jones shooting personal FOUL (5 PF) (Randle 2 FT) 98–105
Q4 1:01 J. McDaniels STEAL (2 STL) 98–105

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Jaden McDaniels 44.9m
32
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+32.7

Jaden McDaniels unleashed a brilliant two-way masterclass, pouring in 32 points on 52% shooting to drive a massive +29.2 offensive credit. He was equally devastating on the other end, grabbing 10 rebounds and locking down his matchups to a stifling 3-of-12 (25%) shooting clip.

Shooting
FG 13/25 (52.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 57.9%
USG% 25.2%
Net Rtg +18.6
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 44.9m
Scoring +23.3
Creation +1.4
Shot Making +7.3
Hustle +10.8
Defense +1.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
S Rudy Gobert 41.8m
10
pts
13
reb
8
ast
Impact
+14.8

Rudy Gobert dominated the interior through sheer activity, racking up 13 rebounds and an astounding 21 shot contests to anchor the defense (+6.0 credit). He was surprisingly vital as an offensive hub (+23.2 credit), dishing out 8 assists (well above his 1.9 average) while generating 10 screen assists to free up his shooters.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 64.4%
USG% 8.0%
Net Rtg +14.5
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 41.8m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +16.5
Defense +0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 31
FGM Against 14
Opp FG% 45.2%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 0
S Julius Randle 37.5m
18
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
-0.7

Inefficient volume scoring defined Julius Randle's night, as he needed 17 shots to scrape together 18 points while coughing up 4 turnovers. Despite recording 4 deflections for a +3.0 hustle credit, he was a sieve in isolation, allowing his primary matchups to shoot 3-of-4 (75%).

Shooting
FG 6/17 (35.3%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 45.8%
USG% 27.0%
Net Rtg +19.2
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Scoring +9.1
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +5.1
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -10.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
24
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+19.3

Terrence Shannon Jr. exploded for 24 points (+143% vs avg), aggressively hunting his shot to generate a +19.0 offensive credit despite a frosty 1-of-7 mark from deep. He paired this high-volume scoring with excellent perimeter defense, holding his matchups to just 4-of-11 (36%) shooting.

Shooting
FG 9/20 (45.0%)
3PT 1/7 (14.3%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.1%
USG% 25.9%
Net Rtg +12.5
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.7m
Scoring +16.3
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +3.7
Hustle +6.7
Defense +1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 36.4%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Mike Conley 26.5m
7
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-1.7

Mike Conley provided steady, low-usage veteran minutes, chipping in 7 points and 6 rebounds while keeping the offense organized. He stayed active in the passing lanes with 3 deflections (+3.1 hustle credit), though opponents found some success shooting 5-of-10 against him.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -1.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.5m
Scoring +4.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +5.7
Defense +0.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Naz Reid 33.8m
15
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
+6.5

Naz Reid provided a highly effective offensive punch off the bench (+8.7 credit), scoring 15 points on an efficient 7-of-13 from the floor. He also flashed his playmaking ability with 4 assists, rounding out a versatile performance that kept the second unit humming.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.8%
USG% 18.3%
Net Rtg +13.4
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.8m
Scoring +10.0
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +8.9
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Jaylen Clark 12.2m
3
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.3

Jaylen Clark struggled to make a tangible impact during his 12 minutes of run, managing just 3 points on three shot attempts. He was a step slow on the defensive end (-1.2 credit), allowing opponents to shoot 2-of-3 (67%) when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 11.5%
Net Rtg +5.4
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.2m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
1
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-13.2

Bones Hyland's microwave scoring completely short-circuited, as he missed all three of his attempts from the field to finish with just a single point. His brief 8-minute stint was further marred by defensive lapses, allowing opponents to convert both of their attempts when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 12.9%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg +29.2
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.7m
Scoring -1.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DEN Denver Nuggets
S Nikola Jokić 43.4m
28
pts
9
reb
10
ast
Impact
+7.6

Nikola Jokić orchestrated the offense with his usual mastery, generating a massive +21.1 offensive credit through efficient scoring (11-of-19 shooting) and elite playmaking (10 assists). Despite the offensive brilliance, he struggled to anchor the defense, allowing opponents to shoot a blistering 60% (12-of-20) when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 11/19 (57.9%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 64.7%
USG% 28.6%
Net Rtg -10.7
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 43.4m
Scoring +21.8
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +6.0
Hustle +3.7
Defense -3.8
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 12
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Jamal Murray 40.3m
12
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
-2.0

A brutal shooting slump derailed Jamal Murray's night, as he managed just 12 points on a frigid 4-of-17 from the floor. While he avoided turning the ball over entirely, his inability to find the bottom of the net severely limited his offensive impact (+6.1 credit).

Shooting
FG 4/17 (23.5%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 32.0%
USG% 22.1%
Net Rtg -25.2
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.3m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +5.7
Defense -2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 47.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Cameron Johnson 39.2m
27
pts
8
reb
3
ast
Impact
+8.4

Cameron Johnson's explosive scoring (+18.2 offensive credit) drove his performance, pouring in 27 points to nearly double his season average. His perimeter shot-making was on full display as he buried 5-of-10 from deep, continuing a hot streak of three straight games shooting 50% or better from the field.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 6/9 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 71.2%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg -5.3
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.2m
Scoring +19.6
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +2.4
Defense -4.5
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 46.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
S Spencer Jones 35.3m
8
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.7

Spencer Jones provided a highly efficient offensive spark (+6.0 credit), knocking down 3-of-4 from the field including a pair of triples. However, his defensive impact was muted as opponents found success against him, shooting 8-for-14 (57%) when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 7.0%
Net Rtg -8.8
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.3m
Scoring +7.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense -3.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Christian Braun 27.6m
3
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.2

Christian Braun completely vanished on the offensive end (-1.6 credit) with just 3 points, but he compensated by turning into an absolute defensive clamps. He smothered his matchups, holding opponents to a staggering 1-of-13 (8%) shooting while adding 3 blocks and racking up +2.5 defensive credit.

Shooting
FG 1/4 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 37.5%
USG% 8.5%
Net Rtg -16.1
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.6m
Scoring +0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 7.7%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 1
13
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+6.5

Tim Hardaway Jr. delivered a hyper-efficient scoring punch off the bench (+13.3 offensive credit), converting 4-of-7 shots to tally 13 points. However, he was targeted relentlessly on the other end, allowing opponents to shoot a near-perfect 4-of-5 (80%) when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.2%
USG% 19.6%
Net Rtg -11.9
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.0m
Scoring +10.8
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +5.1
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
Bruce Brown 14.4m
1
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-15.0

Bruce Brown was an offensive liability (-5.0 credit), failing to hit a single field goal and committing 3 turnovers (above his 1.3 average) in just 14 minutes. He salvaged some value through sheer defensive disruption, recording 3 deflections and holding his matchups to 2-of-7 (29%) shooting.

Shooting
FG 0/2 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 17.4%
USG% 18.2%
Net Rtg -13.1
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.4m
Scoring -1.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense +4.1
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
Tyus Jones 12.4m
4
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-6.0

Tyus Jones played a clean, mistake-free floor game, dishing out 3 assists without committing a single turnover. His steady hand generated a +4.2 offensive credit, providing a stabilizing presence during his brief 12-minute stint.

Shooting
FG 2/4 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +26.1
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.4m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.0
Defense +1.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.8

Jonas Valančiūnas barely saw the floor, logging just under four minutes of largely empty action. He managed a quick bucket and two rebounds, but his brief stint was too short to leave any meaningful footprint on the game.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 44.4%
Net Rtg -41.1
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.7m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Zeke Nnaji 2.7m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
+0.6

In a microscopic 3-minute cameo, Zeke Nnaji failed to register a single box-score statistic. He did manage to stay active defensively, logging 2 contests and a deflection to scrape together +1.1 hustle credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -85.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.7m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0