DEN

2025-26 Season

BRUCE BROWN

Denver Nuggets | Guard-Forward | 6-4
Bruce Brown
7.7 PPG
3.8 RPG
2.1 APG
24.4 MPG
-3.2 Impact

Brown produces at an below average rate for a 24-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.2
Scoring +4.6
Points 7.7 PPG × +1.00 = +7.7
Missed 2PT 2.2/g × -0.78 = -1.7
Missed 3PT 1.1/g × -0.87 = -1.0
Missed FT 0.4/g × -1.00 = -0.4
Creation +2.4
Assists 2.1/g × +0.50 = +1.1
Off. Rebounds 1.0/g × +1.26 = +1.3
Turnovers -2.1
Turnovers 1.1/g × -1.95 = -2.1
Defense +1.5
Steals 1.0/g × +2.30 = +2.3
Blocks 0.2/g × +0.90 = +0.2
Def. Rebounds 2.9/g × +0.30 = +0.9
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.3
Contested Shots 2.5/g × +0.20 = +0.5
Deflections 2.3/g × +0.65 = +1.5
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.5/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.1/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +8.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.9
Net Impact
-3.2
22th pctl vs Guards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 38th
7.7 PPG
Efficiency 39th
53.2% TS
Playmaking 37th
2.1 APG
Rebounding 72th
3.8 RPG
Rim Protection 49th
0.11/min
Hustle 36th
0.09/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 69th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Bruce Brown’s first twenty games of the season were defined by a jarring offensive slump and erratic defensive lapses that severely limited his value off the bench. He occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without filling the bucket. Look no further than 10/29 vs NOP. Despite scoring just 5 points, he posted a massive +12.0 impact score driven entirely by scrappy point-of-attack defense and relentless loose-ball pursuit. Yet, those winning plays were frequently overshadowed by catastrophic breakdowns. During his 12/25 vs MIN appearance, he chipped in 7 points, but his overall impact plummeted to a staggering -16.2 because constant miscommunications on defensive switches surrendered a barrage of easy baskets. Even when he flashed rare playmaking brilliance with 10 assists on 11/29 vs PHX, a sharp regression in finishing dragged him down to a -3.4 impact rating. He simply cannot survive as a connective piece when his defensive shell cracks and his touch around the rim evaporates.

A maddening inconsistency defined Bruce Brown's mid-season stretch, bouncing wildly between opportunistic energy guy and outright defensive liability. During a rare start on 12/18 vs ORL, he managed 11 points but posted a disastrous -14.2 impact score. Getting repeatedly torched on straight-line drives completely eradicated his offensive contributions that night. He flipped the script entirely on 12/20 vs HOU. Thriving in the chaotic transition game, Brown grabbed 12 rebounds and fueled a stellar +10.4 impact score through relentless energy on the glass rather than sheer scoring volume. Yet, those hustle-driven peaks were too often erased by hidden defensive costs later in the month. On 12/29 vs MIA, he poured in 15 points on highly efficient 7-for-9 shooting, but still dragged the unit down with a -3.6 impact because of glaring defensive lapses and poor rotations. To salvage his nightly rotation spot, these sloppy mistakes and bouts of off-ball passivity must vanish.

Bruce Brown’s midseason stretch was defined by a frustrating paradox where his most productive scoring nights often actively harmed his team. During the 01/23 vs MIL matchup, he poured in 15 points on an efficient 6-for-11 from the floor, yet posted a -4.7 impact score because a disastrous -9.0 defensive rating completely erased his offensive contributions. His highest-scoring effort of the span, a 19-point outburst on 02/19 vs LAC, similarly resulted in a negative -1.1 impact due to costly lapses on the other end of the floor (-3.2 def). Conversely, he found ways to win on the margins when his jumper abandoned him. In the 01/22 vs WAS contest, Brown managed just 6 points but generated a +5.8 impact score by leaning heavily into gritty perimeter defense (+1.6 def) and relentless activity (+2.6 hustle). When he committed to being a disruptive pest, his overall value soared regardless of his shooting volume. But whenever he treated defensive rotations as an afterthought, his efficient finishing meant absolutely nothing.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Brown has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~5 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 53% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Brown consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 3 games. Longest cold streak: 9 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 75 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Sheppard 69.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 13
C. Spencer 48.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
M. Monk 36.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
J. Miller 35.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
D. DeRozan 34.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
B. Williams 33.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 5
B. Hyland 31.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
T. Maxey 31.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
G. Allen 30.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
J. McCain 30.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Sheppard 71.6 poss
FG% 27.8%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 16
N. Reid 57.0 poss
FG% 45.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.23
PTS 13
M. Monk 37.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 9
C. Spencer 32.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
K. Durant 32.1 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 11
Q. Grimes 32.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.28
PTS 9
R. Nembhard 31.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 5
C. Flagg 31.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.44
PTS 14
R. Westbrook 30.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 7
D. Bane 28.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 9

SEASON STATS

76
Games
7.7
PPG
3.8
RPG
2.1
APG
1.0
SPG
0.2
BPG
47.0
FG%
38.1
3P%
76.1
FT%
24.4
MPG

GAME LOG

76 games played