ATL

2025-26 Season

JONATHAN KUMINGA

Atlanta Hawks | Forward | 6-7
Jonathan Kuminga
11.9 PPG
5.6 RPG
2.3 APG
22.9 MPG
-0.5 Impact

Kuminga produces at an average rate for a 23-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-0.5
Scoring +7.0
Points 11.9 PPG × +1.00 = +11.9
Missed 2PT 3.2/g × -0.78 = -2.5
Missed 3PT 1.7/g × -0.87 = -1.5
Missed FT 0.9/g × -1.00 = -0.9
Creation +2.9
Assists 2.3/g × +0.50 = +1.1
Off. Rebounds 1.4/g × +1.26 = +1.8
Turnovers -3.9
Turnovers 2.0/g × -1.95 = -3.9
Defense +1.1
Steals 0.6/g × +2.30 = +1.4
Blocks 0.3/g × +0.90 = +0.3
Def. Rebounds 4.2/g × +0.30 = +1.3
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.5
Contested Shots 3.9/g × +0.20 = +0.8
Deflections 1.8/g × +0.65 = +1.2
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.4/g × +0.30 = +0.1
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +9.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.1
Net Impact
-0.5
44th pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 65th
11.9 PPG
Efficiency 30th
53.9% TS
Playmaking 70th
2.3 APG
Rebounding 76th
5.6 RPG
Rim Protection 48th
0.14/min
Hustle 51th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 6th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jonathan Kuminga's first twenty games were defined by a jarring mid-season demotion to the bench and a maddeningly inconsistent approach to offensive basketball. Even when he filled the stat sheet early in the year, hidden costs routinely dragged down his overall value. During the 11/05 vs SAC matchup, he poured in 24 points but posted a dismal -7.5 impact score because severe inefficiency on high volume completely cratered the offense. Conversely, he occasionally found ways to contribute when his scoring abandoned him. In the 12/02 vs OKC game, he scored just 8 points on a slew of heavily contested misses, yet salvaged a positive +1.1 impact score by leaning on stout defensive metrics (+4.5) to keep his team afloat. Banished to the second unit, Kuminga finally began to maximize his physical gifts in shorter bursts, generating a massive +11.2 impact score in just nine minutes during the 01/22 vs DAL contest by attacking the basket with ruthless efficiency for 10 points. If he wants his starting job back, he must permanently abandon his tunnel vision and fully embrace this streamlined, high-energy role.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Kuminga's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~7 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 53% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Kuminga consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -2.6, second-half: +1.5. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 11 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 55 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. Johnson 37.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
W. Riley 35.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.25
PTS 9
A. Gordon 31.1 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
J. Minott 24.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Ayton 21.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 6
G. Trent Jr. 21.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 6
R. Westbrook 21.6 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Grant 21.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
A. Nesmith 20.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 6
J. Brown 19.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

L. Dončić 44.7 poss
FG% 58.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 16
A. Gordon 33.7 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.5
PTS 17
J. Minott 30.9 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.29
PTS 9
W. Riley 28.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
B. Coulibaly 26.8 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
C. Braun 25.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 5
J. Grant 23.4 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
R. Rollins 21.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 7
C. Johnson 21.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
P. Siakam 21.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 9

SEASON STATS

33
Games
11.9
PPG
5.6
RPG
2.3
APG
0.6
SPG
0.3
BPG
46.5
FG%
37.5
3P%
72.3
FT%
22.9
MPG

GAME LOG

33 games played