WAS

2025-26 Season

TRISTAN VUKCEVIC

Washington Wizards | Forward | 7-0
Tristan Vukcevic
9.0 PPG
3.0 RPG
1.1 APG
13.7 MPG
+1.8 Impact

Vukcevic produces at an above average rate for a 14-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.8
Scoring +5.7
Points 9.0 PPG × +1.00 = +9.0
Missed 2PT 1.4/g × -0.78 = -1.1
Missed 3PT 1.9/g × -0.87 = -1.7
Missed FT 0.5/g × -1.00 = -0.5
Creation +1.6
Assists 1.1/g × +0.50 = +0.6
Off. Rebounds 0.8/g × +1.26 = +1.0
Turnovers -2.5
Turnovers 1.3/g × -1.95 = -2.5
Defense +0.5
Steals 0.5/g × +2.30 = +1.1
Blocks 0.7/g × +0.90 = +0.6
Def. Rebounds 2.2/g × +0.30 = +0.7
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.1
Contested Shots 4.1/g × +0.20 = +0.8
Deflections 1.1/g × +0.65 = +0.7
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 1.5/g × +0.30 = +0.4
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +7.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −5.6
Net Impact
+1.8
71st pctl vs Forwards

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 227 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 59th
10.3 PPG
Efficiency 86th
62.4% TS
Playmaking 31th
1.2 APG
Rebounding 34th
3.5 RPG
Rim Protection 82th
0.19/min
Hustle 84th
0.13/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 3th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Tristan Vukcevic's first twenty games were defined by a stark mid-season awakening, transforming him from a fringe rotation piece into a legitimate frontcourt weapon. Early on, he had to scrape together value without the ball. During his 10/24 vs DAL appearance, he managed a +0.3 impact score despite scoring just 2 points because his relentless activity level and smart defensive positioning completely offset his offensive invisibility. His growing pains peaked during an ugly 11/19 vs MIN outing, where a relatively high-scoring 7-point, 5-rebound line masked a disastrous -9.6 impact score. That massive negative rating stemmed directly from him struggling mightily to find his rhythm and forcing awkward attempts around the basket. He quickly adapted. Just days later in the 11/22 vs CHI game, Vukcevic erupted for 12 points and 8 rebounds while logging a massive +9.6 impact score. He generated that tremendous value by anchoring the paint with phenomenal verticality, deterring drivers and swinging the momentum entirely.

A wildly erratic roller-coaster of defensive engagement and stubborn shot selection defined this stretch of the season for Tristan Vukcevic. Even when his outside shot was falling, hidden costs often dragged his overall value into the red. On 02/08 vs MIA, he poured in 14 points on blistering 4-for-5 shooting from deep, yet still posted a -1.1 impact because his significant defensive liabilities in pick-and-roll coverage bled points. Conversely, he found ways to salvage terrible offensive nights through sheer effort. During his 01/09 vs NOP outing, he clanked his way to a 4-for-14 shooting performance but generated a +5.2 impact by relying on high-motor hustle plays and elite defensive positioning. When he fully committed to using his size, the results were staggering. Look no further than 02/19 vs IND, where a modest 12-point night yielded a massive +24.7 impact because he delivered an absolute masterclass in paint deterrence and rim protection.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Vukcevic's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 58% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Vukcevic consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: +0.3, second-half: +3.3. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Hot right now — 4 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 7 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 58 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

O. Okongwu 85.2 poss
FG% 52.4%
3P% 42.9%
PPP 0.33
PTS 28
J. Huff 50.8 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 11
P. Reed 40.3 poss
FG% 70.0%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.52
PTS 21
J. Poeltl 30.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 6
J. Smith 27.9 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 5
I. Jackson 22.0 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
L. Kornet 21.7 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 8
K. Ware 21.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.28
PTS 6
L. Garza 20.6 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 5
N. Reid 19.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

O. Okongwu 76.6 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 22.2%
PPP 0.18
PTS 14
J. Huff 54.6 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 60.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 21
P. Reed 38.4 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 8
J. Poeltl 33.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 6
A. Bona 28.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 7
L. Kornet 27.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 6
I. Jackson 26.6 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.3
PTS 8
N. Claxton 23.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
J. Sims 23.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 3
D. Queen 21.3 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 6

SEASON STATS

49
Games
9.0
PPG
3.0
RPG
1.1
APG
0.5
SPG
0.7
BPG
47.9
FG%
34.7
3P%
78.4
FT%
13.7
MPG

GAME LOG

49 games played