GAME ANALYSIS

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DEN Denver Nuggets
S Jamal Murray 39.5m
31
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+12.6

Taking total control of the offense, his decisive shot-making and excellent pick-and-roll pacing dictated the flow. His ability to hit heavily contested pull-ups at the end of the shot clock bailed out multiple broken possessions. He relentlessly hunted favorable switches down the stretch to close out crucial offensive sets.

Shooting
FG 10/18 (55.6%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 9/10 (90.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.2%
USG% 27.1%
Net Rtg +2.1
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.5m
Offense +24.7
Hustle +3.8
Defense +5.0
Raw total +33.5
Avg player in 39.5m -20.9
Impact +12.6
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Nikola Jokić 37.5m
22
pts
8
reb
9
ast
Impact
+7.4

Masterful offensive orchestration generated high-quality looks for everyone on the floor. He consistently manipulated the defense from the high post, using his gravity to open up backdoor cuts and easy finishes. His pinpoint outlet passes single-handedly ignited the team's transition attack.

Shooting
FG 9/14 (64.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.9%
USG% 20.9%
Net Rtg -5.8
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Offense +19.7
Hustle +4.2
Defense +3.2
Raw total +27.1
Avg player in 37.5m -19.7
Impact +7.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 12
Opp FG% 63.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Christian Braun 33.4m
11
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.3

Lacking secondary rim protection and poor defensive positioning severely damaged his overall impact. Despite finding some success slashing to the basket, he was repeatedly targeted and blown by in isolation sets. His tendency to bite on pump fakes compromised the entire defensive shell.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg -10.5
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.4m
Offense +9.3
Hustle +0.4
Defense -1.5
Raw total +8.2
Avg player in 33.4m -17.5
Impact -9.3
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Cameron Johnson 30.9m
6
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.0

A frigid shooting night completely erased the value of his otherwise solid perimeter defense. When his outside shot isn't falling, his inability to pressure the rim leaves the offense playing four-on-five. Defenders aggressively chased him off the line, and he failed to counter with decisive drives.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 36.1%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg +7.1
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.9m
Offense +1.3
Hustle +1.9
Defense +7.1
Raw total +10.3
Avg player in 30.9m -16.3
Impact -6.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Aaron Gordon 28.8m
16
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.1

While quietly efficient on the interior, he bled value through missed defensive assignments in space. His scoring in the dunker spot was completely neutralized by his struggles to navigate screens on the other end. Opposing guards repeatedly targeted his drop coverage to generate clean pull-up looks.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.6%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -8.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Offense +12.4
Hustle +1.7
Defense +0.9
Raw total +15.0
Avg player in 28.8m -15.1
Impact -0.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
23
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+8.4

Catching fire from deep, he bent the defense to its breaking point with his limitless range. The sheer volume of his perimeter makes single-handedly swung the momentum and forced the opposition out of their zone coverage. He punished every late rotation with a quick-trigger release from beyond the arc.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 7/10 (70.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 71.9%
USG% 29.0%
Net Rtg +17.1
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.5m
Offense +15.4
Hustle +4.6
Defense +2.9
Raw total +22.9
Avg player in 27.5m -14.5
Impact +8.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Bruce Brown 21.0m
12
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.4

Poorly timed gambles on defense compromised the team's shell and overshadowed his efficient finishing. He leaked out too early in transition a few times, leaving the defensive glass vulnerable to second-chance opportunities. His aggressive attempts to jump passing lanes resulted in easy backdoor layups for his assignment.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.2%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg +33.4
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.0m
Offense +6.7
Hustle +0.8
Defense +1.1
Raw total +8.6
Avg player in 21.0m -11.0
Impact -2.4
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-7.0

Operating as an absolute ghost offensively, he allowed defenders to completely ignore him in the half-court. His reluctance to look at the basket resulted in stagnant spacing and bogged down the entire second unit. By refusing to attack closeouts, he let the defense rest and reset without consequence.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 2.6%
Net Rtg +19.4
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.0m
Offense +2.5
Hustle +0.4
Defense -0.4
Raw total +2.5
Avg player in 18.0m -9.5
Impact -7.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Tyus Jones 3.4m
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.5

Providing a brief, uneventful cameo, he primarily served to eat up a few rotation minutes. He barely broke a sweat before being subbed back out as the coaching staff quickly pivoted. He simply initiated the offense without taking any risks or creating any distinct advantages.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.4m
Offense 0.0
Hustle 0.0
Defense +0.3
Raw total +0.3
Avg player in 3.4m -1.8
Impact -1.5
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
TOR Toronto Raptors
S Scottie Barnes 38.1m
15
pts
8
reb
8
ast
Impact
+1.1

Relentless hustle plays kept his impact positive despite a brutal shooting night from the floor. He compensated for his clunky perimeter jumper by generating deflections and anchoring the weak side. His continuous disruption of passing lanes completely stalled the opponent's half-court sets.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg +4.8
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.1m
Offense +7.6
Hustle +4.3
Defense +9.2
Raw total +21.1
Avg player in 38.1m -20.0
Impact +1.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 2
S Brandon Ingram 35.5m
19
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-10.7

Defensive lapses and empty calorie scoring dragged his overall rating into the red. His inability to rotate on the perimeter allowed open looks that erased any value he provided on the other end. Opposing wings consistently exploited his late closeouts during the second half.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 64.9%
USG% 22.5%
Net Rtg +6.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.5m
Offense +9.3
Hustle 0.0
Defense -1.4
Raw total +7.9
Avg player in 35.5m -18.6
Impact -10.7
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jakob Poeltl 35.1m
23
pts
11
reb
2
ast
Impact
+13.0

Hyper-efficient finishing fueled a massive box score impact as he completely dominated the interior. His continued streak of high-percentage looks at the rim anchored the half-court offense and punished defensive mismatches. Repeatedly sealing off smaller defenders in the paint allowed him to feast at the basket.

Shooting
FG 10/14 (71.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.1%
USG% 20.8%
Net Rtg +0.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.1m
Offense +24.7
Hustle +2.7
Defense +4.0
Raw total +31.4
Avg player in 35.1m -18.4
Impact +13.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 61.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
15
pts
4
reb
8
ast
Impact
+5.2

Timely perimeter shot-making and stellar point-of-attack defense drove a highly efficient two-way performance. He controlled the tempo beautifully, punishing drop coverages while blowing up pick-and-rolls on the defensive end. A crucial stretch of pull-up jumpers in the third quarter broke the opposing defense's rhythm.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.2%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg -1.2
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.0m
Offense +13.0
Hustle +1.9
Defense +8.2
Raw total +23.1
Avg player in 34.0m -17.9
Impact +5.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S RJ Barrett 33.6m
18
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.2

Poor shot selection early in the clock led to a negative overall impact despite decent counting stats. The lack of perimeter efficiency stalled offensive momentum and allowed the opposition to leak out in transition. His tunnel vision on drives resulted in forced attempts into heavy traffic.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.6%
USG% 26.4%
Net Rtg -4.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.6m
Offense +7.8
Hustle +2.1
Defense +0.6
Raw total +10.5
Avg player in 33.6m -17.7
Impact -7.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
14
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.1

Lethal spot-up spacing completely changed the geometry of the floor during his minutes. His willingness to take and make contested corner threes punished defensive rotations and provided a massive spark off the bench. He consistently relocated along the baseline to make himself available for drive-and-kick feeds.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 101.7%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg -20.1
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Offense +14.6
Hustle +3.0
Defense +2.7
Raw total +20.3
Avg player in 23.2m -12.2
Impact +8.1
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
Jamal Shead 21.2m
4
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
-9.2

Bricking open perimeter looks repeatedly cratered his value and stalled possessions. Without his shot falling, defenders sagged entirely off him, which completely clogged the driving lanes for his teammates. His inability to punish under-screens made the half-court offense incredibly stagnant.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 26.9%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -10.7
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.2m
Offense +0.9
Hustle +0.8
Defense +0.2
Raw total +1.9
Avg player in 21.2m -11.1
Impact -9.2
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
0.0

Failing to assert himself within the offensive flow resulted in a completely neutral stint. He simply existed on the floor, passing up open looks and making zero tangible dents in the game's momentum. His hesitation to shoot off the catch allowed defenders to sag and clog the paint.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 106.4%
USG% 5.9%
Net Rtg -8.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.8m
Offense +6.3
Hustle +0.4
Defense +0.6
Raw total +7.3
Avg player in 13.8m -7.3
Impact 0.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
+3.0

Squeezing noticeable hustle and defensive value out of a microscopic rotation stint, he made his presence felt immediately. He crashed the glass and fought through screens to disrupt off-ball actions. A pair of hard closeouts on perimeter shooters highlighted his brief burst of energy.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.6%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -35.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.5m
Offense +1.8
Hustle +2.7
Defense +1.4
Raw total +5.9
Avg player in 5.5m -2.9
Impact +3.0
How is this calculated?
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0