Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
DEN lead TOR lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
TOR 2P — 3P —
DEN 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 167 attempts

TOR TOR Shot-making Δ

Barnes Hard 7/18 -2.2
Poeltl Open 10/14 +4.1
Barrett 6/14 -2.4
Ingram 7/12 +2.7
Quickley Hard 6/11 +4.3
Shead 2/7 -3.4
Walter Hard 4/6 +5.4
Battle Hard 1/3 -0.6
Mamukelashvili Open 1/1 +0.6

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Murray 10/18 +4.1
Hardaway Jr. Hard 8/16 +6.3
Jokić 9/14 +4.0
Gordon 6/10 +2.0
Braun 5/9 +0.3
Johnson 2/7 -3.7
Brown 4/6 +2.7
Jones Hard 0/1 -0.9
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
TOR
DEN
44/86 Field Goals 44/81
51.2% Field Goal % 54.3%
10/31 3-Pointers 14/30
32.3% 3-Point % 46.7%
17/23 Free Throws 19/25
73.9% Free Throw % 76.0%
59.8% True Shooting % 65.8%
45 Total Rebounds 47
11 Offensive 9
29 Defensive 29
32 Assists 26
3.20 Assist/TO Ratio 2.60
10 Turnovers 10
8 Steals 5
4 Blocks 2
24 Fouls 20
50 Points in Paint 52
18 Fast Break Pts 12
15 Points off TOs 14
8 Second Chance Pts 16
25 Bench Points 35
11 Largest Lead 6
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jakob Poeltl
23 PTS · 11 REB · 2 AST · 35.1 MIN
+27.58
2
Jamal Murray
31 PTS · 5 REB · 6 AST · 39.5 MIN
+26.72
3
Nikola Jokić
22 PTS · 8 REB · 9 AST · 37.5 MIN
+20.37
4
Immanuel Quickley
15 PTS · 4 REB · 8 AST · 34.0 MIN
+19.37
5
Ja'Kobe Walter
14 PTS · 2 REB · 2 AST · 23.2 MIN
+16.61
6
Tim Hardaway Jr.
23 PTS · 4 REB · 0 AST · 27.5 MIN
+16.49
7
Scottie Barnes
15 PTS · 8 REB · 8 AST · 38.1 MIN
+12.79
8
Aaron Gordon
16 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 28.8 MIN
+12.19
9
RJ Barrett
18 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 33.6 MIN
+7.63
10
Brandon Ingram
19 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 35.5 MIN
+7.51
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:01 TEAM defensive REBOUND 115–121
Q4 0:04 MISS B. Ingram 24' 3PT 115–121
Q4 0:06 A. Gordon Free Throw 2 of 2 (16 PTS) 115–121
Q4 0:06 TEAM offensive REBOUND 115–120
Q4 0:06 MISS A. Gordon Free Throw 1 of 2 115–120
Q4 0:06 R. Barrett take personal FOUL (3 PF) (Gordon 2 FT) 115–120
Q4 0:09 J. Murray away-from-play Free Throw 1 of 1 (31 PTS) 115–120
Q4 0:09 J. Poeltl away-from-play personal FOUL (4 PF) (Murray 1 FT) 115–119
Q4 0:09 A. Gordon REBOUND (Off:1 Def:4) 115–119
Q4 0:10 MISS J. Poeltl Free Throw 2 of 2 115–119
Q4 0:10 TEAM offensive REBOUND 115–119
Q4 0:10 MISS J. Poeltl Free Throw 1 of 2 115–119
Q4 0:10 N. Jokić take personal FOUL (5 PF) (Poeltl 2 FT) 115–119
Q4 0:12 J. Murray Free Throw 2 of 2 (30 PTS) 115–119
Q4 0:12 J. Murray Free Throw 1 of 2 (29 PTS) 115–118

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DEN Denver Nuggets
S Jamal Murray 39.5m
31
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+22.8

Taking total control of the offense, his decisive shot-making and excellent pick-and-roll pacing dictated the flow. His ability to hit heavily contested pull-ups at the end of the shot clock bailed out multiple broken possessions. He relentlessly hunted favorable switches down the stretch to close out crucial offensive sets.

Shooting
FG 10/18 (55.6%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 9/10 (90.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.2%
USG% 27.1%
Net Rtg +2.1
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.5m
Scoring +24.9
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +6.0
Hustle +1.5
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Nikola Jokić 37.5m
22
pts
8
reb
9
ast
Impact
+19.3

Masterful offensive orchestration generated high-quality looks for everyone on the floor. He consistently manipulated the defense from the high post, using his gravity to open up backdoor cuts and easy finishes. His pinpoint outlet passes single-handedly ignited the team's transition attack.

Shooting
FG 9/14 (64.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 67.9%
USG% 20.9%
Net Rtg -5.8
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.5m
Scoring +17.2
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +10.2
Defense -2.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 12
Opp FG% 63.2%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Christian Braun 33.4m
11
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.0

Lacking secondary rim protection and poor defensive positioning severely damaged his overall impact. Despite finding some success slashing to the basket, he was repeatedly targeted and blown by in isolation sets. His tendency to bite on pump fakes compromised the entire defensive shell.

Shooting
FG 5/9 (55.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.1%
USG% 14.1%
Net Rtg -10.5
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.4m
Scoring +7.8
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +5.1
Defense -6.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Cameron Johnson 30.9m
6
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-3.0

A frigid shooting night completely erased the value of his otherwise solid perimeter defense. When his outside shot isn't falling, his inability to pressure the rim leaves the offense playing four-on-five. Defenders aggressively chased him off the line, and he failed to counter with decisive drives.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 36.1%
USG% 12.3%
Net Rtg +7.1
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.9m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +5.4
Defense +3.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Aaron Gordon 28.8m
16
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+5.8

While quietly efficient on the interior, he bled value through missed defensive assignments in space. His scoring in the dunker spot was completely neutralized by his struggles to navigate screens on the other end. Opposing guards repeatedly targeted his drop coverage to generate clean pull-up looks.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 65.6%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -8.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Scoring +12.0
Creation +2.7
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +5.4
Defense -1.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
23
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+10.7

Catching fire from deep, he bent the defense to its breaking point with his limitless range. The sheer volume of his perimeter makes single-handedly swung the momentum and forced the opposition out of their zone coverage. He punished every late rotation with a quick-trigger release from beyond the arc.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 7/10 (70.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 71.9%
USG% 29.0%
Net Rtg +17.1
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.5m
Scoring +17.3
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +6.9
Hustle +3.1
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
Bruce Brown 21.0m
12
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.8

Poorly timed gambles on defense compromised the team's shell and overshadowed his efficient finishing. He leaked out too early in transition a few times, leaving the defensive glass vulnerable to second-chance opportunities. His aggressive attempts to jump passing lanes resulted in easy backdoor layups for his assignment.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 87.2%
USG% 19.1%
Net Rtg +33.4
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.0m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +2.6
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
-13.4

Operating as an absolute ghost offensively, he allowed defenders to completely ignore him in the half-court. His reluctance to look at the basket resulted in stagnant spacing and bogged down the entire second unit. By refusing to attack closeouts, he let the defense rest and reset without consequence.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 2.6%
Net Rtg +19.4
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.0m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.8
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Tyus Jones 3.4m
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.7

Providing a brief, uneventful cameo, he primarily served to eat up a few rotation minutes. He barely broke a sweat before being subbed back out as the coaching staff quickly pivoted. He simply initiated the offense without taking any risks or creating any distinct advantages.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.4m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
TOR Toronto Raptors
S Scottie Barnes 38.1m
15
pts
8
reb
8
ast
Impact
+5.0

Relentless hustle plays kept his impact positive despite a brutal shooting night from the floor. He compensated for his clunky perimeter jumper by generating deflections and anchoring the weak side. His continuous disruption of passing lanes completely stalled the opponent's half-court sets.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 41.7%
USG% 22.7%
Net Rtg +4.8
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.1m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +3.4
Defense +3.3
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 2
S Brandon Ingram 35.5m
19
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+1.5

Defensive lapses and empty calorie scoring dragged his overall rating into the red. His inability to rotate on the perimeter allowed open looks that erased any value he provided on the other end. Opposing wings consistently exploited his late closeouts during the second half.

Shooting
FG 7/12 (58.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 64.9%
USG% 22.5%
Net Rtg +6.2
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.5m
Scoring +14.4
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +4.4
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jakob Poeltl 35.1m
23
pts
11
reb
2
ast
Impact
+22.8

Hyper-efficient finishing fueled a massive box score impact as he completely dominated the interior. His continued streak of high-percentage looks at the rim anchored the half-court offense and punished defensive mismatches. Repeatedly sealing off smaller defenders in the paint allowed him to feast at the basket.

Shooting
FG 10/14 (71.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.1%
USG% 20.8%
Net Rtg +0.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.1m
Scoring +18.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +12.0
Defense +0.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 61.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
15
pts
4
reb
8
ast
Impact
+9.2

Timely perimeter shot-making and stellar point-of-attack defense drove a highly efficient two-way performance. He controlled the tempo beautifully, punishing drop coverages while blowing up pick-and-rolls on the defensive end. A crucial stretch of pull-up jumpers in the third quarter broke the opposing defense's rhythm.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.2%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg -1.2
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.0m
Scoring +11.2
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +1.2
Defense +5.5
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S RJ Barrett 33.6m
18
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-1.4

Poor shot selection early in the clock led to a negative overall impact despite decent counting stats. The lack of perimeter efficiency stalled offensive momentum and allowed the opposition to leak out in transition. His tunnel vision on drives resulted in forced attempts into heavy traffic.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.6%
USG% 26.4%
Net Rtg -4.2
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.6m
Scoring +11.8
Creation +2.0
Shot Making +3.3
Hustle +4.4
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
14
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.6

Lethal spot-up spacing completely changed the geometry of the floor during his minutes. His willingness to take and make contested corner threes punished defensive rotations and provided a massive spark off the bench. He consistently relocated along the baseline to make himself available for drive-and-kick feeds.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 101.7%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg -20.1
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring +12.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +2.5
Defense +2.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
Jamal Shead 21.2m
4
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
-13.7

Bricking open perimeter looks repeatedly cratered his value and stalled possessions. Without his shot falling, defenders sagged entirely off him, which completely clogged the driving lanes for his teammates. His inability to punish under-screens made the half-court offense incredibly stagnant.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 26.9%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg -10.7
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.2m
Scoring -0.3
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +1.6
Defense -0.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.4

Failing to assert himself within the offensive flow resulted in a completely neutral stint. He simply existed on the floor, passing up open looks and making zero tangible dents in the game's momentum. His hesitation to shoot off the catch allowed defenders to sag and clog the paint.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 106.4%
USG% 5.9%
Net Rtg -8.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.8m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.2
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
3
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.3

Squeezing noticeable hustle and defensive value out of a microscopic rotation stint, he made his presence felt immediately. He crashed the glass and fought through screens to disrupt off-ball actions. A pair of hard closeouts on perimeter shooters highlighted his brief burst of energy.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.6%
USG% 18.8%
Net Rtg -35.7
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.5m
Scoring +1.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0