Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
CHA lead DEN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
DEN 2P — 3P —
CHA 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 168 attempts

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Murray Hard 14/25 +5.4
Jokić 11/16 +8.9
Valančiūnas 4/9 -1.4
Watson Open 4/9 -1.9
Johnson Hard 2/7 -2.3
Hardaway Jr. Hard 3/6 +2.2
Jones Hard 3/5 +2.6
Pickett 2/3 +1.6
Brown 0/3 -3.3

CHA CHA Shot-making Δ

Bridges 10/19 -0.4
Miller Hard 5/19 -3.2
Simpson Hard 6/14 -0.2
Knueppel Hard 5/13 -0.3
James Hard 2/6 -1.1
McNeeley Hard 4/5 +6.9
Kalkbrenner Open 3/4 +0.9
Salaün Hard 2/3 +2.8
Plumlee Open 1/2 -0.6
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DEN
CHA
43/83 Field Goals 38/85
51.8% Field Goal % 44.7%
13/35 3-Pointers 14/46
37.1% 3-Point % 30.4%
16/22 Free Throws 16/21
72.7% Free Throw % 76.2%
62.0% True Shooting % 56.2%
43 Total Rebounds 57
5 Offensive 10
30 Defensive 37
29 Assists 24
2.90 Assist/TO Ratio 1.71
10 Turnovers 13
8 Steals 7
2 Blocks 3
19 Fouls 22
46 Points in Paint 46
11 Fast Break Pts 10
15 Points off TOs 13
12 Second Chance Pts 11
27 Bench Points 29
14 Largest Lead 6
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jamal Murray
34 PTS · 3 REB · 5 AST · 35.5 MIN
+29.7
2
Nikola Jokić
28 PTS · 9 REB · 11 AST · 34.8 MIN
+23.92
3
Miles Bridges
24 PTS · 9 REB · 8 AST · 36.9 MIN
+18.73
4
Tim Hardaway Jr.
14 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST · 26.9 MIN
+16.62
5
Liam McNeeley
13 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 19.5 MIN
+14.88
6
KJ Simpson
16 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 29.3 MIN
+12.45
7
Jalen Pickett
5 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 16.1 MIN
+8.59
8
Jonas Valančiūnas
8 PTS · 4 REB · 3 AST · 13.2 MIN
+7.49
9
Kon Knueppel
14 PTS · 4 REB · 4 AST · 33.5 MIN
+7.32
10
Spencer Jones
8 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 24.6 MIN
+7.22
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:12 CHA 5-second-violation Team TURNOVER 115–106
Q4 0:12 T. Hardaway Jr. Free Throw 2 of 2 (14 PTS) 115–106
Q4 0:12 T. Hardaway Jr. Free Throw 1 of 2 (13 PTS) 114–106
Q4 0:12 R. Kalkbrenner personal FOUL (6 PF) (Hardaway Jr. 2 FT) 113–106
Q4 0:16 C. Johnson REBOUND (Off:1 Def:3) 113–106
Q4 0:20 MISS B. Miller 26' running pullup 3PT 113–106
Q4 0:23 K. Knueppel REBOUND (Off:1 Def:3) 113–106
Q4 0:25 R. Kalkbrenner BLOCK (2 BLK) 113–106
Q4 0:25 MISS P. Watson driving DUNK - blocked 113–106
Q4 0:42 M. Bridges driving DUNK (24 PTS) (K. Knueppel 4 AST) 113–106
Q4 0:52 J. Murray Free Throw 2 of 2 (34 PTS) 113–104
Q4 0:52 J. Murray Free Throw 1 of 2 (33 PTS) 112–104
Q4 0:52 M. Bridges shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (Murray 2 FT) 111–104
Q4 1:06 N. Jokić REBOUND (Off:0 Def:9) 111–104
Q4 1:10 MISS M. Bridges Free Throw 2 of 2 111–104

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

CHA Charlotte Hornets
S Miles Bridges 36.9m
24
pts
9
reb
8
ast
Impact
+13.6

Compensated for a brutal shooting night from deep by relentlessly attacking the basket and generating elite hustle numbers (+5.2). His downhill aggression collapsed the defense, allowing him to spray passes to open teammates. Thrived in transition sequences where his athleticism overwhelmed retreating defenders.

Shooting
FG 10/19 (52.6%)
3PT 0/6 (0.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 55.5%
USG% 29.4%
Net Rtg -10.0
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.9m
Scoring +16.1
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +8.5
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
S Kon Knueppel 33.5m
14
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-1.0

Dragged down his overall impact (-4.8) by stubbornly hoisting low-quality perimeter shots against tight closeouts. While his defensive effort (+3.5) remained commendable, the sheer volume of empty offensive possessions stalled the team's momentum. A classic case of poor shot selection overriding decent foundational play.

Shooting
FG 5/13 (38.5%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.4%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg -19.1
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Scoring +7.9
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +4.1
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Brandon Miller 29.5m
17
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
-3.3

Sabotaged his own impact (-6.9) with a brutal shooting performance characterized by forced, off-balance jumpers. Snapped a highly efficient three-game streak by settling for contested looks early in the shot clock. Despite decent defensive metrics (+3.2), his offensive inefficiency was a massive anchor on the starting unit.

Shooting
FG 5/19 (26.3%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 41.8%
USG% 35.7%
Net Rtg -19.7
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.5m
Scoring +7.3
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +4.4
Hustle +6.3
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -12.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 5
S KJ Simpson 29.3m
16
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+7.8

Mitigated a shaky perimeter shooting night by consistently breaking down the defense off the dribble. His active hands and defensive pressure (+3.5) helped offset the damage from his missed jumpers. Provided crucial secondary creation during a stagnant third-quarter stretch.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.8%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg -24.1
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.3m
Scoring +8.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +3.4
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
6
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.9

Generated tremendous hustle (+4.8) and defensive value (+3.5), but likely suffered from hidden negative plays like costly fouls or unforced errors to drag his total to -1.0. Executed well as a roll man, yet couldn't quite tilt the broader lineup metrics in his favor. His rim protection during the second quarter was a notable bright spot.

Shooting
FG 3/4 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 9.1%
Net Rtg -15.5
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.5m
Scoring +5.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +1.8
Defense -4.6
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 12
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
Sion James 25.9m
7
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.8

A lack of shooting gravity severely cramped the floor, leading to a detrimental -5.9 overall impact. While he brought decent energy (+3.0 hustle), his inability to punish defensive sag allowed opponents to pack the paint. Forced several ill-advised drives when his outside shot failed to fall.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.9%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -0.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.9m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.5
Defense +1.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-7.8

Struggled to positively influence the game (-4.0) despite converting his limited looks around the basket. Bled value through defensive miscommunications and struggles defending in space against quicker lineups. Failed to establish a physical presence in the paint during his rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 8.0%
Net Rtg +9.5
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring +3.1
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +4.7
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
13
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+7.7

Delivered a lethal display of spot-up shooting that instantly warped the opposing defense and drove a +5.6 impact. Punished late rotations with quick-trigger confidence, maximizing every second of his floor time. His gravity as a spacer completely unlocked the half-court offense for the second unit.

Shooting
FG 4/5 (80.0%)
3PT 4/5 (80.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 110.5%
USG% 14.0%
Net Rtg +12.5
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.6m
Scoring +11.7
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.5

Played within himself, taking only high-value shots to notch a tidy +1.0 overall impact. Provided reliable spacing and didn't force any action against set defenses. A quiet but effective shift that stabilized the rotation during the middle quarters.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 8.3%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.8m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +5.7
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.4

Barely broke a sweat in three minutes of garbage time action. Registered a slightly negative impact (-1.4) during a disorganized closing stretch.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +133.3
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.1m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DEN Denver Nuggets
S Cameron Johnson 38.6m
8
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.5

Impact cratered (-12.6) due to a barrage of bricked perimeter looks that fueled transition opportunities going the other way. Defensive lapses (-0.6) compounded the damage when his shot wasn't falling. Failed to adjust his shot selection during a brutal second-half cold streak.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 45.7%
USG% 10.8%
Net Rtg +10.2
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.6m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +5.1
Defense -5.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Jamal Murray 35.5m
34
pts
3
reb
5
ast
Impact
+30.5

Overcame a frosty night from beyond the arc by relentlessly attacking the midrange and generating elite hustle metrics (+6.7). His sheer scoring gravity bent the defense, opening up passing lanes and driving a stellar +20.5 overall impact. Took over the game down the stretch with tough, contested shot-making.

Shooting
FG 14/25 (56.0%)
3PT 2/9 (22.2%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 63.5%
USG% 33.8%
Net Rtg +16.0
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.5m
Scoring +25.8
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +8.1
Hustle +0.9
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
S Nikola Jokić 34.8m
28
pts
9
reb
11
ast
Impact
+19.4

Absolute masterclass in offensive orchestration that generated a massive +22.8 box impact. Picked apart defensive rotations with surgical precision, creating high-value looks at the rim and from deep. His ability to manipulate the pick-and-roll coverage dictated the entire flow of the game.

Shooting
FG 11/16 (68.8%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 80.8%
USG% 27.6%
Net Rtg +6.7
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +23.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +7.4
Hustle +2.7
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Peyton Watson 30.4m
10
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
-4.5

Defensive intensity and strong hustle metrics (+3.6) were completely overshadowed by offensive disjointedness. His negative overall impact (-8.5) stemmed from empty possessions and a lack of playmaking rhythm. Struggled to find his spots in the half-court, stalling out several key possessions on the perimeter.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/5 (20.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.6%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg +12.1
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.4m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +1.7
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +7.2
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 23.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 4
S Spencer Jones 24.6m
8
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-3.9

Capitalized on limited touches by providing excellent spacing and high-energy off-ball movement. His hustle (+4.7) kept possessions alive during crucial second-quarter stretches. A highly efficient complementary performance that subtly tipped the scales in his team's favor.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 12.0%
Net Rtg +28.6
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.6m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +2.5
Defense -0.2
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
14
pts
1
reb
2
ast
Impact
+8.1

Provided a massive spark off the bench by hitting timely shots and executing defensive assignments perfectly (+5.1). Avoided the erratic shot selection that sometimes plagues him, letting the offense come to him organically. His disciplined perimeter defense against opposing guards was a quiet game-changer.

Shooting
FG 3/6 (50.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 6/6 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.0%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg +14.6
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.9m
Scoring +11.6
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +0.3
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
Bruce Brown 19.9m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-14.5

A complete offensive ghost whose inability to generate any rim pressure resulted in a disastrous -12.2 total impact. Defensive struggles (-1.2) meant he couldn't offset his scoreless outing on the other end. Looked entirely out of sync during his rotation minutes, breaking a five-game streak of efficient play.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.0%
Net Rtg -24.4
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.9m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
+0.1

Maximized a brief stint on the floor with decisive decision-making and rock-solid defensive positioning (+2.0). Kept the offense humming without forcing the issue, taking only high-percentage looks. His steady hand during non-Jokic minutes was exactly what the second unit needed.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 8.8%
Net Rtg -12.1
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.1m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +5.1
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
4
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.7

Anchored the paint with bruising physicality, driving a strong +5.3 defensive impact in limited action. Punished smaller defenders on the interior, though a few missed bunnies kept his overall score from soaring higher. Set bone-crushing screens that repeatedly freed up shooters in the half-court.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 44.4%
USG% 35.7%
Net Rtg +12.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.2m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.7
Hustle +2.2
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1