2025-26 Season
JEREMIAH FEARS
2025-26 Season
JEREMIAH FEARS
Fears produces at an below average rate for a 25-minute workload.
About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works
TEAM COMPARISON
of 16 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 235 Guards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Jeremiah Fears spent his first twenty games riding a chaotic pendulum between disruptive two-way menace and inefficient volume shooter. When he embraced the gritty margins of the game, his value spiked regardless of his scoring totals. Take his 10/31 vs LAC performance as a prime example. Despite an ugly 4-for-14 shooting night yielding just 13 points, he posted a +8.0 impact score because his relentless energy (+7.0 hustle) and defensive tenacity completely wrecked the opposition's flow. Conversely, his shot selection frequently sabotaged his overall effectiveness even when his point totals looked respectable. During an outing on 11/02 vs OKC, he dropped 16 points but recorded a brutal -10.0 impact score, bleeding value through live-ball turnovers and awful decision-making that ignited opponent fast breaks. He hit absolute rock bottom on 10/27 vs BOS, where an abysmal 1-for-11 shooting night yielded just 2 points and a disastrous -19.3 impact score driven by forced, low-percentage jumpers. To survive as a reliable starter, Fears must stop hunting empty stats and commit to the point-of-attack defense that actually drives winning basketball.
A disastrous regression into tunnel vision and forced offense completely derailed Jeremiah Fears during this brutal winter stretch. Even when his raw scoring totals looked respectable, hidden costs routinely bled his team dry. During the 01/02 vs POR matchup, Fears tallied 18 points but posted a dismal -11.7 impact score because his failure to stretch the floor severely cramped the halfcourt offense. Similarly, his 20-point outing on 12/04 vs MIN yielded a negative -1.5 impact, as empty-calorie production masked a slew of hidden mistakes. He only managed to stay afloat when he fully committed to the gritty margins of the floor. On 12/22 vs DAL, Fears scored just 12 points on a miserable 4-for-14 shooting night, yet still scraped out a +2.1 impact by relying on tenacious on-ball defense and active hands to disrupt the opponent. If Fears wants to be a winning player, he must abandon the disastrous decision-making that currently poisons his offensive profile.
A mid-season demotion to the second unit defined this volatile stretch, turning Jeremiah Fears into a chaotic rotation piece whose shot selection constantly swung his value. When he embraced his role as a defensive pest, he found ways to tilt the floor without filling up the scoring column. During 02/02 vs CHA, Fears managed just 9 points but generated a robust +6.0 impact by utilizing active hands in passing lanes and applying disciplined on-ball pressure. Too often, though, his worst habits surfaced. Look no further than 02/28 vs UTA, where a hefty box score of 18 points, 11 rebounds, and 5 assists masked a damaging -5.8 impact because chilly perimeter shooting and forced attempts completely dragged down his efficiency. He finally found his rhythm during 03/01 vs LAC. Scorching the nets for 28 points, Fears broke the opposing zone and secured a +5.6 impact to end the stretch on a brilliant high note.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Boom-or-bust player. Fears's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 43% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Defensive difference-maker. Fears consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.
Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 5 games. Longest cold streak: 6 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY
Based on 77 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
77 games played