Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
MIN lead DEN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click a shooter to isolate their shots on the court
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 175 attempts

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Jokić 7/26 -11.0
Murray 5/17 -6.9
Hardaway Jr. Hard 3/8 -0.5
Brown Open 4/7 -0.7
Strawther 2/7 -2.5
Johnson 2/6 -2.9
Braun Open 0/4 -5.0
Jones Hard 2/3 +2.9
Nnaji Hard 2/2 +3.0
Jones Hard 1/2 +0.1

MIN MIN Shot-making Δ

Dosunmu Open 10/15 +0.2
Edwards Hard 6/15 -0.3
Randle Open 6/15 -5.8
McDaniels 9/13 +4.0
DiVincenzo 6/13 +0.1
Reid Hard 2/7 -2.0
Gobert Open 3/7 -2.7
Hyland Hard 2/5 +1.8
Anderson Hard 0/1 -0.8
Conley Hard 0/1 -1.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DEN
MIN
28/82 Field Goals 44/93
34.1% Field Goal % 47.3%
8/32 3-Pointers 9/34
25.0% 3-Point % 26.5%
32/40 Free Throws 16/21
80.0% Free Throw % 76.2%
48.2% True Shooting % 55.3%
55 Total Rebounds 62
6 Offensive 12
34 Defensive 41
12 Assists 31
1.20 Assist/TO Ratio 2.82
10 Turnovers 10
5 Steals 6
2 Blocks 5
18 Fouls 27
34 Points in Paint 68
7 Fast Break Pts 21
4 Points off TOs 14
19 Second Chance Pts 10
39 Bench Points 36
0 Largest Lead 27
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Jaden McDaniels
20 PTS · 10 REB · 3 AST · 40.8 MIN
+26.74
2
Ayo Dosunmu
25 PTS · 3 REB · 9 AST · 32.0 MIN
+20.77
3
Donte DiVincenzo
15 PTS · 4 REB · 7 AST · 32.9 MIN
+18.01
4
Nikola Jokić
27 PTS · 15 REB · 3 AST · 35.2 MIN
+13.86
5
Rudy Gobert
10 PTS · 12 REB · 3 AST · 36.3 MIN
+13.56
6
Zeke Nnaji
10 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST · 16.4 MIN
+11.41
7
Bruce Brown
9 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 23.1 MIN
+6.7
8
Julius Randle
15 PTS · 6 REB · 4 AST · 32.7 MIN
+6.14
9
Jamal Murray
16 PTS · 3 REB · 4 AST · 34.8 MIN
+6.09
10
Tim Hardaway Jr.
11 PTS · 5 REB · 0 AST · 28.0 MIN
+5.48
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:04 TEAM defensive REBOUND 96–113
Q4 0:08 MISS J. Beringer tip Layup 96–113
Q4 0:09 J. Beringer REBOUND (Off:2 Def:0) 96–113
Q4 0:09 MISS K. Anderson 16' step back Shot 96–113
Q4 0:20 J. Beringer REBOUND (Off:1 Def:0) 96–113
Q4 0:24 MISS M. Conley 24' pullup 3PT 96–113
Q4 0:42 J. Phillips REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 96–113
Q4 0:44 MISS T. Jones 25' pullup 3PT 96–113
Q4 0:50 D. DiVincenzo running alley-oop DUNK (15 PTS) (A. Dosunmu 9 AST) 96–113
Q4 0:54 J. Phillips STEAL (1 STL) 96–111
Q4 0:54 J. Strawther lost ball TURNOVER (2 TO) 96–111
Q4 1:02 D. DiVincenzo 24' 3PT (13 PTS) (A. Dosunmu 8 AST) 96–111
Q4 1:13 T. Jones 10' pullup Jump Shot (2 PTS) 96–108
Q4 1:21 J. Randle Free Throw 2 of 2 (15 PTS) 94–108
Q4 1:21 TEAM offensive REBOUND 94–107

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

MIN Minnesota Timberwolves
S Jaden McDaniels 40.8m
20
pts
10
reb
3
ast
Impact
+28.0

McDaniels dominated both ends of the floor, pairing a highly efficient 20-point scoring night (9-of-13 shooting) with a dominant effort on the glass (10 rebounds). His two-way brilliance was cemented by a +4.5 Defense credit, built on suffocating his matchups into a 6-of-16 shooting performance.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.4%
USG% 13.5%
Net Rtg +7.1
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 40.8m
Scoring +17.3
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +12.7
Defense +1.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Rudy Gobert 36.3m
10
pts
12
reb
3
ast
Impact
+12.3

Gobert completely anchored the paint, utilizing a massive 17 shot contests to stifle opponents into a miserable 8-of-26 shooting clip. His rim protection fueled a +6.9 Defense credit, while his 6 screen assists and relentless glass-cleaning kept the offense humming.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.3%
USG% 10.2%
Net Rtg +23.4
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.3m
Scoring +6.0
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +15.2
Defense -3.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 26
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 30.8%
STL 0
BLK 3
TO 0
15
pts
4
reb
7
ast
Impact
+10.2

DiVincenzo was an absolute menace in the passing lanes, racking up 4 steals and 4 deflections to drive a stellar +8.1 Defense credit. He paired this disruptive energy with elite connective playmaking, dishing out 7 assists to comfortably exceed his season average.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.7%
USG% 17.3%
Net Rtg +30.6
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.9m
Scoring +9.8
Creation +1.3
Shot Making +3.6
Hustle +1.2
Defense +4.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 1
S Julius Randle 32.7m
15
pts
6
reb
4
ast
Impact
+1.2

Randle struggled to find his typical scoring groove, missing all three of his perimeter looks during an inefficient 6-of-15 shooting night. He managed to salvage his floor time with solid positional defense, holding opponents to 40% shooting when he was the primary contest to earn a +2.2 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.5%
USG% 25.0%
Net Rtg +14.8
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.7m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.8
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Anthony Edwards 23.7m
17
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
-0.7

Edwards settled for too many difficult perimeter looks, clanking 6 of his 8 three-point attempts to finish well below his season scoring average. His lack of engagement bled into his own end, where a -2.2 Defense credit reflected opponents shooting a comfortable 56% against him.

Shooting
FG 6/15 (40.0%)
3PT 2/8 (25.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 34.6%
Net Rtg +27.6
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.7m
Scoring +10.7
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +3.9
Hustle +1.5
Defense -5.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Ayo Dosunmu 32.0m
25
pts
3
reb
9
ast
Impact
+15.6

Dosunmu relentlessly attacked the interior, shrugging off a winless night from deep to pour in 25 points on blistering 10-of-15 shooting. His downhill pressure collapsed the defense and fueled his playmaking (9 assists), resulting in a massive +23.0 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 10/15 (66.7%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 70.9%
USG% 25.6%
Net Rtg +15.5
+/- +11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.0m
Scoring +20.4
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +4.1
Hustle +1.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 12.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Naz Reid 17.6m
5
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.2

Reid’s microwave scoring was unplugged in this outing, as he forced up inefficient looks (2-of-7) to finish with just 5 points. His struggles extended to the defensive end, where he offered little resistance and allowed his matchups to shoot 60%.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 20.5%
Net Rtg +5.5
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.6m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +4.7
Defense -6.2
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Bones Hyland 15.4m
6
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.0

Hyland's typical high-volume bench scoring was neutralized by a stark lack of touches, limiting him to just 6 points on five shot attempts. He did manage to lock down his assignments during his 15 minutes, holding opponents scoreless (0-of-3) when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 17.9%
Net Rtg -2.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.4m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.7

Anderson was a complete non-factor during his five minutes of spot duty, failing to record a single point, rebound, or assist. His offensive passivity resulted in a negative Offense credit as he merely kept the ball moving without threatening the defense.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.1%
Net Rtg +35.6
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.3m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.1

Phillips made the most of his brief 81-second cameo, immediately jumping into the passing lanes to secure a steal. This instant burst of energy was enough to register a surprisingly high +2.6 Defense credit in absolute garbage time.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +116.7
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.4m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Joe Ingles 0.7m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.3

Ingles was inserted for the final 42 seconds of garbage time, functioning purely as a veteran placeholder. He logged no official statistics, continuing his late-season role as a locker-room presence rather than an on-court contributor.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.7m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.0

Beringer saw less than a minute of mop-up duty but still managed to pull down a pair of rebounds. His brief activity on the glass was enough to generate a +1.7 Offense credit before the final buzzer sounded.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.7m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.5

Conley made a fleeting 42-second appearance at the end of the game, missing his lone three-point attempt. The veteran point guard was merely burning the final seconds off the clock in a purely ceremonial stint.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.7m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
DEN Denver Nuggets
S Nikola Jokić 35.2m
27
pts
15
reb
3
ast
Impact
+18.1

A brutal shooting night (7-of-26 from the floor) and a sharp drop in playmaking (just 3 assists vs his 11.3 average) hampered Jokić's usual offensive orchestration. However, he compensated with sheer volume at the foul line (11-of-11) and active hands in the passing lanes, generating 5 deflections to help buoy his +7.5 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 7/26 (26.9%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 11/11 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.8%
USG% 42.7%
Net Rtg -29.5
+/- -21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Scoring +13.1
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +4.5
Hustle +15.2
Defense +0.1
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 23
FGM Against 14
Opp FG% 60.9%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 4
S Jamal Murray 34.8m
16
pts
3
reb
4
ast
Impact
+2.5

An ice-cold perimeter stroke derailed Murray's scoring rhythm, as he bricked all five of his three-point attempts en route to an inefficient 5-of-17 shooting night. His struggles compounded on the other end of the floor, where opponents hunted him to the tune of 8-of-13 shooting when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 5/17 (29.4%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 39.8%
USG% 26.3%
Net Rtg -19.4
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.8m
Scoring +7.6
Creation +1.8
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +0.9
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Spencer Jones 28.4m
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.3

Active hands defined Jones's minutes, as his 5 deflections fueled a massive +4.5 Hustle credit. He also flashed perfect perimeter efficiency (2-of-2 from deep) and stifled his assignments, holding opponents to a miserable 4-of-15 shooting clip when he was the primary defender.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 6.2%
Net Rtg -6.9
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.4m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense -2.9
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 26.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Christian Braun 23.7m
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.3

Braun completely vanished on the offensive end, missing all four of his field goal attempts to finish 86% below his season scoring average. He survived his minutes strictly through defensive grit, yielding a +2.1 Defense credit by suffocating his matchups into a 2-of-8 shooting performance.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 17.4%
USG% 11.3%
Net Rtg -41.2
+/- -19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.7m
Scoring -2.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
S Cameron Johnson 23.6m
6
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.6

A frigid shooting night (0-of-3 from deep) neutered Johnson's usual floor-spacing value, continuing a recent downward trend from beyond the arc. Despite the scoring dip, he managed to salvage some utility on the other end, generating a +1.6 Defense credit by holding his primary matchups to 2-of-5 shooting.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.6%
USG% 12.5%
Net Rtg -27.5
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
11
pts
5
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.8

Hardaway provided his standard microwave scoring off the bench, leaning heavily on the three-ball to generate a +6.2 Offense credit. He also chipped in surprisingly well on the glass, pulling down 5 rebounds to comfortably exceed his season average.

Shooting
FG 3/8 (37.5%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.4%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg -22.8
+/- -13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.0m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.3
Hustle +3.4
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
Bruce Brown 23.1m
9
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.2

Brown operated efficiently as a secondary cutter and finisher, converting 4-of-7 looks from the floor to post a +5.4 Offense credit. Despite earning a solid Defense credit overall, his point-of-attack resistance faltered, as opponents converted 75% of their attempts when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 4/7 (57.1%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 15.5%
Net Rtg -5.9
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Scoring +6.3
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Zeke Nnaji 16.4m
10
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.7

Nnaji exploded for a highly unexpected offensive outburst, leveraging perfect shooting from the field and aggressive rim runs to draw fouls (5-of-6 FT). This hyper-efficient scoring barrage drove a massive +12.7 Offense credit, a stark contrast to his typically invisible bench cameos.

Shooting
FG 2/2 (100.0%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 5/6 (83.3%)
Advanced
TS% 107.8%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg +2.4
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.4m
Scoring +9.5
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +3.8
Defense -2.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-5.4

Strawther struggled to find any rhythm during his rotation minutes, bleeding value via inefficient shooting (2-of-7) and a pair of sloppy turnovers (avg 0.5). His defensive resistance was practically non-existent, allowing opponents to torch him for 6-of-8 shooting when he was the primary contest.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.1%
USG% 27.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 14.3m
Scoring +1.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Tyus Jones 4.2m
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.0

Relegated to deep-bench duty, Jones barely left a footprint during his four minutes of action. He managed a single field goal for a minor +1.1 Offense credit but failed to register a single assist or hustle statistic.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -13.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.2m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.2

Holmes was deployed strictly for garbage-time cleanup, grabbing a pair of rebounds in his four minutes on the floor. He contested two shots and offered a screen assist, but was entirely excluded from the offensive flow.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -13.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
1
pts
0
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.1

Pickett operated purely as a mop-up guard in his brief four-minute stint, converting one of his two free throws. He managed a single assist to earn a +0.9 Offense credit but otherwise stayed out of the way as the clock wound down.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.8%
USG% 10.0%
Net Rtg -13.9
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.2m
Scoring +0.5
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0