Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
GSW lead DEN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
DEN 2P — 3P —
GSW 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 185 attempts

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Jokić 11/21 +3.9
Murray Hard 9/17 +2.6
Braun 7/11 +2.1
Brown 5/10 +0.5
Hardaway Jr. Hard 3/9 -1.3
Valančiūnas Open 3/7 -2.1
Strawther 2/7 -3.3
Johnson Hard 1/7 -4.9
Jones 1/2 -0.5

GSW GSW Shot-making Δ

Melton Hard 7/18 -2.3
Moody 9/16 +4.5
Podziemski Hard 7/16 +1.1
Horford Hard 8/11 +10.8
Payton II 6/11 +2.5
Richard 4/9 -0.4
Santos 6/7 +6.4
Spencer Hard 1/3 -1.0
Post 0/3 -3.6
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DEN
GSW
42/91 Field Goals 48/94
46.2% Field Goal % 51.1%
8/31 3-Pointers 21/52
25.8% 3-Point % 40.4%
25/29 Free Throws 11/12
86.2% Free Throw % 91.7%
56.4% True Shooting % 64.5%
52 Total Rebounds 50
14 Offensive 9
30 Defensive 35
25 Assists 42
1.47 Assist/TO Ratio 2.33
17 Turnovers 15
13 Steals 14
3 Blocks 2
11 Fouls 24
60 Points in Paint 46
20 Fast Break Pts 12
17 Points off TOs 24
22 Second Chance Pts 12
28 Bench Points 44
8 Largest Lead 14
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Nikola Jokić
35 PTS · 20 REB · 12 AST · 35.9 MIN
+42.05
2
Al Horford
22 PTS · 1 REB · 7 AST · 27.0 MIN
+28.16
3
De'Anthony Melton
20 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 25.0 MIN
+21.52
4
Moses Moody
23 PTS · 7 REB · 5 AST · 35.2 MIN
+18.78
5
Brandin Podziemski
18 PTS · 15 REB · 9 AST · 36.6 MIN
+17.43
6
Gui Santos
17 PTS · 5 REB · 7 AST · 27.8 MIN
+15.74
7
Bruce Brown
12 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 29.4 MIN
+15.63
8
Christian Braun
18 PTS · 5 REB · 2 AST · 35.1 MIN
+15.27
9
Gary Payton II
15 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 19.4 MIN
+9.74
10
Will Richard
11 PTS · 2 REB · 3 AST · 29.6 MIN
+8.96
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:20 A. Horford DUNK (22 PTS) (M. Moody 5 AST) 117–128
Q4 0:33 B. Podziemski REBOUND (Off:3 Def:12) 117–126
Q4 0:36 MISS J. Murray 27' pullup 3PT 117–126
Q4 0:38 M. Moody kicked ball VIOLATION 117–126
Q4 0:44 GSW shot clock Team TURNOVER 117–126
Q4 0:45 TEAM offensive REBOUND 117–126
Q4 0:46 MISS D. Melton 26' 3PT 117–126
Q4 1:06 D. Melton REBOUND (Off:1 Def:3) 117–126
Q4 1:09 MISS C. Johnson 3PT 117–126
Q4 1:13 B. Brown REBOUND (Off:3 Def:2) 117–126
Q4 1:17 MISS C. Johnson 28' 3PT 117–126
Q4 1:30 GSW 5-second-violation Team TURNOVER 117–126
Q4 1:30 C. Johnson personal FOUL (1 PF) 117–126
Q4 1:41 J. Murray 25' 3PT pullup (21 PTS) (B. Brown 2 AST) 117–126
Q4 1:45 C. Braun REBOUND (Off:2 Def:3) 114–126

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

GSW Golden State Warriors
S Moses Moody 35.2m
23
pts
7
reb
5
ast
Impact
+10.2

Generated strong offensive value through aggressive spot-up shooting, though he gave back a large portion of that impact through off-ball defensive miscommunications. His ability to punish late closeouts kept the offense humming despite the leaks on the other end.

Shooting
FG 9/16 (56.2%)
3PT 4/9 (44.4%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 19.8%
Net Rtg +6.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.2m
Scoring +17.4
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +5.6
Hustle +5.0
Defense -0.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 14
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 35.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Gui Santos 27.8m
17
pts
5
reb
7
ast
Impact
+2.4

Maintained his scorching efficiency by strictly taking high-value shots within the natural flow of the offense. While his overall impact was slightly muted by a lack of point-of-attack resistance, his connective passing kept the second unit highly functional.

Shooting
FG 6/7 (85.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 97.0%
USG% 15.7%
Net Rtg +12.0
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.8m
Scoring +15.8
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +4.4
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 54.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
S Al Horford 27.0m
22
pts
1
reb
7
ast
Impact
+16.1

Delivered a masterclass in two-way efficiency, anchoring the defense with elite positioning while completely breaking the opponent's coverage with lethal pick-and-pop shooting. His veteran awareness snuffed out multiple driving lanes, driving a massive positive net rating.

Shooting
FG 8/11 (72.7%)
3PT 6/7 (85.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg +26.6
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Scoring +19.8
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +6.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense +8.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 43.8%
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 2
20
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+13.4

Overcame a brutal shooting night from deep by generating immense value through point-of-attack defense and relentless hustle plays. His ability to blow up dribble handoffs and force live-ball turnovers completely masked the erratic perimeter execution.

Shooting
FG 7/18 (38.9%)
3PT 2/10 (20.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.6%
USG% 32.3%
Net Rtg +13.0
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.0m
Scoring +11.9
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +3.1
Defense +7.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 80.0%
STL 4
BLK 0
TO 0
S Pat Spencer 18.6m
2
pts
0
reb
5
ast
Impact
-20.8

Suffered a steep drop-off from his recent production, primarily due to passive offensive positioning that allowed the defense to sag into the passing lanes. This lack of scoring gravity clogged the paint for his teammates, dragging his overall impact firmly into the negative.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg -10.7
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.6m
Scoring +0.4
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense -2.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
18
pts
15
reb
9
ast
Impact
+16.2

Racked up massive counting stats but ultimately posted a negative impact due to defensive breakdowns in isolation coverage. The high-volume rebounding masked several costly late-game rotations that surrendered easy momentum-shifting buckets.

Shooting
FG 7/16 (43.8%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.7%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg +22.0
+/- +19
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.6m
Scoring +11.3
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +18.1
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 3
Will Richard 29.6m
11
pts
2
reb
3
ast
Impact
-6.3

Despite a notable scoring surge compared to his recent average, his impact plummeted due to poor transition defense and ill-advised reaching fouls. The extra offensive production was entirely negated by the free points he handed back on the other end of the floor.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.7%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +18.1
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.6m
Scoring +7.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Quinten Post 20.9m
0
pts
7
reb
4
ast
Impact
-15.3

Completely neutralized on the offensive end, failing to register a single point and severely damaging the team's half-court spacing. An inability to finish through contact or command defensive attention allowed opponents to freely double-team the primary ball-handlers.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 7.5%
Net Rtg -2.2
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +5.0
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
15
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.1

Cooled off from his recent hyper-efficient stretch but still drove positive value by wreaking havoc in the passing lanes. A persistent willingness to take open corner threes kept the defense honest, even if they weren't falling at his usual blistering rate.

Shooting
FG 6/11 (54.5%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 68.2%
USG% 31.1%
Net Rtg +16.7
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.4m
Scoring +10.9
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +3.8
Hustle +2.8
Defense +4.4
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
DEN Denver Nuggets
S Cameron Johnson 37.9m
9
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-4.4

A massive regression from his recent efficient stretch, cratering his overall impact through forced perimeter looks. His inability to stretch the floor allowed the defense to collapse inside, compounding the negative value of his missed jumpers.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 7/7 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 44.6%
USG% 10.2%
Net Rtg -12.4
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.9m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Nikola Jokić 35.9m
35
pts
20
reb
12
ast
Impact
+49.7

Utterly dominated the game by operating as the central hub, generating massive positive value through elite defensive positioning and hyper-efficient floor mapping. His ability to punish drop coverage from beyond the arc broke the opponent's defensive scheme entirely.

Shooting
FG 11/21 (52.4%)
3PT 3/4 (75.0%)
FT 10/11 (90.9%)
Advanced
TS% 67.7%
USG% 32.0%
Net Rtg -8.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.9m
Scoring +27.5
Creation +2.5
Shot Making +7.0
Hustle +24.4
Defense +7.8
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 25
FGM Against 12
Opp FG% 48.0%
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 5
S Christian Braun 35.1m
18
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+4.9

Showed strong finishing ability inside the arc, yet his overall impact slipped into the negative due to hidden transition lapses. Missed assignments on the perimeter overshadowed what was otherwise a highly efficient downhill scoring night.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.5%
USG% 15.8%
Net Rtg +1.2
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.1m
Scoring +14.3
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +5.4
Defense +1.6
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 23.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 3
S Jamal Murray 33.5m
21
pts
2
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.4

Weighed down by a significant drop in scoring volume and erratic perimeter execution compared to his recent tear. Settling for contested long-range looks instead of attacking the paint stalled the offensive rhythm and dragged his net rating down.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 57.3%
USG% 24.7%
Net Rtg -2.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Scoring +14.7
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 64.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 5
6
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.6

Provided a solid defensive spark off the bench, but his overall impact remained negative due to errant perimeter shooting. The scoring uptick was entirely negated by empty possessions and an inability to convert from deep.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.1%
USG% 16.0%
Net Rtg -5.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.5m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +2.8
Defense +1.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
Bruce Brown 29.4m
12
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.0

Continued his streak of highly efficient two-way play, anchoring the perimeter defense while making timely cuts to the basket. His elite hustle metrics reflect a series of crucial loose-ball recoveries that sustained extra offensive possessions.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 16.4%
Net Rtg -26.6
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.4m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +1.2
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +4.4
Defense +5.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
8
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.1

Hurt the team significantly by forcing contested perimeter shots early in the shot clock. The lack of secondary playmaking or defensive disruption meant his cold shooting directly fueled opponent transition momentum.

Shooting
FG 3/9 (33.3%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 40.5%
USG% 19.4%
Net Rtg -10.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
2
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-12.0

Struggled to find the rhythm of the game during his brief rotation stint, frequently getting caught out of position on defensive switches. A complete lack of offensive involvement made it impossible to offset the structural damage done on the other end.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 6.9%
Net Rtg -49.9
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.9m
Scoring +1.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.4
Hustle +0.6
Defense +0.5
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
6
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
-6.4

Provided a sturdy interior presence in limited minutes, using his massive frame to alter shots at the rim. Kept his impact positive by securing the defensive glass and setting bruising screens that opened up driving lanes for the guards.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 42.9%
USG% 25.9%
Net Rtg -25.0
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 12.1m
Scoring +2.8
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +3.8
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0