GSW

2025-26 Season

WILL RICHARD

Golden State Warriors | Guard | 6-3
Will Richard
6.3PPG
2.5RPG
1.3APG
19.7MPG
-3.8 Impact

Richard produces at an below average rate for a 20-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.8
Scoring +5.6
Points Scored 6.3 PPG = +6.3
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.1
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.4
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 1.3 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -1.7
Turnovers 0.8/g (live + dead blend) = -1.7
Defense +1.1
Steals 1.1/g = +2.5
Blocks 0.1/g = +0.1
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.5
Hustle & Effort +2.2
Rebounds 2.5 RPG (OREB + DREB) = -0.1
Contested Shots 2.1/g = +0.4
Deflections 2.2/g = +1.4
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.2
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 0.2/g = +0.1
Raw Impact +7.6
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.4
Net Impact
-3.8
33th pctl vs Guards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 246 Guards with 10+ games

Scoring 23th
6.5 PPG
Efficiency 67th
56.6% TS
Playmaking 21th
1.4 APG
Rebounding 40th
2.5 RPG
Defense 97th
+13.9/g
Hustle 47th
+8.9/g
Creation 41th
+2.50/g
Shot Making 47th
+6.43/g
TO Discipline 78th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Will Richard’s opening stretch of the 2025-26 season was defined by extreme, maddening volatility as he yo-yoed between the starting lineup and the bench. When he caught fire, he looked like a legitimate offensive focal point, erupting for 30 points on 10-of-15 shooting on 11/06 vs SAC to generate a massive +26.1 impact score. Yet, that blistering aggression would inexplicably vanish just days later. On 11/13 vs SAS, Richard logged 22 minutes as a starter but attempted merely two shots, finishing with three points and a brutal -16.2 impact because his passive perimeter floating completely stalled the first-unit offense. He is a player whose value is almost entirely tethered to whether his jumper is falling. You can see this clearly on 12/21 vs PHX, where he poured in 20 points in just 19 minutes off the bench, hitting all four of his three-pointers to drive a +11.4 impact. Until he finds a way to consistently contribute through physical defense or rebounding on his cold nights, Richard will remain a pure gamble for his coaching staff.

Will Richard’s midseason stretch was defined by maddening inconsistency, oscillating between versatile two-way play and sheer offensive invisibility. Despite scoring an efficient 8 points on 01/04 vs UTA, hidden costs like a total lack of playmaking and porous defense dragged him down to a dismal -9.6 impact. He flipped the script completely during a spot start on 01/18 vs CHA. By attacking the glass and actively distributing the basketball, he racked up 11 points, 6 rebounds, and 5 assists for a stellar +11.1 impact. Interestingly, Richard occasionally found ways to generate value even when his jumper evaporated entirely. During the 01/27 vs MIN matchup, he bricked all six of his three-point attempts and scored just 4 points. However, his willingness to keep the offense flowing with 3 assists and battle for loose balls salvaged a +3.2 impact. If he wants to stick in the rotation permanently, he must figure out how to bridge the gap between these wild extremes.

This stretch was defined by a maddening inconsistency where brief flashes of offensive brilliance were quickly swallowed by long, agonizing disappearing acts. Richard briefly looked like a legitimate rotation piece during a spot start on 02/25 vs MEM, racking up 21 points, five rebounds, and six assists. His aggressive shot creation and crisp secondary playmaking drove a stellar +14.4 Impact score that night. However, that momentum completely evaporated by the time he started on 03/16 vs WAS. Despite logging 32 minutes, Richard posted a brutal -13.4 Impact, failing to score a single point on 0-for-6 shooting while dragging down the lineup with empty possessions and poor defensive rotations. Even when he finally found his stroke again, hitting all four of his three-point attempts for 12 points on 03/23 vs DAL, his overall influence remained surprisingly muted. He managed just a +2.3 Impact in that contest because his perfect outside shooting was offset by a complete lack of rebounding and nonexistent defensive disruption. You simply cannot survive in a modern NBA rotation when you log zero points in nine separate games over a two-month span.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Richard has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~6 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 53% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Richard locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

In a rough stretch — 8 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 8 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 76 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Vassell 46.2 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
FG% 37.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.21
PTS 9
A. Edwards 39.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 6
P. Pritchard 35.1 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.14
PTS 5
J. Giddey 34.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 8
C. McCollum 34.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
W. Riley 33.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 3
C. Johnson 33.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
L. Markkanen 28.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 6
C. Spencer 27.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

A. Edwards 41.2 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 75.0%
PPP 0.51
PTS 21
S. Castle 40.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
J. Giddey 36.3 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 10
N. Powell 30.2 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 5
P. Pritchard 29.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 4
FG% 44.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.43
PTS 12
I. Quickley 28.2 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 9
W. Riley 27.8 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.29
PTS 8
C. McCollum 25.1 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.4
PTS 10
D. DiVincenzo 24.9 poss
FG% 16.7%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 3

SEASON STATS

70
Games
6.3
PPG
2.5
RPG
1.3
APG
1.1
SPG
0.1
BPG
46.8
FG%
33.5
3P%
85.2
FT%
19.7
MPG

GAME LOG

70 games played