Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
SAS lead DEN lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
DEN 2P — 3P —
SAS 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 183 attempts

DEN DEN Shot-making Δ

Murray 11/21 +1.6
Jokić 9/17 +2.7
Jones 8/13 +4.7
Braun 3/11 -5.1
Johnson 6/8 +3.8
Strawther Hard 4/6 +3.7
Brown 2/5 -1.9
Hardaway Jr. Hard 0/4 -4.3
Valančiūnas Hard 1/3 -0.5

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Fox Hard 10/19 +5.5
Castle 7/15 +0.9
Vassell Hard 5/14 -0.3
Harper 6/12 -1.0
Johnson 2/12 -8.5
Barnes 6/10 +2.6
Champagnie Hard 3/7 +0.9
Bryant Open 4/6 +1.4
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
DEN
SAS
44/88 Field Goals 43/95
50.0% Field Goal % 45.3%
12/36 3-Pointers 19/47
33.3% 3-Point % 40.4%
36/38 Free Throws 26/32
94.7% Free Throw % 81.2%
64.9% True Shooting % 60.0%
50 Total Rebounds 57
7 Offensive 12
40 Defensive 37
27 Assists 34
2.70 Assist/TO Ratio 3.40
10 Turnovers 10
8 Steals 8
4 Blocks 4
20 Fouls 25
56 Points in Paint 42
13 Fast Break Pts 9
7 Points off TOs 15
15 Second Chance Pts 21
21 Bench Points 48
9 Largest Lead 20
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Nikola Jokić
31 PTS · 20 REB · 12 AST · 39.0 MIN
+39.86
2
Jamal Murray
39 PTS · 2 REB · 7 AST · 39.8 MIN
+27.9
3
Stephon Castle
30 PTS · 11 REB · 10 AST · 35.4 MIN
+27.41
4
Spencer Jones
19 PTS · 4 REB · 2 AST · 32.8 MIN
+23.84
5
Harrison Barnes
20 PTS · 7 REB · 1 AST · 27.0 MIN
+19.72
6
Cameron Johnson
15 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST · 30.8 MIN
+15.77
7
De'Aaron Fox
27 PTS · 3 REB · 9 AST · 36.0 MIN
+13.52
8
Devin Vassell
18 PTS · 1 REB · 3 AST · 31.9 MIN
+12.35
9
Julian Strawther
10 PTS · 2 REB · 1 AST · 15.2 MIN
+10.9
10
Dylan Harper
13 PTS · 5 REB · 5 AST · 23.6 MIN
+9.78
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:01 J. Murray Free Throw 2 of 2 (39 PTS) 136–131
Q4 0:01 J. Murray Free Throw 1 of 2 (38 PTS) 135–131
Q4 0:01 C. Bryant personal FOUL (2 PF) (Murray 2 FT) 134–131
Q4 0:04 H. Barnes reverse Layup (20 PTS) 134–131
Q4 0:06 H. Barnes REBOUND (Off:2 Def:5) 134–129
Q4 0:07 MISS D. Fox 26' step back 3PT 134–129
Q4 0:12 J. Murray Free Throw 2 of 2 (37 PTS) 134–129
Q4 0:12 J. Murray Free Throw 1 of 2 (36 PTS) 133–129
Q4 0:12 D. Fox personal FOUL (5 PF) (Murray 2 FT) 132–129
Q4 0:13 L. Kornet personal FOUL (3 PF) 132–129
Q4 0:16 C. Braun REBOUND (Off:0 Def:9) 132–129
Q4 0:19 MISS S. Castle 27' 3PT 132–129
Q4 0:29 H. Barnes REBOUND (Off:1 Def:5) 132–129
Q4 0:32 MISS C. Johnson driving finger roll Layup 132–129
Q4 0:56 D. Fox 7' driving floating Jump Shot (27 PTS) (S. Castle 10 AST) 132–129

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

SAS San Antonio Spurs
S De'Aaron Fox 36.0m
27
pts
3
reb
9
ast
Impact
+9.3

Explosive scoring numbers were severely undercut by a string of careless live-ball turnovers that ignited the opponent's fast break. He struggled to navigate drop coverage defensively, allowing opposing guards to walk into comfortable rhythm jumpers. The sheer volume of points couldn't compensate for the defensive bleeding and transition points surrendered.

Shooting
FG 10/19 (52.6%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 3/6 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.4%
USG% 27.4%
Net Rtg -13.2
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 36.0m
Scoring +19.0
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +6.8
Hustle +2.8
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Stephon Castle 35.4m
30
pts
11
reb
10
ast
Impact
+19.2

Dominated the flow of the game with relentless downhill pressure that constantly collapsed the defense and created high-value passing windows. His rebounding from the guard position single-handedly ended defensive possessions and sparked immediate transition attacks. A brilliant two-way performance defined by aggressive, decisive decision-making.

Shooting
FG 7/15 (46.7%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 12/13 (92.3%)
Advanced
TS% 72.4%
USG% 25.3%
Net Rtg -17.1
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.4m
Scoring +23.5
Creation +3.3
Shot Making +5.1
Hustle +7.2
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
S Devin Vassell 31.9m
18
pts
1
reb
3
ast
Impact
+3.6

Inefficient isolation attempts and a reliance on contested mid-range pull-ups severely dragged down his overall offensive value. Despite showing excellent effort fighting through screens defensively, his shot selection bailed the opponent out of tough possessions. The volume of missed jumpers ultimately outweighed his solid perimeter containment.

Shooting
FG 5/14 (35.7%)
3PT 4/10 (40.0%)
FT 4/5 (80.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.6%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg -20.8
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.9m
Scoring +10.4
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +0.3
Defense +1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
S Luke Kornet 24.7m
0
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.3

Anchored the paint with exceptional verticality, altering numerous shots at the rim without committing fouls. His offensive value came entirely from bone-crushing screens that freed up the guards for downhill attacks. A prime example of doing the dirty work, proving that a player can shift momentum without ever looking at the basket.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -22.0
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.7m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.9
Defense +2.3
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 61.1%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 0
8
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.2

A lack of spatial awareness on offense led to clogged driving lanes and disrupted the team's motion principles. He was repeatedly caught ball-watching on defense, surrendering crucial offensive rebounds that extended opponent possessions. These fundamental lapses entirely overshadowed a respectable shooting night.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.1%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -7.6
+/- -3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.9m
Scoring +5.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +2.1
Defense -3.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
20
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+14.3

Delivered veteran stability by punishing late rotations with timely corner spacing and intelligent straight-line drives. His defensive communication was elite, seamlessly executing switches and covering up mistakes by younger teammates. A highly efficient, mistake-free performance that stabilized the lineup whenever the game got chaotic.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 6/7 (85.7%)
Advanced
TS% 76.5%
USG% 19.2%
Net Rtg -4.7
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Scoring +16.2
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +6.0
Defense +2.1
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
Dylan Harper 23.6m
13
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+1.7

Struggled to process defensive rotations quickly enough, resulting in stagnant possessions and late-clock desperation heaves. He was frequently targeted on switches, where stronger forwards bullied him out of position on the block. While he found his spots offensively, his inability to string together stops negated his production.

Shooting
FG 6/12 (50.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 54.2%
USG% 21.0%
Net Rtg +17.0
+/- +9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.6m
Scoring +8.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +5.4
Defense -1.7
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 44.4%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
5
pts
7
reb
3
ast
Impact
-6.8

Offensive momentum cratered due to his tendency to force wild, off-balance drives into set defenses. His frustration on the offensive end bled into his defensive focus, resulting in late closeouts and poor transition awareness. A highly detrimental stint characterized by tunnel vision and a refusal to move the ball.

Shooting
FG 2/12 (16.7%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 20.8%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg -9.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 21.9m
Scoring -2.4
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +8.9
Defense -2.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 42.9%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 0
10
pts
3
reb
1
ast
Impact
-0.5

Injected immediate life into the second unit with decisive cuts and confident shot-making during a crucial second-quarter run. He exploited sleeping defenders with sharp baseline movement, converting high-percentage looks at the rim. Maximized every second of his brief appearance by playing with relentless offensive intent.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 77.6%
USG% 20.7%
Net Rtg +24.6
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 9.0m
Scoring +8.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense -0.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-7.9

Shifted the geometry of the offense entirely with bruising dribble hand-offs and elite screen-setting. He deterred multiple drives at the rim through sheer verticality and excellent positional awareness. Proved highly effective in a short burst by focusing entirely on facilitating and rim protection.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg 0.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 7.7m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense +3.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 57.1%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
DEN Denver Nuggets
S Jamal Murray 39.9m
39
pts
2
reb
7
ast
Impact
+23.6

High-volume scoring masked a tendency to over-dribble late in the shot clock, which occasionally stalled the half-court offense. He gave back a significant portion of his value on the defensive end by dying on screens and losing his man off the ball. Still, his shot-making versatility during a crucial fourth-quarter stretch kept the team afloat.

Shooting
FG 11/21 (52.4%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 15/15 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 70.7%
USG% 31.3%
Net Rtg +15.5
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.9m
Scoring +31.9
Creation +4.2
Shot Making +6.1
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.8
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Nikola Jokić 39.0m
31
pts
20
reb
12
ast
Impact
+49.5

Masterfully dictated the terms of engagement through high-post orchestration and punishing physical mismatches down low. His defensive positioning was superb, consistently blowing up pick-and-roll actions with perfectly timed stunts and recoveries. The sheer gravity of his passing angles created wide-open looks for cutters all night.

Shooting
FG 9/17 (52.9%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 11/11 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.0%
USG% 26.0%
Net Rtg +9.0
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.0m
Scoring +25.1
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +5.6
Hustle +22.5
Defense +7.5
Turnovers -7.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 38.1%
STL 3
BLK 2
TO 3
S Christian Braun 37.7m
11
pts
9
reb
2
ast
Impact
-8.0

Offensive flow stagnated whenever he touched the ball due to forced drives into heavy traffic and poor shot selection. While he remained active on the glass, his inability to space the floor allowed defenders to pack the paint. A string of costly offensive fouls in the third quarter derailed any momentum he tried to build.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 2/7 (28.6%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 43.1%
USG% 15.7%
Net Rtg +29.5
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.7m
Scoring +3.5
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +2.7
Defense -2.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 38.9%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Spencer Jones 32.8m
19
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+14.1

An unexpected offensive explosion was matched by relentless point-of-attack defense that completely disrupted the opponent's rhythm. He consistently fought over screens and generated deflections, fueling transition opportunities. This two-way surge provided a massive spark off the bench and changed the game's momentum.

Shooting
FG 8/13 (61.5%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 73.1%
USG% 16.9%
Net Rtg +25.0
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Scoring +14.9
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +4.1
Defense +2.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 0
S Cameron Johnson 30.8m
15
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
+6.2

Despite efficient perimeter execution, his overall impact was dragged down by ill-timed defensive rotations that yielded open corner looks. He struggled to contain dribble penetration during a pivotal third-quarter stretch, forcing the defense into scramble mode. A few careless live-ball turnovers further eroded his strong offensive output.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 84.5%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg +12.9
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.8m
Scoring +13.2
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +5.4
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 70.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
1
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-22.2

A complete lack of offensive rhythm resulted in forced, contested perimeter jumpers early in the shot clock. His struggles compounded on the other end, where he repeatedly lost track of his assignment during transition sequences. This negative feedback loop of empty possessions and defensive lapses made him a severe liability.

Shooting
FG 0/4 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 10.2%
USG% 14.6%
Net Rtg -12.0
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.8m
Scoring -2.7
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -3.4
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
Bruce Brown 17.4m
6
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.8

Failed to make a tangible imprint on the game, largely due to passive off-ball movement and an unwillingness to attack closeouts. He was frequently targeted in isolation mismatches, struggling to stay in front of quicker guards. Without his usual chaotic energy and cutting, his presence on the floor was a net negative.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.0%
USG% 14.6%
Net Rtg -8.5
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Scoring +3.3
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.1
Hustle +0.3
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 12.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
10
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+1.5

Capitalized on defensive breakdowns by relocating perfectly along the perimeter for timely catch-and-shoot opportunities. His active hands in the passing lanes disrupted several entry passes, leading to easy run-outs. Played strictly within his role, providing a highly efficient burst of secondary scoring.

Shooting
FG 4/6 (66.7%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 83.3%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg -30.1
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 15.2m
Scoring +8.4
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.6
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-10.9

Provided a brief flash of interior physicality but struggled to navigate the pace of the game during his short rotation. He was consistently beaten down the floor in transition, negating the value of his half-court screening. Ultimately served as a neutral placeholder while the primary bigs rested.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.5%
USG% 30.8%
Net Rtg -71.8
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.3m
Scoring +2.7
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Tyus Jones 3.1m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.7

Barely saw the floor but managed to disrupt the offensive spacing during his brief stint by hesitating on open looks. A quick blown defensive assignment on a backdoor cut highlighted a lack of immediate focus. His limited minutes were ultimately a wash, offering neither stability nor a spark.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -132.1
+/- -11
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.1m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.8
Hustle +0.5
Defense -0.5
Turnovers -0.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0