LAL

2025-26 Season

LEBRON JAMES

Los Angeles Lakers | Forward | 6-9
LeBron James
21.3PPG
6.2RPG
7.2APG
33.9MPG
+10.8 Impact

James produces at an elite rate for a 34-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+10.8
Scoring +18.3
Points Scored 21.3 PPG = +21.3
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -6.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +3.7
Creation +2.7
Assists & Self-Creation 7.2 AST/g + self-creation = +2.7
Turnovers -7.2
Turnovers 3.1/g (live + dead blend) = -7.2
Defense +2.1
Steals 1.2/g = +2.8
Blocks 0.5/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.2
Hustle & Effort +4.0
Rebounds 6.2 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.2
Contested Shots 2.1/g = +0.4
Deflections 1.3/g = +0.9
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 0.5/g = +0.2
Raw Impact +19.9
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.1
Net Impact
+10.8
89th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 93th
21.3 PPG
Efficiency 67th
58.8% TS
Playmaking 98th
7.2 APG
Rebounding 83th
6.2 RPG
Defense 65th
+7.9/g
Hustle 88th
+18.1/g
Creation 99th
+7.30/g
Shot Making 76th
+7.60/g
TO Discipline 4th
0.09/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

LeBron James's early 2025-26 campaign was defined by a stark contrast between lazy perimeter settling and masterful offensive orchestration. During a disastrous 12/02 vs PHX matchup, he looked completely disengaged, posting a dismal -8.8 impact score while clanking contested jumpers and grabbing zero rebounds. He can still dictate a game without a heavy scoring load, however, as seen in the 11/19 vs UTA contest. He earned a +5.2 impact score despite tallying just 11 points because his elite court vision yielded 12 assists. Yet his bad habits occasionally returned. In the 12/31 vs DET game, a -1.8 impact score accurately punished him for chucking ten three-pointers instead of attacking the paint. When he avoids falling in love with his outside shot, James remains an utterly terrifying maestro who controls the entire geometry of the floor.

This twenty-game stretch revealed an aging superstar carefully picking his spots, oscillating between vintage offensive dominance and nights where tired legs clearly compromised his overall value. He set the tone immediately on 01/16 vs CHA, pouring in 29 points on 10-of-19 shooting to generate a massive +31.9 impact score. That dominant rating stemmed from highly efficient shot selection and suffocating defensive effort rather than just empty box-score stuffing. The physical toll of the long season, however, frequently reared its head, most notably on 02/07 vs GSW. Despite a highly productive-looking 20 points and 10 assists, he posted a -3.2 impact score because those raw numbers were heavily taxed by erratic perimeter shooting and sluggish defensive rotations. Conversely, he still found ways to win on the margins during a quiet 02/26 vs PHX matchup. He managed a +4.8 impact despite scoring just 15 points, relying entirely on relentless hustle plays and smart defensive positioning to tilt the floor when his jumper refused to fall.

LeBron James spent this late-season stretch operating less like a traditional volume scorer and more like a surgical game manager who completely dictated the pace of play. When he decided to hunt his own shot, the results were devastating. Look no further than 03/18 vs HOU, where he dropped 30 points on a near-flawless 13-of-14 shooting performance. That ruthless shot selection generated a massive +25.3 Impact score, as he punished the defense by refusing to settle for low-percentage jumpers. Even when his scoring output dipped, his overall value remained immense. During 03/19 vs MIA, he scored a modest 19 points but still posted a +15.7 Impact score by bullying his way to 15 rebounds and orchestrating the offense with 10 assists. Pushing his aging body too far occasionally backfired, though. Logging a grueling 40 minutes on 03/14 vs DEN resulted in a sluggish -2.4 Impact score, as physical fatigue led to defensive lapses and empty offensive possessions.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. James posts positive impact in 83% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~6 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 70% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. James consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Hot right now — 6 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 12 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 56 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

P. Washington 87.0 poss
FG% 52.6%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 22
S. Barnes 71.7 poss
FG% 52.9%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 20
K. Durant 66.0 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 9
R. O'Neale 64.4 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 16.7%
PPP 0.14
PTS 9
J. Harden 63.0 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.14
PTS 9
P. Achiuwa 62.0 poss
FG% 53.8%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.31
PTS 19
K. Leonard 57.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
L. Markkanen 57.0 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
Z. Williamson 51.1 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
D. Brooks 46.1 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 12

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Collins 62.3 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.18
PTS 11
R. O'Neale 54.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 12
A. Thompson 53.4 poss
FG% 88.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 17
P. Washington 50.9 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
D. Brooks 48.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 40.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 12
A. Gordon 46.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 3
R. Dunn 44.3 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 6
J. Jackson Jr. 43.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
D. Barlow 43.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
P. Achiuwa 41.5 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

70
Games
21.3
PPG
6.2
RPG
7.2
APG
1.2
SPG
0.5
BPG
50.5
FG%
31.9
3P%
73.9
FT%
33.9
MPG

GAME LOG

70 games played