Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
OKC lead PHX lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
PHX 2P — 3P —
OKC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 196 attempts

PHX PHX Shot-making Δ

Bouyea 12/23 +2.4
Maluach 8/15 -0.1
Coffey Hard 7/14 +3.0
Fleming Hard 6/13 +2.1
Brea Hard 7/11 +8.3
Dunn 8/11 +5.0
Huntley 5/8 +0.6
Highsmith 2/3 +0.7
Ighodaro 1/3 -0.9

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Carlson 10/20 +3.4
Topić 8/16 -0.9
Sandfort Hard 9/13 +9.1
McCain 4/13 -7.5
Williams 5/12 -1.1
Barnhizer 2/8 -3.8
Wiggins Hard 1/7 -3.3
Dort Hard 2/6 +0.1
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
PHX
OKC
56/101 Field Goals 41/95
55.4% Field Goal % 43.2%
20/41 3-Pointers 18/46
48.8% 3-Point % 39.1%
3/6 Free Throws 3/9
50.0% Free Throw % 33.3%
65.1% True Shooting % 52.0%
65 Total Rebounds 43
13 Offensive 9
41 Defensive 27
28 Assists 32
2.15 Assist/TO Ratio 3.20
11 Turnovers 10
5 Steals 9
8 Blocks 7
9 Fouls 8
64 Points in Paint 44
18 Fast Break Pts 21
14 Points off TOs 19
21 Second Chance Pts 12
53 Bench Points 41
32 Largest Lead 0
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Branden Carlson
26 PTS · 10 REB · 1 AST · 42.2 MIN
+28.32
2
Payton Sandfort
23 PTS · 4 REB · 0 AST · 28.1 MIN
+23.22
3
Khaman Maluach
18 PTS · 14 REB · 0 AST · 29.0 MIN
+23.09
4
Ryan Dunn
20 PTS · 11 REB · 5 AST · 24.6 MIN
+22.27
5
Koby Brea
20 PTS · 5 REB · 3 AST · 28.7 MIN
+17.86
6
Jamaree Bouyea
27 PTS · 5 REB · 9 AST · 39.7 MIN
+17.48
7
Rasheer Fleming
16 PTS · 6 REB · 2 AST · 38.0 MIN
+13.14
8
Amir Coffey
17 PTS · 3 REB · 3 AST · 26.8 MIN
+12.66
9
Kenrich Williams
13 PTS · 9 REB · 8 AST · 32.9 MIN
+12.29
10
CJ Huntley
10 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST · 29.2 MIN
+11.68
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:13 PHX shot clock Team TURNOVER 135–103
Q4 0:35 R. Fleming REBOUND (Off:0 Def:6) 135–103
Q4 0:38 MISS B. Carlson 25' 3PT 135–103
Q4 0:48 K. Brea 27' 3PT step back (20 PTS) 135–103
Q4 1:00 K. Maluach REBOUND (Off:7 Def:7) 132–103
Q4 1:03 J. Bouyea BLOCK (2 BLK) 132–103
Q4 1:03 MISS K. Williams cutting Layup - blocked 132–103
Q4 1:12 R. Fleming 8' turnaround fadeaway Jump Shot (16 PTS) 132–103
Q4 1:34 P. Sandfort running Jump Shot (23 PTS) (K. Williams 8 AST) 130–103
Q4 1:37 K. Williams REBOUND (Off:3 Def:6) 130–101
Q4 1:39 MISS J. Bouyea 24' running pullup 3PT 130–101
Q4 1:45 J. Bouyea REBOUND (Off:0 Def:5) 130–101
Q4 1:48 MISS K. Williams 26' 3PT 130–101
Q4 2:00 K. Brea 25' 3PT (17 PTS) (J. Bouyea 9 AST) 130–101
Q4 2:04 K. Williams personal FOUL (2 PF) 127–101

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
S Branden Carlson 42.2m
26
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+24.9

An absolute masterclass in two-way dominance, driven by elite rim protection (+7.2 Defense) and relentless rebounding (+11.7 Hustle). He paired this physical interior presence with lethal perimeter execution (+6.3 Shot Making), completely breaking the game open and dictating the terms of engagement on both ends.

Shooting
FG 10/20 (50.0%)
3PT 5/10 (50.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 62.3%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -22.0
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 42.2m
Scoring +16.4
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +11.7
Defense +7.2
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 23
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 39.1%
STL 2
BLK 5
TO 1
S Nikola Topić 39.4m
18
pts
4
reb
14
ast
Impact
-8.3

Disastrous ball security (-10.6 Turnovers) completely torpedoed what was otherwise a highly productive offensive showing (+10.1 Scoring). Despite initiating numerous scoring sequences, his actual playmaking impact was minimal (+0.3 Creation) because he was setting up basic, low-difficulty looks rather than bending the defense.

Shooting
FG 8/16 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/3 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.0%
USG% 24.4%
Net Rtg -20.6
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.4m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +4.0
Hustle +5.1
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -10.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 61.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
S Aaron Wiggins 27.0m
3
pts
2
reb
5
ast
Impact
-17.0

Crippling turnover woes (-4.7) and an absolute inability to generate efficient offense (-1.1 Scoring) cratered Wiggins's impact score. He was completely neutralized as a scoring threat, repeatedly stalling out possessions and failing to offset his mistakes with meaningful defensive disruption.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 21.4%
USG% 13.8%
Net Rtg -39.3
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.0m
Scoring -1.1
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +1.6
Defense +1.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Jared McCain 24.8m
9
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-11.4

A glaring lack of scoring punch (+1.7) from a volume shooter ultimately doomed McCain's overall value. While he didn't bleed value in any one specific area, his failure to bend the defense or connect from deep left the second unit starving for offensive gravity.

Shooting
FG 4/13 (30.8%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 32.4%
USG% 25.9%
Net Rtg -54.1
+/- -29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Scoring +1.7
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +2.2
Defense +0.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 69.2%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Luguentz Dort 20.1m
6
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.9

Despite providing excellent point-of-attack resistance (+4.7 Defense), Dort's overall rating was dragged down by a severe lack of offensive volume (+3.0 Scoring). His inability to generate gravity or contribute on the glass (+0.3 Hustle) turned him into a one-dimensional specialist who couldn't tilt the math in his team's favor.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -63.8
+/- -28
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.1m
Scoring +3.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +0.3
Defense +4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
13
pts
9
reb
8
ast
Impact
+2.7

Relentless work on the glass (+8.5 Hustle) and timely shot-making (+3.1) allowed Williams to grind out a positive impact. He operated as a vital connective hub (+2.4 Creation), overcoming minor defensive lapses by consistently keeping possessions alive and finding open teammates.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.5%
USG% 18.4%
Net Rtg -35.1
+/- -26
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.9m
Scoring +6.8
Creation +2.4
Shot Making +3.1
Hustle +8.5
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
23
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+14.2

A blistering scoring barrage (+19.9) built on hitting highly contested perimeter looks (+6.4 Shot Making) drove this massive positive rating. He required zero playmaking credit to be effective, simply operating as a lethal release valve who punished the defense every time they lost track of him.

Shooting
FG 9/13 (69.2%)
3PT 5/9 (55.6%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 88.5%
USG% 20.3%
Net Rtg +7.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring +19.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +6.4
Hustle +2.2
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
5
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.7

Elite defensive disruption (+5.2) was entirely squandered by his complete offensive invisibility (+0.2 Scoring). He functioned as a total non-threat with the ball in his hands, allowing the opposing defense to ignore him and clog the paint against his teammates.

Shooting
FG 2/8 (25.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 31.3%
USG% 13.1%
Net Rtg -41.5
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.5m
Scoring +0.2
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.5
Defense +5.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 16
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 56.2%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 0
PHX Phoenix Suns
S Jamaree Bouyea 39.7m
27
pts
5
reb
9
ast
Impact
+5.8

Catastrophic turnover issues (-9.5) severely undercut an otherwise brilliant offensive explosion (+18.0 Scoring). He was hitting incredibly tough shots all night (+6.3 Shot Making) to shatter his recent scoring drought, but the sheer volume of empty possessions kept his overall impact grounded.

Shooting
FG 12/23 (52.2%)
3PT 3/8 (37.5%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 56.5%
USG% 29.2%
Net Rtg +45.1
+/- +37
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 39.7m
Scoring +18.0
Creation +1.5
Shot Making +6.3
Hustle +1.5
Defense +3.0
Turnovers -9.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 4
S Rasheer Fleming 38.0m
16
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
+0.3

Severe turnover damage (-4.7) nearly erased the value of a surprisingly potent scoring punch (+10.1). While he converted tough looks from the perimeter (+4.8 Shot Making) to snap a recent shooting slump, his sloppy ball security prevented this from being a truly dominant two-way outing.

Shooting
FG 6/13 (46.2%)
3PT 4/7 (57.1%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 61.5%
USG% 16.5%
Net Rtg +28.6
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.0m
Scoring +10.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +1.8
Defense +3.4
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Amir Coffey 26.8m
17
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
+2.3

Coffey's sudden offensive explosion (+12.0 Scoring) salvaged a positive impact despite offering virtually nothing as a playmaker or defender. His ability to hit difficult looks (+4.8 Shot Making) broke a brutal string of invisible performances, finally providing the floor-spacing gravity the second unit desperately needed.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.7%
USG% 22.4%
Net Rtg +33.9
+/- +20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Scoring +12.0
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +2.8
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 4
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
S Ryan Dunn 24.6m
20
pts
11
reb
5
ast
Impact
+16.0

Absolute dominance on the glass (+10.1 Hustle) paired perfectly with a massive scoring surge (+17.1) to drive a stellar overall rating. Breaking out of a brutal offensive slump, he consistently converted difficult looks (+4.3 Shot Making) while punishing the opponent with relentless second-chance effort.

Shooting
FG 8/11 (72.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 81.2%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg +44.9
+/- +22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.6m
Scoring +17.1
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +10.1
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 45.5%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S Oso Ighodaro 13.5m
2
pts
6
reb
5
ast
Impact
-10.0

A complete lack of offensive aggression (+0.6 Scoring) doomed Ighodaro's overall value in this brief rotational cameo. Although he provided solid value on the glass (+4.7 Hustle), his inability to pressure the rim or generate meaningful scoring gravity rendered him an offensive passenger.

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 11.4%
Net Rtg +59.3
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 13.5m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.5
Hustle +4.7
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
CJ Huntley 29.2m
10
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
+0.8

A balanced mix of timely finishing (+7.1 Scoring) and solid rebounding (+5.1 Hustle) kept Huntley's head above water in a low-usage role. He provided just enough defensive resistance (+2.1) to justify his minutes, serving as a reliable connective piece rather than a focal point.

Shooting
FG 5/8 (62.5%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 62.5%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +28.5
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.2m
Scoring +7.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +5.1
Defense +2.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
18
pts
14
reb
0
ast
Impact
+14.9

An overwhelming presence on the glass (+17.8 Hustle) served as the primary engine for this massive positive rating. He supplemented that relentless rebounding with highly efficient finishing (+11.4 Scoring), completely overpowering the opposing frontcourt despite offering zero playmaking value.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 60.0%
USG% 22.5%
Net Rtg +21.2
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Scoring +11.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.6
Hustle +17.8
Defense -1.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 27
FGM Against 15
Opp FG% 55.6%
STL 1
BLK 2
TO 1
Koby Brea 28.7m
20
pts
5
reb
3
ast
Impact
+10.8

Lethal perimeter execution (+6.2 Shot Making) fueled a massive scoring output (+17.1) that single-handedly drove his positive impact. Snapping out of a brutal shooting slump, his ability to drain highly contested looks completely warped the opposing defense and masked his quiet defensive showing.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 6/9 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 90.9%
USG% 17.6%
Net Rtg +22.0
+/- +13
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.7m
Scoring +17.1
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +6.2
Hustle +4.4
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 71.4%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.2

Complete invisibility on the glass (+0.0 Hustle) and negative defensive value (-1.6) tanked his rating during a brief stint. While he managed a few buckets (+4.2 Scoring), his failure to register any physical presence or disrupt the opponent's rhythm made him a glaring liability.

Shooting
FG 2/3 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 72.7%
USG% 11.1%
Net Rtg +3.4
+/- +2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.5m
Scoring +4.2
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0