LAC

2025-26 Season

YANIC KONAN NIEDERHÄUSER

LA Clippers | Center | 6-11
Yanic Konan Niederhäuser
4.3PPG
2.9RPG
0.3APG
10.3MPG
-4.8 Impact

Niederhäuser produces at an below average rate for a 10-minute workload. Defensive impact (-1.1/game) is a concern.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-4.8
Scoring +4.1
Points Scored 4.3 PPG = +4.3
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -0.7
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.5
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 0.3 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -1.5
Turnovers 0.6/g (live + dead blend) = -1.5
Defense -1.1
Steals 0.1/g = +0.2
Blocks 0.7/g = +0.6
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.8
Rebounds 2.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +1.4
Contested Shots 3.3/g = +0.7
Deflections 0.5/g = +0.3
Charges Drawn 0.1/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.0/g = +0.0
Screen Assists 1.1/g = +0.3
Raw Impact +4.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.5
Net Impact
-4.8
12th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 24th
5.8 PPG
Efficiency 88th
66.2% TS
Playmaking 4th
0.4 APG
Rebounding 15th
3.8 RPG
Defense 18th
+3.3/g
Hustle 22th
+12.7/g
Creation 31th
+1.86/g
Shot Making 9th
+1.81/g
TO Discipline 32th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Yanic Konan Niederhäuser’s early season was defined by deep-bench obscurity and empty minutes that consistently bled value. Even when his shot actually fell, the underlying metrics painted a bleak picture of his on-court presence. Take the 10/24 vs PHX matchup, where he dropped 6 points on perfect 3-for-3 shooting in just 5 minutes. Despite that flawless offensive burst, he still posted a -1.7 impact score because his complete lack of playmaking and defensive resistance immediately negated the buckets. Given a longer leash on 12/02 vs MIA, he managed another 6 points in 12 minutes but sank to a brutal -8.3 impact by grabbing just a single rebound and failing to anchor the second unit. The bottom completely fell out on 12/27 vs POR during a scoreless 12-minute cardio session that resulted in a disastrous -16.8 impact. He simply floats through games without generating assists or securing the glass. Until he learns to do the gritty rotational work, his brief appearances will remain a heavy tax on the lineup.

Yanic Konan Niederhäuser’s midseason stretch was defined by extreme rotational whiplash, alternating between highly efficient offensive outbursts and total invisibility at the end of the bench. He looked like a genuine frontcourt weapon on 12/31 vs SAC, pouring in 16 points and 6 rebounds to generate a stellar +10.2 impact score. That massive positive mark stemmed directly from decisive, hyper-efficient 6-for-8 shooting and aggressive rim runs that kept the offense humming. He caught fire again on 01/15 vs WAS, hitting all seven of his field goal attempts for another 16 points and a +3.9 impact. The rest of the month was a wasteland. Look no further than his disastrous stint on 01/28 vs UTA. A completely vacant stat line—zero points, zero rebounds, and zero assists in six minutes—resulted in a catastrophic -13.1 impact score. When the offense wasn't spoon-feeding him at the rim, his defensive passivity and sheer lack of floor engagement actively dragged the second unit down.

Yanic Konan Niederhäuser spent this midseason stretch wrestling with the stark difference between filling a box score and actually playing winning basketball. During an extended rut in early February, his counting stats often masked severe defensive liabilities and disjointed rotations. Take his outing on 02/04 vs CLE, where a flawless shooting night yielded 10 points and 8 rebounds, yet his team bled points during his 25 minutes to result in a bleak -4.3 Impact score. He slowly learned to anchor a lineup without demanding touches, highlighted by a gritty shift on 02/22 vs ORL. Despite scoring just 7 points, he battled for 8 rebounds and contested everything at the rim to earn a positive +1.5 Impact. This evolution peaked on 03/02 vs GSW. He posted a modest 11 points and 9 rebounds but generated a staggering +15.2 Impact by ditching the empty calories for hard closeouts, relentless glass-cleaning, and crucial hustle plays.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Niederhäuser has posted negative impact in 80% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 57% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Average defender. Niederhäuser doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Slight upward trend. First-half impact: -5.9, second-half: -3.7. Modest improvement — possibly settling into a rhythm.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 15 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 55 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

C. Capela 38.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
T. Bryant 28.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 4
M. Bagley III 26.0 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 6
M. Raynaud 25.1 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 7
W. Carter Jr. 22.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 2
J. Randle 22.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 4
A. Horford 19.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
A. Sengun 19.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 4
K. Filipowski 18.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
D. Queen 16.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Randle 29.7 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 6
C. Capela 29.4 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.03
PTS 1
A. Sengun 26.4 poss
FG% 61.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.64
PTS 17
M. Bagley III 26.1 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 7
M. Raynaud 25.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
T. Bryant 22.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 5
W. Carter Jr. 19.8 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 3
K. Anderson 18.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 4
O. Tshiebwe 18.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
N. Jokić 16.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 4

SEASON STATS

41
Games
4.3
PPG
2.9
RPG
0.3
APG
0.1
SPG
0.7
BPG
64.0
FG%
20.0
3P%
75.8
FT%
10.3
MPG

GAME LOG

41 games played