NOP

2025-26 Season

YVES MISSI

New Orleans Pelicans | Center | 6-11
Yves Missi
5.5 PPG
5.7 RPG
1.2 APG
19.2 MPG
+2.3 Impact

Missi produces at an above average rate for a 19-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+2.3
Scoring +3.3
Points 5.5 PPG × +1.00 = +5.5
Missed 2PT 2.0/g × -0.78 = -1.6
Missed 3PT 0.0/g × -0.87 = -0.0
Missed FT 0.6/g × -1.00 = -0.6
Creation +2.4
Assists 1.2/g × +0.50 = +0.6
Off. Rebounds 1.4/g × +1.26 = +1.8
Turnovers -1.6
Turnovers 0.8/g × -1.95 = -1.6
Defense +1.5
Steals 0.3/g × +2.30 = +0.7
Blocks 1.5/g × +0.90 = +1.4
Def. Rebounds 4.3/g × +0.30 = +1.3
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +2.8
Contested Shots 6.6/g × +0.20 = +1.3
Deflections 0.8/g × +0.65 = +0.5
Loose Balls 0.5/g × +0.60 = +0.3
Screen Assists 1.9/g × +0.30 = +0.6
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +8.4
Baseline (game-average expected) −6.1
Net Impact
+2.3
48th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 20th
5.6 PPG
Efficiency 22th
55.0% TS
Playmaking 43th
1.3 APG
Rebounding 46th
5.9 RPG
Rim Protection 76th
0.22/min
Hustle 53th
0.12/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 79th
0.04/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Yves Missi’s opening stretch of the season was defined by a wild pendulum swing between unstoppable vertical spacing and complete offensive invisibility. When fully engaged, he looked like a dominant interior force, peaking on 11/24 vs CHI with 14 points and 14 rebounds to drive a massive +11.8 impact score. Elite vertical leaping and relentless lob-catching warped Chicago's defensive shell, making his presence felt far beyond the box score. Yet, raw production didn't always translate to winning basketball. During the 10/29 vs DEN matchup, Missi tallied 10 points on highly efficient 5-of-6 shooting, but a disastrous -6.6 defensive mark dragged his overall impact down to a poor -5.4. His lack of polish became an even bigger liability on 11/30 vs LAL, where a complete absence of offensive rhythm resulted in a brutal -14.9 impact score. Missi clearly possesses the physical tools to anchor a modern defense and catch lobs, but his erratic awareness keeps him grounded as a situational weapon rather than a reliable fixture.

This stretch of the season was defined by Missi's polarizing existence as a low-usage defensive anchor whose value swung wildly based on his offensive engagement. On 12/27 vs PHX, he managed a staggering +14.3 impact score despite scoring just 4 points. He completely altered the geometry of the floor, using terrifying vertical contests and elite rim deterrence to wreck opposing drives without needing the ball in his hands. When he actually asserted himself offensively, he could dominate the paint, erupting for 12 points and 12 rebounds on 01/14 vs BKN to generate a +12.4 impact through sheer hustle and a relentless motor. Yet, that physical edge frequently vanished. During a 01/23 vs MEM matchup, he grabbed 8 rebounds and scored 8 points, but a fundamentally inefficient 4-for-9 shooting night dragged his impact down to a disappointing -1.8. Missi is a genuine terror around the basket when his motor runs hot, but his habit of fading into complete offensive invisibility still throttles his ultimate ceiling.

This stretch was defined by Yves Missi evolving into a low-usage, high-leverage wrecking ball. He dictated games entirely through rim deterrence. During the 03/13 vs HOU contest, Missi managed just 5 points but posted a massive +9.2 impact score because his relentless rim protection completely suffocated the opposing offense. He replicated that exact blueprint in a spot start on 03/05 vs SAC, turning a modest 7-point outing into an exceptional +8.4 impact through sheer defensive intimidation. Yet, when his defensive focus wavered, his value plummeted. A perfect shooting clip on 02/02 vs CHA meant absolutely nothing when fatal defensive lapses in pick-and-roll coverage dragged his impact down to -2.5. Missi is currently a pure specialist who swings games with verticality and hustle, but only when his rotational discipline remains airtight.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Typical consistency. Missi is positive more often than not (61% of games) with scoring varying ~3 points from the average.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 54% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Missi consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 9 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 67 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Jackson Jr. 58.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 8
M. Raynaud 56.9 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.26
PTS 15
B. Lopez 44.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
J. Landale 44.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Jokić 39.2 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 8
K. Porziņģis 37.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7
J. Smith 37.2 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
J. Williams 36.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6
D. Ayton 34.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2
I. Zubac 31.5 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Jackson Jr. 56.2 poss
FG% 36.8%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 20
M. Raynaud 51.7 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 9
J. Smith 42.8 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
D. Ayton 41.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 8
J. Landale 38.2 poss
FG% 20.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
I. Hartenstein 38.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
N. Jokić 34.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.43
PTS 15
J. Duren 34.6 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.38
PTS 13
I. Zubac 34.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 6
K. Porziņģis 32.3 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 57.1%
PPP 0.43
PTS 14

SEASON STATS

64
Games
5.5
PPG
5.7
RPG
1.2
APG
0.3
SPG
1.5
BPG
53.4
FG%
0.0
3P%
56.7
FT%
19.2
MPG

GAME LOG

64 games played