UTA

2025-26 Season

OSCAR TSHIEBWE

Utah Jazz | Forward-Center | 6-8
Oscar Tshiebwe
7.8PPG
6.6RPG
1.2APG
16.6MPG
+0.9 Impact

Tshiebwe produces at an average rate for a 17-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.9
Scoring +7.0
Points Scored 7.8 PPG = +7.8
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.0
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.2
Creation +0.5
Assists & Self-Creation 1.2 AST/g + self-creation = +0.5
Turnovers -1.8
Turnovers 0.8/g (live + dead blend) = -1.8
Defense -0.4
Steals 0.6/g = +1.4
Blocks 0.2/g = +0.2
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.0
Hustle & Effort +7.4
Rebounds 6.6 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +5.8
Contested Shots 2.3/g = +0.5
Deflections 1.0/g = +0.6
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.3/g = +0.2
Screen Assists 1.0/g = +0.3
Raw Impact +12.7
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.8
Net Impact
+0.9
58th pctl vs Forwards

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games

Scoring 45th
8.4 PPG
Efficiency 84th
61.5% TS
Playmaking 28th
1.2 APG
Rebounding 90th
7.0 RPG
Defense 41th
+6.8/g
Hustle 99th
+27.9/g
Creation 47th
+2.28/g
Shot Making 33th
+4.69/g
TO Discipline 54th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Oscar Tshiebwe’s first nine games of the 2025-26 season were defined by a desperate, often clumsy struggle to translate his rebounding dominance into a viable NBA role. During a brutal stretch of brief bench cameos, his limitations were glaringly obvious. On 02/20 vs MEM, he logged 14 minutes but managed just 2 points and 6 rebounds, resulting in a dismal -11.3 Impact score as a lack of offensive gravity bogged his unit down. He briefly flipped the script on 03/02 vs DEN, turning 18 minutes of aggressive interior play into 8 points and 8 rebounds. That relentless effort on the glass and efficient 4-for-5 shooting earned him a +5.8 Impact score, highlighting the value he creates when he simply sticks to doing the dirty work around the rim. However, a surprise promotion to the starting lineup on 03/07 vs MIL immediately exposed his ceiling. Despite a respectable 6 points and 5 rebounds in just 12 minutes, he posted a -7.2 Impact score because he was hopelessly outmatched by starting-caliber athletes on the defensive end.

Oscar Tshiebwe’s mid-March stretch was defined by sheer, chaotic physicality off the bench. He operated as a pure energy big. During the 03/15 vs SAC matchup, he scored a modest 9 points but still posted a stellar +11.9 Impact score. That massive positive rating stemmed entirely from his non-scoring value, as he vacuumed up 8 rebounds and exhausted Sacramento's frontcourt with his relentless motor. Conversely, his value plummeted when opponents successfully kept him off the glass. This glaring flaw surfaced on 03/11 vs NYK, where he grabbed just a single rebound in 15 minutes and suffered a brutal -13.4 Impact score. He found his offensive rhythm later on 03/23 vs TOR, bullying his way to 16 points and 7 rebounds in 28 minutes. That performance yielded a +9.3 Impact, highlighting exactly how destructive the bruising center can be when given a longer runway.

Oscar Tshiebwe’s late-season stretch was defined by a rocky transition to the starting lineup that ultimately exploded into sheer interior dominance. When first thrust into heavier minutes, his overall effectiveness tanked, highlighted by a rough outing on 04/07 vs NOP where his -3.4 impact score betrayed a respectable 12-point scoring night. While he hit six of his ten shots, a complete lack of playmaking and costly defensive lapses bled value whenever he was on the floor. The switch flipped three days later during an absolute rebounding clinic on 04/10 vs MEM. He hauled in a staggering 22 boards and generated a +25.8 impact score by overwhelming Memphis with relentless hustle and suffocating interior defense. He then bullied his way to a massive double-double on 04/12 vs LAL, pouring in 29 points and grabbing 17 rebounds in 32 minutes. That performance yielded an elite +30.4 impact score, reflecting a big man who finally figured out how to translate his brute physical force into highly efficient, game-altering production.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Tshiebwe's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~6 points per game.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 100% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Tshiebwe locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -3.2, second-half: +4.6. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 39 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

D. Clingan 30.0 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 6
N. Jokić 28.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 10
C. Murray-Boyles 21.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 1
M. Turner 20.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 4
M. Robinson 19.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
Y. Niederhäuser 18.6 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
K. Maluach 17.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 3
A. Drummond 14.9 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 2
E. Mobley 14.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
M. Raynaud 14.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

D. Clingan 27.3 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
C. Murray-Boyles 19.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.41
PTS 8
M. Turner 16.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 4
D. Cardwell 16.4 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
A. Gill 16.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 4
M. Robinson 14.8 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
J. Sims 14.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
Y. Niederhäuser 14.5 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2
G. Antetokounmpo 14.3 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.49
PTS 7
M. Raynaud 13.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

27
Games
7.8
PPG
6.6
RPG
1.2
APG
0.6
SPG
0.2
BPG
63.4
FG%
0.0
3P%
55.1
FT%
16.6
MPG

GAME LOG

27 games played