NYK

2025-26 Season

ARIEL HUKPORTI

New York Knicks | Center | 7-0
Ariel Hukporti
2.0 PPG
2.9 RPG
0.5 APG
8.9 MPG
0.0 Impact

Hukporti produces at an average rate for a 9-minute workload.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+0.0
Scoring +1.4
Points 2.0 PPG × +1.00 = +2.0
Missed 2PT 0.5/g × -0.78 = -0.4
Missed 3PT 0.1/g × -0.87 = -0.1
Missed FT 0.1/g × -1.00 = -0.1
Creation +1.1
Assists 0.5/g × +0.50 = +0.2
Off. Rebounds 0.7/g × +1.26 = +0.9
Turnovers -1.2
Turnovers 0.6/g × -1.95 = -1.2
Defense -0.3
Steals 0.2/g × +2.30 = +0.5
Blocks 0.5/g × +0.90 = +0.5
Def. Rebounds 2.1/g × +0.30 = +0.6
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +1.2
Contested Shots 3.0/g × +0.20 = +0.6
Deflections 0.3/g × +0.65 = +0.2
Loose Balls 0.2/g × +0.60 = +0.1
Screen Assists 1.1/g × +0.30 = +0.3
Raw Impact +2.2
Baseline (game-average expected) −2.2
Net Impact
+0.0
11th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 4th
3.0 PPG
Efficiency 7th
49.9% TS
Playmaking 20th
0.9 APG
Rebounding 24th
4.2 RPG
Rim Protection 52th
0.19/min
Hustle 28th
0.10/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 36th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Ariel Hukporti’s early season was defined by offensive invisibility and wildly erratic stretches of defensive anchoring. His glaring limitations were immediately exposed during a start on 10/22 vs CLE, where he surrendered a brutal -9.4 impact score by allowing constant dribble penetration that compromised the entire defensive scheme. Even when he managed to score with perfect efficiency, hidden costs dragged him down. During his 12/05 vs UTA appearance, a flawless 4-point shooting stint was completely erased by frontcourt defensive lapses, resulting in a -3.8 impact. Too often, he operated strictly as an empty screen-setter who offered zero gravity, allowing opponents to completely ignore him in the half-court. Yet, he occasionally found ways to tilt the floor without filling up the basket. On 12/18 vs IND, he tallied just 4 points but generated a +2.2 impact score because he finally anchored the interior with massive defensive energy and relentless hustle plays.

Ariel Hukporti’s mid-season stretch was defined by wild swings in usage, oscillating between dominant physical rebounding and completely invisible spot minutes. When given a spot start on 01/02 vs ATL, he absolutely bullied his way to 16 rebounds and 8 points in 28 minutes, generating a massive +14.7 impact score through sheer physicality and second-chance generation. He brought that same bruising energy off the bench on 02/03 vs WAS, posting a +5.2 impact score by utilizing hard rolls to the rim and excellent hands in traffic to score 12 points. Even when his scoring vanished, his massive frame often created immense non-box-score value. During a 15-minute stint on 02/22 vs CHI, he managed just 4 points but still registered a stellar +5.3 impact score because his exceptional rim deterrence completely disrupted the opposing second unit. Yet, his floor remains dangerously low when his fundamentals slip. On 02/27 vs MIL, a brief six-minute appearance yielded a -2.1 impact score because his inability to set solid screens completely bogged down the half-court offense.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Hukporti's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~3 points per game.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Hukporti locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -0.2, second-half +0.2. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 75 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Huff 66.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 3
O. Okongwu 28.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
R. Kalkbrenner 23.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Sharpe 23.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Richards 20.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
I. Stewart 19.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
I. Jackson 18.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 3
E. Mobley 17.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Carter Jr. 17.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
K. Ware 16.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Huff 50.1 poss
FG% 27.3%
3P% 11.1%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
O. Okongwu 27.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 10
D. Sharpe 26.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
R. Kalkbrenner 23.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
I. Jackson 22.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
E. Mobley 18.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 7
I. Stewart 18.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.38
PTS 7
P. Reed 17.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
P. Siakam 17.7 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 5
N. Richards 17.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

51
Games
2.0
PPG
2.9
RPG
0.5
APG
0.2
SPG
0.5
BPG
54.4
FG%
25.0
3P%
78.8
FT%
8.9
MPG

GAME LOG

51 games played