NYK

2025-26 Season

ARIEL HUKPORTI

New York Knicks | Center | 7-0
Ariel Hukporti
2.2PPG
3.1RPG
0.5APG
9.3MPG
-6.1 Impact

Hukporti produces at an poor rate for a 9-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-6.1
Scoring +1.8
Points Scored 2.2 PPG = +2.2
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -0.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.2
Creation +0.2
Assists & Self-Creation 0.5 AST/g + self-creation = +0.2
Turnovers -1.7
Turnovers 0.6/g (live + dead blend) = -1.7
Defense -0.6
Steals 0.2/g = +0.5
Blocks 0.5/g = +0.5
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -1.6
Hustle & Effort +3.3
Rebounds 3.1 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +2.2
Contested Shots 2.5/g = +0.5
Deflections 0.2/g = +0.2
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 0.9/g = +0.3
Raw Impact +3.0
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.1
Net Impact
-6.1
6th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 6th
3.4 PPG
Efficiency 9th
52.2% TS
Playmaking 18th
0.8 APG
Rebounding 26th
4.4 RPG
Defense 19th
+3.7/g
Hustle 69th
+20.3/g
Creation 16th
+1.60/g
Shot Making 10th
+1.98/g
TO Discipline 28th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Ariel Hukporti's opening stretch of the 2025-26 campaign was defined by a rapid demotion and a glaring inability to stay on the court. After beginning the year in the starting five, he quickly lost his spot. The breaking point arrived during a dismal 10/26 vs MIA outing where he logged zero points in 10 minutes and generated a brutal -11.3 impact score. His sheer offensive invisibility and failure to anchor the paint dragged down lineups, creating severe hidden costs even when he barely touched the ball. This dead-weight effect peaked on 12/04 vs CHA, yielding an abysmal -18.0 impact score in just 13 minutes of scoreless basketball. He finally found a pulse off the bench on 12/07 vs ORL, grabbing seven rebounds and tallying six points in 23 minutes. While still a non-threat as a scorer, his relentless activity on the glass and timely passing earned him a +2.9 impact score, revealing the narrow hustle-based path he must walk to actually help this roster.

Ariel Hukporti spent this midseason stretch bouncing between absolute invisibility and sudden, shocking flashes of interior dominance. On 12/30 vs NOP, the big man logged 12 minutes of pure cardio, posting zeroes across the board to earn a brutal -15.2 Impact score. Yet, just days later on 01/03 vs ATL, he was thrust into the starting lineup and generated a massive +19.4 Impact score despite scoring just eight points. He completely controlled the glass with 16 rebounds and kept the offense humming with four assists, offering immense non-scoring value as a relentless garbage-man and connector. Sadly, that starting gig was a mirage. He immediately regressed to being a deep-bench afterthought, hitting rock bottom again on 02/04 vs DEN with an empty four-minute stint that resulted in another -15.2 Impact score. If Hukporti wants to shed his label as a fringe rotation piece, he has to bring that same aggressive rebounding energy to his shorter shifts instead of simply floating through games.

Ariel Hukporti spent the bulk of this late-season stretch buried in deep-rotation purgatory, struggling to generate any positive momentum during erratic minutes off the bench. His outing on 03/04 vs OKC epitomized his offensive woes, yielding a dismal -14.5 Impact score as he failed to attempt a single shot or record an assist in nine completely empty minutes. Even when his raw box score looked respectable, underlying issues often dragged down his overall effectiveness. On 03/18 vs MEM, Hukporti tallied 7 points, 6 rebounds, and 3 assists in just 12 minutes, yet still posted a -2.7 Impact score due to poor defensive positioning and a total lack of disruptive hustle plays. Thankfully, a sudden role change salvaged his finale. Stepping into the starting lineup on 04/12 vs CHA, he logged a massive 30 minutes and earned a +3.4 Impact score. Though he scored just 8 points, he created crucial winning value by crashing the glass for 9 rebounds and aggressively anchoring the interior defense.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Struggling. Hukporti has posted negative impact in 87% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.

Good defender on his best nights, but it comes and goes. Some games Hukporti locks in defensively, others he gets picked apart.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 2 games. Longest cold streak: 13 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 75 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Huff 66.4 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 3
O. Okongwu 28.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 2
R. Kalkbrenner 23.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
D. Sharpe 23.1 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
N. Richards 20.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
I. Stewart 19.5 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 2
I. Jackson 18.9 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 3
E. Mobley 17.6 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
W. Carter Jr. 17.3 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 2
K. Ware 16.8 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

J. Huff 50.1 poss
FG% 27.3%
3P% 11.1%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
O. Okongwu 27.6 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.36
PTS 10
D. Sharpe 26.6 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 2
R. Kalkbrenner 23.1 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 4
I. Jackson 22.9 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
E. Mobley 18.7 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.37
PTS 7
I. Stewart 18.6 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.38
PTS 7
P. Reed 17.7 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 2
P. Siakam 17.7 poss
FG% 22.2%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 5
N. Richards 17.4 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 5

SEASON STATS

60
Games
2.2
PPG
3.1
RPG
0.5
APG
0.2
SPG
0.5
BPG
54.4
FG%
20.0
3P%
68.8
FT%
9.3
MPG

GAME LOG

60 games played