2025-26 Season
KELLY OLYNYK
2025-26 Season
KELLY OLYNYK
Olynyk produces at an poor rate for a 8-minute workload.
Olynyk produces at an poor rate for a 8-minute workload.
PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology
TEAM COMPARISON
of 13 teammates (10+ games, 10+ min)
Similar Players
Same position, closest production profile this season.
SKILL DNA
Percentile rank vs 235 Forwards with 10+ games
THE SEASON SO FAR
Kelly Olynyk’s early season was defined by a harsh reality check. The veteran big man found himself buried on the bench, struggling to positively influence games in brief, erratic bursts. Even when he stuffed the stat sheet on 11/16 vs SAC with 5 points, 6 rebounds, and 8 assists in 18 minutes, his presence yielded a dismal -8.0 Impact score. Those raw playmaking numbers masked a severe lack of scoring gravity and defensive bleeding that allowed Sacramento to easily exploit his minutes. The wheels completely fell off during a brutal stint on 11/24 vs PHX. Missing all three of his field goal attempts to finish with just 4 points, Olynyk suffered a staggering -14.3 Impact score because his inability to stretch the floor turned him into a glaring offensive liability. He finally broke through the malaise on 12/09 vs NOP, tallying 11 points and a season-best +5.2 Impact score. By sinking four of his seven shots and hitting two triples, he forced the defense to respect him and provided the genuine perimeter spacing his team desperately needed.
Kelly Olynyk spent this fourteen-game stretch clinging to the absolute fringes of the rotation, looking like a veteran whose tank is finally running on empty. His lone flash of vintage form arrived on 01/03 vs IND, where he tallied 10 points, five rebounds, and three assists in 20 minutes. Smart passing and efficient 4-for-6 shooting earned him a solid +5.7 Impact score that night. The magic did not last. The very next night on 01/04 vs POR, Olynyk forced terrible looks from the perimeter and bricked all five of his three-point attempts. That disastrous 2-for-9 shooting performance dragged his Impact down to a dismal -7.7. He eventually bottomed out into pure cardio sessions, highlighted by a ghost-like appearance on 01/19 vs UTA. Failing to record a single point, rebound, or assist in six minutes, his complete lack of physical engagement resulted in a brutal -12.9 Impact score.
This stretch was defined by Kelly Olynyk fading into the deep recesses of the bench, struggling to generate any rhythm during sporadic, low-minute appearances. On 03/03 vs PHI, he logged 12 minutes but failed to score a single point, missing both of his field goal attempts. That offensive invisibility left the second unit completely stagnant, resulting in a brutal -11.1 Impact score. He finally found a way to be useful without filling up the scoring column during a 03/17 vs SAC matchup. Despite managing just 4 points on 1-for-4 shooting, Olynyk clawed his way to a +1.1 Impact by grabbing 6 rebounds and dishing 3 assists to keep possessions alive. A few nights later, he managed a brief flash of his old offensive spark on 03/25 vs MEM. Hitting all of his shots for 9 points and 3 assists in just 9 minutes, his flawless execution yielded a +2.0 Impact, providing a rare bright spot in a month mostly filled with empty cardio.
IMPACT TIMELINE
Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.
Struggling. Olynyk has posted negative impact in 89% of games this season. The production rarely outweighs the cost.
Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 67% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.
Average defender. Olynyk doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.
Flat trajectory all season — first-half impact -6.1, second-half -6.4. No major shifts, which fits with the overall steadiness.
In a rough stretch — 6 straight games with negative impact. Longest cold streak this season: 15 games.
MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago
Based on 70 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.
ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM
His shooting stats against each primary defender this season
ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED
How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.
SEASON STATS
GAME LOG
45 games played