MIL

2025-26 Season

JERICHO SIMS

Milwaukee Bucks | Center | 6-10
Jericho Sims
5.1PPG
5.6RPG
1.6APG
20.0MPG
-3.8 Impact

Sims produces at an below average rate for a 20-minute workload. Defensive impact (-1.2/game) is a concern.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
-3.8
Scoring +5.0
Points Scored 5.1 PPG = +5.1
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -0.6
Shot Making above expected FG% = +0.5
Creation +0.4
Assists & Self-Creation 1.6 AST/g + self-creation = +0.4
Turnovers -3.0
Turnovers 1.1/g (live + dead blend) = -3.0
Defense -1.2
Steals 0.3/g = +0.7
Blocks 0.3/g = +0.3
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.2
Hustle & Effort +6.3
Rebounds 5.6 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +4.8
Contested Shots 3.2/g = +0.6
Deflections 0.5/g = +0.3
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 1.7/g = +0.5
Raw Impact +7.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −11.3
Net Impact
-3.8
20th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 20th
5.6 PPG
Efficiency 96th
73.2% TS
Playmaking 64th
1.8 APG
Rebounding 50th
6.3 RPG
Defense 15th
+3.2/g
Hustle 91th
+25.4/g
Creation 62th
+2.67/g
Shot Making 13th
+2.23/g
TO Discipline 34th
0.06/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Jericho Sims spent the first quarter of the season as a deep-bench afterthought before roster shuffling forced him into a chaotic, wildly uneven rotation role. He finally erupted on 12/04 vs DET, logging a massive +18.7 Impact score off the bench. He generated that immense value through sheer physical dominance rather than playmaking, converting a flawless 7-for-7 from the floor for 15 points and gobbling up 14 rebounds. However, his offensive limitations were brutally punished just three days later during a start on 12/07 vs DET. Despite logging 31 minutes, he managed just two points and three boards, yielding a dismal -11.4 Impact score as his lack of floor spacing and offensive gravity dragged the starting unit into the mud. He eventually settled back into a reserve role where he could occasionally scrape together value without scoring much, relying on pure hustle to grab seven rebounds on 12/14 vs BKN to earn a +4.2 Impact score. Ultimately, Sims remains a purely situational big man who thrives in short bursts of energy but collapses when asked to shoulder starter-level minutes.

Jericho Sims spent the middle of the season battling his way out of the deep reserve unit to become an erratic but fascinating rotation piece. When fully engaged, his relentless hustle created massive value without requiring offensive touches. He earned a starting nod on 02/06 vs IND, generating a +4.0 Impact score despite scoring just four points because he completely controlled the glass with 15 rebounds, anchored the interior defense, and kept the ball moving with four assists. A few nights later, he delivered a flawless 6-for-6 shooting performance on 02/11 vs ORL, bullying his way to 17 points, 11 boards, and a towering +13.1 Impact score. However, his production frequently came with hidden costs. Coming off the bench on 02/25 vs CLE, Sims tallied 11 points and 11 rebounds but still walked away with a -0.1 Impact score. Despite the shiny double-double, quiet defensive breakdowns and poor rim protection entirely neutralized his offensive contributions that night.

This late-season stretch was defined by extreme volatility, as Jericho Sims bounced between the starting lineup and the bench while trying to figure out how to influence winning without demanding the basketball. When he committed to the dirty work, his value skyrocketed regardless of his scoring totals. Look at his 04/01 vs HOU performance; he shot a miserable 1-for-5 from the floor for just six points, yet generated a stellar +7.4 impact score purely by vacuuming up 20 massive rebounds. Conversely, empty scoring often dragged down his overall effectiveness. During his 04/05 vs MEM outing, Sims dropped 12 points on blistering 6-for-7 shooting, but bled value with a -7.3 impact mark because of sluggish defensive rotations and an inability to anchor the paint. He finally found the perfect balance of hustle and playmaking on 04/08 vs DET. Logging a dominant +11.2 impact, he battered the Pistons with a brilliant 11-point, 11-rebound, 10-assist triple-double that revealed exactly what he can be when fully engaged.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Inconsistent. Sims has clear good-night/bad-night splits, with scoring swinging ~4 points between games. You're never quite sure which version shows up.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 93% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Average defender. Sims doesn't hurt you defensively, but he's not making opponents uncomfortable either.

Getting better as the season goes on. First-half impact: -6.8, second-half: -0.9. That's a significant jump — could be a role change, confidence, or development clicking.

Hot right now — 4 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 4 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 75 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

J. Duren 59.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 11
J. Huff 58.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
W. Carter Jr. 55.0 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 13
B. Lopez 53.7 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.07
PTS 4
M. Wagner 52.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 8
K. Ware 46.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
D. Clingan 45.3 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.2
PTS 9
I. Stewart 45.2 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 6
S. Mamukelashvili 43.7 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 4
D. Sharpe 37.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 4

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

P. Banchero 52.5 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.23
PTS 12
J. Duren 42.4 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 5
J. Jaquez Jr. 39.6 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.05
PTS 2
Z. Williamson 38.7 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 11
P. Siakam 37.4 poss
FG% 28.6%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.19
PTS 7
D. Clingan 33.5 poss
FG% 83.3%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.33
PTS 11
K. Ware 33.1 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 4
S. Mamukelashvili 32.1 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 25.0%
PPP 0.28
PTS 9
D. Sharpe 31.3 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.29
PTS 9
I. Stewart 30.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.06
PTS 2

SEASON STATS

66
Games
5.1
PPG
5.6
RPG
1.6
APG
0.3
SPG
0.3
BPG
78.4
FG%
0.0
3P%
62.0
FT%
20.0
MPG

GAME LOG

66 games played