OKC

2025-26 Season

ISAIAH HARTENSTEIN

Oklahoma City Thunder | Center-Forward | 7-0
Isaiah Hartenstein
9.2PPG
9.3RPG
3.4APG
24.2MPG
+5.7 Impact

Hartenstein produces at an elite rate for a 24-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+5.7
Scoring +8.1
Points Scored 9.2 PPG = +9.2
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.2
Creation +1.0
Assists & Self-Creation 3.4 AST/g + self-creation = +1.0
Turnovers -4.3
Turnovers 1.8/g (live + dead blend) = -4.3
Defense +0.9
Steals 1.0/g = +2.3
Blocks 0.8/g = +0.7
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.1
Hustle & Effort +9.6
Rebounds 9.3 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +6.4
Contested Shots 5.2/g = +1.0
Deflections 1.6/g = +1.0
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.1
Loose Balls 0.5/g = +0.3
Screen Assists 2.5/g = +0.8
Raw Impact +15.3
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.6
Net Impact
+5.7
70th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 51th
9.2 PPG
Efficiency 52th
59.3% TS
Playmaking 89th
3.4 APG
Rebounding 85th
9.3 RPG
Defense 88th
+10.0/g
Hustle 85th
+24.1/g
Creation 77th
+3.30/g
Shot Making 46th
+4.15/g
TO Discipline 18th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Isaiah Hartenstein spent the opening weeks of the season transforming into an absolute interior terror who bends games through sheer brute force. Look no further than his monstrous eruption on 11/08 vs SAC. He bullied his way to 33 points and 19 rebounds, generating a jaw-dropping +48.4 Impact score because of his flawless 14-for-17 shooting and relentless rim pressure. Even when his scoring vanished, he found ways to dictate the terms of engagement. During the 10/29 vs SAC matchup, he managed a mere 4 points but still posted a +3.8 Impact. He salvaged that night by vacuuming up 14 rebounds and dominating the glass, ensuring his value remained high without a single play being called for him. He wasn't entirely immune to early-season duds, however, as seen on 10/23 vs IND where he grabbed 14 boards but suffered a dismal -12.3 Impact. That steep negative mark was dragged down by defensive lapses and an overly passive offensive approach that actively stalled the team's momentum.

This midseason stretch defined Isaiah Hartenstein as a highly volatile offensive hub, bouncing wildly between masterful playmaking and total scoring invisibility. He found ways to contribute without shooting on 11/24 vs POR, generating a +1.3 Impact despite scoring just seven points because his 14 rebounds dominated the glass and secured crucial extra possessions. However, that same pass-first mentality frequently backfired when he refused to attack the rim. During the 02/07 vs HOU matchup, he dished out 11 assists but dragged the team down with a -5.6 Impact, as his passive four-point scoring output allowed the defense to completely ignore him as a scoring threat and clog the passing lanes. He hit rock bottom offensively on 12/20 vs MIN, attempting just two shots and scoring a single point to post a brutal -11.2 Impact. When Hartenstein balances his elite distribution with aggressive finishing, he is a devastating weapon. When his offensive aggression completely vanishes, he becomes a half-court liability.

This fifteen-game stretch was defined by a bizarre oscillation between complete offensive passivity and absolute glass-eating dominance. During a brutal mid-March rut, he became a complete non-threat looking at the rim, bottoming out on 03/17 vs ORL. Despite dishing out 8 assists in just 16 minutes that night, his total refusal to shoot the basketball yielded zero points and a dismal -12.7 Impact score because defenders simply abandoned him to clog the passing lanes. He quickly flipped the script just days later on 03/21 vs WAS by leaning into his true identity as a chaotic, high-motor hub. Even though he only scored 9 points, he generated a massive +19.0 Impact score because he absolutely hijacked the game with 20 rebounds and 10 assists. He maintained that dirty-work mentality on 03/28 vs CHI, pulling down 16 boards to drive a +11.4 Impact score despite managing only 6 points. When Hartenstein relentlessly attacks the glass and creates extra possessions, his single-digit scoring totals become completely irrelevant to his actual on-court value.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Hartenstein posts positive impact in 77% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~6 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 87% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Hartenstein consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Tends to go on runs. Longest hot streak: 9 games. Longest cold streak: 3 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 45 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Gobert 98.9 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 10
L. Kornet 77.3 poss
FG% 70.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 26
N. Jokić 69.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 9
D. Ayton 61.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 15
D. Eubanks 61.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
D. Clingan 47.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
A. Sarr 43.2 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 10
A. Sengun 39.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
Y. Missi 38.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
R. Kalkbrenner 36.7 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Gobert 99.0 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 8
D. Ayton 85.4 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 8
L. Kornet 80.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 8
D. Eubanks 68.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 6
N. Jokić 67.9 poss
FG% 43.8%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.24
PTS 16
D. Clingan 53.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
A. Sarr 49.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 9
R. Kalkbrenner 41.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
A. Sengun 41.1 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.34
PTS 14
A. Davis 40.2 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 13

SEASON STATS

57
Games
9.2
PPG
9.3
RPG
3.4
APG
1.0
SPG
0.8
BPG
63.3
FG%
0.0
3P%
64.4
FT%
24.2
MPG

GAME LOG

57 games played