OKC

2025-26 Season

ISAIAH HARTENSTEIN

Oklahoma City Thunder | Center-Forward | 7-0
Isaiah Hartenstein
9.4 PPG
9.5 RPG
3.7 APG
24.8 MPG
+6.1 Impact

Hartenstein produces at an elite rate for a 25-minute workload. Elite defensive value (+3.4/game) is a major strength.

NET IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+6.1
Scoring +6.4
Points 9.4 PPG × +1.00 = +9.4
Missed 2PT 2.3/g × -0.78 = -1.8
Missed 3PT 0.2/g × -0.87 = -0.2
Missed FT 1.0/g × -1.00 = -1.0
Creation +4.9
Assists 3.7/g × +0.50 = +1.9
Off. Rebounds 2.4/g × +1.26 = +3.0
Turnovers -3.5
Turnovers 1.8/g × -1.95 = -3.5
Defense +3.4
Steals 1.1/g × +2.30 = +2.5
Blocks 0.8/g × +0.90 = +0.7
Def. Rebounds 7.2/g × +0.30 = +2.1
Fouls Committed 2.5/g × -0.75 = -1.9
Hustle & Effort +4.3
Contested Shots 6.9/g × +0.20 = +1.4
Deflections 2.1/g × +0.65 = +1.4
Loose Balls 0.6/g × +0.60 = +0.4
Screen Assists 3.3/g × +0.30 = +1.0
Off. Fouls Drawn 0.0/g uncredited × +2.70 = +0.1
Raw Impact +15.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −9.4
Net Impact
+6.1
84th pctl vs Centers

About this model: Net Impact can't measure floor spacing, help defense rotations, or playmaking gravity — so wings and guards are slightly undervalued vs bigs. How Net Impact works

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 92 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 48th
9.4 PPG
Efficiency 48th
58.4% TS
Playmaking 93th
3.7 APG
Rebounding 86th
9.5 RPG
Rim Protection 89th
0.25/min
Hustle 76th
0.13/min
Shot Creation 50th
0% pullup
TO Discipline 18th
0.07/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Isaiah Hartenstein’s first twenty games were defined by a relentless mastery of the dirty work, oscillating between quiet glue-guy utility and sudden bursts of interior dominance. He routinely generated value without needing to shoot. On 10/21 vs HOU, he scored just 6 points but posted a +5.2 impact score by anchoring the second unit with brilliant high-post passing and relentless activity on the offensive glass. When called upon to be the primary weapon, he completely demolished the paint. On 11/07 vs SAC, Hartenstein erupted for 33 points and 19 rebounds, driving a monstrous +29.4 impact score through flawless execution around the basket. Yet, his effectiveness occasionally cratered despite appealing box score numbers. During the 10/23 vs IND matchup, he pulled down 14 rebounds but suffered a staggering -13.1 impact score, as massive hidden costs and a stark drop-off from his baseline production dragged his team down. This stretch revealed a wildly impactful big man whose true value lies in the margins, even if his night-to-night consistency remains a puzzle.

Isaiah Hartenstein’s midseason stretch was defined by a radical shift into a pure high-post playmaking hub, though his extreme offensive passivity created wild swings in his nightly value. He eventually figured out how to influence winning without taking shots. During a gritty 03/15 vs MIN performance, he scored zero points but still posted a +2.5 impact by sacrificing his offense to focus entirely on bruising interior defense and grabbing 12 rebounds. Conversely, even when he found the bottom of the net, hidden costs occasionally dragged him down. On 02/22 vs CLE, Hartenstein shot a perfect 6-for-6 from the floor for 13 points, but his overall impact flatlined at -2.8 because poor defensive execution completely erased his scoring contributions. When he finally balanced the scales, the results were staggering. He ripped down 20 rebounds and dished 10 assists on 03/21 vs WAS, generating a massive +14.6 impact through relentless glass activity and elite connecting play.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Very consistent. Hartenstein posts positive impact in 77% of games — you almost always get a productive night. Scoring varies by ~6 points, but the overall contribution stays positive.

Reliable shooter — hits 45%+ from the field in 84% of games. You can count on efficient nights more often than not.

Defensive difference-maker. Hartenstein consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Performance has dropped off. First-half impact: +7.7, second-half: +4.5. Worth watching whether it's fatigue, injury, or opponents adjusting.

Hot right now — 5 straight games with positive impact. Longest positive run this season: 18 games.

MATCHUP HISTORY

Based on 45 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

R. Gobert 98.9 poss
FG% 41.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 10
L. Kornet 77.3 poss
FG% 70.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.34
PTS 26
N. Jokić 69.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 9
D. Ayton 61.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 15
D. Eubanks 61.2 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 6
D. Clingan 47.2 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.15
PTS 7
A. Sarr 43.2 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 10
A. Sengun 39.8 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
Y. Missi 38.1 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 5
R. Kalkbrenner 36.7 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.16
PTS 6

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

R. Gobert 99.0 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.08
PTS 8
D. Ayton 85.4 poss
FG% 57.1%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 8
L. Kornet 80.5 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 8
D. Eubanks 68.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 6
N. Jokić 67.9 poss
FG% 43.8%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.24
PTS 16
D. Clingan 53.3 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
A. Sarr 49.7 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.18
PTS 9
R. Kalkbrenner 41.9 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.1
PTS 4
A. Sengun 41.1 poss
FG% 55.6%
3P% 66.7%
PPP 0.34
PTS 14
A. Davis 40.2 poss
FG% 54.5%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.32
PTS 13

SEASON STATS

43
Games
9.4
PPG
9.5
RPG
3.7
APG
1.1
SPG
0.8
BPG
62.0
FG%
0.0
3P%
59.4
FT%
24.8
MPG

GAME LOG

43 games played