Interactive analysis

EXPLORE THE GAME

Every shot, every lead change, every rotation — visualized.

Lead over time · win-probability overlay
LEAD TRACKER
OKC lead SAS lead Win %
Every shot · colored by difficulty
SHOT CHART
Click shooters to compare their shots on the court
SAS 2P — 3P —
OKC 2P — 3P —
Tough make Easy make Blown miss Tough miss 175 attempts

SAS SAS Shot-making Δ

Champagnie 8/15 +2.3
Fox 4/15 -7.6
Wembanyama 4/15 -8.8
Johnson 7/13 -0.5
Castle 7/11 +5.1
Vassell Hard 2/11 -5.9
Bryant 3/5 +1.6
Harper 1/5 -2.8
McLaughlin Hard 1/1 +1.2
Kornet Open 0/1 -1.4

OKC OKC Shot-making Δ

Gilgeous-Alexander 7/19 -2.2
McCain Hard 7/19 -2.5
Caruso Hard 5/10 +3.0
Holmgren 6/9 +2.7
Hartenstein 6/8 +3.5
Dort 3/7 -1.1
Wallace 2/5 -1.2
Williams 3/3 +4.6
Williams Hard 1/3 0.0
How the game was played
BY THE NUMBERS
SAS
OKC
37/92 Field Goals 40/83
40.2% Field Goal % 48.2%
12/41 3-Pointers 14/32
29.3% 3-Point % 43.8%
28/32 Free Throws 33/38
87.5% Free Throw % 86.8%
53.7% True Shooting % 63.7%
49 Total Rebounds 58
15 Offensive 14
26 Defensive 34
25 Assists 26
1.67 Assist/TO Ratio 1.53
15 Turnovers 16
14 Steals 9
3 Blocks 5
29 Fouls 22
46 Points in Paint 38
26 Fast Break Pts 9
22 Points off TOs 20
15 Second Chance Pts 26
33 Bench Points 40
8 Largest Lead 20
Biggest contributors
TOP NET IMPACT
1
Alex Caruso
22 PTS · 2 REB · 6 AST · 28.1 MIN
+23.78
2
Stephon Castle
24 PTS · 5 REB · 6 AST · 33.3 MIN
+22.45
3
Julian Champagnie
22 PTS · 8 REB · 1 AST · 30.2 MIN
+20.94
4
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
32 PTS · 2 REB · 9 AST · 37.1 MIN
+18.15
5
Victor Wembanyama
20 PTS · 6 REB · 1 AST · 37.6 MIN
+16.09
6
Chet Holmgren
16 PTS · 11 REB · 1 AST · 29.8 MIN
+15.35
7
Isaiah Hartenstein
12 PTS · 15 REB · 4 AST · 30.6 MIN
+14.77
8
Cason Wallace
7 PTS · 4 REB · 5 AST · 31.3 MIN
+14.03
9
Kenrich Williams
8 PTS · 3 REB · 0 AST · 11.6 MIN
+9.11
10
De'Aaron Fox
9 PTS · 4 REB · 8 AST · 32.5 MIN
+7.88
Play-by-play (most recent first)
PLAY FEED
Q4 0:13 J. McLaughlin Free Throw 2 of 2 (4 PTS) 114–127
Q4 0:13 J. McLaughlin Free Throw 1 of 2 (3 PTS) 113–127
Q4 0:13 I. Joe shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (McLaughlin 2 FT) 112–127
Q4 0:19 K. Williams tip Layup (8 PTS) 112–127
Q4 0:20 K. Williams REBOUND (Off:1 Def:2) 112–125
Q4 0:21 MISS J. McCain 27' 3PT 112–125
Q4 0:37 K. Olynyk Free Throw 2 of 2 (2 PTS) 112–125
Q4 0:37 K. Olynyk Free Throw 1 of 2 (1 PTS) 111–125
Q4 0:37 A. Wiggins shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (Olynyk 2 FT) 110–125
Q4 0:45 J. McCain Free Throw 2 of 2 (20 PTS) 110–125
Q4 0:45 J. McCain Free Throw 1 of 2 (19 PTS) 110–124
Q4 0:45 B. Biyombo shooting personal FOUL (1 PF) (McCain 2 FT) 110–123
Q4 1:02 C. Bryant driving bank Hook (7 PTS) 110–123
Q4 1:08 C. Bryant REBOUND (Off:0 Def:1) 108–123
Q4 1:09 MISS J. McCain driving finger roll Layup 108–123

GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
32
pts
2
reb
9
ast
Impact
+10.7

His performance was fueled by an aggressive, foul-drawing approach that led to 16-of-17 shooting from the free-throw line. This generated a massive +18.3 Offense credit, though it was partially offset by an uncharacteristically high 6 turnovers.

Shooting
FG 7/19 (36.8%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 16/17 (94.1%)
Advanced
TS% 60.4%
USG% 35.1%
Net Rtg +8.7
+/- +8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.1m
Scoring +23.1
Creation +4.3
Shot Making +4.7
Hustle +0.6
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -14.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 21
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 6
S Jared McCain 33.5m
20
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.4

He operated as a high-volume scorer, taking 19 shots to get his 20 points in a performance that was more aggressive than efficient. Despite the volume, his +5.5 Offense credit shows he provided a needed scoring punch.

Shooting
FG 7/19 (36.8%)
3PT 3/9 (33.3%)
FT 3/5 (60.0%)
Advanced
TS% 47.2%
USG% 26.4%
Net Rtg +1.4
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.5m
Scoring +9.5
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 41.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
12
pts
15
reb
4
ast
Impact
+10.8

A dominant interior presence defined his game, pairing efficient scoring (6/8 FG) with monstrous work on the glass (15 rebounds). His defensive impact was immense, holding opponents to just 4/15 (27%) shooting when he was the nearest defender.

Shooting
FG 6/8 (75.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 75.0%
USG% 13.4%
Net Rtg +33.9
+/- +24
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.6m
Scoring +10.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +19.1
Defense -4.5
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 26.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 3
S Chet Holmgren 29.8m
16
pts
11
reb
1
ast
Impact
+14.6

Efficient scoring and strong rebounding drove his performance, as he posted 16 points (6/9 FG) and 11 boards. This offensive production generated a +12.9 Offense credit, though it was somewhat diminished by 3 turnovers.

Shooting
FG 6/9 (66.7%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 74.3%
USG% 18.7%
Net Rtg -4.9
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.8m
Scoring +13.7
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +13.0
Defense +0.7
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 3
S Luguentz Dort 18.1m
7
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.0

His impact was concentrated on the defensive end, where he held opponents to 2/8 (25%) shooting. Offensively, he was a low-volume contributor, scoring 7 points in his 18 minutes of action.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 15.2%
Net Rtg -4.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.1m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +3.1
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
4
reb
5
ast
Impact
+2.9

A stellar all-around defensive game was his calling card, generating a +9.3 Defense credit through 4 deflections, 2 blocks, and 2 steals. He added 5 assists and committed zero turnovers, showcasing a high-feel, low-usage offensive performance.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 59.5%
USG% 7.7%
Net Rtg +41.9
+/- +29
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Scoring +4.5
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +2.2
Defense +3.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 2
TO 0
Alex Caruso 28.1m
22
pts
2
reb
6
ast
Impact
+18.9

He erupted for a highly efficient 22-point performance, shooting 4/8 from three and a perfect 8/8 from the line. This offensive explosion, combined with 3 steals, drove a massive +19.8 Offense credit and a +7.9 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 8/8 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 81.4%
USG% 22.9%
Net Rtg +27.1
+/- +18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.1m
Scoring +17.8
Creation +3.2
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +2.5
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 30.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
3
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-6.9

He served his role as a floor-spacing big, hitting one of his two 3-point attempts and grabbing 4 rebounds. His contributions were modest in 17 minutes, with his Defense credit dipping slightly into the negative (-0.8).

Shooting
FG 1/3 (33.3%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 0/2 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 38.7%
USG% 9.8%
Net Rtg -35.3
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 16.6m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +3.1
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 60.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
8
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
+1.3

Perfect shooting efficiency defined his 12-minute stint, going 3/3 from the field and 2/2 from deep for 8 points. This flawless offensive burst generated a +9.3 Offense credit, providing a potent spark off the bench.

Shooting
FG 3/3 (100.0%)
3PT 2/2 (100.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 133.3%
USG% 9.4%
Net Rtg +26.9
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.6m
Scoring +8.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.4
Hustle +1.9
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
Isaiah Joe 1.8m
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.6

His 1:46 of playing time was notable only for a single deflection and a steal. He made a minor positive impact on defense (+1.6) in his brief, low-leverage minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -93.3
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 1.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.8
Turnovers +0.0
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.0

He played less than a minute and his only statistical contribution was a single foul. His time on the court was too brief to make any meaningful impact.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-0.5

He saw the floor for just 46 seconds at the end of the game. His appearance was too short to register any statistics or make a tangible impact.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -100.0
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.8m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
SAS San Antonio Spurs
20
pts
6
reb
1
ast
Impact
+9.4

A difficult shooting night from the field (4/15 FG) was offset by his ability to manufacture points at the charity stripe, going a perfect 12/12. Despite lower-than-usual rebounding, his +11.3 Defense credit shows he remained a significant two-way presence.

Shooting
FG 4/15 (26.7%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 12/12 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 49.3%
USG% 22.9%
Net Rtg -9.9
+/- -8
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 37.6m
Scoring +11.3
Creation +2.9
Shot Making +1.3
Hustle +3.7
Defense +4.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 11
Opp FG% 61.1%
STL 2
BLK 3
TO 2
S Devin Vassell 35.6m
6
pts
4
reb
4
ast
Impact
-3.6

A brutal shooting night (2/11 FG) erased his offensive contributions, but Vassell found other ways to impact the game. His +7.8 Defense credit was driven by generating 3 steals, double his season average.

Shooting
FG 2/11 (18.2%)
3PT 2/9 (22.2%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 26.2%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg -2.6
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.6m
Scoring -1.6
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +2.2
Defense +5.5
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
S Stephon Castle 33.3m
24
pts
5
reb
6
ast
Impact
+18.7

This was a masterful two-way performance, driven by hyper-efficient scoring (7/11 FG) that generated a +20.8 Offense credit. He was just as impactful on the other end, holding his matchups to 33% shooting and collecting 6 deflections.

Shooting
FG 7/11 (63.6%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 7/8 (87.5%)
Advanced
TS% 82.6%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg -14.2
+/- -9
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 33.3m
Scoring +20.4
Creation +1.9
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +2.5
Defense +5.6
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 3
S De'Aaron Fox 32.5m
9
pts
4
reb
8
ast
Impact
+1.0

With his shot abandoning him (4/15 FG), he shifted his focus to playmaking and defense. His 8 assists were well above his 5.7 average, and his defensive activity produced 5 deflections and 3 steals, driving his +5.5 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 4/15 (26.7%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 28.3%
USG% 20.0%
Net Rtg -15.6
+/- -10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.5m
Scoring -0.0
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.0
Hustle +5.1
Defense +5.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 1
22
pts
8
reb
1
ast
Impact
+20.1

An efficient scoring outburst defined his night, as he poured in 22 points on 53% shooting, nearly double his season average. His +16.4 Offense credit reflects his role as a primary bucket-getter, complemented by 3 steals on the defensive end.

Shooting
FG 8/15 (53.3%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 67.4%
USG% 23.1%
Net Rtg -28.4
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.2m
Scoring +15.9
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +5.2
Hustle +9.2
Defense +3.7
Turnovers -5.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 0
TO 2
Dylan Harper 24.9m
5
pts
6
reb
3
ast
Impact
-5.5

His value came almost exclusively on defense, where he held opponents to a stellar 2/11 (18%) shooting. Offensively, he was a non-factor, scoring just 5 points on 1/5 shooting and committing 3 turnovers.

Shooting
FG 1/5 (20.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.5%
USG% 13.6%
Net Rtg -8.9
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.9m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +7.6
Defense -0.3
Turnovers -7.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 11
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 18.2%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 3
15
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
+3.1

He provided an efficient scoring punch in his 20 minutes, scoring 15 points on 7/13 shooting to generate a +10.9 Offense credit. His value was one-dimensional, however, as his Defense credit was a slight negative (-0.9).

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 57.7%
USG% 29.4%
Net Rtg +15.4
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 19.9m
Scoring +10.6
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +4.1
Defense -2.8
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.3

His 8 minutes on the floor were largely invisible, failing to record a point or a rebound while committing 3 fouls. His negative defensive impact (-1.8) was the most notable part of his brief outing.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.5%
Net Rtg -26.8
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.2m
Scoring -0.7
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense -3.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
7
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.0

He made the most of his limited court time, scoring 7 points in just 5:02 on an efficient 3/5 shooting. This brief but effective offensive burst was the sole driver of his performance, generating a +5.2 Offense credit.

Shooting
FG 3/5 (60.0%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 41.7%
Net Rtg -9.8
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 5.0m
Scoring +5.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-2.3

In just under 4 minutes of action, he was a complete non-factor, failing to record a single statistic. His minimal court time resulted in zero contribution across the board, reflected in his +0.0 scores for Offense, Hustle, and Defense.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -66.7
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 3.9m
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.0

He was on the floor for just 2:13, contributing a single rebound and a screen assist. His brief appearance was defined by minor defensive lapses, leading to a -1.2 Defense credit.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +43.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-12.1

His 2:13 of court time were a net negative, marked only by a single turnover and a foul. He failed to make any positive statistical contributions, resulting in negative Offense (-0.7) and Defense (-0.8) credits.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +43.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +1.3
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 1
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.0

His entire contribution came from the free-throw line, where he scored 2 points in just 2:13 of action. This resulted in a small positive Offense credit of +2.4 in an otherwise empty stat line.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 113.6%
USG% 16.7%
Net Rtg +43.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-4.4

He provided a quick scoring burst in garbage time, hitting a field goal and two free throws for 4 points in just 2:13. This hyper-efficient cameo generated a +4.9 Offense credit in his limited minutes.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 106.4%
USG% 33.3%
Net Rtg +43.3
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.2m
Scoring +4.0
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0