PHI

2025-26 Season

ANDRE DRUMMOND

Philadelphia 76ers | Center | 6-11
Andre Drummond
6.1PPG
7.9RPG
1.2APG
18.7MPG
+1.5 Impact

Drummond produces at an above average rate for a 19-minute workload.

·
Embed this player card

Copy & paste this HTML into any page:

The widget updates automatically whenever our data does.

IMPACT BREAKDOWN
Every stat, every credit, every cost — per game average
+1.5
Scoring +4.9
Points Scored 6.1 PPG = +6.1
Missed Shots difficulty-adjusted = -2.3
Shot Making above expected FG% = +1.1
Creation +0.5
Assists & Self-Creation 1.2 AST/g + self-creation = +0.5
Turnovers -2.2
Turnovers 0.9/g (live + dead blend) = -2.2
Defense -0.2
Steals 0.6/g = +1.4
Blocks 0.7/g = +0.6
Fouls + context committed fouls, matchup adj = -2.2
Hustle & Effort +8.5
Rebounds 7.9 RPG (OREB + DREB) = +6.5
Contested Shots 3.9/g = +0.8
Deflections 1.1/g = +0.7
Charges Drawn 0.0/g = +0.0
Loose Balls 0.2/g = +0.1
Screen Assists 1.3/g = +0.4
Raw Impact +11.5
Baseline (game-average expected) −10.0
Net Impact
+1.5
48th pctl vs Centers

PBP Credit: Every play is analyzed from play-by-play data. Scorers get difficulty-adjusted credit, assisters get creation value based on the shot opportunity they created, and turnovers are classified by type. Shot difficulty is derived from 1M+ shots across 4 seasons. Full methodology

SKILL DNA

Percentile rank vs 93 Centers with 10+ games

Scoring 33th
6.4 PPG
Efficiency 17th
54.4% TS
Playmaking 38th
1.2 APG
Rebounding 75th
8.2 RPG
Defense 50th
+6.4/g
Hustle 99th
+30.5/g
Creation 47th
+2.18/g
Shot Making 42th
+3.91/g
TO Discipline 48th
0.05/min

THE SEASON SO FAR

Andre Drummond's first 22 games were defined by a sudden mid-November promotion to the starting lineup that resurrected his status as a premier glass-cleaner. During an exhausting 38-minute shift on 11/23 vs MIA, he hauled in an absurd 24 rebounds while adding 14 points, generating a massive +26.6 Impact score. He simply bullies people. Even without being a primary scoring option, his sheer physical dominance on the boards generated immense value by extending possessions and punishing smaller frontcourts. Just days earlier on 11/18 vs LAC, he posted a +25.2 Impact by grabbing 18 rebounds and shooting a highly efficient 5-for-8 from the floor. However, his utility quickly vanished when he forced bad shots instead of playing within his role, as seen on 11/26 vs ORL. Despite grabbing 12 rebounds in that contest, his dismal 1-for-6 shooting dragged his Impact down to a -7.8, revealing the hidden costs of wasted offensive touches.

Andre Drummond spent this midseason stretch oscillating wildly between dominant spot starts and completely invisible shifts. When given heavy minutes, he could still warp the geometry of the paint, though he added a bizarre perimeter wrinkle to his game. During a 12/20 vs NYK start, he exploded for 14 points and 13 rebounds while shockingly knocking down three triples, generating a massive +17.4 Impact score through sheer offensive volume and rebounding dominance. Even when his scoring touch vanished, his mass on the glass created vital second-chance value. On 01/21 vs PHX, he managed just eight points but vacuumed up 15 rebounds, posting a +6.7 Impact score simply by bullying his way to extra possessions. Yet, trusting him with a permanent starting role remained a dangerous gamble. Look no further than his disastrous 12/28 vs OKC outing, where he sleepwalked to four points and four rebounds in 18 minutes, suffering a brutal -15.7 Impact score as his empty minutes actively dragged the lineup down. He remains a fascinating, flawed wrecking ball who can win you a quarter on the glass but might lose you a half if his motor stalls.

This volatile stretch for Andre Drummond was defined by a bizarre mid-season identity crisis that eventually gave way to a dominant rebounding resurgence. Early on, he inexplicably fancied himself a stretch big. He launched terrible perimeter shots during a disastrous start on 03/03 vs SAS, missing all four of his three-point attempts in just five minutes. That baffling shot selection actively derailed the offense, resulting in a brutal -9.2 impact score. Thankfully, Drummond eventually abandoned the perimeter and returned to doing the dirty work in the paint. Look at his performance on 03/15 vs POR. Despite scoring a mere six points, he vacuumed up 17 rebounds in 35 minutes to generate a +7.8 impact by simply overpowering smaller defenders on the glass. He carried that physical momentum through the end of the year, culminating in a massive +22.4 impact off the bench on 04/15 vs ORL.

IMPACT TIMELINE

Game-by-game performance vs average. Green = above average, red = below.

PATTERNS

Boom-or-bust player. Drummond's impact swings wildly relative to his average — some nights dominant, others invisible. Scoring varies by ~5 points per game.

Middle-of-the-road efficiency — shoots 45%+ from the field in 60% of games. Not automatic, but not a problem either.

Defensive difference-maker. Drummond consistently forces tough shots and protects the rim — opponents shoot worse when he's guarding them.

Small downward trend. First-half impact: +3.0, second-half: +0.1. Not alarming yet, but trending the wrong direction.

MATCHUP HISTORY ⚠ Updated 46 days ago

Based on 74 games with tracking data. Shows who guarded this player on offense and who he guarded on defense, with their shooting stats in those matchups.

ON OFFENSE: WHO GUARDED HIM

His shooting stats against each primary defender this season

N. Queta 67.2 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.22
PTS 15
W. Carter Jr. 65.6 poss
FG% 30.0%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.11
PTS 7
D. Clingan 59.4 poss
FG% 44.4%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.13
PTS 8
N. Claxton 58.7 poss
FG% 40.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 10
O. Okongwu 57.4 poss
FG% 50.0%
3P% 100.0%
PPP 0.09
PTS 5
J. Duren 51.8 poss
FG% 71.4%
3P% 50.0%
PPP 0.25
PTS 13
I. Zubac 51.0 poss
FG% 0.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.0
PTS 0
C. Murray-Boyles 46.5 poss
FG% 33.3%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
J. Poeltl 46.2 poss
FG% 25.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.04
PTS 2
K. Ware 40.8 poss
FG% 100.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7

ON DEFENSE: WHO HE GUARDED

How opponents shot when he was the primary defender. Lower FG% = better defense.

N. Queta 66.5 poss
FG% 66.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.23
PTS 15
N. Claxton 62.8 poss
FG% 85.7%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.24
PTS 15
W. Carter Jr. 56.8 poss
FG% 62.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.21
PTS 12
D. Clingan 55.3 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 33.3%
PPP 0.13
PTS 7
J. Duren 51.1 poss
FG% 80.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.18
PTS 9
O. Okongwu 49.1 poss
FG% 42.9%
3P% 20.0%
PPP 0.14
PTS 7
I. Zubac 48.3 poss
FG% 37.5%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.12
PTS 6
J. Poeltl 45.1 poss
FG% 75.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.27
PTS 12
A. Davis 41.3 poss
FG% 63.6%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.39
PTS 16
C. Murray-Boyles 41.3 poss
FG% 60.0%
3P% 0.0%
PPP 0.17
PTS 7

SEASON STATS

75
Games
6.1
PPG
7.9
RPG
1.2
APG
0.6
SPG
0.7
BPG
48.9
FG%
37.6
3P%
64.6
FT%
18.7
MPG

GAME LOG

75 games played