GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

ATL Atlanta Hawks
S Onyeka Okongwu 34.9m
11
pts
12
reb
4
ast
Impact
+4.6

Misguided perimeter shot selection severely capped his offensive ceiling and dragged his overall rating near neutral. However, his strong interior anchoring (+6.3 Def) and persistence on the glass prevented the opposing frontcourt from completely taking over.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 45.8%
USG% 15.0%
Net Rtg -31.0
+/- -22
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 34.9m
Scoring +5.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +7.5
Defense -1.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 20
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 0
S Trae Young 30.2m
15
pts
4
reb
10
ast
Impact
-5.9

The shiny double-double masked a deeply negative overall impact (-7.2), likely driven by costly live-ball turnovers that fueled opponent transition runs. His defensive metrics (+1.7) were far too weak to compensate for the possessions he gave away while forcing difficult passes.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 54.5%
USG% 25.7%
Net Rtg -21.4
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.2m
Scoring +9.7
Creation +3.1
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -11.8
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 5
17
pts
3
reb
2
ast
Impact
+14.2

Efficient perimeter execution and lockdown defensive metrics (+7.0) drove a highly productive shift. He masterfully navigated screens to smother opposing guards, proving to be a reliable two-way stabilizer despite a slight dip from his recent scoring tear.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 3/6 (50.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 78.1%
USG% 18.6%
Net Rtg -32.4
+/- -18
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.5m
Scoring +14.1
Creation +0.6
Shot Making +4.2
Hustle +3.8
Defense +5.2
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 18
FGM Against 12
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 2
BLK 1
TO 2
S Dyson Daniels 27.2m
8
pts
4
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.3

Offensive passivity and a sharp decline in scoring volume tanked his overall impact rating. Even though he generated solid hustle (+4.9) and defensive metrics, his reluctance to attack the paint allowed defenders to freely cheat off him.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 1/1 (100.0%)
FT 3/4 (75.0%)
Advanced
TS% 51.5%
USG% 15.6%
Net Rtg -21.4
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +4.4
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +1.4
Hustle +3.1
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Mouhamed Gueye 23.1m
11
pts
6
reb
2
ast
Impact
0.0

An unexpected scoring surge and active hustle (+3.9) barely kept his total impact in the green. While his overall efficiency was clunky, his willingness to space the floor forced opposing bigs out of their comfort zones.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 1/3 (33.3%)
Advanced
TS% 48.6%
USG% 21.8%
Net Rtg -36.4
+/- -16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.1m
Scoring +5.5
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +7.6
Defense -2.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 75.0%
STL 0
BLK 2
TO 1
Asa Newell 24.8m
12
pts
10
reb
1
ast
Impact
+5.2

A massive offensive breakout fueled by confident perimeter shooting kept his overall impact in the positive. While his defensive and hustle metrics were relatively pedestrian, his ability to stretch the floor from the frontcourt provided critical breathing room for the guards.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 3/5 (60.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 60.7%
USG% 19.0%
Net Rtg -8.1
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 24.8m
Scoring +6.9
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +3.0
Hustle +12.7
Defense -2.2
Turnovers -6.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
13
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
+4.4

Timely perimeter shot-making and highly disruptive defensive rotations (+6.1 Def) drove a very solid positive rating. He executed his role as a connector perfectly, using his length to bother passing lanes while punishing late closeouts from deep.

Shooting
FG 4/10 (40.0%)
3PT 3/7 (42.9%)
FT 2/3 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 57.4%
USG% 21.8%
Net Rtg -13.9
+/- -4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.2m
Scoring +7.9
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +1.6
Defense +4.1
Turnovers -3.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
Luke Kennard 20.7m
5
pts
0
reb
3
ast
Impact
-8.0

Failing to deliver on his primary role as a floor spacer, his bricked perimeter looks severely clogged the half-court offense. He was virtually invisible in both hustle (+0.4) and defensive metrics (+0.7), offering zero secondary value to justify his minutes.

Shooting
FG 2/5 (40.0%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 12.2%
Net Rtg -33.3
+/- -14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.7m
Scoring +2.5
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +0.0
Defense +0.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
5
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-11.1

A brutal combination of forced shots, zero hustle contributions, and defensive liability (-1.2 Def) resulted in a catastrophic -9.9 total impact. He completely disrupted the team's rhythm during his stint, bleeding points on one end while stalling the offense on the other.

Shooting
FG 2/6 (33.3%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 1/2 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 36.3%
USG% 31.0%
Net Rtg +0.8
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 11.7m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +1.0
Shot Making +1.2
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
1
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
-3.5

Pure defensive specialization (+2.9 Def) salvaged a positive impact despite a completely inept offensive showing. He missed all his attempts around the basket but utilized his size to effectively alter shots during his brief rotation.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 14.5%
USG% 13.0%
Net Rtg +37.1
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 8.7m
Scoring -1.3
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +5.1
Defense +2.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 5
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 20.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
2
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.2

A lack of defensive awareness (-0.8 Def) and zero hustle plays quickly pushed his brief cameo into negative territory. He failed to make any meaningful impression, struggling to stay in front of his man during mop-up duty.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 15.4%
Net Rtg +55.6
+/- +6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Scoring +1.4
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.0
Defense -0.3
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-1.1

Registering absolute zeroes across the box score, hustle, and defensive metrics, this was the definition of an empty cardio session. His complete lack of involvement during his two minutes on the floor resulted in a baseline negative impact.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +20.0
+/- +1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
14
pts
10
reb
2
ast
Impact
+12.6

Physical interior positioning and excellent rotational awareness anchored a highly effective +8.3 defensive rating. He capitalized on favorable drop-coverage matchups to nearly double his usual scoring output, providing a steadying presence in the paint.

Shooting
FG 7/13 (53.8%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/1 (0.0%)
Advanced
TS% 52.1%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +33.5
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.0m
Scoring +8.1
Creation +0.2
Shot Making +1.8
Hustle +9.8
Defense +4.7
Turnovers -2.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 2
30
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
+29.4

Surgical isolation execution and relentless rim pressure yielded a massive +25.6 box score impact. He consistently broke down the primary defender to generate high-value looks, while supplementing his offensive masterclass with elite hustle metrics (+6.5).

Shooting
FG 12/17 (70.6%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 80.0%
USG% 28.2%
Net Rtg +25.2
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.7m
Scoring +26.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +7.0
Hustle +2.5
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 2
S Chet Holmgren 27.2m
31
pts
11
reb
1
ast
Impact
+40.0

A massive offensive explosion fueled by scorching perimeter efficiency drove a staggering +22.0 total impact. He completely dictated the terms of engagement, pairing elite shot selection with dominant rim protection (+9.0 Def) to overwhelm the frontcourt matchup.

Shooting
FG 8/12 (66.7%)
3PT 6/8 (75.0%)
FT 9/10 (90.0%)
Advanced
TS% 94.5%
USG% 29.4%
Net Rtg +33.3
+/- +16
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +27.2
Creation +2.6
Shot Making +6.8
Hustle +13.0
Defense +4.5
Turnovers -6.6
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 3
S Luguentz Dort 27.1m
5
pts
2
reb
1
ast
Impact
-2.4

Elite defensive metrics (+7.5) and relentless hustle plays salvaged a positive overall impact despite a brutal shooting night. His perimeter containment consistently disrupted the opponent's flow, effectively offsetting the damage from his clanked open looks.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 35.7%
USG% 10.4%
Net Rtg +25.5
+/- +12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.1m
Scoring +0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.5
Hustle +1.6
Defense +4.4
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 53.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Cason Wallace 25.6m
3
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-2.3

An uncharacteristic offensive disappearing act cratered his total score, as he failed to capitalize on standard spot-up opportunities. However, tenacious point-of-attack pressure (+7.1 Def) and active hands in the passing lanes prevented his overall impact from completely bottoming out.

Shooting
FG 1/7 (14.3%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 21.4%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +38.5
+/- +21
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 25.6m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.0
Hustle +3.8
Defense +5.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 62.5%
STL 3
BLK 1
TO 1
14
pts
7
reb
7
ast
Impact
+16.0

Steady two-way execution and timely perimeter shot-making pushed his total impact well into the green. He overcame some inefficient finishing inside the arc by maintaining excellent defensive rotations (+5.2) and generating secondary offensive actions.

Shooting
FG 6/14 (42.9%)
3PT 2/3 (66.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 20.9%
Net Rtg +2.3
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 28.8m
Scoring +8.6
Creation +2.2
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +7.0
Defense +3.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 14.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
9
pts
5
reb
2
ast
Impact
-5.1

Snapping a four-game streak of high-efficiency shooting, his forced attempts in semi-transition resulted in a noticeably negative total impact. His defensive metrics (+0.6) were unusually quiet, failing to provide the two-way stability he normally offers.

Shooting
FG 4/11 (36.4%)
3PT 1/4 (25.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 40.9%
USG% 17.4%
Net Rtg +27.7
+/- +14
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +3.7
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.1
Hustle +6.3
Defense -4.7
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
7
pts
3
reb
0
ast
Impact
-8.5

A failure to stretch the floor effectively dragged down his overall rating, as clanked perimeter looks allowed the opposing frontcourt to sag into the paint. Minimal hustle contributions (+0.8) meant he couldn't offset the negative offensive value through dirty work.

Shooting
FG 3/7 (42.9%)
3PT 1/5 (20.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 50.0%
USG% 21.4%
Net Rtg +8.3
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 18.1m
Scoring +3.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +1.6
Hustle +0.9
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 2
0
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.5

Continuing a prolonged scoreless stretch, his complete lack of offensive gravity allowed defenders to freely roam and double-team elsewhere. Minimal defensive and hustle contributions left him as a net-negative presence during his rotation minutes.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 4.3%
Net Rtg -19.3
+/- -5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.8m
Scoring -1.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 16.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
4
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-7.0

Empty offensive possessions defined this stint, as he failed to connect on any field goal attempts and squandered open spot-up looks. A lack of disruptive defensive plays (+0.3) compounded the damage, preventing him from salvaging his floor time.

Shooting
FG 0/3 (0.0%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 4/4 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 42.0%
USG% 21.7%
Net Rtg +4.0
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 10.5m
Scoring +1.6
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense +0.0
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 2
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 100.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-13.8

A stark departure from his recent high-volume scoring, he was completely neutralized in a brief, scoreless cameo. He struggled to catch the rhythm of the game, leading to a quick hook and a negative impact across the board.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 22.2%
Net Rtg -55.6
+/- -6
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.8m
Scoring -0.6
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-11.4

Relegated to pure garbage time, his brief appearance was marred by being a step slow on defensive rotations (-0.8 Def). He registered no tangible stats, acting merely as a placeholder until the final buzzer.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg -20.0
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 2.1m
Scoring +0.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.0
Defense -1.6
Turnovers +0.0
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0