GAME ANALYSIS

KEEP READING

Create a free account and follow your team to get the full analysis every morning.

Create Free Account

Already have an account? Log in

Share Post

PLAYER PERFORMANCE

DAL Dallas Mavericks
S Anthony Davis 38.1m
26
pts
11
reb
3
ast
Impact
+27.9

Utterly dismantled the interior defense with elite pick-and-roll finishing and dominant post positioning. His staggering +25.8 box impact was fueled by overwhelming efficiency near the basket and a refusal to settle for low-percentage looks.

Shooting
FG 10/16 (62.5%)
3PT 1/2 (50.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 71.4%
USG% 23.8%
Net Rtg +4.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.1m
Scoring +22.2
Creation +2.1
Shot Making +4.8
Hustle +13.0
Defense -2.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 17
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 52.9%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 1
S P.J. Washington 38.0m
15
pts
9
reb
3
ast
Impact
+13.7

Served as the linchpin of the defensive scheme, utilizing his length to smother drives and rack up a massive +7.2 defensive impact score. He complemented that lockdown effort by picking his spots wisely on offense, punishing closeouts without forcing bad shots.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 3/7 (42.9%)
Advanced
TS% 57.3%
USG% 15.9%
Net Rtg -23.2
+/- -17
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 38.0m
Scoring +9.5
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +9.5
Defense +2.9
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 52.6%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
S Max Christie 31.3m
14
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
+3.2

Stretched the floor beautifully by hunting the corners and punishing late closeouts from deep. Beyond the perimeter marksmanship, his +5.2 hustle rating reflected a willingness to crash the glass and keep plays alive against bigger matchups.

Shooting
FG 5/10 (50.0%)
3PT 4/8 (50.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 70.0%
USG% 14.7%
Net Rtg +12.7
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.3m
Scoring +9.9
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +4.3
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.9
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 41.7%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
S Cooper Flagg 31.1m
2
pts
2
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.3

Suffered a catastrophic regression in shot-making, clanking nearly every attempt in the paint to crater his offensive value. He tried to salvage his night with spectacular weak-side rim protection (+6.6 defense), but the sheer volume of empty offensive trips dragged him deep into the negative.

Shooting
FG 1/9 (11.1%)
3PT 0/3 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 11.1%
USG% 11.4%
Net Rtg -31.7
+/- -20
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.1m
Scoring -4.3
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +0.6
Defense +4.7
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 58.3%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 0
S Klay Thompson 22.4m
8
pts
4
reb
2
ast
Impact
-9.6

Continued a troubling trend of perimeter misfires, short-circuiting offensive sets with forced, contested jumpers early in the shot clock. While he fought hard over screens to post a +3.0 defensive mark, the sheer volume of wasted offensive possessions tanked his overall rating.

Shooting
FG 3/11 (27.3%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 36.4%
USG% 24.1%
Net Rtg -30.0
+/- -12
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 22.4m
Scoring +1.7
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +2.5
Hustle +1.2
Defense +0.5
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 10
FGM Against 4
Opp FG% 40.0%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
9
pts
2
reb
10
ast
Impact
-12.0

Paralyzed the half-court offense by repeatedly settling for contested, early-clock triples that missed the mark. The resulting long rebounds fueled opponent transition opportunities, completely negating the value of his high-level playmaking.

Shooting
FG 3/14 (21.4%)
3PT 1/8 (12.5%)
FT 2/4 (50.0%)
Advanced
TS% 28.6%
USG% 25.4%
Net Rtg +4.9
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 30.4m
Scoring +0.1
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +2.2
Hustle +0.6
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -4.7
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 10
Opp FG% 66.7%
STL 0
BLK 1
TO 2
9
pts
4
reb
0
ast
Impact
+4.5

Overcame a clunky shooting performance by leaning heavily into his role as an energy forward. A steady diet of physical box-outs and timely defensive rotations (+2.4) ensured he remained a net positive despite struggling to find his touch around the rim.

Shooting
FG 2/7 (28.6%)
3PT 0/2 (0.0%)
FT 5/5 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 48.9%
USG% 14.8%
Net Rtg -29.4
+/- -15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 23.2m
Scoring +5.3
Creation +1.1
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +5.1
Defense +1.8
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 6
FGM Against 0
Opp FG% 0.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 0
Jaden Hardy 20.9m
11
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-1.3

Provided a crucial two-way spark off the bench, blending opportunistic perimeter scoring with surprisingly stout point-of-attack defense (+3.3). His +4.0 hustle score highlighted a relentless motor in transition, constantly pressuring backpedaling defenders.

Shooting
FG 4/9 (44.4%)
3PT 2/4 (50.0%)
FT 1/1 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 58.3%
USG% 21.3%
Net Rtg +22.7
+/- +10
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 20.9m
Scoring +7.4
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +2.8
Hustle +0.3
Defense +2.3
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 3
Opp FG% 37.5%
STL 2
BLK 0
TO 1
0
pts
1
reb
1
ast
Impact
-14.4

Looked completely out of sync during a brief first-half stint, failing to register any positive hustle metrics. A blown defensive assignment and an empty offensive possession quickly earned him a spot back on the bench.

Shooting
FG 0/1 (0.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 14.3%
Net Rtg -15.5
+/- -1
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 4.6m
Scoring -0.8
Creation +0.3
Shot Making +0.0
Hustle +0.3
Defense -0.6
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
OKC Oklahoma City Thunder
23
pts
4
reb
8
ast
Impact
+12.9

A heavy diet of contested midrange pull-ups dragged down his usual hyper-efficiency, keeping his overall impact muted (+0.8). However, he supplemented the erratic shooting with elite gap discipline on the other end, posting a stellar +4.9 defensive rating by disrupting passing lanes.

Shooting
FG 10/22 (45.5%)
3PT 1/3 (33.3%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 50.3%
USG% 33.8%
Net Rtg +12.9
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 35.5m
Scoring +14.7
Creation +2.8
Shot Making +5.0
Hustle +1.2
Defense +2.4
Turnovers -8.2
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 8
Opp FG% 42.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 4
S Cason Wallace 32.8m
4
pts
5
reb
5
ast
Impact
-6.5

Phenomenal defensive metrics (+4.9) and relentless hustle (+5.5) were completely undone by a frigid perimeter shooting night. Opponents blatantly sagged off him to clog the driving lanes, turning his outside marksmanship into a structural offensive liability.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 0/5 (0.0%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 22.2%
USG% 13.3%
Net Rtg +11.1
+/- +4
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.8m
Scoring -1.3
Creation +0.5
Shot Making +0.9
Hustle +3.4
Defense +1.8
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 8
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 25.0%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
S Chet Holmgren 32.1m
18
pts
11
reb
2
ast
Impact
+13.2

Elite rim protection and active help rotations generated a massive +5.8 defensive impact score. He maximized his offensive touches by converting efficiently in the paint, punishing smaller defenders on switches to elevate his overall rating.

Shooting
FG 6/10 (60.0%)
3PT 2/5 (40.0%)
FT 4/6 (66.7%)
Advanced
TS% 71.2%
USG% 21.9%
Net Rtg +23.1
+/- +15
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 32.1m
Scoring +13.5
Creation +1.6
Shot Making +3.5
Hustle +12.0
Defense -1.2
Turnovers -8.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 15
FGM Against 5
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 4
TO 3
S Luguentz Dort 31.5m
6
pts
5
reb
1
ast
Impact
-8.4

Brutal overall impact (-12.3) was driven by an inability to finish plays, clanking multiple perimeter looks and missing all his attempts inside the arc. His typically stout point-of-attack defense slipped into the negative (-0.4), failing to offset the offensive dead weight.

Shooting
FG 2/9 (22.2%)
3PT 2/6 (33.3%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 33.3%
USG% 12.9%
Net Rtg +5.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 31.5m
Scoring +0.2
Creation +0.8
Shot Making +1.9
Hustle +1.5
Defense -2.2
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 12
FGM Against 6
Opp FG% 50.0%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
16
pts
12
reb
0
ast
Impact
+12.8

Dominated the interior with relentless activity, generating a massive +5.4 hustle score through extra-effort plays and screen assists. His highly efficient finishing around the basket punished Dallas's drop coverage and fueled a team-high +13.9 total impact rating.

Shooting
FG 8/11 (72.7%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 72.7%
USG% 17.1%
Net Rtg -13.9
+/- -7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 29.9m
Scoring +14.1
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +2.9
Hustle +8.4
Defense -0.4
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 19
FGM Against 9
Opp FG% 47.4%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 1
17
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
+8.1

Injected immediate energy into the second unit with a superb +5.9 hustle rating, consistently beating opponents to loose balls. His decisive downhill attacking broke down the defensive shell, creating high-quality looks at the rim to drive a robust +6.3 net impact.

Shooting
FG 7/14 (50.0%)
3PT 0/4 (0.0%)
FT 3/3 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 55.5%
USG% 25.8%
Net Rtg -0.3
+/- -2
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 27.2m
Scoring +11.7
Creation +0.9
Shot Making +3.2
Hustle +6.0
Defense -1.1
Turnovers -3.5
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 9
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 11.1%
STL 1
BLK 0
TO 2
11
pts
3
reb
3
ast
Impact
-3.4

Settled for too many outside looks, breaking a four-game streak of high-efficiency basketball by bricking the majority of his attempts from beyond the arc. The resulting empty possessions stalled offensive momentum, dragging his overall impact into the red despite serviceable perimeter defense.

Shooting
FG 5/12 (41.7%)
3PT 1/6 (16.7%)
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 45.8%
USG% 19.7%
Net Rtg +1.6
+/- 0
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 26.8m
Scoring +5.9
Creation +0.7
Shot Making +2.7
Hustle +0.9
Defense -1.9
Turnovers -1.1
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 7
FGM Against 2
Opp FG% 28.6%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 1
4
pts
7
reb
1
ast
Impact
-5.1

Anchored the backup frontcourt with brilliant positional awareness, drawing charges and rotating perfectly to generate a +5.2 defensive score. He sacrificed his own offensive volume to operate as a high-post hub, keeping the ball moving while letting his defensive dirty work drive his positive value.

Shooting
FG 1/2 (50.0%)
3PT 0/1 (0.0%)
FT 2/2 (100.0%)
Advanced
TS% 69.4%
USG% 10.3%
Net Rtg +22.6
+/- +7
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 17.4m
Scoring +3.2
Creation +0.4
Shot Making +0.1
Hustle +2.1
Defense +1.0
Turnovers -2.4
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 13
FGM Against 7
Opp FG% 53.8%
STL 1
BLK 1
TO 1
2
pts
1
reb
0
ast
Impact
-10.1

Made the most of a brief rotation cameo by staying strictly within his role and avoiding mistakes. A quick burst of defensive activity (+1.2) and flawless execution on his lone offensive touch yielded a tidy positive rating.

Shooting
FG 1/1 (100.0%)
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 100.0%
USG% 6.7%
Net Rtg +33.3
+/- +5
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 6.4m
Scoring +2.0
Creation +0.0
Shot Making +0.6
Hustle +0.3
Defense -3.1
Turnovers +0.0
Defensive Matchups
FGA Against 3
FGM Against 1
Opp FG% 33.3%
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0
0
pts
0
reb
0
ast
Impact
-6.2

Logged just a few seconds of garbage time at the end of a quarter. He did not have enough runway to register any meaningful statistical footprint.

Shooting
FG 0/0
3PT 0/0
FT 0/0
Advanced
TS% 0.0%
USG% 0.0%
Net Rtg +300.0
+/- +3
Impact Breakdown
vs game-average production for 0.3m
Scoring +1.3
Creation +0.1
Shot Making +0.7
Hustle +0.6
Defense -0.7
Turnovers -0.1
STL 0
BLK 0
TO 0